WITHDRAWN: Efficacy and safety of Sijunzi decoction for peptic ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine as adjunctive treatment for Helicobacter pylori: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a significant risk factor for gastrointestinal diseases, and the eradication of H. pylori is a critical measure for many diseases. In recent years, however, the resistance rate of H. pylori to antibiotics has increased and the eradication rate of H. pylori has decreased. There are many studies on the adjuvant treatment of H. pylori infection with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), but the results on the efficacy are conflicting. It is still unclear whether TCM can improve the eradication rate of H. pylori.

AIM

To systematically evaluate the adjunctive role of TCM in H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

Databases, including CNKI, CBM, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of TCM plus Western medicine (triple therapy, quadruple therapy, sequential therapy and so on) and Western medicine alone for H. pylori eradication were retrieved. The time was limited to January 1983 to November 2019. Revman 5.3 and Stata 16 statistical software were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles on RCTs were collected, and their risk of quality deviation and the published offset may be lower. We performed a meta-analysis of these 24 articles, and there was significant heterogeneity between the studies (P < 0.01, I² = 59%). After excluding the studies with significantly different research methods, there was still significant heterogeneity (P < 0.1, I² > 50%). The meta-analysis was done with the random-effects model, which revealed that the efficacy of TCM plus Western medicine was significantly better than that of Western medicine alone [odds ratio (OR) = 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28-2.15, P < 0.05]. The eradication rate of H. pylori in the combination group was significantly better than that in the Western medicine alone group (OR = 1.94, 95%CI: 1.36-2.75, P < 0.05; OR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.47-2.54, P < 0.05). The eradication rates of H. pylori in the 7-d subgroup (OR = 2.07, 95%CI: 1.01-4.22, P = 0.05), 14-d subgroup (OR = 1.94, 95%CI: 1.54-2.45, P < 0.05), syndrome differentiation-based treatment subgroup (OR = 2.19, 95%CI: 1.53-3.14, P < 0.05), peptic ulcer subgroup (OR = 2.03, 95%CI: 1.14-3.59, P < 0.05), mixed disease subgroup (OR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.17-1.89, P < 0.05), eradication times-nonspecified subgroup (OR = 2.09, 95%CI: 1.58-2.77, P < 0.05), decoction type subgroup (OR = 2.54, 95%CI: 1.88-3.43, P < 0.05) in the combination group were much better than that of the Western medicine alone group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the other subgroups and the Western medicine alone group. Sensitivity analysis showed the similar results (OR > 1, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TCM has certain benefits in the treatment of H. pylori infection. There may be more benefits if we select the patients according to the principle of syndrome differentiation, use the decoction, and apply only to patients with peptic ulcer.