Intragenic codon bias in a set of mouse and human genes

Codon usage similarity between viral and some host genes suggests a codon-specific translational regulation

The codon usage pattern is a specific characteristic of each species; however, the codon usage of all of the genes in a genome is not uniform. Intriguingly, most viruses have codon usage patterns that are vastly different from the optimal codon usage of their hosts. How viral genes with different codon usage patterns are efficiently expressed during a viral infection is unclear. An analysis of the similarity between viral codon usage and the codon usage of the individual genes of a host genome has never been performed. In this study, we demonstrated that the codon usage of human RNA viruses is similar to that of some human genes, especially those involved in the cell cycle. This finding was substantiated by its concordance with previous reports of an upregulation at the protein level of some of these biological processes. It therefore suggests that some suboptimal viral codon usage patterns may actually be compatible with cellular translational machineries in infected conditions.

Evidence for a trade-off between translational efficiency and splicing regulation in determining synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster

In Drosophila melanogaster, synonymous codons corresponding to the most abundant cognate tRNAs are used more frequently, especially in highly expressed genes. Increased use of such "optimal" codons is considered an adaptation for translational efficiency. Need it always be the case that selection should favor the use of a translationally optimal codon? Here, we investigate one possible confounding factor, namely, the need to specify information in exons necessary to enable correct splicing. As expected from such a model, in Drosophila many codons show different usage near intron-exon boundaries versus exon core regions. However, this finding is in principle also consistent with Hill-Robertson effects modulating usage of translationally optimal codons. However, several results support the splice model over the translational selection model: 1) the trends in codon usage are strikingly similar to those in mammals in which codon usage near boundaries correlates with abundance in exonic splice enhancers (ESEs), 2) codons preferred near boundaries tend to be enriched for A and avoid C (conversely those avoided near boundaries prefer C rather than A), as expected were ESEs involved, and 3) codons preferred near boundaries are typically not translationally optimal. We conclude that usage of translationally optimal codons usage is compromised in the vicinity of splice junctions in intron-containing genes, to the effect that we observe higher levels of usage of translationally optimal codons at the center of exons. On the gene level, however, controlling for known correlates of codon bias, the impact on codon usage patterns is quantitatively small. These results have implications for inferring aspects of the mechanism of splicing given nothing more than a well-annotated genome.

Amino acids as placeholders: base-composition pressures on protein length in malaria parasites and prokaryotes

BACKGROUND

The composition and sequence of amino acids in a protein may serve the underlying needs of the nucleic acids that encode the protein (the genome phenotype). In extreme form, amino acids become mere placeholders inserted between functional segments or domains, and--apart from increasing protein length--playing no role in the specific function or structure of a protein (the conventional phenotype).

METHODS

We studied the genomes of two malarial parasites and 521 prokaryotes (144 complete) that differ widely in GC% and optimum growth temperature, comparing the base compositions of the protein coding regions and corresponding lengths (kilobases).

RESULTS

Malarial parasites show distinctive responses to base-compositional pressures that increase as protein lengths increase. A low-GC% species (Plasmodium falciparum) is likely to have more placeholder amino acids than an intermediate-GC% species (P. vivax), so that homologous proteins are longer. In prokaryotes, GC% is generally greater and AG% is generally less in open reading frames (ORFs) encoding long proteins. The increased GC% in long ORFs increases as species' GC% increases, and decreases as species' AG% increases. In low- and intermediate-GC% prokaryotic species, increases in ORF GC% as encoded proteins increase in length are largely accounted for by the base compositions of first and second (amino acid-determining) codon positions. In high-GC% prokaryotic species, first and third (non-amino acid-determining) codon positions play this role.

CONCLUSION

In low- and intermediate-GC% prokaryotes, placeholder amino acids are likely to be well defined, corresponding to codons enriched in G and/or C at first and second positions. In high-GC% prokaryotes, placeholder amino acids are likely to be less well defined. Increases in ORF GC% as encoded proteins increase in length are greater in mesophiles than in thermophiles, which are constrained from increasing protein lengths in response to base-composition pressures.

The origins of eukaryotic gene structure

Most of the phenotypic diversity that we perceive in the natural world is directly attributable to the peculiar structure of the eukaryotic gene, which harbors numerous embellishments relative to the situation in prokaryotes. The most profound changes include introns that must be spliced out of precursor mRNAs, transcribed but untranslated leader and trailer sequences (untranslated regions), modular regulatory elements that drive patterns of gene expression, and expansive intergenic regions that harbor additional diffuse control mechanisms. Explaining the origins of these features is difficult because they each impose an intrinsic disadvantage by increasing the genic mutation rate to defective alleles. To address these issues, a general hypothesis for the emergence of eukaryotic gene structure is provided here. Extensive information on absolute population sizes, recombination rates, and mutation rates strongly supports the view that eukaryotes have reduced genetic effective population sizes relative to prokaryotes, with especially extreme reductions being the rule in multicellular lineages. The resultant increase in the power of random genetic drift appears to be sufficient to overwhelm the weak mutational disadvantages associated with most novel aspects of the eukaryotic gene, supporting the idea that most such changes are simple outcomes of semi-neutral processes rather than direct products of natural selection. However, by establishing an essentially permanent change in the population-genetic environment permissive to the genome-wide repatterning of gene structure, the eukaryotic condition also promoted a reliable resource from which natural selection could secondarily build novel forms of organismal complexity. Under this hypothesis, arguments based on molecular, cellular, and/or physiological constraints are insufficient to explain the disparities in gene, genomic, and phenotypic complexity between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.