Quantification of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies and their neutralizing capacity using competitive displacement and tandem mass spectrometry: Infliximab as proof of principle

Optimization of a Quantitative Anti-Drug Antibodies against Infliximab Assay with the Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry: A Method Validation Study and Future Perspectives

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), such as infliximab, are important treatment options for different diseases. Immunogenicity is a major risk, resulting in anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), being associated with adverse events and loss of response, influencing long-term outcomes. The development of ADAs against infliximab is primarily measured by immunoassays like radioimmunoassay (RIA). Although liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is increasingly utilized across different fields, this technique is currently not used for ADAs against infliximab measurements. Therefore, we developed the first LC-MS/MS method. Stable isotopically labeled infliximab antigen-binding fragments (SIL IFX F(ab')₂) were used to bind and measure ADAs indirectly. Protein A magnetic beads were used to capture IgG, including ADAs, whereafter SIL IFX F(ab')₂ was added for labeling. After washing, internal standard addition, elution, denaturation and digestion samples were measured by LC-MS/MS. Internal validation showed good linearity between 0.1 and 16 mg/L (R² > 0.998). Sixty samples were used for cross-validation with RIA, and no significant difference between ADA concentrations was found. The methods had high correlation (R = 0.94, p < 0.001) and excellent agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.912 (95% confidence interval 0.858-0.947, p < 0.001). We present the first ADA against the infliximab LC-MS/MS method. The method is amendable for quantifying other ADAs, making it applicable as a template for future ADA methods.

Subcutaneous Infliximab Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy with Immunosuppressants in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomised Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Whether benefits and risks of intravenous (IV) infliximab combotherapy with immunosuppressants versus infliximab monotherapy apply to subcutaneous (SC) infliximab is unknown. This post hoc analysis of a pivotal randomised CT-P13 SC 1.6 trial aimed to compare SC infliximab monotherapy with combotherapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

Biologic-naïve patients with active Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis received CT-P13 IV 5 mg/kg at Week (W) 0 and 2 (dose-loading phase). At W6, patients were randomised (1:1) to receive CT-P13 SC 120 or 240 mg (patients < 80 or ≥ 80 kg) every 2 weeks until W54 (maintenance phase), or to continue CT-P13 IV every 8 weeks until switching to CT-P13 SC from W30. The primary endpoint-non-inferiority of trough serum concentrations-was assessed at W22. We report a post hoc analysis comparing pharmacokinetic, efficacy, safety and immunogenicity outcomes up to W54 for patients randomised to CT-P13 SC, stratified by concomitant immunosuppressant use.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were randomised to CT-P13 SC (37 monotherapy, 29 combotherapy). At W54, there were no significant differences in the proportions of patients achieving target exposure (5 µg/mL; 96.6% monotherapy vs 95.8% combotherapy; p > 0.999) or meeting efficacy or biomarker outcomes including clinical remission (62.9% vs 74.1%; p = 0.418). Monotherapy and combotherapy groups had comparable immunogenicity (anti-drug antibodies [ADAs]: 65.5% vs 48.0% [p = 0.271], neutralising antibodies [in ADA-positive patients]: 10.5% vs 16.7% [p = 0.630], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and immunogenicity were potentially comparable between SC infliximab monotherapy and combotherapy in biologic-naïve IBD patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02883452.

Impact of immunogenicity on clinical efficacy and toxicity profile of biologic agents used for treatment of inflammatory arthritis in children compared to adults

The treatment of inflammatory arthritis has been revolutionised by the introduction of biologic treatments. Many biologic agents are currently licensed for use in both paediatric and adult patients with inflammatory arthritis and contribute to improved disease outcomes compared with the pre-biologic era. However, immunogenicity to biologic agents, characterised by an immune reaction leading to the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), can negatively impact the therapeutic efficacy of biologic drugs and induce side effects to treatment. This review explores for the first time the impact of immunogenicity against all licensed biologic treatments currently used in inflammatory arthritis across age, and will examine any significant differences between ADA prevalence, titres and timing of development, as well as ADA impact on therapeutic drug levels, clinical efficacy and side effects between paediatric and adult patients. In addition, we will investigate factors associated with differences in immunogenicity across biologic agents used in inflammatory arthritis, and their potential therapeutic implications.

Association of adalimumab trough concentrations and treatment response in patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship of adalimumab trough concentrations and treatment response in paediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

Monocentric cohort study of JIA patients treated with adalimumab. Clinical data and samples were collected during routine follow-up. Adalimumab trough concentrations were quantified by a novel liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. Anti-adalimumab antibodies were measured in samples with trough concentrations ≤5mg/l. Disease activity was evaluated using the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score with 71 joint-count (cJADAS71). Response to adalimumab was defined according to recent international treat-to-target guidelines.

RESULTS

35 adalimumab trough samples were available from 34 paediatric patients with JIA. Although there was no significant difference in adalimumab dose, trough concentrations were significantly lower in patients with secondary failure (median 1.0 mg/l; IQR 1.0-5.3) compared with patients with primary failure (median 13.97 mg/l; IQR 11.81-16.67) or an adequate response (median 14.94 mg/l; IQR 10.31-16.19) to adalimumab.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab trough concentrations were significantly lower in JIA patients with secondary failure compared with patients with primary failure or an adequate response to adalimumab. Results suggest that trough concentration measurements could identify JIA patients who require increased adalimumab doses to achieve or maintain therapeutic drug concentrations.

Comparison of three commercially available ELISA assays for anti-infliximab antibodies

Three commercially available assays for the measurement of antibodies to infliximab (ATI) are approved for clinical use in Australia: Promonitor anti-infliximab (Grifols), Lisa Tracker anti-infliximab (Theradiag) and Ridascreen anti-IFX (R-Biopharm). All are bridging ELISA assays. Measurement of ATI has been incorporated into treatment algorithms for assessing loss of response to infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, but results obtained by the three ATI assays have not been systematically compared. We performed a series of experiments to allow comparison of results between the assays. Forty-two patient samples known to be positive for ATI by the Lisa Tracker assay were run on the Promonitor assay in singlicate, of which 26 were run on the Ridascreen assay in duplicate, according to the manufacturers' instructions. The Spearman correlation coefficient for all three pairwise assay comparisons was 0.95. Results were not numerically comparable between the assays. The coefficient of variation (CV) was 2.3% for the Lisa Tracker assay, 7.6% for the Promonitor assay and 7.4% for the Ridascreen assay. The presence of infliximab interfered with all three assays in a dose dependent manner. The cut-point for loss of response to infliximab dose intensification, previously demonstrated to be 200 ng/mL on the Lisa Tracker assay, is equivalent to approximately 60 ng/mL on the Ridascreen assay and between 22.9 and 41 AU/mL on the Promonitor assay. All three assays are suitable for clinical use.