Dynamic flight stability of hovering mosquitoes

Quasi-steady aerodynamic modeling and dynamic stability of mosquito-inspired flapping wing pico aerial vehicle

Recent exploration in insect-inspired robotics has generated considerable interest. Among insects navigating at low Reynolds numbers, mosquitoes exhibit distinct flight characteristics, including higher wingbeat frequencies, reduced stroke amplitudes, and slender wings. This leads to unique aerodynamic traits such as trailing edge vortices via wake capture, diminished reliance on leading vortices, and rotational drag. This paper shows the energetic analysis of a mosquito-inspired flapping-wing Pico aerial vehicle during hovering, contributing insights to its future design and fabrication. The investigation relies on kinematic and quasi-steady aerodynamic modeling of a symmetric flapping-wing model with a wingspan of approximately 26 mm, considering translational, rotational, and wake capture force components. The control strategy adapts existing bird flapping wing approaches to accommodate insect wing kinematics and aerodynamic features. Flight controller design is grounded in understanding the impact of kinematics on wing forces. Additionally, a thorough analysis of the dynamic stability of the mosquito-inspired PAV model is conducted, revealing favorable controller response and maneuverability at a small scale. The modified model, incorporating rigid body dynamics and non-averaged aerodynamics, exhibits weak stability without a controller or sufficient power density. However, the controller effectively stabilizes the PAV model, addressing attitude and maneuverability. These preliminary findings offer valuable insights for the mechanical design, aerodynamics, and fabrication of RoboMos, an insect-inspired flapping wing pico aerial vehicle developed at UPM Malaysia.

Dynamic stability in hovering flight of insects with different sizes

Previous works on the flight dynamic stability of insects have focused on relatively large insects. Here, the longitudinal flight dynamic stability of two hovering miniature insects was computed. With the stability properties of the miniature insects from the present work and those of large insects from previous works, we studied the effects of insect size on the stability properties in the full range of insect sizes. The following results were obtained. Although the insects considered have a 30 000-fold difference in mass, their modal structure of flight stability is the same: an unstable oscillatory mode, a stable fast subsidence mode, and a stable slow subsidence mode; because of the unstable mode, the flight is unstable. An approximate analytical expression on the growth rate of the unstable mode as a function of insect mass (m) was derived. It shows that the time to double the initial values of disturbances (t_{d}) is proportional to the 0.17 power of the insect mass (m). That is, as m becomes smaller, t_{d} decreases (i.e., the instability becomes faster). This means that miniature insects need a faster nervous system to control the instability than larger insects. For example, the response time (represented by t_{d}) of a miniature insect, the gall midge (m≈0.05mg), needs to be faster by about 7 times than that of a larger insect, the hawk moth (m≈1600mg).

Mosquitoes buzz and fruit flies don't-a comparative aeroacoustic analysis of wing-tone generation

Crepuscular mosquitoes, which swarm in low light conditions, exhibit a range of adaptations including large aspect-ratio wings, high flapping frequencies and small stroke amplitudes that taken together, facilitate the generation of wing-tones that are well-suited for acoustic communication. In the current study, we employ computational aeroacoustic modeling to conduct a comparative study of wing-tone and flight efficiency in a mosquito (maleCulex) and a similar sized flying insect: a fruit fly (Drosophila). Based on this analysis, we show that pound-for-pound, a mosquito generates wing-tones that are a factor of about 3.4 times more intense than a fruit fly, and the mosquito is more efficient by a factor of about 3.7 in converting mechanical power into acoustic power. The wing-tones for the mosquito are also more tilted in the forward direction, a characteristic that would be more conducive for acoustic signaling during a mate chase. The simulation data also shows that the specific power (mechanical power over mean lift) of the mosquito is nearly equal to that of the fruit fly, indicating that the adaptations that facilitate wing-tone based communication in mosquitoes, do not seem to compromise their flight efficiency.

Wing kinematic and aerodynamic compensations for unilateral wing damage in a small phorid fly

To investigate the way in which very small insects compensate for unilateral wing damage, we measured the wing kinematics of a very small insect, a phorid fly (Megaselia scalaris), with 16.7% wing area loss in the outer part of the left wing and a normal counterpart, and we computed the aerodynamic forces and power expenditures of the phorid flies. Our major findings are the following. The phorid fly compensates for unilateral wing damage by increasing the stroke amplitude and the deviation angle of the damaged wing (the large deviation angle gives the wing a deep U-shaped wing path), unlike the medium and large insects studied previously, which compensate for the unilateral wing damage mainly by increasing the stroke amplitude of the damaged wing. The increased stroke amplitude and the deep U-shaped wing path give the damaged wing a larger wing velocity during its flapping motion and a rapid downward acceleration in the beginning of the upstroke, which enable the damaged wing to generate the required vertical force for weight support. However, the larger wing velocity of the damaged wing also generates larger horizontal and side forces, increasing the resultant aerodynamic force of the damaged wing. Due to the larger aerodynamic force and the smaller wing area, the wing loading of the damaged wing is 25% larger than that of the wings of the normal phorid fly; this may greatly shorten the life of the damaged wing. Furthermore, because the damaged wing has much larger angular velocity and produces larger aerodynamic moment compared with the intact wing of the damaged phorid fly, the aerodynamic power consumed by the damaged wing is 38% larger than that by the intact wing, i.e., the energy distribution between the damaged and intact wings is highly asymmetrical; this may greatly increase the muscle wastage of the damaged side.

Forward flight stability in a drone-fly

Previous studies on forward flight stability in insects are for low to medium flight-speeds. In the present work, we investigated the stability problem for the full range of flight speeds (0-8.6 m/s) of a drone-fly. Our results show the following: The longitudinal derivatives due to the lateral motion are approximately 3 orders of magnitude smaller than the other longitudinal derivatives. Thus, we can decouple these two motions of the insect, as commonly done for a conventional airplane. At hovering flight, the motion of the dronefly is weakly unstable owing to two unstable natural modes of motion, a longitudinal one and a lateral one. At low (1.6 m/s) and medium (3.1 m/s) flight-speeds, the unstable modes become even weaker and the flight is approximately neutral. At high flight-speeds (4.6 m/s, 6.9 m/s and 8.6 m/s), the flight becomes more and more unstable due to an unstable longitudinal mode. At the highest flight speed, 8.6 m/s, the instability is so strong that the time constant representing the growth rate of the instability (disturbance-doubling time) is only 10.1 ms, which is close to the sensory reaction time of a fly (approximately 11 ms). This indicates that strong instability may play a role in limiting the flight speed of the insect.