Left internal thoracic artery-radial artery composite grafts as the technique of choice for myocardial revascularization in elderly patients: a prospective randomized evaluation

Multiple versus single arterial grafting in the elderly: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score studies

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of adding a second arterial conduit is still controversial, mainly in specific subgroups. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score (PS) studies comparing survival and early results in elderly patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with multiple (MAG) versus single arterial grafting (SAG).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were used to find relevant literature (1960-April 2020). Survival at a ≥ 1-year follow-up and early outcomes were evaluated. Outcomes were collected from matched samples or PS adjusted analysis: hazard ratio (HR) along with their variance, frequencies or odds ratios. Random effect models were used to compute combined statistical measures and 95% confidence intervals (CI) through generic inverse variance method (time-to-event) or Mantel-Haenszel method (binary events).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Eleven PS cohorts and 1 RCT comprising > 18,800 patients older than 70 (>6200 MAG and >12,500 SAG) were included in this meta-analysis. MAG was associated with lower long-term mortality (pooled HR: 0.81, 95%CI: 0.72-0.91, p<0.01, I2=64%) in the absence of higher risk of early mortality (pooled OR: 0.74, 95%CI: 0.44 to 1.25, p=0.27, I2=0%). In a meta-regression, MAG survival advantage was more pronounced in studies with a higher MAG usage rate (β = -0.0052, p=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that advanced age should not limit MAG's use considering its benefits in long-term survival. Of note, an individualized patient selection for this approach is warranted.

The Use of Radial Artery for CABG: An Update

We used the radial artery as a second target conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting since 1971. However, randomized clinical studies have demonstrated differences in clinical outcomes between the radial artery and other grafts because these trials are underpowered. As we proceed toward 50 years of experience with radial artery grafting, we examined the literature to define the best second-best target vessel for coronary artery bypass grafting. The literature was reviewed with emphasis, and a large number of randomized controlled trials, propensity-matched observational series, and meta-analyses were identified with a large patient population who received arterial conduit and saphenous vein grafts. The radial artery has been shown to be effective and safe when used as a second target conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting. Results and patency rates were superior to those for saphenous vein grafting. It has also been shown that the radial artery is a safe and effective graft as a third conduit into the territory of the artery right coronary artery. However, there is little evidence based on a few comparable series limiting the use of the gastroepiploic artery. In its fifth decade of use, we can finally deduced that the aorto-to-coronary radial bypass graft is the conduit of choice for coronary operations after the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery.

Angiographic Patency of Coronary Artery Bypass Conduits: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Background Several randomized trials have compared the patency of coronary artery bypass conduits. All of the published studies, however, have performed pairwise comparisons and a comprehensive evaluation of the patency rates of all conduits has yet to be published. We set out to investigate the angiographic patency rates of all conduits used in coronary bypass surgery by performing a network meta-analysis of the current available randomized evidence. Methods and Results A systematic literature search was conducted for randomized controlled trials comparing the angiographic patency rate of the conventionally harvested saphenous vein, the no-touch saphenous vein, the radial artery (RA), the right internal thoracic artery, or the gastroepiploic artery. The primary outcome was graft occlusion. A total of 4160 studies were retrieved of which 14 were included with 3651 grafts analyzed. The weighted mean angiographic follow-up was 5.1 years. Compared with the conventionally harvested saphenous vein, both the RA (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.82) and the no-touch saphenous vein (IRR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.78) were associated with lower graft occlusion. The RA ranked as the best conduit (rank score for RA 0.87 versus 0.85 for no-touch saphenous vein, 0.23 for right internal thoracic artery, 0.29 for gastroepiploic artery, and 0.25 for the conventionally harvested saphenous vein). Conclusions Compared with the conventionally harvested saphenous vein, only the RA and no-touch saphenous vein grafts are associated with significantly lower graft occlusion rates. The RA ranks as the best conduit. Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; Unique identifier: CRD42020164492.

Internal mammary harvesting: Techniques and evidence from the literature

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is one of the most commonly performed cardiac surgeries in the world. CABG using the internal mammary artery (IMA) remains the gold standard intervention for myocardial intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease. IMA harvesting can be performed with various techniques and approaches: pedicled vs skeletonized harvesting technique as well as approaches such as conventional sternotomy, robotic and endoscopic approaches. While each technique and approach have their respective advantages and disadvantages, evidence remains varied between cohorts. Traditionally, IMA has been used as an in situ conduit; however, IMA free grafts also provide satisfactory outcomes in certain situations. This literature review aims to explore the efficacy of different techniques and approaches of IMA harvesting and grafting. With evidence compiled, this will provide an overview of the complexity of CABG and locate gaps in current literature to direct future research.

Arterial Grafts for Coronary Bypass

Observational and randomized evidence shows that arterial grafts have better patency rates than saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) in coronary artery bypass grafting. Observational studies suggest that the use of multiple arterial grafts is associated with longer postoperative survival, but this must be interpreted in the context of treatment allocation bias and hidden confounders intrinsic to the study designs. Recently, a pooled analysis of 6 randomized trials comparing the radial artery with the SVG as the second conduit and the largest randomized trial comparing the use of single and bilateral internal thoracic arteries have provided apparently divergent results about a clinical benefit with the use of >1 arterial conduit. However, both analyses have methodological limitations that may have influenced their results. At present, it is unclear whether the well-documented increased patency rate of arterial grafts translates into clinical benefits in the majority of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. A large randomized trial testing the arterial grafts hypothesis (ROMA [Randomized Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Single Versus Multiple Arterial Grafts]) is underway and will report the results in a few years.

Multiarterial coronary artery bypass grafting: is the radial artery fulfilling the unkept promise of the right internal thoracic artery?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The debate on the second best conduit for CABG is still intense. In this review, we discuss the role of the radial artery and the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) compared with saphenous vein grafts (SVG).

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent RADIAL STUDY has been the first evidence based on randomized trials of a clinical benefit using a second arterial graft in CABG.On the other hand, the definitive 10-year results of the ART trial failed to show a clinical advantage associated with the use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA). A thorough and contextualized analysis of this and other studies, however, may offer a different perspective.

SUMMARY

Arterial conduits in CABG have shown better patency rates than SVG. Whether this leads to better clinical outcomes is still debated. In this setting, the radial artery and the RITA seem to offer a similar advantage, although with different indications and contraindications.

Radial artery versus saphenous vein as the second conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Individual studies may be limited by sample size to detect differences in late survival between radial artery (RA) or saphenous vein graft (SVG) as a second conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery. Here we undertook a meta-analysis of the best evidence available on the comparison of early and late clinical outcomes of the RA and the SVG.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies comparing use of the RA versus SVG for isolated coronary artery bypass surgery. Time-to-event outcomes for long-term mortality, repeat revascularization, and myocardial infarction (MI) were extracted as incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95%confidence intervals (95% CI). Odds ratios (OR) were extracted for perioperative mortality, stroke, and MI. A random effects meta-analysis was performed. Sensitivity analyses included leave-one-out-analyses and meta-regression.

RESULTS

Among 1201 articles, 14 studies (20,931 patients) were included (mean follow-up: 6.6 years). Operative mortality was 1.25% in the RA versus 1.33% in the SVG group (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.68-1.28). No difference in perioperative MI (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.59-1.56) or stroke (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.43-1.13) was found between RA and SVG. Long-term mortality (mean follow-up 6.6 years) was 24.5% in RA versus 34.2% in SVG group (IRR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.87, P < .001). No difference in follow-up MI or repeat revascularization was found (IRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.42-1.36 and IRR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.42-1.09 respectively). At meta-regression, RA survival advantage was independent of age, sex, diabetes, and ventricular function.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the SVG, using the RA as the second conduit is associated with a 26% relative risk reduction in mortality at 6.6-year follow-up.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Arterial Conduits in the Elderly

Although improved long-term outcomes obtained with the use of arterial grafts for coronary revascularization in comparison with the traditional association of a single arterial and saphenous vein grafts have been demonstrated in the overall population, the efficacy of this newer technique in the elderly is difficult to prove because their shorter life expectancy due to advanced heart disease, associated with severe comorbidities. Moreover, more widespread use of this technique is limited by the concerns on the potential morbidity, particularly the longer time required to perform the operation and the possibility of deep sternal wound infection in case of bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting due to the decreased blood supply to the sternum and surrounding tissues.The review of the recent literature indicates that the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries in very elderly patients should not be considered routinely. It seems reasonable to avoid it in octogenarians in the presence of well-known predictors of sternal complications such as diabetes, morbid obesity, and severe chronic lung disease.There is also still controversy about the superiority of the radial artery over the saphenous vein graft as a second or third conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization, although the majority of recent studies seem to support more liberal use of the radial artery as second arterial conduit in the elderly. Although a clinical benefit of arterial graft revascularization cannot be formally excluded for elderly patients, the increased complexity of this technique suggests that careful clinical judgment is necessary to select grafts for individual patients.

Five-Year Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Versus Open Radial Artery Harvesting: A Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the popularity of less invasive approaches for conduits procurement in coronary artery bypass graft surgery, concerns have been raised about the potential detrimental effects of the endoscopic technique when compared with the conventional "open" technique.

METHODS

Among 470 patients undergoing coronary surgery with the use of a radial artery conduit, a propensity score analysis was performed among those patients assigned either to an open technique (n = 82) or to an endoscopic approach (n = 82). Endoscopic harvesting was performed with a nonsealed system. The primary endpoint was cardiac-related mortality, and secondary endpoint was survival free from major cardiac and cerebrovascular adverse events. Moreover, hand and forearm sensory discomfort and forearm wound healing were also assessed.

RESULTS

No conversion to the open technique occurred in patients undergoing endoscopic harvesting. No patients in either group showed hand ischemia; wound infection occurred only in the open group (open 7.3% versus endoscopic 0%, p = 0.007). Wound healing (Hollander scale) was considerably better in the endoscopic group (open 3.3, endoscopic 4.7; p < 0.001) as well as paresthesia at the latest follow-up (open 19.5% versus endoscopic 3.6%, p < 0.001). Pain (visual analog scale score) was significantly reduced with the endoscopic technique (open 3.2, endoscopic 1.2; p = 0.003). At 5 years of follow-up, freedom from cardiac-related mortality (open 96.3% ± 2.1% versus endoscopic 98.1% ± 1.8%; p = 0.448) as well as survival free from major cardiac and cerebrovascular adverse events (open 93.9% ± 2.6% versus endoscopic 93% ± 3.4%; p = 0.996) were similar among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic radial artery harvesting allows for incremental benefits in the short term in terms of improved cosmesis and reduced wound and neurologic complications, without yielding detrimental effects in terms of graft-related events at 5 years of follow-up.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines on Arterial Conduits for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) should be used to bypass the left anterior descending (LAD) artery when bypass of the LAD is indicated (class of recommendation [COR] I, level of evidence [LOE] B). As an adjunct to left internal thoracic artery (LITA), a second arterial graft (right ITA or radial artery [RA]) should be considered in appropriate patients (COR IIa, LOE B). Use of bilateral ITAs (BITAs) should be considered in patients who do not have an excessive risk of sternal complications (COR IIa, LOE B). To reduce the risk of sternal infection with BITA, skeletonized grafts should be considered (COR IIa, LOE B), smoking cessation is recommended (COR I, LOE C), glycemic control should be considered (COR IIa, LOE B), and enhanced sternal stabilization may be considered (COR IIb, LOE C). As an adjunct to LITA to LAD (or in patients with inadequate LITA grafts), use of a RA graft is reasonable when grafting coronary targets with severe stenoses (COR IIa, LOE: B). When RA grafts are used, it is reasonable to use pharmacologic agents to reduce acute intraoperative and perioperative spasm (COR IIa, LOE C). The right gastroepiploic artery may be considered in patients with poor conduit options or as an adjunct to more complete arterial revascularization (COR IIb, LOE B). Use of arterial grafts (specific targets, number, and type) should be a part of the discussion of the heart team in determining the optimal approach for each patient (COR I, LOE C).

The radial artery: a forgotten conduit

We reviewed the published literature on the clinical and angiographic outcome of radial artery (RA) grafts and on the comparison between the RA and the other conduits used in coronary operations. The RA is a better graft than the saphenous vein and comparable to the right internal thoracic artery (RITA); moreover, the RA seems a better choice than the RITA in patients at risk of sternal or pulmonary complications. We conclude that the RA should be preferred to the saphenous vein and considered at least equivalent to the RITA as the second conduit during every elective coronary artery bypass procedure.

A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing CABG surgery performed with total arterial grafts or without

OBJECTIVE

To date only a few randomized controlled studies have compared grafting strategies in patients with multi-vessel coronary disease. This study represents a pilot RCT designed to test the feasibility of a trial comparing conventional CABG performed with a LIMA-LAD plus saphenous vein grafts (LIMA+SVG) and CABG performed with total arterial grafting (TAG).

METHODS

Consenting patients undergoing non-redo isolated CABG surgery at a single institution were randomized to TAG or LIMA+SVG groups. Exclusion criteria included prior CABG, emergent procedure, concomitant procedure, varicose veins and renal dysfunction. The primary endpoints were: enrolment >20% and completion of CT coronary angiography at 6 months >80%. Statistical investigation was performed on an intention to treat analysis.

RESULTS

Of 421 eligible patients, 60 were enrolled and 2 withdrew (n = 30 in TAG, n = 28 LIMA+SVG) for 14% enrolment rate. Patient characteristics were similar in each group. No patients died in hospital and adverse events such as MI, stroke and deep sternal wound infection were not significantly different between groups. Clinical follow-up was complete in 100% of patients, with 44/58 (76%) undergoing CT coronary angio at 6 months. Graft occlusion occurred in 2 patients in each group for patency rates of 89% (TAG) and 91% (LIMA+SVG).

CONCLUSIONS

We provide evidence that an RCT comparing grafting strategy is possible but also show that achieving recruitment or follow-up CT may be difficult. Given the excellent patency results and little difference between groups, our findings suggest that the sample size required may make it infeasible to compare graft patency at 6 months as a study end-point.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Randomized Controlled Trial number: ISRCTN80270323 . Few RCT's exist comparing conventional CABG performed with a LIMA-LAD plus saphenous vein grafts (LIMA+SVG) compared to CABG performed with total arterial grafting (TAG). This study is a pilot RCT designed to test the feasibility of such a trial and identify pitfalls.

Optimal bypass graft design for left anterior descending and diagonal territory in multivessel coronary disease

OBJECTIVES

Coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel disease requires an appropriate graft design to avoid the competition of flow between the graft and the native vessel in order to achieve a sufficient coronary flow and durable graft patency.

METHODS

Three-dimensional computational models of the left coronary artery were created based on the angiographic data. Three stenosis patterns of 75 and 90% combinations were created in the left anterior descending artery (LAD), the diagonal branch (Dx) and the circumflex artery (LCx). The left internal thoracic artery (LITA) was anastomosed to the LAD, and separate saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) were anastomosed to the Dx and the LCx in the 'Independent' model. The 'Sequential' model included sequential SVG anastomoses to the Dx and the LCx with a left internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery bypass, and Y-composite arterial grafts to LAD and Dx were created in the 'Composite' model.

RESULTS

The 'Independent' model had high reverse flow from the Dx to the LAD in systole, resulting in decreased LITA flow when Dx stenosis was mild. The 'Sequential' model also had reverse flow in diastole, resulting in additional LAD flow. The 'Composite' model distributed increased flow to the Dx when Dx stenosis was severe, resulting in decreased flow to the LAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic flow evaluation is beneficial for determining the optimal bypass graft arrangement in patients with multivessel disease. Individual SVG anastomoses to the Dx and the LCx are not desirable when Dx stenosis is not severe and a Y-composite arterial graft to the LAD and the Dx is not desirable when Dx stenosis is severe.

Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvest and mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: protocol for the 2 × 2 factorial designed randomised NEO trial

Background

Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery has, since the 1990s, gone through a revival. Observational studies have indicated better long-term patency when using radial arteries. Therefore, radial artery might be preferred especially in younger patients where long time patency is important. During the last 10 years different endoscopic techniques to harvest the radial artery have evolved. Endoscopic radial artery harvest only requires a small incision near the wrist in contrast to open harvest, which requires an incision from the elbow to the wrist. However, it is unknown whether the endoscopic technique results in fewer complications or a graft patency comparable to open harvest. When the radial artery has been harvested, there are two ways to use the radial artery as a graft. One way is sewing it onto the aorta and another is sewing it onto the mammary artery. It is unknown which technique is the superior revascularisation technique.

Methods/Design

The NEO Trial is a randomised clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. We plan to randomise 300 participants into four intervention groups: (1) mammario-radial endoscopic group; (2) aorto-radial endoscopic group; (3) mammario-radial open surgery group; and (4) aorto-radial open surgery group.

The hand function will be assessed by a questionnaire, a clinical examination, the change in cutaneous sensibility, and the measurement of both sensory and motor nerve conduction velocity at 3 months postoperatively. All the postoperative complications will be registered, and we will evaluate muscular function, scar appearance, vascular supply to the hand, and the graft patency including the patency of the central radial artery anastomosis. A patency evaluation by multi-slice computer tomography will be done at one year postoperatively.

We expect the nerve conduction studies and the standardised neurological examinations to be able to discriminate differences in hand function comparing endoscopic to open harvest of the radial artery. The trial also aims to show if there is any patency difference between mammario-radial compared to aorto-radial revascularisation techniques but this objective is exploratory.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01848886.

Danish Ethics committee number: H-3-2012-116.

Danish Data Protection Agency: 2007-58-0015/jr.n:30–0838.

Composite arterial grafting

The success of coronary artery bypass grafting, the gold standard for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease, is limited by poor long-term vein-graft patency. By contrast, the left internal mammary artery has been demonstrated to have a superior graft patency rate and has provided excellent clinical results. This suggests that the use of arterial conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting may be beneficial for long-term results. Recently, there has been an upsurge in the use of arterial grafts for myocardial revascularization based on the clinical advantage of the use of the left internal mammary artery as a bypass conduit. Many retrospective studies have supported the safety and the effectiveness of arterial grafting, and it has become apparent that the free arterial graft can be used as a branched or a lengthened conduit to the in situ arterial graft by adopting one or more of the several composite grafting techniques. Arterial composite grafts with or without sequential grafting techniques appear an attractive strategy as increased number of distal coronary anastomoses can be performed, with a limited number of grafts, avoiding proximal aortic anastomoses. However, concerns regarding the total dependence of the coronary bypass flow on the flow of one in situ arterial graft and technical error, resulting in compromised flow in one or both limbs of the composite graft have prevented composite arterial grafting from being universally adopted. It is expected that in the near future a prospective, multi-institutional, randomized controlled trial, to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of exclusive arterial grafting using composite and conventional aortocoronary revascularization strategies, will be undertaken to validate the safety and efficacy of composite arterial grafting.

Composite versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting strategy for the anterolateral territory: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

In severe coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery is indicated to re-establish an adequate blood supply to the ischemic myocardium. Effectiveness of CABG surgery for symptom relief and mortality decrease should therefore depend on bypass graft patency. As bypass using a left internal mammary artery (LIMA)-to-left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) anastomosis allows the best results in terms of graft patency, we designed a new surgical technique using a saphenous vein graft as a venous bridge to distribute the LIMA flow to the cardiac anterolateral territory. This novel strategy could extend the patency benefits associated to the LIMA. Other potential benefits of this technique include easier surgical technique, possibility to use saphenous vein grafts as vein patch angioplasty, shorter saphenous vein grafts requirement and reduced or eliminated manipulations of the ascendant aorta (and associated stroke risk).

Methods/Design

Between July 2012 and 2016, 200 patients undergoing a primary isolated CABG surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass with a LAD bypass graft and at least another target on the anterolateral territory will be randomized (1:1) according to 1) the new composite strategy and 2) the conventional strategy with a LIMA-to-LAD anastomosis and revascularization of the other anterolateral target(s) with a separated aorto-coronary saphenous vein graft. The primary objective of the trial is to assess whether the composite strategy allows non-inferior anterolateral graft patency index (proportion of non-occluded CABGs out of the total number of CABGs) compared to the conventional technique. The primary outcome is the anterolateral graft patency index, evaluated at one year by 256-slice computed tomography angiography. Ten years of clinical follow-up is planned to assess clinical outcomes including death, myocardial infarction and need for revascularization.

Discussion

This non-inferiority trial has the potential to advance the adult cardiac surgery field, given the potential benefits associated with the composite grafting strategy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01585285.

Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study)

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to present radial and saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusion results more than 5 years following coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND

In the RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study) study, complete graft occlusion was less frequent in radial artery compared with SVG 1 year post-operatively while functional occlusion (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0, 1, 2) was similar.

METHODS

A total of 510 patients <80 years of age undergoing primary isolated nonemergent coronary artery bypass grafting with 3-vessel disease were initially enrolled in 9 Canadian centers. Target vessels for the radial artery and study SVG were the right and circumflex coronary arteries, which had >70% proximal stenosis. Within-patient randomization was performed; the radial artery was randomized to either the right or circumflex territory and the study SVG was used for the other territory. The primary endpoint was functional graft occlusion by invasive angiography at least 5 years following surgery. Complete graft occlusion by invasive angiography or computed tomography angiography was a secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of 269 patients underwent late angiography (234 invasive angiography, 35 computed tomography angiography) at a mean of 7.7 ± 1.5 years after surgery. The frequency of functional graft occlusion was lower in radial arteries compared with SVGs (28 of 234 [12.0%] vs. 46 of 234 [19.7%]; p = 0.03 by McNemar's test). The frequency of complete graft occlusion was also significantly lower in radial compared with SVGs (24 of 269 [8.9%] vs. 50 of 269 [18.6%]; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Radial arteries are associated with reduced rates of functional and complete graft occlusion compared with SVGs more than 5 years following surgery. (Multicentre Radial Artery Patency Study: 5 Year Results; NCT00187356).

Angiographic evaluation of flow distribution in sequential and composite arterial grafts for three vessel disease

OBJECTIVES

We sought to delineate the effects of the severity of target lesions and their combinations on the occurrence of competitive flow, especially in the composite Y-graft and to establish an optimal strategy for graft arrangement and patient selection.

METHODS

We reviewed early and late angiograms of 2514 bypass grafts in 601 patients, who underwent off-pump coronary revascularization to three-vessel vascular regions using the internal thoracic artery (ITA) and radial artery (RA) without aortic manipulation. As a standard technique, the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was bypassed with the in situ ITA, and the left circumflex and right coronary arteries (RCA) were bypassed with the composite RA. Bypass flow was graded as antegrade, competitive or no flow.

RESULTS

The early patency rate was 98.1% (2466/2514), while competitive flow was detected in 6.4% (162/2514). For the LAD, the individual and sequential in situ ITA provided lower incidence of competitive flow than the composite graft (0.3% (1/298) versus 7.6% (23/303), P < 0.0001). Regarding the RA to non-LAD bypass, 86.3% (113/131) of competitive flow occurred at the distal end of the I- or Y-graft, and the cumulative patency rate was significantly lower than that of sequential proximal anastomosis (80.1 versus 56.6% at 5 years, P < 0.0001). The number of sequential anastomoses did not affect the cumulative patency rate (P = 0.09). For the composite Y-graft to three-vessel regions, the rate of antegrade flow in patients with 76-100% stenosis in both the LAD and the RCA was 95.7% (178/186), which was significantly higher than that of 78.1% (100/128) in patients with 76-100% stenosis in the LAD and 51-75% stenosis in RCA (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential and composite grafting was considered reliable, exclusively in appropriately selected situations. To secure entire patency of the Y-graft to three-vessel regions, balanced bypass flow toward LAD and RCA would be crucial.

Systematic comparison of the effectiveness of radial artery and saphenous vein or right internal thoracic artery coronary bypass grafts in non-left anterior descending coronary arteries

Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery is increasingly being carried out on patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, but the best grafting candidate for non-left anterior descending coronary arteries is unclear. This research sought to systematically compare the efficacies and safeties of coronary bypass with radial artery and other available grafts. A systematic literature retrieval was performed for all clinical trials comparing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery with radial artery and other grafts in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Seven eligible clinical studies, comparing radial artery and great saphenous vein grafts, were found between 1966 and 2010: one prospective non-randomized and six prospective randomized trials. The pooling analysis obtained a relative risk of 0.507 (P<0.05) of graft occlusion in radial arteries compared with great saphenous veins. There was a significantly lower infection rate in arms (i.e., harvest sites for radial arteries) relative to legs (harvest sites for veins), with a pooled relative risk of 0.140 (P<0.05). From the reports on mortality after follow-up ranging from one year to six years, there was no significant difference in mortality between the two graft types (P=0.927). In addition, four cohort controlled trials for radial and right internal thoracic artery grafts were included. The radial graft was associated with less cardiac related events relative to the right internal thoracic artery graft (P=0.014), but with comparable mortality and comparable rates of repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Subjects with radial arteries seemed to have a lower occlusion rate and a lower graft harvest site infection rate than those with great saphenous veins. Moreover there were fewer cardiac related events with radial arteries relative to the right internal thoracic artery grafts. More studies are needed to confirm these findings concerning the favorable outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting with radial arteries on long-term patency and mortality.

Outcome of composite arterial Y-grafts in off-pump coronary artery bypass

The efficacy of using composite arterial Y-grafts in off-pump coronary artery bypass has not been established. We assessed graft patency, long-term clinical outcomes, and the indications for composite arterial Y-grafting by reviewing 53 patients who underwent primary isolated elective off-pump coronary artery bypass with composite arterial Y-grafts between January 2002 and December 2008. Coronary angiography or 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography was used to assess graft patency. Follow-up raged from 18 to 97 months. The rates of mortality, graft failure, and recurrence of ischemic heart disease were 0%, 22.6%, and 13.2%, respectively. Only 4 (7.5%) patients required additional procedures (percutaneous coronary interventions or repeat surgery) because of graft failure. A significantly higher rate of graft failure was evident when one end of the composite graft was anastomosed to a 75% stenosed branch of a native coronary artery and the other end to a branch with >90% stenosis. The long-term patency of composite arterial Y-grafts in off-pump coronary artery bypass requires proper judgment of the indications.

What has happened to multiple arterial grafting in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery?

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a well-established therapy for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, with excellent short- and medium-term results. This is best illustrated by studies comparing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) with CABG surgery, where CABG continues to offer better event-free survival. However, there has been increasing concern about the long-term patency of vein grafts utilized for CABG when compared with arterial grafts. Some have suggested that revascularization with arterial grafts rather than vein grafts may result in improved outcomes following CABG. This is particularly important when one considers that graft occlusion can result in recurrence of disabling angina, rehospitalization, reintervention and death. To date, however, multiple arterial grafts have yet to become the standard approach for patients undergoing CABG. This is best exemplified by reports from large registries suggesting that the use of multiple arterial grafting is limited to approximately 10% of all patients undergoing CABG. In this article, we will provide some of the evidence outlining the risk and benefits of multiple arterial grafting, but more importantly, begin to explore why the utilization of multiple arterial grafting does not appear to be increasing significantly.

Aorta no-touch off-pump coronary artery revascularization in octogenarians: 5 years' experience

BACKGROUND

Approximately 18% of octogenarians have ischemic heart disease. Increasingly, they are being referred for coronary artery revascularization by surgical and/or percutaneous procedures. These strategies have been questioned, however, because of reports of poor outcomes in the elderly. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of age on morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) with the pi-circuit procedure during 5 years of follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 2001 to November 2005, 1359 patients underwent isolated coronary revascularization with the pi-circuit technique, which consists of (1) beating heart surgery, (2) OPCAB, (3) no touching of the aorta, (4) use of composite grafts, and (5) arterial revascularization. Sixty-two patients were > or = 80 years of age (group A), and 1297 were <80 years old (group B). Both groups were compared with respect to preoperative risk factors, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Follow-up lasted from 4 to 60 months. Data were analyzed with the chi(2) test, the Fisher exact test, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox model of regression analysis.

RESULTS

Females predominated among the octogenarians (P < .0005). Octogenarians more frequently underwent emergent operations (P < .031) and had worse ejection fractions (P < .026). Obesity was also less prevalent among these patients (P < .007). There were no differences between the groups in the preoperative and postoperative use of an intraaortic balloon pump. Octogenarians had lower cholesterol levels (P < .0005) and had fewer distal anastomoses (2.24 + or - 0.0.76 versus 2.77 + or - 0.92, P < .0005). The 2 groups were not significantly different with respect to 30-day mortality (3.2% versus 1.5%) and 7-day mortality (1.6% versus 0.2%). Differences were noted in the incidences of pulmonary complications (12.9% versus 5.6%, P < .027), atrial fibrillation (41.9% versus 19%, P < .0005), and cognitive disturbances (6.5% versus 0.3%, P < .0005). During follow-up, survival seemed to favor the younger group (P < .001). Nevertheless, further analysis of the data with the Cox regression model to exclude confounding risk factors, revealed the survival rates of the 2 groups to be similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the pi-circuit technique is very effective for octogenarians. Although these older patients have a higher incidence of early postoperative morbidity, overall survival is not affected.

Y grafting for coronary artery bypass: is it as good as single grafting?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of multiple arterial grafting has gained popularity in recent years due to its clinical advantages when compared with conventional CABG surgery. The purpose of the present review is to focus in particular on the safety and efficacy of composite Y grafting in coronary surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies demonstrated mid-term and long-term benefits of total arterial myocardial revascularization when compared with conventional CABG, that is utilizing the left internal mammary artery and multiple veins. Nevertheless, there have been concerns whether it is safe to have a single inflow rather than multiple aorto-coronary grafts. There is evidence in literature that composite arterial grafting is nowadays a well established technique, and several configurations can be performed according to the specific patients' needs. Moreover, the use of Y grafting completely avoids aortic manipulation, especially when used in association with the off-pump technique.

SUMMARY

Composite Y grafting with the exclusive use of arterial conduits is a well tolerated and effective technique. The choice of the second arterial conduit should be tailored according to the specific patients' characteristics. The association of composite arterial grafting and off-pump technique allows a no-touch technique of the ascending aorta, thereby also minimizing the risk of neurological events.

Endoscopic radial artery harvesting for U-clip high-flow EC-IC bypass: technical report

INTRODUCTION

Bypass and aneurysm trapping constitute a well-known surgical solution for aneurysms that are not suitable for clipping or coiling. New techniques are available that make EC-IC bypass procedures easier, safer and, possibly, less invasive. The nitinol self-closing U-Clip device (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis) has been designed to facilitate the interrupted suture technique by eliminating the need for suture management, knot tying, and surgical assistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present two consecutive U-clip bypass procedures in which the radial artery graft was harvested endoscopically.

RESULTS

This novel bypass technique employs endoscopy to minimise arm injury due to radial artery harvesting and self-closing U-clips to simplify the intracranial micro-anastomosis and reduce the temporary occlusion time. Angiography confirmed bypass patency in all patients.

DISCUSSION

Combined with the innovative use of U-clips, these two examples illustrate how new technologies can simplify EC-IC bypass surgery while yielding a better cosmetic and functional outcome.

One-year results of total arterial revascularization vs. conventional coronary surgery: CARRPO trial

AIMS

To investigate clinical and angiographic outcomes after coronary surgery using total arterial revascularization (TAR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We randomized 331 patients with multivessel or isolated left main disease to TAR [internal thoracic (ITA) and radial arteries] vs. conventional revascularization (CR) using left ITA and vein grafts. The primary angiographic outcome was the patency index: number of patent grafts (<50% stenosed) divided by number of constructed grafts. One-year angiography was complete for 83% of patients. Mean patency index (+/-SD) was 87 +/- 22% in the TAR group and 88 +/- 18% in the conventional group (P = 0.52). In 72% of TAR patients and 67% of the conventional group, all grafts were patent (P = 0.45). Multiple imputation of missing angiographic data did not influence on results. Within 1 year, 37 (23%) TAR patients and 43 (25%) conventional group patients suffered cardiac events (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70-1.69, P = 0.70). One patient (0.6%) in the TAR group and two (1.2%) in the conventional group died (P = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

Within 1 year post-operatively, TAR seems at least as safe and effective as CR. Prolonged follow-up will reveal whether this is sustained or superior results of TAR can justify a more general use.

Late results of conventional versus all-arterial revascularization based on internal thoracic and radial artery grafting

BACKGROUND

Use of one or more arterial grafts to revascularize two-vessel and three-vessel coronary artery disease has been shown to improve coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) survival. Yet, the presumed long-term survival benefits of all-arterial CABG have not been quantified.

METHODS

We compared propensity-adjusted 12-year survival in two contemporaneous multivessel primary CABG cohorts with all patients receiving 2 or more grafts: (1) all-arterial cohort (n = 612; 297 three-vessel disease [49%]); and (2) single internal thoracic artery (ITA) plus saphenous vein (SV) cohort (n = 4,131; 3,187 three-vessel disease [77%]).

RESULTS

Early (30-day) deaths were similar for the all-arterial and ITA/SV cohorts (8 [1.30%] versus 69 [1.67%]) whereas late mortality was substantially greater for the ITA/SV cohort (85 [13.9%] versus 1,216 [29.4%]; p < 0.0001). The risk-adjusted 12-year survival was significantly better for all-arterial (with a risk ratio [RR] = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48 to 0.75; p < 0.001), but this benefit was true only for three-vessel disease (RR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.78; p < 0.001) and not for two-vessel disease (RR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.43; p = 0.89). The all-arterial survival benefit was also true for varying risk subcohorts: no diabetes mellitus (RR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.69), diabetes mellitus (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.07), ejection fraction 40% or greater (RR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.78), and ejection fraction less than 40% (RR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.98). Lastly, the multivariate analysis indicated a strong long-term effect of completeness of revascularization, particularly for all-arterial patients, so that compared with patients with two grafts, survival was significantly better when three grafts (RR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.87) or four grafts (RR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.76) were completed.

CONCLUSIONS

All-arterial revascularization is associated with significantly better 12-year survival compared with the standard single ITA with saphenous vein CABG operation, in particular for triple-vessel disease patients. The completeness of revascularization of the underlying coronary disease is critical for maximizing the long-term benefits of arterial-only grafting.

Doppler derived quantitative flow estimate in coronary artery bypass graft: a computational multiscale model for the evaluation of the current clinical procedure

In order to investigate the reliability of the so called mean velocity/vessel area formula adopted in clinical practice for the estimation of the flow rate using an intravascular Doppler guide wire instrumentation, a multiscale computational model was used to give detailed predictions on flow profiles within Y-shaped coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) models. At this purpose three CABG models were built from clinical patient's data and used to evaluate and compare, in each model, the computed flow rate and the flow rate estimated according to the assumption of parabolic velocity profile. A consistent difference between the exact and the estimated value of the flow rate was found in every branch of all the graft models. In this study we showed that this discrepancy in the flow rate estimation is coherent to the theory of Womersley regarding spatial velocity profiles in unsteady flow conditions. In particular this work put in evidence that the error in flow rate estimation can be reduced by using the estimation formula recently proposed by Ponzini et al. [Ponzini R, Vergara C, Redaelli A, Veneziani A. Reliable CFD-based estimation of flow rate in haemodynamics measures. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32(10):1545-55], accounting for the unsteady nature of blood, applicable in the clinical practice without resorting to further measurements.

The effect of total arterial grafting on medium-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

While it is believed that total arterial grafting (TAG) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) confers improved long-term outcomes when compared to conventional grafting with left internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts (LIMA+SVG), to date, this has not become the standard of care. In this study, we assessed the impact of TAG on medium-term outcomes after CABG.

METHODS

Peri-operative data was prospectively collected on consecutive first-time, isolated CABG patients between 1995 and 2005. Patients were divided into two groups based on grafting strategy: TAG (all arterial grafts no saphenous veins) or LIMA+SVG. Patients who had an emergent status or underwent fewer than two distal bypasses were excluded. Medium term univariate and risk-adjusted comparisons between TAG and LIMA+SVG cases were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 4696 CABG patients were included with 1019 patients undergoing TAG (22%). Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was 1.5% for TAG patients compared to 2.0% for LIMA+SVG (p = 0.31). The mean follow-up was 4.8 +/- 2.0 years for TAG patients compared to 6.1 +/- 3.0 years for LIMA+SVG patients (p < 0.0001). At follow-up total mortality (8% vs 19%; p < 0.0001), and the incidence of readmission to hospital for cardiac reasons (29% vs 38%; p < 0.0001) were significantly lower in TAG compared to LIMA+SVG patients. However, after adjusting for clinical covariates, TAG did not emerge as a significant independent predictor of long-term mortality (HR 0.92; CI 0.71-1.18), readmission to hospital (HR 1.02; CI 0.89-1.18) or the composite outcome of mortality and readmission (HR 1.00; CI 0.88-1.15). Risk adjusted survival was better than 88% in both TAG and LIMA-SVG patients at 5 years follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing TAG appear to experience lower rates of medium-term all-cause mortality and readmission to hospital for any cardiac cause when compared to patients undergoing LIMA+SVG. However, after adjusting for clinical variables, this difference no longer persists suggesting that at median follow-up there are no mortality or morbidity benefit based on the choice of conduit.

Redo off-pump coronary bypass grafting with arterial grafts for Kawasaki disease

Surgical revascularization for coronary artery lesions secondary to Kawasaki disease is relatively uncommon. The late stenosis of the saphenous vein graft is the problem to be solved. We report a case of redo off-pump coronary bypass grafting in a 35-year-old man, 20 years after bypass grafting using a saphenous vein graft. Off-pump total arterial revascularization was performed uneventfully. The procedure comprised grafting of bilateral internal thoracic arteries to left anterior descending branch and obtuse marginal branch, and radial artery to AV branch and posterior descending branch. Off-pump total arterial revascularization is a safe and less invasive procedure at the time of redo operation, even for patients with Kawasaki disease.

Nanoscale Radiofrequency Control Technology for Endoscopic Radial Artery Harvesting: A Case Report

A recent revival in the use of the radial artery for bypass surgery stimulated the development of minimally invasive harvesting techniques since the endoscopic approach has several advantages when compared to the open technique. A novel nanoscale radiofrequency-controlled device has been recently introduced in the surgical armamentarium as a vesselsealing system, albeit to date it has been mainly used in the urological setting. To our knowledge, this is the first report in the literature about the use of such an innovative device for endoscopic harvesting of the radial artery, along with a stainless steel resterilizable retractor conventionally used for endoscopic vein harvesting.

Total Arterial Revascularization is Safe: Multicenter Ten-Year Analysis of 71,470 Coronary Procedures

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the use of arterial revascularization and to compare the in-hospital mortality with other CABG grafting strategies.

METHODS

A total of 71,470 CABG patients (1992-2001) in 27 centers in the United Kingdom were studied. The proportion of patients with arterial revascularization was compared. In-hospital mortality was compared for various grafting strategies: all-arterial (n = 5,401), all non-all-arterial patients (n = 66,069), one artery any number of veins (n = 49,801). The groups were compared for in-hospital mortality using multivariate logistic regression to assess the independent effect of the grafting strategies on mortality; logistic EuroSCORE-predicted mortality was compared to actual mortality, and all arterial and one artery and veins patients were compared with propensity score analysis.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in the proportion of all-arterial patients over time (3.2% to 11.7%, p < 0.001) with evidence of variability across centers. Crude mortality for all-arterial patients was 2% vs 3% for all non-all-arterial patients (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, all-arterial was associated with a slight but insignificant increase in in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.13; [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.86-1.48], p = 0.36). There was a trend toward higher mortality in the all-arterial group when compared with the one artery and veins group (OR 1.19 [95% CI 0.91-1.56], p = 0.10). The one artery and veins group was the only group where actual mortality was significantly lower than predicted by EuroSCORE (p < 0.001). In propensity analysis the mortality was 1.51% for one artery and veins and 1.74% of all-arterial patients (p = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of arterial grafting has increased over time, varies by center, and appears to be safe in terms of in-hospital mortality.

Functional Angiographic Evaluation of Individual, Sequential, and Composite Arterial Grafts

BACKGROUND

To help optimize graft arrangement, we examined the effects of target vessel characteristics, conduit type, and interactions between the target vessels on the occurrence of flow reversal or occlusion.

METHODS

The postoperative angiograms of 458 patients after total arterial revascularization with an off-pump, no aortic manipulation technique beginning in December 2000 were reviewed. Reverse flow was defined as the lack of opacification of a distal anastomotic site during graft angiography, but clear retrograde graft opacification during native coronary angiography. We analyzed characteristics of the target coronary branches, and bypass conduits. The potential interactions between coronary branches and sequential anastomoses were categorized as those with two 75% stenotic branches (situation 1); one 75% stenotic branch at the end of the graft and a 99% to 100% stenotic branch at the middle of the graft (situation 2); and a composite Y (or K) graft with one end to a 75% stenotic branch and the other to a 99% to 100% stenotic branch (situation 3).

RESULTS

A total of 18 bypasses (1.1%) were occluded while reverse flow was found in 4.5% (74 of 1,627). In a multivariate analysis of the 521 bypass conduits having more than two distal anastomoses, the predictors of reverse flow or occlusion were a right coronary artery target with 75% or less stenosis (p = 0.006), more than three distal anastomoses with a conduit (p = 0.005), situation 1 (p = 0.04), situation 2 (p < 0.0001), and situation 3 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Interactions between coronary branches and graft arrangement play important roles in flow distribution. Graft arrangement should be adjusted for each patient to minimize reverse flow.

Radial Artery Graft for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Biological Characteristics and Clinical Outcome

The radial artery (RA) is gaining popularity as a bypass conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting, and its impact on clinical practice has been extensively explored. In the present article, we provide a review of postoperative hand circulation, vascular biological characteristics of the RA graft, the efficacy of vasodilator therapies, and mid-term clinical results of use of the RA graft. Fundamental studies revealed excellent vascular biological characteristics of the RA graft as a living arterial conduit, making it almost equivalent to the internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft. Clinical studies have yielded encouraging mid-term results. Most studies reported in favor of the RA graft over the saphenous vein graft with regard to patency rate, freedom from cardiac events, and survival. However, superiority of either the RA or right ITA graft has not been conclusively determined. The long-term results of RA grafts remain unknown, but at present, supplementary use of an RA graft with a left ITA graft appears feasible for CABG.

The Arterial Sling Operation: One-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery with total arterial revascularization, particularly the use of bilateral in situ internal thoracic arteries, is considered an improved treatment of patients with ischemic heart disease. The sling operation connects the internal thoracic arteries with the radial artery, creating an arterial arcade with double inlet of blood to the peripheral vascular bed. In this paper we present 1-year follow up of angiographic and clinical results of the arterial sling operation.

METHODS

The arterial sling operation was performed in 28 patients in the period from October 2000 to September 2001, and all patients were offered an angiographical and clinical examination 1 year postoperatively. All angiograms were systematically reviewed by an interventional cardiologist and a cardiac surgeon.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients participated in the 1-year angiographic follow up. Of these 3 patients had a fully open arterial sling, 15 patients had stenosis or occlusion of one segment, and 5 patients had occlusion or stenosis of 2 segments of the radial artery. Eight of the total 93 peripheral anastomoses were occluded. The 1-year graft patency rate was 91.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The arterial sling operation is safe and the one year patency rate is high. Although one or two segments of the arterial sling may degenerate due to competitive blood flow, this does not affect blood flow in the vascular bed in patients without disease progression. However, arterial revascularization should be performed in a way to minimize competitive flow.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using Only Arterial Grafts in Elderly Patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to elucidate the safety and feasibility of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with only arterial grafts for elderly patients.

METHODS

Of 653 patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting from April 2000 to December 2003, 581 patients did so with only arterial grafts. The average age was 66.9 +/- 9.3 years. The patients were divided into the elder group E (75 years old or more: 111 cases) or the younger group Y (younger than 75 years old: 470 cases). The mean follow-up term was 21 +/- 12 months.

RESULTS

Additive and logistic EuroSCOREs of group E were significantly higher than those of group Y (p < 0.0001). The number of bypass grafts was 3.3 +/- 0.9 in group E and 3.3 +/- 1.1 in group Y (p = 0.43). The proportion of total revascularization was 74% (82 of 111) in group E and 80% (377 of 470) in group Y (p = 0.15). The number of bilateral implementations of internal thoracic artery was 10 (9.0%) in group E and 196 (42%) in group Y (p < 0.0001). The graft patency rate was 98.7% in group E and 97.8% in group Y (p = 0.96). Hospital mortality was 2.7% (3 of 111) in group E and 0.2% (1 of 470) in group Y (p = 0.095). The causes of death were unrelated to cardiac events. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 5 patients (5.1%) in group E and in 24 patients (5.6%) in group Y (p > 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting using only arterial grafts in elderly patients is as safe and feasible as in young patients.