Evolution of stinginess and generosity in finite populations

Coevolution of vaccination behavior and perceived vaccination risk can lead to a stag-hunt-like game

Voluntary vaccination is effective to prevent infectious diseases from spreading. Both vaccination behavior and cognition of the vaccination risk play important roles in individual vaccination decision making. However, it is not clear how the coevolution of the two shapes population-wide vaccination behavior. We establish a coupled dynamics of epidemic, vaccination behavior, and perceived vaccination risk with three different time scales. We assume that the increase of vaccination level inhibits the rise of perceived vaccination risk, and the increase of perceived vaccination risk inhibits the rise of vaccination level. It is shown that the resulting vaccination behavior is similar to the stag-hunt game, provided that the basic reproductive ratio is moderate and that the epidemic dynamics evolves sufficiently fast. This is in contrast with the previous view that vaccination is a snowdriftlike game. And we find that epidemic breaks out repeatedly and eventually leads to vaccine scares if these three dynamics evolve on a similar time scale. Furthermore, we propose some ways to promote vaccination behavior, such as controlling side-effect bias and perceived vaccination costs. Our work sheds light on epidemic control via vaccination by taking into account the coevolutionary dynamics of cognition and behavior.

Voluntary vaccination dilemma with evolving psychological perceptions

Voluntary vaccination is a universal control protocol for infectious diseases. Yet there exists a social dilemma between individual benefits and public health: non-vaccinators free ride via the herd immunity from adequate vaccinators who bear vaccination cost. This is due to the interplay between disease prevalence and individual vaccinating behavior. To complicate matters further, individual vaccinating behavior depends on the perceived vaccination cost rather than the actual one. The perception of vaccination cost is an individual trait, which varies from person to person, and evolves in response to the disease prevalence and vaccination coverage. To explore how evolving perception shapes individual vaccinating behavior and thus the vaccination dynamics, we provide a model combining epidemic dynamics with evolutionary game theory which captures the voluntary vaccination dilemma. In particular, individuals adjust their perception based on the inertia effect in psychology and then update their vaccinating behavior through imitating the behavior of a more successful peer. We find that i) vaccination is acceptable when the expected vaccination cost considering perception and actual vaccination cost is less than the maximum of the expected non-vaccination cost; ii) the evolution of perception is a "double-edged sword" for vaccination dynamics: it can improve vaccination coverage when most individuals perceive exaggerated vaccination cost, and it inhibits vaccination coverage in the other cases.