Risk of cytomegalovirus infection with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in haploidentical and HLA-matched unrelated donor transplantation

Risk-adapted letermovir prophylaxis based on a scoring system predicting a higher burden of cytomegalovirus exposure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

We previously reported that the area under the curve of log-transformed cytomegalovirus antigenemia (CMV-AUC) until 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) was associated with an increased risk of non-relapse mortality. We applied a risk-adapted letermovir (LTV) prophylaxis strategy guided by a risk score that predicts a higher CMV-AUC. First, we retrospectively analyzed 278 allo-HCT recipients between 2007 and 2017 (Period 1). We scored risk factors for higher CMV-AUC by odds ratios: malignant lymphoma including adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (1 point), an unrelated or haploidentical donor (1 point), and recipient/donor CMV serostatus (+/+; 2 points, ±; 3 points). We have administered LTV to patients with a total score of ≥ 4 points. We then focused on 143 patients who underwent allo-HCT when we applied this strategy (Period 2). Forty patients (28%) in Period 2 received LTV prophylaxis. Two patients (5.4%) exhibited higher CMV-AUC among 37 patients in the higher-risk group (≥ 4 points). However, as many as 33% of the patients with 3 points in Period 2 experienced higher CMV-AUC. Notably, in the lower-risk patients of Period 2, 68% of patients who received systemic steroids for acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) developed higher CMV-AUC. Our risk-adapted LTV prophylaxis strategy effectively prevented higher CMV-AUC in the higher-risk group and reduced the use of LTV. Additionally, including the use of systemic steroids for acute GVHD in this risk-adapted approach is preferable.

HLA and Non-HLA Factors for Donor Selection in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide GvHD Prophylaxis

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches in stem cell transplantation can be well-tolerated with the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. Haploidentical (Haplo) and HLA-mismatched unrelated donors become acceptable donors. This review focuses on Haplo and unrelated donor selection in the context of PTCy-transplant for hematological malignancy, in comparison with conventional GvHD prophylaxis. Evaluating patient's donor-specific antibody (DSA) is critical in donor selection regardless of donor type or the use of PTCy. High DSA levels and positive C1q increase the risk of engraftment failure and unsuccessful desensitization. On the other hand, the degree of donor HLA matching is less critical under PTCy compared to conventional GvHD prophylaxis. Donor age was found to be important, as younger donors improve survival outcomes. HLA-B leader match appears to be preferable. The impacts of donor gender, donor cytomegalovirus serostatus, and ABO mismatch are unclear or non-significant. Additionally, available studies suggest that, in PTCy-transplant, preferred Haplo-donors are HLA class II mismatched (DRB1 mismatch and DPB1 non-permissive), siblings or offspring over parents, and if parent, father over mother, while preferred unrelated donors are HLA class I matched. Further study is warranted.

Cytomegalovirus Reactivations in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from HLA-Matched and Haploidentical Donors with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations cause significant morbidity in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is associated with an increased risk of CMV infections. Data are limited comparing HSCT with PTCy performed from matched sibling donors (MSDs), matched unrelated donors (MUDs), and haploidentical (Haplo) donors. In the present study, we aimed to characterize CMV reactivation and recurrence in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing HSCT from MSD, MUD, and Haplo donors using PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis in the pre-letermovir era. We also analyzed risk factors of CMV reactivation, including GVHD as a time-dependent variable, on the incidence and mortality associated with CMV infections. We analyzed CMV reactivation in patients undergoing HSCT from 160 MSDs, 124 MUDs, and 82 Haplo donors from a single institution. Uniform GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil was given irrespective of donor type. Overall, 46% of patients had at least 1 CMV reactivation. The 1-year cumulative incidence of CMV infection was 39% for MSD, 44% for MUD, and 62% for Haplo donors (P < .001), with 96% of reactivations occurring before day +100. Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with the first CMV reactivation, including Haplo donor, positive recipient CMV serology, older patient age, and grade II-IV acute GVHD. The 1-year cumulative incidence of second reactivation from HSCT was 13%. Recipient CMV seropositivity, older patient age, and grade II-IV acute GVHD, but not type of donor, were identified as adverse factors for second CMV reactivation in multivariate analysis. The 1-year cumulative incidence of a third reactivation post HSCT was 4.4%. Ten cases of CMV disease were recorded, with no attributable deaths. Nevertheless, the risk for nonrelapse mortality was greater for patients who experienced CMV reactivation in multivariate time-dependent Cox model analysis. CMV reactivation is frequent in HSCT with PTCy in patients not receiving letermovir prophylaxis. Identified risk factors include the use of a Haplo donor, recipient CMV seropositivity, and grade II-IV acute GVHD. The prevalence of recurrent CMV reactivations is a noteworthy issue, especially after acute GVHD, warranting trials of secondary prophylaxis strategies.

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide is associated with increased bacterial infections

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is increasingly used to reduce graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT); however, it might be associated with more infections. All patients who were ≥2 years old, receiving haploidentical or matched sibling donor (Sib) HCT for acute leukemias or myelodysplastic syndrome, and either calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)- or PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis [Haploidentical HCT with PTCy (HaploCy), 757; Sibling with PTCy (SibCy), 403; Sibling with CNI-based (SibCNI), 1605] were included. Most bacterial infections occurred within the first 100 days; 953 patients (34.5%) had at least 1 infection and 352 patients (13%) had ≥2 infections. Patients receiving PTCy had a greater incidence of bacterial infections by day 180 [HaploCy 46%; SibCy 48%; SibCNI 35%; p < 0.001]. Compared with the SibCNI without infection cohort, 1.99-fold, 3.33-fold, 2.78-fold, and 2.53-fold increased TRM was seen for the HaploCy cohort without infection and HaploCy, SibCy, and SibCNI cohorts with infection, respectively. Bacterial infections increased mortality [HaploCy (HR1.84, 99% CI: 1.45-2.33, p < 0.0001), SibCy cohort (HR,1.68, 99% CI: 1.30-2.19, p < 0.0001), and SibCNI cohort (HR,1.76, 99% CI: 1.43-2.16, p < 0.0001). PTCy was associated with increased bacterial infections regardless of donor, and bacterial infections were associated with increased mortality irrespective of GVHD prophylaxis. Patients receiving PTCy should be monitored carefully for bacterial infections following PTCy.

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Recent advances and modification

Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the most important therapeutic option for hematological disorders, although graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains the main cause of mortality. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) induces immune tolerance and is associated with a low incidence of GVHD and non-relapse mortality. Therefore, PTCY has emerged as a safe and effective GVHD prophylaxis in haploidentical transplantation and has been expanded to matched related or unrelated donor and mismatched unrelated donor HSCT. On the basis of current understanding of the mechanisms of PTCY and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in the prevention of GVHD, growing evidence suggests that the combination of ATG and PTCY could improve allo-HSCT clinical outcomes. Further research will focus on optimizing PTCY regimens by modifying the timing of administration or adding other immunosuppressive agents.

Novel developments in the prophylaxis and treatment of acute GVHD

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Traditional standard prophylaxis for aGVHD has included a calcineurin inhibitor plus an antimetabolite, whereas treatment has relied mainly on corticosteroids, followed by multiple nonstandard second-line options. In the past decade, this basic framework has been reshaped by approval of antithymocyte globulin products, the emergence of posttransplant cyclophosphamide, and recent pivotal trials studying abatacept and vedolizumab for GVHD prophylaxis, whereas ruxolitinib was approved for corticosteroid-refractory aGVHD treatment. Because of this progress, routine acute GVHD prophylaxis and treatment practices are starting to shift, and results of ongoing trials are eagerly awaited. Here, we review recent developments in aGVHD prevention and therapy, along with ongoing and future planned clinical trials in this space, outlining what future goals should be and the limitations of current clinical trial designs and end points.

Systematic overview of HLA-matched allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide

The successful application of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in HLA-haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) led to the expansion of its application to HLA-matched related and unrelated allo-HCT. Notably, single-agent PTCy was found to be feasible for GVHD prevention in HLA-matched bone marrow transplantation. Single-agent PTCy prophylaxis was later attempted to control GVHD in HLA-matched peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), but this approach was inadequate to alleviate GVHD as evidenced by the high incidence of severe GVHD and/or non-relapse mortality. Therefore, various combinations of immunosuppressants with PTCy have been explored to identify the optimal drug combination that would efficiently prevent GVHD in HLA-matched PBSCT. A recent murine study helped clarify the putative mechanism underlying the activity of PTCy, demonstrating that PTCy impairs the proliferation and function of alloreactive T cells from the donor, but does not eliminate alloreactive T cells altogether. In addition, imbalanced reconstitution of NK cell as well as T cells has been observed in HLA-haploidentical allo-HCT. Therefore, it remains unclear whether or not PTCy-containing GVHD prophylaxis should replace the classical GVHD prophylaxis regimen in the HLA-matched setting, and convincing evidence supporting the benefits of PTCy is needed.

Prevention and management of human cytomegalovirus in pediatric HSCT recipients: A review

Cytomegalovirus (CMV), like other herpesviruses, has the unique ability to establish latent infection with subsequent reactivation during periods of stress and immunosuppression. Herpesviruses cause potentially devastating disease, particularly in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. CMV is especially of concern in HSCT recipients given the high community seroprevalence, high risk of reactivation and high risk of transmission from HSCT donors to recipients causing primary infection after transplantation. The risk of CMV infection and severity of CMV disease varies depending on the underlying disease of the HSCT recipient, donor and recipient CMV status prior to HSCT, type of conditioning therapy in preparation for HSCT, allogeneic versus autologous HSCT, donor graft source, timing of infection in relation to HSCT, and other patient comorbidities. Different strategies exist for prevention (e.g., preemptive therapy vs. universal prophylaxis) as well as management of CMV disease (e.g., antiviral therapy, augmenting immune reconstitution, cytotoxic T-cell therapy). The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss diagnosis, prevention, and management of CMV infection and disease at different stages of HSCT, including key points illustrated through presentations of complex cases and difficult clinical scenarios. Traditional and novel strategies for CMV management will be discussed in the context of these unique clinical cases.