Cytomegalovirus-Specific Immunity Recovers More Slowly after Cord Blood Transplantation Compared with Matched Sibling Donor Allogeneic Transplantation

Durable outcomes of double cord blood transplantation in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: high-risk features for early and long-term mortality

Background:

Cord blood transplantation (CBT) has been reported as an acceptable option with comparable outcomes to conventional donors in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We aimed to analyze the long-term CBT outcomes and risk factors for early and long-term mortalities.

Methods:

Between 2006 and 2020, 112 patients (median age: 35 years; 62 Ph-negative ALL and 50 Ph-positive ALL) were treated with double CBT. Conditioning regimen consisted of total body irradiation (12 Gy) plus cytarabine (9.0 g/m²) plus fludarabine (150 mg/ m²), and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was attempted by administering tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil.

Results:

The median time for neutrophil and platelet recovery was 25 days (range: 5–59 days) and 34 days (range: 7–185 days), respectively. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 1 year was 43.8%, and the incidence of acute GVHD with grades III–IV was 8.9%. The overall cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 22.0%, and the incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 8.5%. After a median follow-up of 60.1 months (range: 5.7–181.3 months), the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were 15.9% and 28.5% (9.7% and 27.2% for CR1), respectively, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 57.9% (66.5% for CR1). In multivariate analysis of 88 patients receiving double CBT in CR1, delayed CR1 was related to high CIR, and age older than 40 years was associated with high NRM and early mortality. Unexpectedly, Ph-positive ALL with MRD had a higher NRM and early mortality than Ph-negative ALL and Ph-positive ALL without MRD subgroups, possibly due to delayed neutrophil and platelet recovery.

Conclusion:

Our data suggest that double CBT for adult ALL in CR1 has a greater benefit in younger patients and in patients with Ph-positive ALL without MRD or Ph-negative ALL.

Risk Factors for CMV Viremia and Treatment-Associated Adverse Events Among Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes substantial morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). There are limited data on risk factors for CMV viremia and the safety of antiviral medications used to treat CMV in children.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of children who underwent HSCT between 2000 and 2016. We used log-logistic regression to evaluate associations between clinical characteristics and CMV-free survival at 100 days after HSCT. We compared the incidences of laboratory-defined adverse events (AEs) during treatment with ganciclovir and foscarnet.

RESULTS

Among 969 children, the median (interquartile range) age was 6.5 (3.1-11.5) years, and 80% underwent allogeneic HSCT. Two hundred forty-four (25%) children developed CMV viremia. Older age (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98), male sex (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99), non-Black, non-White race (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87), umbilical cord blood donor source (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.97), and CMV seropositivity (R-/D+: OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07-0.41; R+/D-: OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.09-0.21; R+/D+: OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.04-0.15) were associated with lower odds of 100-day CMV-free survival. Compared with foscarnet, ganciclovir was associated with lower incidences of thrombocytopenia (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.97), electrolyte AEs (IRR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.75), endocrine AEs (IRR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34-0.79), and renal AEs (IRR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

CMV viremia occurred commonly among children after HSCT, and ganciclovir and foscarnet were associated with distinct toxicity profiles among children with CMV infection. These findings should be considered when developing CMV prevention and treatment strategies for children after HSCT.