Donor-Specific Antibodies and Primary Graft Failure in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ASTCT Consensus Recommendations on Testing and Treatment of Patients with Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are an important cause of engraftment failure and may negatively impact survival outcomes of patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using an HLA-mismatched allograft. The incidence of DSA varies across studies, depending on individual factors, detection or identification methods and thresholds considered clinically relevant. Although DSA testing by multiplex bead arrays remains semiquantitative, it has been widely adopted as a standard test in most transplant centers. Additional testing to determine risk of allograft rejection may include assays with HLA antigens in natural conformation, such as flow cytometric crossmatch, and/or antibody binding assays, such as C1q testing. Patients with low level of DSA (<2,000 mean fluorescence intensity; MFI) may not require treatment, while others with very high level of DSA (>20,000 MFI) may be at very high-risk for engraftment failure despite current therapies. By contrast, in patients with moderate or high level of DSA, desensitization therapy can successfully mitigate DSA levels and improve donor cell engraftment rate, with comparable outcomes to patients without DSA. Treatment is largely empirical and multimodal, involving the removal, neutralization, and blocking of antibodies, as well as inhibition of antibody production to prevent activation of the complement cascade. Desensitization protocols are based on accumulated multicenter experience, while prospective multicenter studies remain lacking. Most patients require a full intensity protocol that includes plasma exchange, while protocols relying only on rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin may be sufficient for patients with lower DSA levels and negative C1q and/or flow cytometric crossmatch. Monitoring DSA levels before and after HSCT could guide preemptive treatment when high levels persist after stem cell infusion. This paper aims to standardize current evidence-based practice and formulate future directions to improve upon current knowledge and advance treatment for this relatively rare, but potentially serious complication in allogeneic HSCT recipients.

Donor selection in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Recent progress in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) characterization, increased accrual of unrelated donors and cord blood units, and a new platform for haploidentical transplantation have resulted in the widespread availability of donors for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in HLA typing have identified an increasing number of loci and alleles that are crucial for successful transplantation. Newer HLA A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 alleles, DPB1 mismatches, and HLA B leader sequence matching are incorporated into donor selection algorithms. Donor selection is highly relevant because of recently published conflicting studies using different donor types. These studies are largely retrospective and compare patients with different diseases and stages, conditioning regimens, graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and time periods. A broad consensus indicates that the best donor is an available matched sibling, followed by a matched unrelated donor, and then alternative donors such as haploidentical, mismatched unrelated, and cord blood units. This consensus is being challenged by other factors, such as donor age, patient condition, urgency of transplantation, and costs involved.

SUMMARY

In this review, we will analyze the unique characteristics of each donor type, the HLA and non HLA factors that affect donor choices, and the outstanding comparative outcome studies of different donor usage in hematologic malignancies.

Racial/ethnic disparities in availability of volunteer unrelated donors for allogeneic transplantation

ABSTRACT

Despite the global unrelated donor (URD) registry size, the degree to which URD availability is a transplant barrier is not established. We evaluated the availability of 3,843 URDs requested for 455 diverse adult patients (predominantly with acute leukemia). URDs for non-Europeans were more likely to be domestic and had markedly lower Donor Readiness scores. Of URDs requested for confirmatory HLA-typing (CT) alone (ie, without simultaneous workup), 1,894 of 3,529 (54%) were available. Availability of domestic URDs was 45%. Donor Readiness score was highly predictive of CT availability. More non-European patients (n = 120) than Europeans (n = 335) had >10 URDs requested and <5 available. Of workup requests (after CT or CT-workup), <70% (604/889 [68%]) were available. More non-Europeans had <2 URDs available. URD availability for CT was markedly worse for non-Europeans, with availabilities for African, non-Black Hispanic, and Asian patients being 150/458 (33%), 120/258 (47%), and 119/270 (44%), respectively, with further decrements in URD workup availability. Our data suggest the functional size of the URD pool is much smaller than appreciated, mandating major operational changes for transplant centers and donor registries. Likelihood of donor availability should have a high priority in donor selection. Considering patient ancestry and URD Donor Readiness scores, centers should pursue, and registries permit, simultaneous pursuit of many URDs and abandon futile searches. Patients should be informed about their likelihood of donor availability and alternative options. Finally, although registries should address high URD attrition and speed procurement, use of all HLA-disparate graft types is needed to facilitate timely transplant for all.

The impact of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies in transplants from HLA-identical sibling donors: A multicenter study

Few studies have performed comparative analysis of the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors (ISD-HSCT) in patients with or without anti-HLA Abs. In this study we retrospectively collected data from a multicenter study to analyze the distribution and impact of the pre-existing anti-HLA Abs in ISD-HSCT. Among 402 recipients, 111 were positive for anti-HLA Abs. Gender, time from diagnosis to transplantation and distribution of primary disease might be risk factors for the occurrence of anti-HLA Abs. We found that patients with anti-HLA Abs had delayed neutrophil engraftment and were more vulnerable to experience Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation. The presence of anti-HLA Abs was proved to be an independent risk factor for neutrophil engraftment (HR 1.42 95% CI 1.13-1.80, p = 0.003) and CMV reactivation (HR 2.03 95% CI 1.19-3.46, p = 0.009). We found that anti-HLA Abs have a negative impact on the prognosis in the early period after transplantation from sibling donors and anti-HLA Abs was also an independent risk factor for the overall survival (OS) at 180 days (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.03-5.27, p = 0.042) among female recipients. In conclusion, anti-HLA Abs have a negative impact on the prognosis early after ISD-HSCT.

Double filtration plasmapheresis combined with rituximab for donor-specific antibody desensitization in haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT). Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) avoids the unnecessary loss of plasma proteins and increases the efficiency of purification. To investigate the effectiveness of the desensitization protocol including DFPP and rituximab, we conducted a nested case-control study. Thirty-three patients who had positive DSA were desensitized by the protocol and 99 patients with negative DSA were randomly matched as control. The median DSA mean fluorescence intensity values before and after DFPP treatment were 7505.88 ± 4424.38 versus 2013.29 ± 4067.22 (p < 0.001). All patients in DSA group achieved haematopoietic reconstitution and the median neutrophils and platelets engraftment times were 13 (10-21) and 13 (10-29) days respectively. Although the cumulative incidence of II-IV aGVHD (41.4% vs. 28.1%) and 3-year moderate to severe cGVHD (16.8% vs. 7.2%) were higher in DSA cohort than in the control, no statistical significance was observed. The 3-year non-relapse mortality and the overall survival were 6.39% and 72.0%, respectively, in the DSA cohort, which were comparable to the negative control. In conclusion, DFPP and rituximab could be effectively used for desensitization and overcome the negative effects of DSA in Haplo-HSCT.

[Impact of immunosuppression intensified conditioning regimen for patients with strong positive pre-transplantation donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) undergoing haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]

Objective: To explore the efficacy of immunosuppression intensified conditioning regimen in patients who have strongly positive donor-specific Anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) and received a haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) . Methods: Clinical data of 10 patients with strongly positive pretransplant DSAs (defined as MFI ≥10000) were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All of them received a haplo-HSCT in the Hematology Department of Shanghai Zhaxin Traditional Chinese & Western Medicine Hospital. Results: ① Of all ten patients, three were males, and seven were females, with a median age of 53.5 (36-64) years. Of the 10 patients, three were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia, two were myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), two were chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), two were in an accelerated phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-AP), and one was primary myelofibrosis (PMF). ② Conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine (Flu) /busulfan (Bu) combined with whole-body irradiation (TBI) /cyclophosphamide (Cy). ③ On the seventh day after transplantation, the median pretransplant DSA level was MFI 15 999 (10 210-23 417) and 10 787 (0-22 720). ④ Eight patients acquired hematopoietic reconstitution; the median time of neutrophil engraftment was 14 (10-16) days; and 18 (14-20) days for platelet engraftment. After a median follow-up of 12.5 (1.5-27) months, primary graft failure was found in one patient and another with poor graft function. Seven patients remained in a disease remission state, and all were DSA-negative. Conclusions: An intensified immunosuppression conditioning regimen can efficiently decrease the level of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs), leading to good short-term efficacy.

Donor-specific HLA antibodies are associated with graft failure and delayed hematologic recovery after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft failure (GF) is one of the major concerns after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Although earlier reports have associated the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) with increased risk of GF after unrelated donor allo-HCT, recent studies have failed to confirm this association.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to validate the presence of DSAs as a risk factor for GF and hematologic recovery in the unrelated donor allo-HCT setting.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated 303 consecutive patients who underwent their first unrelated donor allo-HCT at our institution from January 2008 to December 2017. DSA evaluation was performed using 2 Single Antigen Beads (SAB) assays, DSA titration with 1:2, 1:8, and 1:32 dilutions, C1q-binding assay, and absorption/elution protocol to assess possible false-positive DSA reactivity. The primary endpoints were neutrophil and platelet recovery and GF, whereas the secondary endpoint was overall survival. Multivariable analyses were performed using Fine-Gray competing risks regression or Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 14 years (range, 0-61 years), 56.1% were male, and 52.5% were transplanted for nonmalignant diseases. Eleven patients (3.63%) were DSA-positive. Of them, 10 had preexisting DSAs, and one showed post-transplant de novo DSA. Nine patients had 1 DSA, 1 had 2 DSAs, and 1 had 3 DSAs, with a median MFI of 4334 (range, 588-20,456) and 3581 (range, 227-12,266) in LABScreen and LIFECODES SAB assays, respectively. Overall, 21 patients experienced GF. Of them, 12 had primary graft rejection, 8 had secondary graft rejection, and 1 had primary poor graft function. The cumulative incidences of GF at 28, 100, and 365 days were 4.0% (95% CI, 2.2%-6.6%), 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-9.8%), and 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4%-10.2%), respectively. In the multivariable analyses, DSA-positive patients had significantly delayed neutrophil (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; P = .006) and platelet recovery (SHR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.74; P = .0003) than patients without DSAs. In addition, only DSAs were significant predictors of primary GF at 28 days (SHR = 2.78; 95% CI, 1.65-4.68; P = .0001). The Fine-Gray regression also demonstrated that the presence of DSAs was strongly associated with a higher incidence of overall GF (SHR = 7.60; 95%CI, 2.61-22.14; P = .0002). DSA-positive patients with GF had significantly higher median MFI values than DSA-positive patients who achieved engraftment in LIFECODES SAB assay using neat serum (10,334 vs. 1250; P = .006) and in LABScreen SAB at 1:32 dilution (1627 vs. 61; P = .006). All 3 patients with C1q-positive DSAs failed to engraft. DSAs were not predictive of inferior survival (hazard ratio = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.20-1.26, P = .14).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results validate the presence of DSAs as a significant risk factor for GF and poor hematologic recovery after unrelated donor allo-HCT. Thus, careful pre-transplant DSA evaluation may optimize unrelated donor selection and improve allo-HCT outcomes.

High-Dose immunoglobulin Intervention as an effective and simple strategy for donor specific Anti-HLA antibody desensitization in haploidentical transplant

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) is a significant obstacle to successful haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) and is associated with poor engraftment rates. DSA strongly positive patients with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) over 5000 have a primary poor graft function (PGF) rate of over 60%. Currently, there is no consensus on the desensitization of DSA, and existing strategies are complex and have limited effectiveness. To address this issue, we conducted a retrospective study on 19 patients with strongly positive DSA (MFI over 5000) who underwent haplo-HSCT and were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)-based therapy. We also included 38 baseline-matched patients with DSA-negative as controls. Our findings revealed that the cumulative incidence of engraftment, PGF, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), virus infection, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in the DSA strongly positive group after desensitization were comparable to those in the DSA negative group (P > 0.05). Our multivariable analysis showed that disease remission was a protective factor against PGF (P = 0.005, OR = 0.019, 95% CI 0.001-0.312). Subgroup analysis revealed that the desensitization efficacy was equal regardless of DSA type against HLA-I or II, and MFI value over 5000 or not. In conclusion, we propose a simple and effective DSA desensitization strategy based on immunoglobulin to ensure successful engraftment and improve patient prognosis.

Trans-population graph-based coverage optimization of allogeneic cellular therapy

Background

Pre-clinical development and in-human trials of 'off-the-shelf' immune effector cell therapy (IECT) are burgeoning. IECT offers many potential advantages over autologous products. The relevant HLA matching criteria vary from product to product and depend on the strategies employed to reduce the risk of GvHD or to improve allo-IEC persistence, as warranted by different clinical indications, disease kinetics, on-target/off-tumor effects, and therapeutic cell type (T cell subtype, NK, etc.).

Objective

The optimal choice of candidate donors to maximize target patient population coverage and minimize cost and redundant effort in creating off-the-shelf IECT product banks is still an open problem. We propose here a solution to this problem, and test whether it would be more expensive to recruit additional donors or to prevent class I or class II HLA expression through gene editing.

Study design

We developed an optimal coverage problem, combined with a graph-based algorithm to solve the donor selection problem under different, clinically plausible scenarios (having different HLA matching priorities). We then compared the efficiency of different optimization algorithms - a greedy solution, a linear programming (LP) solution, and integer linear programming (ILP) -- as well as random donor selection (average of 5 random trials) to show that an optimization can be performed at the entire population level.

Results

The average additional population coverage per donor decrease with the number of donors, and varies with the scenario. The Greedy, LP and ILP algorithms consistently achieve the optimal coverage with far fewer donors than the random choice. In all cases, the number of randomly-selected donors required to achieve a desired coverage increases with increasing population. However, when optimal donors are selected, the number of donors required may counter-intuitively decrease with increasing population size. When comparing recruiting more donors vs gene editing, the latter was generally more expensive. When choosing donors and patients from different populations, the number of random donors required drastically increases, while the number of optimal donors does not change. Random donors fail to cover populations different from their original populations, while a small number of optimal donors from one population can cover a different population.

Discussion

Graph-based coverage optimization algorithms can flexibly handle various HLA matching criteria and accommodate additional information such as KIR genotype, when such information becomes routinely available. These algorithms offer a more efficient way to develop off-the-shelf IECT product banks compared to random donor selection and offer some possibility of improved transparency and standardization in product design.

Effects of donor-specific antibodies on engraftment and long-term survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-A systematic review and meta-analysis

The presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of primary graft failure following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but its effects on the time to engraftment and long-term outcomes remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the impact of DSAs on engraftment and long-term survival of patients undergoing allo-HSCT. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CBM. Data were analyzed using RevMan5.4. Pooled hazard ratio (HR), standard mean difference (SMD) or odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) are calculated for time-to-event data, continuous data, discontinuous data respectively. 17 eligible studies were included, involving 2169 patients main receiving haploidentical SCT (haplo-SCT) or umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Meta-analysis showed that DSAs-positive patients are associated with significantly higher risk of GF(OR = 12.87, 95%CI, 6.45-25.70; P < 0.00001; OR = 4.76, 95%CI, 2.88-7.87), poorer neutrophil engraftment (HR = 2.20, 95%CI, 1.02-4.73; P = 0.04; HR = 1.83, 95%CI, 1.46-2.30; P < 0.00001), worse OS (HR = 3.19, 95%CI, 1.85-5.50; P < 0.0001; HR = 1.68, 95%CI, 1.04-2.71; P = 0.03), and inferior PFS (HR = 4.25, 95%CI, 1.59-11.40; P = 0.004; HR = 4.83, 95%CI, 1.65-14.12; P = 0.004) in haplo-SCT and UCBT, respectively.

Antigen-guided depletion of anti-HLA antibody-producing cells by HLA-Fc fusion proteins

Platelet transfusion and transplantation of allogeneic stem cells and solid organs are life-saving therapies. Unwanted alloantibodies to nonself human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) on donor cells increase the immunological barrier to these therapies and are important causes of platelet transfusion refractoriness and graft rejection. Although the specificities of anti-HLA antibodies can be determined at the allelic level, traditional treatments for antibody-mediated rejection nonselectively suppress humoral immunity and are not universally successful. We designed HLA-Fc fusion proteins with a bivalent targeting module derived from extracellular domains of HLA and an Fc effector module from mouse IgG2a. We found that HLA-Fc with A2 (A2Fc) and B7 (B7Fc) antigens lowered HLA-A2- and HLA-B7-specific reactivities, respectively, in sera from HLA-sensitized patients. A2Fc and B7Fc bound to B-cell hybridomas bearing surface immunoglobulins with cognate specificities and triggered antigen-specific and Fc-dependent cytotoxicity in vitro. In immunodeficient mice carrying HLA-A2-specific hybridoma cells, A2Fc treatment lowered circulating anti-HLA-A2 levels, abolished the outgrowth of hybridoma cells, and prolonged survival compared with control groups. In an in vivo anti-HLA-A2-mediated platelet transfusion refractoriness model, A2Fc treatment mitigated refractoriness. These results support HLA-Fc being a novel strategy for antigen-specific humoral suppression to improve transfusion and transplantation outcomes. With the long-term goal of targeting HLA-specific memory B cells for desensitization, further studies of HLA-Fc's efficacy in immune-competent animal models are warranted.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for inherited metabolic disorders

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been used to treat patients with inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs) for more than 40 years. In the first two decades, various IMDs were treated by HSCT with a wide variety of donor sources and conditioning regimens selected at the institutional level. However, HSCT was not always successful due to post-transplant complications such as graft failure. In the third decade, myeloablative conditioning with targeted busulfan-based pharmacokinetic monitoring was established as an optimal conditioning regimen, and unrelated cord blood was recognized as an excellent donor source. During the fourth decade, further improvements were made to transplant procedures, including modification of the conditioning regimen, and the survival rate after HSCT markedly improved. Simultaneously, several long-term observational studies for patients after HSCT clarified its therapeutic effects on growth and development of cognitive function, fine motor skills, and activities of daily living when compared with enzyme replacement therapy. Although immune-mediated cytopenia was newly highlighted as a problematic morbidity after HSCT for IMDs, especially in younger patients who received unrelated cord blood, a recent study with rituximab added to the conditioning raised expectations that this issue can be overcome.

The impact of HLA donor-specific antibodies on engraftment and the evolving desensitization strategies

The majority of contemporary allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) procedures utilize partially HLA-mismatched stem cell grafts. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are associated with primary graft failure independent of the graft source, conditioning intensity and other patient and donor factors. Here we provide an update on testing and monitoring of DSA, review the impact of DSA on stem cell engraftment, and present promising desensitization modalities. Ultimately, we attempt to provide practical recommendations for DSA screening and mitigation strategies.