Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus Cyclosporine A and Methotrexate in Matched Sibling Donor Transplantation

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine A versus methotrexate and cyclosporine A for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplantation in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients

BACKGROUND

Different prophylactic protocols are available for preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after matched sibling donor (MSD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide plus cyclosporine A (PT-CY/CSA) versus methotrexate plus CSA (MTX/CSA) as GVHD prophylaxis protocols in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who received peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from fully matched donors.

METHODS

The 1-year outcomes of 89 patients treated with PT-CY/CSA and 90 patients treated with MTX/CSA who had MSD allo-HCT for AML using unmanipulated mobilized PBSC were examined and compared.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 100 days was considerably lower in the PT-CY/CSA group (4% vs 19.3%, p = 0.002), however there were no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1-year (19.6% vs 37.4%, p = 0.053). Significant delays in neutrophil and platelet engraftments were reported in the PT-CY/CSA group (17 vs 12 days) and (13 vs 12 days), respectively (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidences of relapse (19.1% vs 13.7%, p = 0.470), overall survival (79.1% vs 77.3%, p = 0.986), non-relapse mortality (16.5% vs 16.8%, p = 0.837), and the GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS) (53.7% vs 46.6%, p = 0.478) did not differ statistically at 1-year.

CONCLUSION

PT-CY/CSA demonstrated a significant decrease in the rate of acute GVHD. However, it was associated with engraftment delay.

Allogeneic transplantation of bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical sibling donors for hematological malignancies in 6064 adults from 2003 to 2020: different impacts on survival according to time period

BACKGROUND

Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have been widely used instead of bone marrow (BM) as the graft source for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although early studies demonstrated no significant differences in survival between PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) and BM transplantation (BMT) from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donors to adults with hematological malignancies, recent results have been unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this retrospective study was to compare overall survival (OS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), hematopoietic recovery and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) between PBSCT and BMT according to the time period of HCT (2003-2008, 2009-2014, or 2015-2020).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively compared the outcomes after PBSCT versus BMT in 6064 adults with hematological malignancies using a Japanese registry database between 2003 and 2020.

RESULTS

The adjusted probability of OS was significantly higher in BMT recipients compared to PBSCT recipients during the early period of 2003-2008 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.91; P < 0.001) and the middle period of 2009-2014 (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.91; P < 0.001). However, during the late period of 2015-2020, the adjusted probability of OS was comparable between BMT and PBSCT recipients (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79-1.13; P = 0.564), which were mainly due to the reduction of NRM. There was no significant difference in the relapse rate between the groups, irrespective of the time period. Compared to BMT, PBSCT led to faster neutrophil and platelet recovery and the cumulative incidences of grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute and overall and extensive chronic GVHD were significantly higher in PBSCT recipients, irrespective of the time period.

CONCLUSIONS

PBSCT and BMT had similar survival outcomes and relapse rates in adult patients with hematological malignancies during the late time period of 2015-2020 despite the hematopoietic recovery and acute and chronic GVHD being higher in PBSCT recipients in all time periods.

Prophylaxis and management of graft-versus-host disease after stem-cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: updated consensus recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major factor contributing to mortality and morbidity after allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). In the last 3 years, there has been regulatory approval of new drugs and considerable change in clinical approaches to prophylaxis and management of GVHD. To standardise treatment approaches, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) has updated its clinical practice recommendations. We formed a panel of one methodologist and 22 experts in the field of GVHD management. The selection was made on the basis of their role in GVHD management in Europe and their contributions to the field, such as publications, presentations at conferences, and other research. We applied the GRADE process to ten PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions: evidence was searched for by the panel and graded for each crucial outcome. In two consensus meetings, we discussed the evidence and voted on the wording and strengths of recommendations. Key updates to the recommendations include: (1) primary use of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute GVHD and steroid-refractory chronic GVHD as the new standard of care, (2) use of rabbit anti-T-cell (thymocyte) globulin or post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as standard GVHD prophylaxis in peripheral blood stem-cell transplantations from unrelated donors, and (3) the addition of belumosudil to the available treatment options for steroid-refractory chronic GVHD. The EBMT proposes to use these recommendations as the basis for routine management of GVHD during allogenic HSCT. The current recommendations favour European practice and do not necessarily represent global preferences.

Post-transplant сyclophosphamide after matched donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with acute leukemia

INTRODUCTION

The data on post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in pediatric acute leukemia after matched allo-HSCT are limited to case series. The present study aimed to assess the results of PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis in a large cohort of children with acute leukemia after matched allo-HSCT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 190 pediatric patients with acute leukemia who had a first allograft between 2008 and 2020 from a matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) was carried out. In the MSD setting, GVHD prophylaxis consisted of PTCy alone (n = 28) for the study group, and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) ± antimetabolite (n = 30) for the control group. In MUD setting, most patients in the study group received GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy+CNI+mycophenolate mofetil (n = 42, 66.7%) or PTCy+CNI+sirolimus (n = 12, 19%). All patients (n = 69) in the control group received ATG+CNI+antimetabolite.

RESULTS

After MUD allo-HSCT, the incidences of acute GVHD grade III-IV and moderate/severe chronic GVHD were significantly lower in the PTCy group compared to control (6.6% vs. 35.0% and 12.7% vs. 47.1%, respectively, p < .0001). Five-year GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) after MUD allo-HSCT was higher in the PTCy group compared to control (35.1% vs. 7.3%, p < .0001). At the same time, there was no significant difference between both groups after MSD allo-HSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric acute leukemia, PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for MUD allo-HSCT is a feasible and effective option that results in a low incidence of GVHD. Compared to the ATG-based approach, PTCy provides better control of GVHD in children. In pediatric allo-HSCT from MSD, PTCy demonstrates comparable effectiveness to conventional GVHD prophylaxis.

Combining post-transplant cyclophosphamide with antithymocyte globulin for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in hematological malignancies

In search of an ideal partner or alternative to conventional immunosuppressive agents, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and, more recently, post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) have both emerged as valid and efficient options for preventing graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). To further reduce the risk of GvHD, strategies combining ATG and PT-Cy have recently been investigated. In a haploidentical setting, retrospective studies suggest that combining PT-Cy and ATG may result in a lower incidence of chronic GvHD without increasing the risks of infection or relapse, when compared to PT-Cy without ATG. In haploidentical or unrelated donor settings, adding reduced doses of PT-Cy to ATG may reduce the risk of acute and chronic GvHD and improve survival, particularly GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), when compared to ATG without PT-Cy. Overall, the combination of PT-Cy and ATG is a safe and promising approach for patients with hematological malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Reduced post-transplant cyclophosphamide dose with antithymocyte globulin in peripheral blood stem cell haploidentical transplantation

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is effective for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, but it may cause dose-dependent toxicities, particularly in frail patients. Therefore, we compared the outcomes with a reduced PT-Cy total dose (70 mg/kg) to those with the standard PT-Cy dose (100 mg/kg) in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) patients aged ≥ 65 years and those with cardiac comorbidities. All consecutive patients with a hematological malignancy receiving peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) after a thiotepa-based conditioning with low-dose antithymocyte globulin were included. Thirty-three patients received PT-Cy at 70 mg/kg and 25 at 100 mg/kg. PT-Cy dose reduction did not increase the risk of GVHD and was associated with faster neutrophil and platelet recovery, and lower cumulative incidences of bacteremia (38% versus 72%, p = 0.004) and cardiac complications (12% versus 44%, p = 0.028). At 2 years, GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was higher with the reduced dose compared to the standard dose (60% versus 33%, p = 0.04). In conclusion, reducing PT-Cy total dose to 70 mg/kg is a safe and valid approach for elderly patients and those with cardiac comorbidities underdoing haploidentical HCT with PBSCs and low-dose antithymocyte globulin. The reduced PT-Cy dose was associated with improved hematological count recovery, lower incidence of toxicities, and higher GRFS.

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide as sole GHVD prophylaxis after matched reduced-intensity conditioning allotransplant

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) alone as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis may avoid/reduce short- and mid-term toxicities of drugs commonly used for GVHD prophylaxis, accelerate immune reconstitution after the graft to decrease infections and facilitate the early integration of adjunct maintenance therapies to prevent relapse.

OBJECTIVE

A prospective phase 2 study was designed in order to assess the feasibility and safety of PTCY as a sole GVHD prophylaxis in adult patients receiving a Baltimore-based reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) peripheral blood (PB) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) with a matched donor.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients were planned to be included stepwise up to 59 evaluable PTCY recipients, in order to be able to stop the protocol in case of excessive corticosteroid resistant grade 3-4 severe acute GVHD (aGVHD). Because a high incidence of grade 2-4 aGVHD was observed after analysis of the first 27 patients, the protocol was amended to test the addition of 1 day of anti-thymoglobulin to PTCY. In spite of this, the trial had to be stopped after 38 treated patients, because of an unacceptable rate of grade 3-4 aGVHD. Donors were matched related to 12 patients and unrelated to 26.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 29.6 months, 2-year overall, disease-free and GVHD-free relapse-free (GRFS) survivals were respectively 65.4%, 62.1% and 46.9%. Cumulative incidences of grade 2-4 and 3-4 aGVHD at day 100 were 52.6% and 21.1%, respectively, while that of moderate/severe chronic(c) GVHD was 15.7% at 2 years. Addition of ATG to PTCY did influence neither aGVHD, cGVHD nor GRFS.

CONCLUSION

Despite paradoxically good survivals, especially GRFS, this study failed to demonstrate that PTCY (± ATG) alone can be used for Baltimore-based RIC PB Allo-HSCT with matched donors. Other combinations should be tested to try and avoid long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs following Allo-HSCT in this setting.

Effect of graft-versus-host disease on posttransplant outcomes following single cord blood transplantation in comparison to haploidentical transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide for adult acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

The possibility that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches could reduce relapse after alternative HLA-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an attractive concept for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, it remains unclear whether the prognostic effect of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) on survival differs between single-unit cord blood transplantation (CBT) or haploidentical HCT using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haplo HCT) for AML.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the effect of acute and chronic GVHD on posttransplant outcomes between CBT and PTCy-haplo HCT.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated the effect of acute and chronic GVHD on posttransplant outcomes following CBT and PTCy-haplo HCT in adults with AML (n=1,981) between 2014 and 2020 using a Japanese registry database.

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, the probability of overall survival was significantly greater in patients who developed grade I-II acute GVHD (P<0.001 by log-rank test) and limited chronic GVHD (P<0.001 by log-rank test) among CBT recipients, but these effects were not significant among PTCy-haplo HCT recipients. In the multivariate analysis, in which the development of GVHD was treated as a time-dependent covariate, the effect of grade I-II acute GVHD on reducing overall mortality was significant between CBT and PTCy-haplo HCT (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for CBT: 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-0.87; adjusted HR for PTCy-haplo HCT: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.70-1.64; p for interaction=0.038).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that grade I-II acute GVHD was associated with a significant improvement in overall mortality in adults with AML receiving CBT but not PTCy-haplo HCT.

PTCY and Tacrolimus for GVHD Prevention for Older Adults Undergoing HLA-Matched Sibling and Unrelated Donor AlloHCT

INTRODUCTION

The use of PTCY for graft-versus-host disease (GHVD) prevention is becoming prevalent in the transplant community when HLA-identical sibling (MSD) and 10/10 HLA-matched (MUD) and 9/10 mismatched (MMUD) unrelated donors are selected for alloHSCT. However, reported evidence on outcomes from elderly receiving PTCY-containing GVHD prophylaxis remains limited.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the outcomes of PTCY-TK prophylaxis and conventional GVHD prophylaxis in patients aged >50 years undergoing peripheral blood alloHSCT from a single institution.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 161 consecutive patients aged >50 years undergoing alloHSCT between Jan-2014 and Feb-2021 were included. Data was collected retrospectively and updated in December 2021. Patients received grafts from HLA-identical sibling (MSD), and from 10/10 and 9/10 HLA matched and mismatched unrelated donors (UD).

RESULTS

Overall, median age was 60 years and 91 (54.8%) received PTCY-TK for GVHD prevention. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was longer in the PTCY-TK group (20 vs. 16 days and 19 vs. 11 days, P< 0.001). The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV aGVHD at day +100 and moderate/severe cGVHD at 2 years were 18.2%, 5.7% and 9.5% for patients receiving PTCY-TK, and 26.0%, 9.6% and 39.5% for those that did not. The multivariate analysis showed that PTCY-TK reduced the probability of grade II-IV aGVHD (HR 0.41, p=0.035), of cGVHD [any grade: HR 0.43 (p=0.014), and of moderate/severe cGVHD (HR 0.15 (p<0.001)]. At 2-years, the overall survival (65.4% vs. 65.6%, p=0.472), non-relapse mortality (17.4% vs. 13.7%, p=0.967), and cumulative incidence of relapse rates (24.2% vs. 27.5%, p=0.712) were comparable between both cohorts; GVHD-Free/Relapse-free survival (GRFS) was higher in the PTCY-TK group (2-years: 50.2% vs. 21.8%; HR 0.42, p=0.001). In patients aged ≥50 years, Conclusion: PTCY-TK was safe and a more effective drug combination than non-PTCY containing GVHD prophylaxis, even with the use of matched and mismatched UD, and resulted in comparable relapse rates and better GRFS.

Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide for Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease: The Prospective Randomized HOVON-96 Trial

PT-Cy after NMA matched alloHSCT will increase the proportion of patients that survive without severe GVHD.

PT-Cy could allow for implementation of early posttransplant chemo- and immunotherapy to further reduce the relapse risk after alloHSCT.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the most important complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). We performed a prospective randomized, multicenter, phase 3 trial to study whether posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) combined with a short course of cyclosporine A (CsA) would result in a reduction of severe GVHD and improvement of GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) as compared with the combination of CsA and mycophenolic acid (MPA) after nonmyeloablative (NMA) matched related and unrelated peripheral blood alloHSCT. Between October 2013 and June 2018, 160 patients diagnosed with a high-risk hematological malignancy and having a matched related or at least 8 out of 8 HLA-matched unrelated donor were randomized and allocated in a 1:2 ratio to CsA/MPA or PT-Cy/CsA; a total of 151 patients were transplanted (52 vs 99 patients, respectively). The cumulative incidence of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD at 6 months was 48% in recipients of CsA/MPA vs 30% following PT-Cy/CsA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.82; P = .007). The 2-year cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD was 48% vs 16% (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.21-0.64; P < .001). The 1-year estimate of GRFS was 21% (11% to 32%) vs 45% (35% to 55%), P < .001. With a median follow-up of 56.4 months, relapse incidence, progression-free survival, and overall survival were not significantly different between the 2 treatment arms. PT-Cy combined with a short course of CsA after NMA matched alloHSCT significantly improves GRFS due to a significant reduction in severe acute and chronic GVHD.