Cellular Therapies for Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Ambra1 modulates the sensitivity of mantle cell lymphoma to palbociclib by regulating cyclin D1

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare B-cell malignancy with a predominantly aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis. Abnormal expression of Ambra1 is closely related to the occurrence and development of various tumors. However, the role of Ambra1 in MCL remains unknown. Here, we performed both in vitro and in vivo experiments to investigate how Ambra1 regulates MCL progression and whether Ambra1 modulates the sensitivity of MCL cells to the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. We discovered that MCL cells had decreased levels of Ambra1 expression relative to normal B cells. Overexpression of Ambra1 in MCL cells inhibited autophagy, reduced cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, and decreased cyclin D1 level. While knockdown of Ambra1 reduced MCL cell sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. Furthermore, overexpression of cyclin D1 lowered the sensitivity of MCL cells to palbociclib, enhanced cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and autophagy, and inhibited cell apoptosis. When Ambra1 expression was inhibited, the in vivo antitumor effects of palbociclib on MCL were reversed. Ambra1 expression was downregulated but cyclin D1 expression was upregulated in MCL samples, demonstrating a negative correlation between Ambra1 and cyclin D1. Our findings suggest a unique tumor suppressor function for Ambra1 in the development of MCL.

Mantle Cell Lymphoma: the Role of Risk-Adapted Therapy and Treatment of Relapsed Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, the current treatment strategies are recapped, evolving agents are discussed, and we provide guidance in treating R/R MCL.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been an advancement in treatment using targeted therapy, cellular therapies including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and novel therapeutic agents including non-covalent BTKis, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates for treatment of refractory and relapsed mantle cell lymphoma. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a mature B-cell lymphoma that is associated with a poor prognosis. Current treatments include immunochemotherapy, chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) which place patients in remission but result in relapse. Chemoimmunotherapy uses chemotherapeutic agents paired with rituximab in patients who have chemo-sensitive disease with prolonged remission of at least > 2 years and/or have contraindications to chemotherapy that serve as bridges to more definitive treatment. Additional therapies including proteosome inhibitor-based therapies and immunomodulators, like bortezomib and lenalidomide, can be used as single agents or in combination with others. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors including ibrutinib, acalaburtinib, and zanubrutinib have also been proven effective for the treatment of (R/R) disease. Another agent is Venetoclax, a robust drug that can be used in MCL after progression or intolerance to BTKi. Newer advances in the management of MCL have led to the utilization of cellular therapies including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and SCT that are options for healthy young (< 65 years old) who have progressed through several lines of therapies. With progression of disease, mutations are acquired that cause therapy resistance. Novel therapeutic agents such as non-covalent BTKis, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates are paving the way for advancements in treatment for R/R MCL. R/R MCL is a complex disease with many therapeutic options none of which has been proven superior in head-to-head comparison. In this review, the current treatment strategies are recapped, evolving agents are discussed, and we provide guidance in treating R/R MCL.

Recent advances of nanodrug delivery system in the treatment of hematologic malignancies

Although the survival rate of hematological malignancies (HM) has increased in recent years, the unnecessary adverse effect to the body is usually generated by the traditional chemotherapy for HM due to the lack of specificity to tumor tissue. Nanodrug delivery systems have exhibited unique advantages in targetability, stability and reducing toxicity, attracting wide concern, which is expected to be the prevalent alternative for the treatment of HM. In this review, we systemically introduced the current therapeutic strategies and the categories of HM. Subsequently, five key factors including circulation, targeting, penetration, internalization and release involving in tailoring nanoparticles were demonstrated, followed by the introduction of the development of nanodrug delivery-traditional synthetic nanomaterilas, biomimetic cell membrane coating nanomaterials, cell-based nanomaterials as well as immunotherapy combined with nanodrug. Afterwards, the recent advances of nanodrug delivery system for the treatment of HM were introduced. Moreover, the challenge and prospect of nanodrug delivery system in treating HM were discussed. The promising drug delivery system will provide new therapeutic avenues for the treatment of HM.

Effect of time to relapse on overall survival in patients with mantle cell lymphoma following autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation

In young and fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), intensive induction therapy followed by a consolidative autologous haematopoietic cell transplant (autoHCT) is the standard of care in the front-line setting. Recently, time-to-event analysis has emerged as an important risk assessment tool in lymphoma, though its impact in MCL is not well defined. We utilized the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database to evaluate the effect of post-autoHCT time to relapse on overall survival (OS) over time in 461 patients who underwent autoHCT within 12 months of MCL diagnosis. On multivariate analysis, the impact of relapse on OS was greatest at the six-month [hazard ratio (HR) = 7·68], 12-month (HR = 6·68), and 18-month (HR = 5·81) landmark timepoints. Using a dynamic landmark model we demonstrate that adjusted OS at five years following each landmark timepoint improved with time for relapsing and non-relapsing patients. Furthermore, early relapse (<18 months) following autoHCT defines a high-risk group with inferior post-relapse OS. This retrospective analysis highlights the impact of time to relapse on OS in MCL patients undergoing up-front autoHCT and emphasizes the need to consider novel therapeutic approaches for patients suffering early relapse.