IMPROVING SAFETY AND OUTCOMES AFTER ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC CELL TRANSPLANTATION: A SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE

Treosulfan- Versus Busulfan-based Conditioning in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Single-center Retrospective Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study

Treosulfan has shown promise in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for its myeloablative properties and low toxicity. In this single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study we compared treosulfan- and busulfan-based conditioning in allogeneic HCT for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). This study included 138 adults who underwent allogeneic HCT for MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia at Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, from 2015 to 2022. Using propensity score matching, we compared transplant outcomes between 2 well-matched cohorts who received conditioning with either fludarabine-treosulfan (FT) (n = 46) or fludarabine-busulfan with total body irradiation (FBT200) (n = 92). A scoring system based on patient age, Karnofsky performance score, and hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index was used to assign patients based on fitness to low-dose (30 g/m2) or high-dose (42 g/m2) treosulfan: 32 (69.6%) received high-dose treosulfan. The racial composition of the 2 groups was similar, with 27.2% and 21.7% of FBT200 and FT recipients, respectively, identifying as non-Caucasian (P = .61). Primary outcomes were analyzed at a median follow-up of 747 days. Of all participants, 116 (84.0%) received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG). Patients who received FT had a superior 2-year overall survival (OS) compared to those who received FBT200: 66.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.1 to 81.2) versus 44.5% (95% CI: 34 to 54.4), hazard ratio (HR): 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.84 (P = .013). In multivariate analysis (MVA), only the use of fresh grafts (P = .02) and FT (P = .01) were associated with improved OS. FT was associated with superior 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) compared to FBT200: 63.1% (95% CI: 42.6 to 77.9) versus 39.1% (95% CI: 29.1 to 49.1), HR: 0.44 (95% CI: 0.24 to 0.81), P = .008. In MVA, the use of fresh grafts (P = .03) and FT (P = .009) were associated with improved RFS. Recipients of FT demonstrated superior 2-year graft-versus-host disease relapse-free survival (GRFS) compared to those who received FBT200: 57.4% (95% CI: 37.8 to 72.8) versus 35.1% (95% CI: 25.5 to 45). In MVA, only FT was associated with superior GRFS (P = .02). FT recipients exhibited markedly superior 1-year event-free survival compared to recipients of FBT200 in univariate analysis (40.3% (95% CI: 25.9 to 54.2) versus 9.2% (95% CI: 4.4 to 16.3), HR: 0.47 (95% CI: 0.30 to 0.72), P < .001) and MVA (P = .004). FT was associated with lower 1-year nonrelapse mortality compared to FBT200 in univariate analysis (9.9% (95% CI: 3.0 to 21.8) versus 29.7% (95% CI: 20.6 to 39.3), HR: 0.41 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.96), P = .04) and MVA (P = .04). Our study utilized propensity score matching to demonstrate superiority of treosulfan- over busulfan-based conditioning in stem cell transplantation of patients with MDS and is the first to evaluate the performance of treosulfan-based conditioning in combination with ATG and PTCY. As such, it contributes to the increasing body of evidence supporting the safety of treosulfan, even at the dose of 42 g/m2.

Pretransplant Blinatumomab Improves Outcomes in B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Who Undergo Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Blinatumomab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody, effectively controls refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and promotes measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity. This study investigated the impact of pretransplant blinatumomab on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes in B cell ALL patients.

METHODS

We analyzed the effect of pretransplant blinatumomab on transplant outcomes of 117 adults undergoing allogeneic HCT for B cell ALL at Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, between 2010 and 2021. Outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival (GRFS), cumulative incidences of relapse (CIR), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 36 months. Thirty-one participants (26.5%) received blinatumomab. Blinatumomab group had higher proportions of individuals with high disease risk index, primary induction failure and was more likely to receive dual T cell depletion with antithymocyte globulin and post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Two-year OS, GRFS, NRM, and CIR in the blinatumomab and nonblinatumomab groups were, respectively: 65.4% versus 45.6% (P = .05), 42.2% versus 17.3% (P = .01), 3.2% versus 43.0% (P = .007) and 34.4% versus 14.4% (P = .02). Blinatumomab was associated with a lower incidence of day-100 grade 2 to 4 and grade 3 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD): 27.5% versus 56.7% (P = .009), and 10.9% versus 34.7% (P = .04), respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association between pretransplant blinatumomab and improved OS and NRM.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant blinatumomab is associated with improved OS and lower risk of NRM in B cell ALL patients undergoing allogeneic HCT, likely reflecting lower burden of treatment-related toxicity in this population. Larger prospective trials are warranted to validate our findings.

Choosing Between Older Matched Sibling Donor and Younger Matched Unrelated Donor in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

The choice between an older matched sibling donor (MSD) and a younger matched unrelated donor (MUD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a subject of ongoing debate. In this single-center retrospective study of 377 patients who received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplants for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we compared outcomes of 85 patients who received grafts from MSDs age >60 years and 292 patients who received grafts from MUDs age <30 years. Compared to recipients of MSD transplants, recipients of MUD transplants were younger and more likely to receive dual T cell depletion (TCD), a higher CD34+ cell dose, and a fresh graft. Recipients of MSD transplants were maintained on immunosuppressive therapy longer than those who received MUD grafts. We found no differences in overall survival, relapse-free survival, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, engraftment, graft failure, and acute GVHD between recipients of MSD grafts and recipients of MUD grafts. We report a higher 30-day incidence, but not 1-year incidence, of bloodstream infections among recipients of MUD transplants compared to subjects who received their grafts from a MSD. The incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was higher in MSD graft recipients compared with MUD graft recipients in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. Although this difference could reflect the greater use of dual TCD, known to be associated with very low rates of chronic GVHD in MUD transplant recipients, the incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was no different between MSD and MUD transplant recipients following propensity score matching, suggesting that other variables could be responsible. Taken together, our data suggest that in patients with AML or MDS who receive PBSC transplants, such factors as convenience, ease of access, and costs should be considered when selecting an older MSD over a younger MUD.

Acute kidney injury within 100 days post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is associated with increased risk of post-transplant complications and poor transplant outcomes

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers cure for some patients with hematological diseases but is associated with significant risk of morbidity and mortality. We investigated the incidence of AKI and its impact on transplant outcomes among 408 patients transplanted at Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada. The overall incidence of AKI at 100 days was 64.2%. Compared to those with no AKI, patients who developed AKI had inferior 2-y overall survival (OS), 44.7% vs. 62.4% (P = 0.0004), higher 2-y transplant related mortality (TRM) 36.8% vs. 18.7% (P = 0.0003), lower 2-y graft-vs-host disease (GVHD)- and relapse-free survival (GRFS), 21.0% vs. 39.8% (P = 0.0002), and higher 100-day grade 3-4 acute GVHD (aGVHD), 12.4% vs. 6.3% (P = 0.01). There was no difference in 2-y incidence of relapse between the AKI and non-AKI groups, 24.2% vs. 24.3% (P = 0.84), 100-day grade 2-4 aGVHD, 27.7% vs. 25.7 (P = 0.41) or 2-y moderate-severe chronic GVHD, 24.0% vs. 21.6% (P = 0.79). Patients who develop AKI within 100 days of HCT have inferior OS and GRFS with higher rates of TRM and grade 3-4 aGVHD. These results highlight the importance of close monitoring of renal function, multidisciplinary collaboration, and implementation of protective strategies throughout HCT to optimize transplant and kidney outcomes.