A Multicenter, Retrospective Study Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Ruxolitinib Therapy In Heavily Pretreated Chronic GVHD Patients With Steroid Failure

Ruxolitinib in patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD): findings from a compassionate use program

The ruxolitinib compassionate use (CU) program offered ruxolitinib to patients ≥2 years of age with confirmed steroid-resistant acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD and cGvHD, respectively). Data from 1180 patients (n = 775, 370 and 35 with cGvHD, aGvHD, and non-specified GvHD, respectively) were analyzed. Most patients had severe cGvHD (56%) or stage III/IV aGvHD (70%) disease and had previously received corticosteroids ( > 80%); ruxolitinib was requested primarily as a second-/third-line option. Patients <12 and ≥12 years old most often received the recommended ruxolitinib doses (5 mg twice daily [BID] and 10 mg BID, respectively); however, 23% and 30% of ≥12 year olds with cGvHD and aGvHD, respectively, received the lower dose of 5 mg BID. Notably, corticosteroid usage decreased with ruxolitinib treatment; at the initial ruxolitinib request, 81% and 91% of patients with cGvHD and aGvHD, respectively, were receiving corticosteroids whereas at resupply, 62% and 64%, respectively, were receiving corticosteroids. Eighty two percent of evaluable patients with cGvHD had a complete or partial response to treatment and 56% of evaluable patients with aGvHD had a best response of grade 0/I. These findings demonstrate the rapid and positive effects of ruxolitinib in patients with GvHD in a real-world setting.

Cell Therapy Transplant Canada (CTTC) Consensus-Based Guideline 2024 for Management and Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Future Directions for Development

This is a consensus-based Canadian guideline whose primary purpose is to standardize and facilitate the management of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) across the country. Creating uniform healthcare guidance in Canada is a challenge for a number of reasons including the differences in healthcare authority structure, funding and access to healthcare resources between provinces and territories, as well as the geographic size. These differences can lead to variable and unequal access to effective therapies for GvHD. This document will provide comprehensive and practical guidance that can be applied across Canada by healthcare professionals caring for patients with cGvHD. Hopefully, this guideline, based on input from GvHD treaters across the country, will aid in standardizing cGvHD care and facilitate access to much-needed novel therapies. This consensus paper aims to discuss the optimal approach to the initial assessment of cGvHD, review the severity scoring and global grading system, discuss systemic and topical treatments, as well as supportive therapies, and propose a therapeutic algorithm for frontline and subsequent lines of cGvHD treatment in adults and pediatric patients. Finally, we will make suggestions about the future direction of cGvHD treatment development such as (1) a mode-of-action-based cGvHD drug selection, according to the pathogenesis of cGvHD, (2) a combination strategy with the introduction of newer targeted drugs, (3) a steroid-free regimen, particularly for front line therapy for cGvHD treatment, and (4) a pre-emptive approach which can prevent the progression of cGvHD in high-risk patients destined to develop severe and highly morbid forms of cGvHD.

Single centre retrospective analysis of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) therapy in patients heavily pre-treated for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) with steroid failure

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is recommended as a second- or later-line therapy for chronic GvHD (cGvHD). Benefits include reasonable response with avoidance of intense systemic immunosuppression, which can translate into lowering the risk of systemic toxicity and opportunistic infection.

METHODS

We evaluated 75 patients treated with ECP for cGvHD from 2007 to 2021 at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, and analyzed overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit (CB) at 3, 6 and 12 months plus other long-term treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 72 months, a gradual increase in ORR was noted over time: 21% (16 out of 75 patients), 57% (36/63) and 70% (32/46) at month 3, 6 and 12, respectively. Gradual increase in CB was also observed over time with CB rate of 23% (17/75), 62% (39/63), and 76% (35/46) at months 3, 6 and 12, respectively. A total of 27 failures (36%) were noted, due to: 1) ECP resistance requiring switch to other therapy (n = 14, 19%), 2) non-relapse mortality (n = 10, 13%), 3) relapse of primary disease (n = 1, 1%) or 4) ECP procedure-related complication (n = 1, 1%, line infection), with 20 deaths (27%) observed. Failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 68.3% and 85.9% at 12 months, respectively. After starting ECP, the proportions of patients who completely discontinued steroids were 17%, 32%, and 64% at months 3, 6 and 12, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ECP is an effective treatment option for heavily pre-treated cGvHD patients.

Ruxolitinib as the first post-steroid treatment for acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease

INTRODUCTION

Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) are potentially life-threatening complications occurring after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although steroids represent the first-line treatment for both conditions, in those patients who do not adequately benefit from steroid therapy, standardized treatment algorithms are lacking. In recent years, ruxolitinib has emerged as the most promising agent for the second-line therapy of steroid-refractory (SR)-GvHD.

AREAS COVERED

This review will summarize the biological properties and the mechanistic aspects that justify the therapeutic role of ruxolitinib in GvHD. In addition, current treatment options for SR-GvHD will be briefly discussed. Finally, results of the most relevant clinical trials on the use of ruxolitinib for SR-GvHD will be analyzed, with a particular focus on two phase-III randomized trials in which ruxolitinib demonstrated its superiority in comparison with the best available therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Ruxolitinib has considerably improved the outcome of patients with SR-acute/chronic-GvHD and should be regarded as the standard-of-care option when corticosteroids fail or cannot be tapered. Nevertheless, a number of questions still remain unanswered and significant room for improvement exists. Additional observations derived from a longer follow-up will certainly increase our expertise in the management of this powerful therapy.

The delicate balance of graft versus leukemia and graft versus host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The curative basis of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) relies in part upon the graft versus leukemia (GvL) effect, whereby donor immune cells recognize and eliminate recipient malignant cells. However, alloreactivity of donor cells against recipient tissues may also be deleterious. Chronic graft versus host disease (cGvHD) is an immunologic phenomenon wherein alloreactive donor T cells aberrantly react against host tissues, leading to damaging inflammatory symptoms.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we discuss biological insights into GvL and cGvHD and strategies to balance the prevention of GvHD with maintenance of GvL in modern HSCT.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

Relapse remains the leading cause of mortality after HSCT with rates as high as 40% for some diseases. GvHD is a major cause of morbidity after HSCT, occurring in up to half of patients and responsible for 15-20% of deaths after HSCT. Intriguingly, the development of chronic GvHD may be linked to lower relapse rates after HSCT, suggesting that GvL and GvHD may be complementary sides of the immunologic foundation of HSCT. The ability to fine tune the balance of GvL and GvHD will lead to improvements in survival, relapse rates, and quality of life for patients undergoing HSCT.