weFrontline Therapy Options for Adults with Newly Diagnosed Severe Aplastic Anemia: Intensive immunosuppressive therapy Plus Eltrombopag or Matched Sibling Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation?

First-line treatment of severe aplastic anemia: immunosuppressive therapy plus eltrombopag versus haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, a multicenter prospective study

Matched-related donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the preferred first-line option for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients aged <40 years even in the era of eltrombopag (EPAG). However, there has not been any direct comparison between immunosuppressive therapy (IST) plus EPAG (IST + EPAG) and haploidentical HSCT (Haplo-HSCT) as first-line therapy. This study prospectively compared the efficacy, safety and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of Haplo-HSCT (n = 147) and IST + EPAG (n = 121) as first-line treatment for patients with SAA. The results showed that 86.3% of patients in the Haplo-HSCT group and 24.1% of patients in the IST + EPAG group achieved normal complete blood count (CBC) (P < 0.001) after 6 months of treatment. The time to achieve transfusion independence and absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.0 × 109/L were shorter in the Haplo-HSCT group than in the IST + EPAG group (P < 0.05). In the IST + EPAG and Haplo-HSCT, 3-year overall survival (OS) was 92.4 ± 2.4% and 82.8 ± 3.1% (P = 0.017), whereas 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) was 69.4 ± 4.2% and 81.6 ± 3.2% (P = 0.002), respectively. Similar results were observed in patients with <40 years of age. Among patients with ≥40 years of age, there was no difference in 3-year OS (88.6 ± 4.8% vs. 82.4 ± 8.1%, P = 0.517) between the IST + EPAG and Haplo-HSCT groups, whereas 3-year FFS was lower in the IST + EPAG (58.7 ± 7.5% vs. 82.4 ± 8.1%, P = 0.043). Subgroup analysis for populations aged <40 years indicated that SAA benefited more from IST + EPAG, and very SAA (vSAA) benefited more from Haplo-HSCT. Patients treated with haplo-HSCT scored significantly better in the HRQoL than treated with IST + EPAG (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that first-line Haplo-HSCT was associated with normal CBC at 6 months, better FFS and led to a better HRQoL (P < 0.001). In summary, the IST + EPAG achieved better OS for <40 years SAA patients, while the Haplo-HSCT accelerated hematopoietic recovery and HRQoL, achieved better FFS even for those <40 years vSAA and ≥40 years patients.

Prolonged use of eltrombopag in patients with severe aplastic anemia in the real world

Eltrombopag (EPAG) can improve the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) consisting of antithymocyte immunoglobulin (ATG) and cyclosporin in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients. This study explored whether patients with SAA could benefit from continuous usage of EPAG beyond 6 months.Seventy-four treatment-naive Chinese patients with SAA were administrated with rabbit ATG-based IST plus EPAG for 6 months. Patients not achieving complete remission (CR) at 6 months were treated with EPAG for another 6 months.At 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after IST, the cumulative response rates were 31%, 61%, 82% and 90%, and the cumulative CR rates were 0, 14%, 27% and 45%, respectively. The cumulative effect curve showed that 93% and 53% of all remission and CR occurred within 6 months, while 98% and 83% of all remission and CR occurred within 12 months. Thirty-seven percent of patients (11 of 30) with partial remission (PR) at 6 months continuously exposed to EPAG improved to CR within 3 (1-5) months of the extended median time. Six patients failing at 6 months continued to use EPAG. Three patients showed improved responses with an extended median time of 6 (1-6) months. The 2-year event-free survival (EFS) was better in those continuing with EPAG (89% vs. 49%, P = 0.006) for patients with PR or non-remission at 6 months.Continuous administration with EPAG could improve the hematologic response and EFS in patients without achieving CR at 6 months.This trial has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100045895).

Development and validation of early death risk score model for emergency status prediction in very severe aplastic anemia

This study developed and validated the Early Death Risk Score Model for early identification of emergency patients with very severe aplastic anemia (VSAA). All 377 patients with VSAA receiving first-line immunosuppressive therapy (IST) were categorized into training (n=252) and validation (n=125) cohorts. In the training cohort, age >24 years, absolute neutrophil count ≤0.015×10⁹/L, serum ferritin >900ng/mL and times of fever before IST >1 time were significantly associated with early death. Covariates were assigned scores and categorized as: low (score 0-4), medium (score 5-7) and high (score ≥8) risk. Early death rate was significantly different between risk groups and the validation cohort results were consistent with those of the training cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.835 (0.734,0.936) in the training cohort and 0.862 (0.730,0.994) in the validation cohort. The calibration plots showed high agreement, and decision curve analysis showed good benefit in clinical applications. The VSAA Early Death Risk Score Model can help with early identification of emergency VSAA and optimize treatment strategies. Emergency VSAA with high risk is associated with high early death rate, and alternative donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation could be a better treatment than IST even without HLA-matching.

Matched related transplantation versus immunosuppressive therapy plus eltrombopag for first-line treatment of severe aplastic anemia: a multicenter, prospective study

This study prospectively compared the efficacy and safety between matched related donor-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MRD-HSCT) (n = 108) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) plus eltrombopag (EPAG) (IST + EPAG) (n = 104) to determine whether MRD-HSCT was still superior as a front-line treatment for patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Compared with IST + EPAG group, patients in the MRD-HSCT achieved faster transfusion independence, absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.0 × 10⁹/L (P < 0.05), as well as high percentage of normal blood routine at 6-month (86.5% vs. 23.7%, P < 0.001). In the MRD-HSCT and IST + EPAG groups, 3-year overall survival (OS) was 84.2 ± 3.5% and 89.7 ± 3.1% (P = 0.164), whereas 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) was 81.4 ± 4.0% and 59.1 ± 4.9% (P = 0.002), respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated that the FFS of the MRD-HSCT was superior to that of the IST + EPAG among patients aged < 40 years old (81.0 ± 4.6% vs. 63.7 ± 6.5%, P = 0.033), and among patients with vSAA (86.1 ± 5.9% vs. 54.9 ± 7.9%, P = 0.003), while the 3-year OS of the IST + EPAG was higher than that of the MRD-HSCT among the patient aged ≥ 40 years old (100.0 ± 0.0% vs. 77.8 ± 9.8%, P = 0.036). Multivariate analysis showed that first-line MRD-HSCT treatment was associated favorably with normal blood results at 6-month and FFS (P < 0.05). These outcomes suggest that MRD-HSCT remains the preferred first-line option for SAA patients aged < 40 years old or with vSAA even in the era of EPAG.