Human cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell reconstitution and late-onset cytomegalovirus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients following letermovir prophylaxis

Letermovir as secondary prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A single center experience

Letermovir, a novel anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) agent acts by inhibiting the viral terminase complex and is approved for primary prophylaxis in CMV seropositive patients post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The favorable efficacy and safety profile make it an attractive option for use as secondary prophylaxis in patients at high-risk for CMV reactivation. In this study, we report the efficacy and safety of letermovir secondary prophylaxis after at least one treated episode of CMV reactivation in a cohort of 39 high-risk patients. Thirty two (82%) patients received anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), 27 (69%) received a combination of ATG and post-transplant cyclophosphamide for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Twenty one patients (54%) received CMV seronegative grafts. In addition, 18 (46%) patients had HLA mismatched unrelated or haploidentical donors while 18 (46%) had active GVHD requiring immunosuppression at the time of commencing secondary prophylaxis. Letermovir was initiated at a median of 47 days (range, 41-56) after HCT and was administered for a median duration of 77 days (range, 46-90). A single breakthrough CMV reactivation was noted in this high-risk cohort. Four additional episodes of CMV reactivation occurred at a median of 28 days (range, 23-59 days) after discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis. The drug was well tolerated and 77% of the cohort completed the planned duration of secondary prophylaxis. None of the patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse effects. In conclusion, letermovir is effective and well tolerated and may be considered for secondary prophylaxis in patients at high risk for CMV reactivation. Prospective studies are required to validate these findings.

Letermovir prophylaxis reduced cytomegalovirus reactivation and resistance post umbilical cord blood transplantation

To explore the impact of letermovir (LET) prophylaxis on cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and resistance in both adult and paediatric umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) patients, we retrospectively compared 43 UCBT patients who received LET as CMV prophylaxis with a historical cohort of 207 UCBT patients without LET usage. LET was administered from Day +1 to Day +100. The 180-day cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation (47.3% vs. 74.4%, p < 0.001) and the proportion of refractory CMV reactivation (15.0% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.016) were significantly lower than those in the control group. However, more frequent late CMV infection (31.0% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.002) and the 180-day cumulative incidence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation (9.3% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.087) were observed in UCBT patients with LET prophylaxis. Meanwhile, older age (>15 years old) and the occurrence of pre-engraftment syndrome were identified as the significant risk factors for CMV reactivation, and in patients at high risk, the incidence of CMV reactivation in the LET group was lower than that in the control group (46.7% vs. 86.5%, p < 0.001), while this decline was less pronounced among patients at low risk (47.8% vs. 62.1%, p = 0.120).

Dynamics of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell recovery in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients using a commercially available flow cytometry assay: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) protects from CMV infection in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), but to date, there is no validated measure of CMV immunity for this population.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational, pilot study, CMV T-cell responses were evaluated monthly and at onset of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or CMV infection in CMV-seropositive allo-HCT recipients using a commercial flow cytometry assay, the CMV inSIGHT T-Cell Immunity Panel (CMV-TCIP). The primary endpoint was the time to first positive CMV-TCIP, defined as percentage of interferon-γ-producing CD4+ or CD8+ CMV-specific T cells >0.2%. Letermovir was prescribed from day +10 to ≥100.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight allo-HCT recipients were enrolled. The median time to first positive CMV-TCIP result was earlier for CD4+ (60 days [interquartile range, IQR 33‒148]) than for CD8+ T cells (96 days [IQR 33‒155]) and longer for haploidentical and mismatched transplant recipients (77 and 96 days, respectively) than for matched donors (45 and 33 days, respectively). CD4+ and CD8+ CMV-CMI recovery was sustained in 10/10 (100%) and 10/11 (91%) patients, respectively, without GVHD, whereas CD4+ and/or CD8+ CMV-CMI was lost in 4/6 and 2/6 patients, respectively, with GVHD requiring steroids. As a predictor of clinically significant CMV infection in patients with low-level CMV reactivation, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of CMV-TCIP were 90% and 87.5%, respectively, for CD4+ CMV-TCIP and 66.7% and 62.5%, respectively, for CD8+ CMV-TCIP.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant variability in time to CMV-CMI recovery post-HCT, with slower recovery after haploidentical and mismatched HCT. CD4+ CMV-CMI may protect against CS-CMVi, but immunity may be lost with GVHD diagnosis and treatment.

Letermovir for cytomegalovirus infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: tips and notes for effective use in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). While conventional antiviral agents such as ganciclovir can be used for CMV prophylaxis, toxicities such as myelosuppression are a major concern.

AREA COVERED

This work aimed to summarize the latest information and practical issues regarding a new anti-CMV agent, letermovir (LET).

EXPERT OPINION

LET inhibits CMV replication by binding to components of the DNA terminase complex. A phase 3 trial in allo-HSCT recipients showed a reduced incidence of clinically significant CMV infection in the LET group. In 2017, this agent was first approved for CMV prophylaxis in adult CMV-seropositive allo-HSCT recipients in the United States, and is now used worldwide. While LET has an excellent toxicity profile, there are issues to be aware of, such as interactions with other drug classes (e.g. immunosuppressants and antifungals) and reactivation of CMV infection following LET cessation. While LET is the current standard of care for CMV prophylaxis, there are no established protocols for preemptive treatment of asymptomatic CMV viremia or for treatment of developed CMV disease. Further research is needed to maximize the benefits of LET, including the discovery of biomarkers.

Efficacy and safety of letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Letermovir is a specific inhibitor of cytomegalovirus (CMV) terminase complex. Several studies have reported that letermovir can effectively prevent CMV activation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We aimed to identify the efficacy and safety of letermovir prophylaxis for CMV infection after allo-HSCT with a systemic review and meta-analysis. A literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. PubMed and Embase databases were searched. A total of 28 studies were included. The incidence of CMV activation at 14 weeks after HSCT was 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.18), which was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.04-0.21) and 0% in adult and children (2 studies were included and both of them were 0%). In addition, the incidence of CMV activation at 14 weeks after allo-HSCT was 0.11 (95% CI, 0.06-0.21) and 0.07 (only 1 study included), respectively, in retrospective and prospective studies. The incidence of CMV activation at 100 and 200 days after HSCT was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.16-0.33) and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.32-0.67), respectively. The incidence of CMV disease at 14 weeks and at 6 months after HSCT was 0.01 (95% CI, 0.01-0.02) and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.09), respectively. Thus, our systemic review and meta-analysis suggested that letermovir prophylaxis was safe and effective for CMV activation after allo-HSCT.

The Reconstitution of T-cells after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in a Pediatric Patient with Congenital Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia (CAMT)

BACKGROUND

Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (CAMT) is a bone marrow failure syndrome with autosomal recessive inheritance characterized by the lack of megakaryocytes and thrombocytopenia. The cause of the disease is a mutation in the c-Mpl gene, which encodes the thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor. The main treatment for this genetic disorder is an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). However, transplant-related mortality, development of acute and chronic graft-versushost disease (GvHD), and susceptibility to opportunistic infections are major barriers to transplantation. Delay in the reconstitution of T cells and imbalance in the regeneration of distinct functional CD4 and CD8 T-cell subsets mainly affect post-transplant complications. We report a case of CAMT, who developed acute GvHD but had no signs and symptoms of chronic GvHD following allo-HSCT.

CASE PRESENTATION

At the age of four, she presented with petechiae and purpura. In laboratory investigations, pancytopenia without organomegaly, and cellularity less than 5% in bone marrow biopsy, were observed. A primary diagnosis of idiopathic aplastic anemia was made, and she was treated with prednisolone, cyclosporine, and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), which did not respond. Genetic analysis revealed the mutation c.1481T>G (p. L494W) in exon 10 of the c-Mpl gene, and the diagnosis of CAMT was confirmed. The patient underwent allo-HSCT from a healthy sibling donor. Alloimmunization reactions and immune disorders were present due to long-term treatment with immunosuppressive medications and repeated blood and platelet transfusions. Hence, the regeneration of T-lymphocytes after allo-HSCT was evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Successful treatment of acute GvHD prevented advancing the condition to chronic GvHD, and this was accompanied by delayed T-cell reconstitution through an increase in Treg:Tcons ratio.

Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation under letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major infectious complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Although letermovir (LMV) prophylaxis dramatically reduces the incidence of early clinically significant CMV (csCMV) infection, it remains unclear whether it has a beneficial effect on nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS). Herein, we evaluated the impact of LMV prophylaxis on posttransplant outcomes using the registry database of the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Adult patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2017 and 2019 were analyzed (n = 6004). LMV prophylaxis was administered to 1640 patients (LMV group) and it significantly reduced the incidence of csCMV infection compared with those not administered LMV prophylaxis (15.4% vs 54.1%; p < 0.01). However, it did not improve the 1-year NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; p = 0.40) and OS (HR, 0.96; p = 0.49). In the LMV group, 74 patients had breakthrough csCMV infection and showed inferior NRM (HR, 3.44; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 1.93; p = 0.02) compared with those without infection. After completing LMV prophylaxis, 252 patients had late csCMV infection and showed inferior NRM (HR, 1.83; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 1.58; p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that managing breakthrough and late csCMV infections is important for improving long-term outcomes.

Letermovir at a Prophylactic Dose for Cytomegalovirus Infection in Children Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in Japan

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Previous studies in adults demonstrated that letermovir prophylaxis for 100 d after HSCT reduces the occurrence of CMV infection; however, studies in children are limited. In this study, we aimed to examine the incidence of CMV infection in children who underwent allogeneic HSCT with prophylactic letermovir therapy. A single-center retrospective study was conducted among patients aged ≤17 who underwent allogeneic HSCT. We compared the cumulative incidence of CMV infection, mainly monitored by pp65-antigenemia, after HSCT between patients with and without letermovir prophylaxis (10-12 or 5-6 mg/kg/d when co-administered with cyclosporine) using Gray's test. We analyzed 79 patients with a median follow-up period of 126 d. The median age of these patients was 8.3 years (Interquartile range, 3.7-12.4). Prophylactic letermovir was used in 25 patients. Twenty-five patients developed CMV infection, and the cumulative incidence was 38.9% (95% confidence intervals, 25.0-52.5). The cumulative incidence of CMV infection was not significantly different between the letermovir and no-letermovir groups (33.1 vs. 36.6%, p = 0.228). Meanwhile, the cumulative incidence of CMV infection up to 100 d following HSCT was significantly lower in the letermovir group than in the no-letermovir group (8.0 vs. 32.8%, p = 0.026). Most patients experienced no noticeable adverse effects associated with letermovir; however, one patient discontinued letermovir because of nausea and anorexia. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that letermovir prophylaxis against CMV infection may be effective in children without severe adverse effects.

Cytomegalovirus Immune reconstitution in cord blood transplant recipients on letermovir prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can cause significant morbidity and mortality in cord blood transplant (CBT) recipients. Development of CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) has been associated with protection against CMV clinically significant reactivation (CsCMV). In this study, we evaluated CMV-CMI reconstitution during letermovir prophylactic therapy, which prevents CsCMV without complete suppression of CMV reactivation.

METHODS

We measured CMV-CMI in CMV-seropositive CBT recipients pre-transplant after Day+90 of letermovir prophylaxis and at Days +180, and +360- post-transplant using a dual color CMV-specific IFNγ/IL2 FLUOROSpot. CsCMV and nonCsCMV reactivations were abstracted from medical records. CsCMV was defined as CMV viral load ≥5,000 IU/ml using a whole blood assay.

RESULTS

Among 70 CBT recipients, 31 developed CMV-CMI by Day+90 and an additional eight and five participants by Days +180 and +360, respectively. Thirty-eight participants developed CMV reactivation, including nine with CsCMV. Most reactivations (33 of 38) occurred before Day+180. Early CMV-CMI was present in six out of nine participants with CsCMV, indicating a lack of protection against CsCMV. Moreover, the magnitude of CMV-CMI at Day+90 did not differ between participants with CsCMV and nonCsCMV.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 50% of CBT recipients reconstituted CMV-CMI during letermovir prophylactic therapy. However, CMV-CMI did not reach levels protective against CsCMV. Extension of CMV prophylaxis beyond Day+90 may be considered in CMV-seropositive CBT recipients.

Dynamics of polyclonal immuno-reconstitution after allogeneic transplant with post-transplant cyclophosphamide and letermovir

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations are strong stimulators of immune-reconstitution (IR) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Herein, we analyzed 317 CMV-seropositive consecutive patients (n = 109 letermovir, LTV; n = 208 no-LTV), undergoing HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and calcineurin inhibitor- (CNI) free graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. At day+90, median CD19+/mm3 was higher in LTV-cohort: 5.5 [0;439] versus 2 [0;294], p = 0.008; median CD3+/mm3 counts were lower in LTV-cohort, with no differences in CD4+, CD8+ and NK-cells. At day+180 median CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+/mm3 values were comparable between groups. Higher CD19+/mm3 counts were observed in LTV-cohort: 62 [0; 2983] versus 42 [0; 863]. Significantly higher median NK/mm3 values were seen in LTV-cohort: 225.5 [0;763] versus 163.5 [0;1181], p = 0.0003. The impact of LTV on B-cell IR at 3 months and NK-cell levels at 6 months was retained in multivariate analysis (p < 0.01), whereas the effect on T-cells was not confirmed. Moreover, we confirmed a significant reduction of clinically-relevant CMV, and moderate-to- severe chronic GvHD in LTV-cohort. Overall, in our study the use of LTV was associated with a slight improvement of B-cell and NK-cells reconstitution, with only minor impact on T-cell subsets, giving new insights on polyclonal IR for HSCT recipients in the LTV era.

Effectiveness of letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A global systematic review

OBJECTIVE(S)

Letermovir (LET), a novel antiviral, has largely supplanted more traditional preemptive therapy (PET) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) patients. Use of LET demonstrated efficacy against placebo in phase III randomized controlled trials, but is considerably more expensive than PET. This review aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of LET in preventing clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) for allo-HCT recipients and related outcomes.

DESIGN

A systematic literature review was performed using an a priori protocol using PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2010 to October 2021.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Studies were included if they met the following criteria: LET compared with PET, CMV-related outcomes, patients aged 18 years or older, and English language-only articles. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study characteristics and outcomes.

OUTCOME MEASURES

CMV viremia, csCMVi, CMV end-organ disease, graft-versus-host-disease, all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 233 abstracts were screened, with 30 included in this review. Randomized trials demonstrated efficacy of LET prophylaxis in preventing csCMVi. Observational studies demonstrated varying degrees of effectiveness of LET prophylaxis compared with use of PET alone. All studies with a comparator group resulted in lower rates of csCMVi for patients using LET. Included studies varied widely by CMV viral load threshold cutoff and CMV test units, limiting synthesis of results owing to high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

LET reduces risk of csCMVi, but lack of standardized clinical definitions on how to evaluate csCMVi and related outcomes largely prevent synthesis of results. Clinicians must consider this limitation in the context of evaluating the effectiveness of LET to other antiviral therapies, especially for patients at risk of late-onset CMV. Future studies should focus on prospective data collection through registries and concordance of diagnostic definitions to mitigate study heterogeneity.

Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) - specific T-cell response after letermovir prophylaxis is predictive for subsequent HCMV reactivation in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is still one of the major concerning infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Letermovir (LTV) has been recently introduced for HCMV prophylaxis in adult patients who received allogeneic HSCT. However, many aspects related to immune reconstitution need to be further explored. The aim of this study was to define the prognostic role of HCMV-specific T-cell frequency measured at the end of LTV prophylaxis in predicting the risk for clinically significant HCMV infection (i.e. infection requiring antiviral treatment) after the stop of the prophylaxis.

METHODS

Sixty-six adult patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT were enrolled and HCMV DNAemia was prospectively monitored. Additionally, HCMV-specific T-cell response was evaluated using ELISpot assay against two different antigens (HCMV infected cell lysate and pp65 peptide pool).

RESULTS

Ten patients (15.2%) developed at least one positive HCMV DNAemia episode during LTV prophylaxis, whereas 50/66 (75.8%) patients developed at least one positive HCMV DNA event after LTV prophylaxis. Of note, 25 of them (50%) experienced a clinically significant HCMV infection. The median HCMV-specific T-cell response measured against HCMV lysate but not against pp65 peptide pool was lower in patients who developed HCMV clinically significant infection after prophylaxis. A ROC analysis revealed that the level of 0.04 HCMV-specific T cells/µl should be used as cut-off for development of clinically significant HCMV reactivation after prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of HCMV-specific immunity upon discontinuation of universal prophylaxis with LTV should be considered as a method for identification of patients at risk for clinically significant HCMV infection.

CD4+ T cells are the major predictor of HCMV control in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients on letermovir prophylaxis

Introduction

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) causes significant morbidity and mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) recipients. Recently, antiviral letermovir prophylaxis during the first 100 days after alloSCT replaced PCR-guided preemptive therapy as the primary standard of care for HCMV reactivations. Here, we compared NK-cell and T-cell reconstitution in alloSCT recipients receiving preemptive therapy or letermovir prophylaxis in order to identify potential biomarkers predicting prolonged and symptomatic HCMV reactivation.

Methods

To that end, the NK-cell and T-cell repertoire of alloSCT recipients managed with preemptive therapy (n=32) or letermovir prophylaxis (n=24) was characterized by flow cytometry on days +30, +60, +90 and +120 after alloSCT. Additionally, background-corrected HCMV-specific T-helper (CD4+IFNγ+) and cytotoxic (CD8+IFNγ+CD107a+) T cells were quantified after pp65 stimulation.

Results

Compared to preemptive therapy, letermovir prophylaxis prevented HCMV reactivation and decreased HCMV peak viral loads until days +120 and +365. Letermovir prophylaxis resulted in decreased T-cell numbers but increased NK-cell numbers. Interestingly, despite the inhibition of HCMV, we found high numbers of "memory-like" (CD56dimFcεRIγ- and/or CD159c+) NK cells and an expansion of HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in letermovir recipients. We further compared immunological readouts in patients on letermovir prophylaxis with non/short-term HCMV reactivation (NSTR) and prolonged/symptomatic HCMV reactivation (long-term HCMV reactivation, LTR). Median HCMV-specific CD4+ T-cell frequencies were significantly higher in NSTR patients (day +60, 0.35 % vs. 0.00 % CD4+IFNγ+/CD4+ cells, p=0.018) than in patients with LTR, whereas patients with LTR had significantly higher median regulatory T-cell (Treg) frequencies (day +90, 2.2 % vs. 6.2 % CD4+CD25+CD127dim/CD4+ cells, p=0.019). ROC analysis confirmed low HCMV specific CD4+ (AUC on day +60: 0.813, p=0.019) and high Treg frequencies (AUC on day +90: 0.847, p=0.021) as significant predictors of prolonged and symptomatic HCMV reactivation.

Discussion

Taken together, letermovir prophylaxis delays HCMV reactivation and alters NK- and T-cell reconstitution. High numbers of HCMV-specific CD4+ T cells and low numbers of Tregs seem to be pivotal to suppress post-alloSCT HCMV reactivation during letermovir prophylaxis. Administration of more advanced immunoassays that include Treg signature cytokines might contribute to the identification of patients at high-risk for long-term and symptomatic HCMV reactivation who might benefit from prolonged administration of letermovir.

Impact of cytomegalovirus immunodominant HLA-I donor-recipient matching on the incidence and features of virus DNAemia and virus-specific T-cell immune reconstitution in unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

We investigated whether donor-recipient mismatch involving one or more cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunodominant (ID) human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-I alleles may impact on the degree of CMV pp65/immediate-early 1 (IE-1) T-cell reconstitution and the incidence of CMV DNAemia in patients undergoing unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with high-dose posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT/Cy-haplo).

METHODS

Multicenter observational study including 106 consecutive adult PT/Cy-haplo patients (34 CMV ID HLA-I matched and 72 mismatched). A real-time PCR was used for plasma CMV DNA load monitoring. Enumeration of CMV-specific (pp65/IE-1) interferon (IFN)-γ-producing T cells from several patients was performed by flow cytometry by days +30, +60, +90 and +180 after transplantation.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia, clinically significant CMV DNAemia episodes (cs-CMVi), and recurrent CMV DNAemia was comparable across CMV ID HLA-I matched and mismatched patients (71.8% vs. 80.9%, p = .95; 40.7% vs. 44.2%, p = .85; 16.4% vs. 28.1%; p = .43, respectively). The percentage of patients exhibiting detectable CMV-specific IFN-γ-producing T-cell responses (either CD8⁺ or CD4⁺ ) was similar across groups; nevertheless, significantly higher CMV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell counts were enumerated in the CMV ID HLA-I matched compared to mismatched patients by day +60 (p = .04) and +180 (p = .016) after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

CMV ID HLA-I matching may impact on the magnitude of CMV-pp65/IE-1-specific CD8⁺ T-cell reconstitution; yet, this effect seemed not to have an impact on the incidence of initial, recurrent CMV DNAemia, or cs-CMVi.

Immunological monitoring after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV, are they the same?

BACKGROUND

CMV-reactivation and -disease is still a major concern after allogeneic stem cell transplantation [allo-HSCT], despite prophylactic and pre-emptive strategies. In recent years, immunologic monitoring using CMV-IGRA has gained interest to better risk stratify immunocompromised patients or to guide prophylactic therapies. CMV-IGRA can quantify CMV cell-mediated immunity by measuring the interferon-gamma that is released by CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes in the presence of CMV-antigens. However, the two most widely used CMV-IGRAs, T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV, have not yet been compared in the setting of an allo-HSCT.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a method comparison between the T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV 28 and 100 days after allo-HSCT, and to assess predictive values of both tests for CMV-reactivation.

STUDY DESIGN

In a bicentric prospective trial, 27 patients were included. Samples were taken on day +28 and day +100 after allo-HSCT. Patients' clinical information was collected up to 270 days after the transplant. Method comparison was performed using Cohen's kappa.

RESULTS

On day +28 (n=26) after allo-HSCT T-SPOT.CMV gave three positive test results, and QuantiFERON-CMV only two. On day +100 (n=24) T-SPOT.CMV gave seven positive test results, and QuantiFERON-CMV nine. One discordant result was obtained at day +28 (n=26), while six results were discordant at day +100 (n=24). Method comparison showed a strong agreement on day +28 (κ = 0.780 [95% CI: 0.366-1.000]), but only a moderate agreement on day +100 (κ = 0.442 [95% CI: 0.070-0.814]) and on pooled data from both time points (κ = 0.578 [95% CI: 0.300-0.856]). Four clinically significant CMV infections, (CS-CMVi) were observed, all occurring after discontinuation of letermovir-prophylaxis. None of those four patients had a positive result with either test at day +100 (or day +28). Negative predictive values (NPV) and sensitivity are therefore very high at 100% (for both tests, for NPV and sensitivity, measured at day +100). At day+100, positive predictive values (PPV) and specificity were considerably lower (T-SPOT.CMV: PPV 23.5% and specificity 35% - QuantiFERON-CMV: PPV 26.7% and specificity 45%).

CONCLUSION

T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV only have a moderate agreement (at day +100) after allo-HSCT. Although these IGRAs are very promising, as shown by their very high negative predictive values for protection against CS-CMVi, they are not interchangeable. Future research should stipulate which IGRA was used, and future guidelines should preferably be assay-specific. As the QuantiFERON-CMV to date still lacks a large validation study after allo-HSCT, the moderate agreement with the T-SPOT.CMV poses a significant hurdle in the routine implementation of this test.

Features of cytomegalovirus DNAemia and virus-specific T-cell responses in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients during prophylaxis with letermovir

BACKGROUND

There is scarce information on the natural kinetics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia and dynamics of CMV-specific T-cell reconstitution in allogeneic hematopoietic transplant recipients (allo-HSCT) undergoing letermovir (LMV) prophylaxis.

METHODS

Twelve adult CMV-seropositive high-risk recipients (median age, 53 years; 9 males/3 females) undergoing LMV prophylaxis and 13 non-LMV allo-HSCT controls (median age, 58 years; 7 males/6 females) were included. CMV DNAemia in plasma was monitored by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Preemptive antiviral therapy (PET) was administered upon detection of ≥1500 IU/ml. CMV-specific interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)-producing CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells were enumerated by flow cytometry around days +30, +60, and +90 after allo-HSCT. Ex vivo experiments assessing of the potential effect of LMV on CMV-specific T-cell expansion in a single CMV-seropositive donor were also conducted.

RESULTS

Five LMV patients (41.6%) developed CMV DNAemia that cleared spontaneously. Four patients (33.3%) developed CMV DNAemia after LMV cessation, of which two required PET. Nine non-LMV patients (69.2%) developed CMV DNAemia (five required PET). The percentage of LMV and non-LMV patients exhibiting detectable CMV-specific T-cell responses was comparable (7/10 vs. 10/13; p = .71). Nevertheless, median CMV-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell counts were lower in LMV patients by days +60 (p = .006 and .02, respectively) and +90 (p = .08 and .02). Ex vivo, CMV-specific CD8⁺ T cells expanded to the same level either in the presence (19.8%) or in the absence of LMV (20.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, episodes of CMV DNAemia in LMV patients cleared spontaneously. A diminished degree of CMV-specific T-cell reconstitution in LMV patients compared to non-LMV patients was observed.

Cytomegalovirus Therapy: Role of Letermovir in Prophylaxis and Treatment in Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common viral pathogen in the transplant population and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. CMV prevention is paramount; however, selecting the best preventive strategy depends on many factors including donor-recipient CMV serostatus, transplant-specific risks, antiviral toxicities and cost. Novel CMV therapeutics such as letermovir (LTV) are desperately needed to optimize CMV management. Uniquely among CMV antiviral therapies, LTV inhibits the viral terminase complex in the CMV DNA synthesis pathway and disrupts viral genome packaging. Further, it lacks side effects frequently associated with other CMV antiviral therapies and evades common mechanisms of resistance. LTV is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for CMV prevention in adult CMV-seropositive hematopoietic cell transplant recipients but is increasingly applied off-label for prophylaxis and treatment. This review summarizes important concepts of CMV management in transplantation, with a specific focus on LTV pharmacology and clinical experience to date alongside future prospects for its application.