Estimations of Typical, Ideal, Premature Ejaculation, and Actual Latencies by Men and Female Sexual Partners of Men During Partnered Sex

Updating, correcting, and calibrating the narrative about premature ejaculation

INTRODUCTION

The narrative surrounding premature ejaculation (PE) has developed and solidified over the past 25 years. Unfortunately, portions of that narrative are outdated and do not reflect more recent conceptualizations or empirical findings regarding this disorder.

OBJECTIVE

In this review we sought to identify existing narratives about PE in need of updating and to provide revised narratives based on the recent research literature.

METHOD

Five PE narratives in need of revision were identified, including: the prevalence of PE, age-related differences in PE prevalence, a validated ejaculation latency (EL) for diagnosing PE, differences between lifelong and acquired PE subtypes, and the application of PE definitions beyond penile-vaginal intercourse. Extensive literature searches provided information supporting both the original narrative and the need for a revised narrative based on both consideration of more recent studies and reinterpretation of studies conducted since the establishment of the original narratives.

RESULTS

For each selected topic, the prevailing narrative based on the extant literature was first presented, followed by discussion of accumulating evidence that challenges the existing narrative. Each section ends with a suggested revised PE narrative. In 2 instances, the revised narrative required significant corrections (eg, PE prevalence, validated EL for diagnosing PE); in 2 instances, it expanded on the existing narrative (eg, PE subtype differences, inclusion of partnered sexual activities beyond penile-vaginal intercourse); and in 2 other instances, it backed off prior conclusions that have since required rethinking (eg, age-related changes in PE, PE subtype differences). Finally, a brief review of the 3-pronged criteria for PE (EL, ejaculatory control, and bother/distress) is presented and discussed.

CONCLUSION

This review reiterates the dynamic state of research on PE and demonstrates the need for and value of ongoing research that not only addresses new issues surrounding this dysfunction but also challenges and revises some of the existing narratives about PE.

Do Ejaculation Latency and Other Sexual Measures Differ Between Men With Lifelong and Acquired Premature Ejaculation?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether men with lifelong vs acquired premature ejaculation (PE) subtypes differ on their estimated ejaculation latencies (EL) and related sexual, relationship, and behavioral parameters.

METHODS

Of 2679 men who responded to an online multinational survey about sexual health and met inclusion criteria, 540 reported "probable" or "definite" PE, as assessed by the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool. Lifelong and acquired PE subtypes were compared on multiple measures related to EL, as well as on sets of demographic, diagnostic, relationship, sexual behavioral, and sexual functioning measures during both partnered sex and masturbation.

RESULTS

Nearly 73% of men with PE in this sample reported the lifelong subtype. No differences emerged in EL measures between subtypes, even when parsed according to age. Specifically, men 37years or under with either definite lifelong or acquired PE reported ELs of 1.9 minutes (SD=1.3). For men over 37, lifelong ELs were 2.0 minutes (SD=1.3), acquired ELs 2.4 minutes (SD=1.4). While the lifelong subgroup was younger and reported lower erectile functioning, these differences occurred only in the probable PE group and not the definite PE group.

CONCLUSION

Our data do not support different EL criteria for men with acquired vs lifelong PE, as suggested by several professional definitions. Furthermore, differences in age and erectile functioning between the groups, often reported in clinical samples though not in our definite PE group, may be an artifact of the general health/patient characteristics that lead such men to seek medical assistance.

Description of and Relationships among Potential Variables Supported for the Diagnosis of Delayed Ejaculation

The lack of empirically based diagnostic criteria for delayed ejaculation (DE) not only undermines confidence in the reported prevalence rates for this sexual dysfunction, but it has also resulted in a lack of validated patient reported outcomes (PROs) for assessing this condition. The current study was designed to describe and evaluate six face-valid variables previously shown to discriminate between men with and without DE for their utility as diagnostic measures for DE. A sample of 1285 men (mean age = 37.8, SD = 12.7) free of erectile problems and premature ejaculation completed an online sexual health survey that included potential questions intended for use in the diagnosis of DE. Questionnaire items included ones reflective of previously proposed diagnostic constructs related to DE: ejaculation timing/latency, ejaculation efficacy/control, and negative effects of DE. Results indicated that five of the six proposed items showed moderate intercorrelations, suggesting that each constituted a distinct (i.e., non-redundant) though relevant criterion related to the diagnosis of DE. Based on the level of interrelatedness, the better items representing each construct were included in commonality analysis to assess their unique contributions to the diagnosis of DE. Perceived lack of ejaculatory efficacy/control contributed the largest portion of the variance to the diagnosis of DE (58%), with bother/distress (an index of the negative effects of DE) contributing the second largest portion (25%), and ejaculation timing/latency contributing only a small portion of the variance (6%) to the diagnosis of DE. The relevance of these findings to developing a patient report outcome (PRO) for diagnosing DE that considers both empirically supported questions/items and an appropriate balance of items regarding the three constructs was discussed.

Does Bother/Distress Contribute to the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation?

Introduction

The role of bother/distress in the diagnosis of premature ejaculation (PE) has received minimal investigation compared with the 2 other diagnostic criteria, ejaculatory control and ejaculatory latency (EL).

Aim

This study assessed (i) the added variance explained by bother/distress to the diagnostic accuracy of PE and (ii) determined its overall contribution to a PE diagnosis.

Methods

The 3 diagnostic criteria for PE were assessed in 2,589 men (mean age = 38.2 years, SD = 13.5) in order to determine the contribution of each factor to a dysfunctional diagnosis. A series of regression and discriminant analyses were used to assess the value of bother/distress in explaining ejaculatory control and in predicting accuracy of PE group status. Commonality analysis was used to determine the relative contribution of each of these factors to the diagnosis of PE.

Main Outcome Measure

The major outcome was the quantified contribution of “bother/distress” to a PE diagnosis.

Results

Bother/distress accounted for about 3–4% of the variation in ejaculatory control and added only minimally to the prediction accuracy of PE group status (no, probable, definite PE). Commonality analysis indicated that bother/distress comprised about 3.6% of the unique explained variation in the PE diagnosis, compared with ejaculatory control and EL which contributed 54.5% and 26.7%, respectively. Common variance among factors contributed the remaining 15.5% to the PE diagnosis.

Clinical Translation

Bother/distress contributes least to the determination of a PE diagnosis. Its contribution is largely redundant with the unique and combined contributions of ejaculatory control and EL.

Strengths and Limitations

Using a well-powered and multivariate analysis, this study parsed out the relative contributions of the 3 diagnostic criteria to a PE diagnosis. The study is limited by its use of estimated EL, a single item assessment of bother/distress, and the lack of differentiation of PE subtypes, lifelong and acquired.

Conclusion

Bother/distress contributes minimally to the PE diagnosis, yet its assessment may be key to understanding the experiences of the patient/couple and to developing an effective treatment strategy.

Rowland DL, McNabney SM, Hevesi K. Does Bother/Distress Contribute to the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation?. Sex Med 2022;10:100548.

Are the Criteria for the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation Applicable to Gay Men or Sexual Activities Other than Penile-Vaginal Intercourse?

INTRODUCTION

The criteria for premature ejaculation (PE) have generally been limited to the diagnosis of heterosexual men engaging in penile-vaginal intercourse and therefore the applicability of PE diagnostic criteria to gay men and to activities beyond penile-vaginal intercourse has yet to be explored in depth.

AIM

To compare the prevalence of PE in gay and straight men and to assess whether PE-related diagnostic measures (ejaculatory control, ejaculation latency [EL], and bother/distress) can be applied with confidence to gay men or to men engaging in sexual activities other than penile-vaginal intercourse.

METHODS

Gay and straight participants (n = 3878) were recruited to take an online survey assessing sexual orientation, sexual function/dysfunction (including specific PE-related measures), sexual relationship satisfaction, and various other sexual behaviors during partnered sex or masturbation.

OUTCOMES

Comparison of ejaculatory control, EL, and bother/distress across gay and straight men, as well as across different types of sexual activities.

RESULTS

A slightly lower PE prevalence among gay men became undetectable when other predictors of prevalence were included in a multivariate analysis (aOR = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.60-1.22]). Gay men with PE reported longer typical ELs (zU = -3.35, P < .001) and lower distress (zU = 3.68, P < .001) relative to straight men, but longer ELs and lower distress were also associated with anal sex.

CLINICAL TRANSLATION

Clinicians can feel confident about using existing criteria for the diagnosis of PE in gay men but should be aware of potentially longer ELs and lower PE-related bother/distress-probably related to the practice of anal sex-compared with straight men.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Although well-powered and international in scope, this study was limited by biases inherent to online surveys, the lack of a sizable sample of bisexual men, and a lack of differentiation between men with acquired vs lifelong PE.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of sexual orientation, gay and straight men with PE reported shorter ELs, lower satisfaction, and greater bother/distress than functional counterparts. While PE-related diagnostic criteria (ejaculatory control, EL, and bother/distress) are applicable to gay men, accommodation for longer ELs and lower bother/distress in gay men should be considered. McNabney SM, Weseman CE, Hevesi K, et al. Are the Criteria for the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation Applicable to Gay Men or Sexual Activities Other than Penile-Vaginal Intercourse?. Sex Med 2022;10:100516.

Premature Ejaculation Measures During Partnered Sex and Masturbation: What These Findings Tell Us About the Nature and Rigidity of Premature Ejaculation

Men with premature ejaculation (PE) during partnered sex (as defined by poor ejaculatory control) show significantly reduced PE symptomology during masturbation, but the reasons for this disparity are not clear. This study investigated the other two PE-related diagnostic criteria, namely ejaculatory latency (EL) and bother/distress, in order to explore possible explanations for this disparity between types of sexual activity. Specifically, 1,447 men with either normal or poor ejaculatory control were compared on EL parameters, bother/distress, and sexual satisfaction/pleasure during both partnered sex and masturbation. Results indicated that men with PE reported longer ELs during masturbation than partnered sex, in contrast with men without PE who reported shorter ELs during masturbation. Bother/distress was lower for both groups during masturbation, but bother/distress in men with PE during masturbation was comparable to that of men without PE during partnered sex. Minimal difference in these patterns was found across lifelong and acquired PE subtypes, whereas men with PE with comorbid erectile dysfunction appeared to represent a distinct group. These findings have implications for PE management or treatment as well as for the overall conceptualization of PE as a pathophysiological condition.

Do Pornography Use and Masturbation Frequency Play a Role in Delayed/Inhibited Ejaculation during Partnered Sex? A Comprehensive and Detailed Analysis

The role of masturbation frequency and pornography use on sexual response during partnered sex has been controversial, the result of mixed and inconsistent findings. However, studies investigating this relationship have often suffered from methodological shortcomings. We investigated the role of masturbation frequency and pornography use on both the occurrence and severity of delayed/inhibited ejaculation (DE), an increasingly common sexual problem among men. We did so in a large (nonclinical) multinational sample of cisgender men (N = 2332; mean age = 40.3, SE = 0.31) within a multivariate context that relied on multiple (and, when possible, standardized) assessments of sexual dysfunctions while controlling for possible confounding variables. Results indicated a weak, inconsistent, and sometimes absent association between the frequency of pornography use and DE symptomology and/or severity. In contrast, both poorer erectile functioning and anxiety/depression represented consistent and strong predictors of DE and, to a lesser extent, DE severity. Other factors, including relationship satisfaction, sexual interest, and masturbation frequency, were significantly though moderately to weakly associated with DE. In conclusion, associations (or sometimes lack thereof) between masturbation frequency, pornography use, and delayed ejaculation are more clearly understood when analyzed in a multivariate context that controls for possible confounding effects.

The Unfinished Business of Defining Premature Ejaculation: The Need for Targeted Research

INTRODUCTION

Fifteen years have passed since the International Society of Sexual Medicine first established the 3-pronged criteria for premature ejaculation (PE): a short ejaculation latency, lack of ejaculatory control, and bother/distress. Although the process of establishing valid criteria for any condition or disorder is an ongoing one, a dearth of targeted research on these criteria has hindered professional societies from updating and revising them.

OBJECTIVES

To review and critique existing criteria used in the diagnosis of PE, to identify specific problems with them, and to recommend studies that will address shortcomings.

METHODS

Each of the PE criteria was evaluated and compared against standard procedures for establishing validated measures. Following each analysis, targeted research to address the gaps has been recommended.

RESULTS

Each PE criterion has shortcomings and each can be improved by using standard validation procedures, as noted by the targeted research outcomes. Professional societies can play an important role by encouraging broad participation in research that generates new and relevant data supporting, validating, or challenging the existing criteria.

CONCLUSION

The concepts underlying the diagnostic criteria for PE have both broad consensus and functional utility. Nevertheless, much of the research investigating PE has uncritically adopted these criteria without concomitantly recognizing their limitations. These limitations prevent determining accurate prevalence rates, interpreting research findings with confidence, and establishing efficacious treatment outcomes. Rowland DL, Althof SE, McMahon CG. The Unfinished Business of Defining Premature Ejaculation: The Need for Targeted Research. Sex Med Rev 2021;XX:XXX-XXX.

Advances and Missteps in Diagnosing Premature Ejaculation: Analysis and Future Directions

BACKGROUND

There are several problems with diagnostic criteria for premature ejaculation (PE) that lack objectivity, clarity and precision. They hamper accurate determination of PE prevalence estimates, investigations into the etiology of the dysfunction, impact on partners, development of validated Patient Reported Outcomes, regulatory authority oversight, and which men might benefit from specific treatment interventions.

AIM

We sought to review, analyze and comment on the evolution of the definitions of PE and offer suggestions for future directions for PE definitions. Our goal is to propose strategies whereby the criterion sets are useful to researchers, clinicians and governmental oversight agencies alike and bring harmony and scientific rigor among the conflicting and confusing definitions.

METHODS

There are several premature ejaculation definitions published in the peer reviewed medical literature. The PUBMED electronic database from 1970 to 2021 was searched for published definitions. Search terms included the medical subject headings of premature ejaculation, definition and diagnosis. In chronological order, Table 1 lists the various diagnosis and criteria sets for PE. We discuss the process by which constructs, which make up diagnostic criteria sets, are operationalized and validated.

RESULTS

We review definitions of PE beginning with Masters and Johnson's focus on partner orgasmic attainment and move through the nebulous and subjective criterion sets found in the early Diagnostic and Statistical Manuals and International Classification of Disease series, to the more evidenced-based definitions found in International Society of Sexual Medicine, Diagnostic and Statistical Manuals-5 and the American Urological Association (AUA) definitions. Additionally, we discuss how constructs and criteria sets have been adopted to minimize errors of inclusion and exclusion in defining disease/dysfunction.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This manuscript offers a careful chronological analysis of the published definitions of PE. This historical lens allows the reader to perceive the shifting science underlying the development of PE definitions. The manuscript is limited regarding our comments on acquired PE as evidenced-based research is incomplete.

CONCLUSION

Over the past 50 years there has been considerable forward momentum in defining PE based on well conducted scientific studies. We support the American Urological Association's modification in Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time to 2-minutes for lifelong PE, concur with the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases recommendation for changing the terminology from premature ejaculation to early ejaculation. We also recommend ongoing validation of definitions, moving away from the current heterosexist definition of PE based on penile-vaginal sex and urge further population based research into acquired PE to develop stronger evidenced-based criterion sets for this subtype.

Sexual Response Differs during Partnered Sex and Masturbation in Men With and Without Sexual Dysfunction: Implications for Treatment

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether men who experience sexual difficulty during partnered sex experience similar difficulty during masturbation.

AIM

To determine whether sexual functionality and dysfunctionality were similar or different during masturbation vs partnered sex.

METHODS

We compared sexual responsivity during masturbation vs partnered sex in a multinational sample of 4,209 men with and without a sexual dysfunction to determine whether dysfunctionality was greater, less, or about the same during these 2 types of sexual activity.

OUTCOMES

Consistently lower impairment of sexual function was found during masturbation compared with partnered sex for all 3 sexual problems assessed: erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, and delayed ejaculation.

CLINICAL TRANSLATION

These findings reiterate the potential value of assessing sexual responsivity during masturbation as well as melding masturbation strategies with couples therapy in order to attenuate impaired response during partnered sex.

STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS

Although this study provides the first empirical evidence based on a large multinational sample indicating that sexual functionality is consistently higher during masturbation than partnered sex, it does not provide an empirically-derived explanation for this difference.

CONCLUSION

Understanding a man's response potential during masturbation may be important to improving sexual response during partnered sex, with the need for more targeted research that more directly evaluates the use of such strategies in the treatment of men's sexual problems. Rowland DL, Hamilton BD, Bacys KR et al. Sexual Response Differs during Partnered Sex and Masturbation in Men With and Without Sexual Dysfunction: Implications for Treatment. J Sex Med 2021;18:1835-1842.

Do the diagnostic criteria for premature ejaculation apply to non-straight men and to sexual activities other than penile-vaginal intercourse?

Professional standards committees have generally applied the diagnostic criteria for premature ejaculation only to situations involving (presumed) heterosexual men having penile-vaginal intercourse. This paper reviews the existing evidence supporting expansion of the criteria for use among non-straight men engaging in sexual activities that do not include vaginal intercourse. In brief, estimated ejaculation latencies appear similar across men identifying with different sexual orientations, and various partnered sexual activities (oral, vaginal, and manual) tend to be well correlated. In contrast, masturbation latency patterns are different between men with and without premature ejaculation, and ejaculatory control and bother/distress may be less critical to gay men than straight men during partnered sex. Finally, it should be noted that existing patient report outcomes (PROs) require modification for use with non-straight men.

Construction and internal validation of a prediction nomogram for acquired premature ejaculation (APE) in PE patients

Background

A predictive model for acquired premature ejaculation (APE) in PE patients has not yet been established.

Objectives

This study was aimed at determining which factors were independently associated with the possibility of predicting APE in PE patients, and whether an effective pre‐treatment nomogram for predicting their individual chances of being APE in PE patients can be developed.

Materials and methods

We analyzed the medical histories of 915 PE patients diagnosed at Xijing Hospital (Xi'an, China) and Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital (Xi'an, China) between May 2019 and May 2020. The diagnostic nomogram was developed using a multivariate logistic regression model by integrating selected significant variables determined through univariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to measure the predictive accuracy of the nomogram and its constituted variables, and calibrations were performed by making a comparison of nomogram‐predicted probability with actual rate of APE.

Results

The independent predictors for APE that were identified include Age, Intra‐vaginal Ejaculation Latency Time (IELT), Frequency of sexual desire (FSD), and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire‐Revised Short Scale for Chinese (psychoticism) [EPQ‐RSC(P)] scores. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was 0.782 (95% CI: 0.723–0.841). Also, excellent agreement was demonstrated between the nomogram‐predicted probability and the actual rate of APE.

Discussion and conclusion

We identified 4 independent predictors for APE and demonstrated the potential significant differences in psychoticism between LPE and APE patients. This was the first internally validated predictive APE nomogram where good discrimination and calibration were applied, and it offers a promising role in clinical practice. More studies are necessary for verification of its universal applicability.

Diagnostic Criteria for Premature Ejaculation: Clarifying the Role of “Ejaculatory Control” and “Bother/Distress”

“Ejaculatory control” and “bother/distress” are key criteria for diagnosing men with premature ejaculation (PE), yet compared with ejaculatory latency (EL), these constructs have received only minimal attention. In addition, they have not been characterized in men having different sexual orientations or subtypes of PE. This study aimed to characterize relationships among ejaculatory control, bother/distress, and EL; to assess differences across men having different sexual orientations, PE status, and PE subtypes (i.e., lifelong vs. acquired); and to determine the importance of ejaculatory control to men’s sexual partners. In total, 1071 men and sexual partners of men rated their ejaculatory control and bother/distress and estimated their EL; these measures were compared across sexual orientation, PE status, PE subtype, and male and female partners of men. Results revealed a monotonic though slightly curvilinear relationship between ejaculatory control and bother/distress. These PE criteria differed significantly between PE and non-PE men, to a lesser extent between gay and straight men, and not at all between men having lifelong vs. acquired PE. Female and male partners of men affirmed the importance of ejaculatory control during partnered sex, indicating lack of control as a potential reason for ending a relationship.

Global perspectives on the three criteria for premature ejaculation: An observational study of ejaculatory latency, ejaculatory control and bother/distress

Criteria for premature ejaculation (PE) were established using Western-based samples, yet these criteria are applied worldwide for its diagnosis. This study (a) determined whether men from various world regions differ/agree on their views of ejaculation latency (ELT) and their perceptions of ejaculatory control and bother/distress, the three criteria for PE, and (b) compared PE and non-PE men across worldwide regions on these measures. 1,065 participants were recruited via social media to respond to a survey about men's typical, ideal and PE ELTs, about their own ELT, and about perceptions of ejaculatory control and bother/distress related to PE. Responses from men from four worldwide regions were compared to a reference group of North American/European men, and PE men were compared with non-PE men across three world regions. Results showed that most world region groups showed similarity in ELT estimations. The Sub-Saharan group focused more heavily on the importance of ejaculatory control. Both ELT and ejaculatory control differed between PE and non-PE groups in all regions assessed. In conclusion, perceived ELTs and ejaculatory control show substantial consistency across world regions despite geo-cultural variations and traditions. Such findings argue for the universality of the concepts of ELT, control and bother/distress related to PE.