Outcome of lung transplantation for patients requiring concomitant cardiac surgery

The Evaluation and Management of Coronary Artery Disease in the Lung Transplant Patient

Lung transplantation can greatly improve quality of life and extend survival in those with end-stage lung disease. In order to derive the maximal benefit from such a procedure, patients must be carefully selected and be otherwise healthy enough to survive a high-risk surgery and sometimes prolonged immunosuppressive therapy following surgery. Patients therefore must be critically assessed prior to being listed for transplantation with close attention paid towards assessment of cardiovascular health and operative risk. One of the biggest dictators of this is coronary artery disease. In this review article, we discuss the assessment and management of coronary artery disease in the potential lung transplant candidate.

Reoperative CABG in a patient with prior concomitant lung transplantation and two-vessel CABG

BACKGROUND

Lung transplants (LTx) are being offered to increasingly older patients, and as a result, more concomitant coronary artery disease is being encountered in LTx candidates. While concurrent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and LTx have become more common, the long-term considerations of reoperative CABG in patients following CABG with concomitant LTx are not fully understood.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 75-year-old man with a history of bilateral LTx and concomitant CABG X 2 15 years prior presented to the emergency room with tachycardia and chest discomfort radiating to the left upper extremity. Emergent coronary angiography revealed severe three-vessel coronary artery disease with two occluded saphenous vein grafts, severe distal obtuse marginal (OM) and left circumflex disease, a collateralized chronic total occlusion of the mid LAD, and tortuosity of the proximal right innominate artery. The patient underwent a complex redo sternotomy and CABG X 2 due to dense adhesions in the mediastinum and pleura bilaterally. The postoperative course was complicated by left leg SVG harvest site cellulitis treated with IV antibiotics and hypervolemia treated with diuresis. The patient was discharged postoperatively on day 13.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first reported successful reoperative CABG in a patient with a history of concomitant LTx and CABG. This case demonstrates feasibility, though additional caution is required due to the technical complexity and risk of immunosuppression in such complex patients.

Lung transplantation and concomitant cardiac surgical procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is an effective treatment option for end-stage lung diseases. In some cases, these patients may also have underlying cardiac disease which may require surgical intervention before or during transplantation. Concomitant cardiac surgery may often be preferred, as reduced lung function precludes these patients from pre-transplant surgery. Our meta-analysis sought to examine the impact of lung transplantation paired with concomitant cardiac surgery on long-term mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Our primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) in hospital and serious postoperative complication rates. We used a meta-analytic model to determine the differences in the above outcomes between patients who underwent lung transplantation with or without concomitant cardiac surgery.

RESULTS

Out of the 1876 articles screened, 7 met our pre-determined inclusion criteria. Lung transplantation with concomitant cardiac surgery was not associated with increased mortality compared to lung transplantation alone (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80-1.31; I²  = 0%; p = .99). LOS in hospital was not significantly different between groups (standardized mean difference = 0.32; 95% CI = -0.91 to 1.55). Postoperative complication rates were also reported but not analyzed due to missing data.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in mortality rates in patients undergoing lung transplantation with or without concomitant cardiac surgery at 1, 3, and 5 years. However, postoperative complication rates were higher in the concomitant group. The decision to perform concomitant procedures should be tailored to each patient's clinical condition.

Bilateral sequential lung transplantation: technical aspects

The surgical technique for lung transplantation has evolved dramatically over the last three decades. Significant improvements in short term outcomes in the early years of lung transplantation were due, in large part, to techniques developed to reduce airway anastomotic complications in single lung transplantation. Following development of the technique of en bloc double lung transplantation, evolution to the bilateral sequential technique further reduced airway complications for double lung transplantation. More recently, some programs have utilized the en bloc double lung transplant technique with bronchial artery revascularization to aid airway healing and potentially improve short- and long-term outcomes. The experience with bronchial artery revascularization remains limited to a few series, with the technique having not been widely adopted by most lung transplant programs. With the implementation of priority allocations schemes in many countries, patients with higher risk profiles are being prioritized for transplantation which results in more complex procedures in fragile recipients with multiple comorbidities. This includes the increased need for concomitant cardiac procedures as well as performing lung transplantation after prior cardiothoracic surgery. Different surgical approaches have been described for bilateral sequential lung transplantation with or without intra-operative mechanical circulatory support (MCS), such as sternotomy, clamshell (bilateral anterior thoracotomies with transverse sternotomy), and bilateral thoracotomy incisions. Herein, we aim, not only to describe the various surgical approaches for double lung transplantation, but to provide a comprehensive review of other aspects related to the recipient pathology and different anatomical variants as well as handling technical challenges that might be encountered during the procedure.

Successful bridge to lung transplantation with transcatheter aortic valve replacement

End-stage lung disease and advanced cardiac conditions are frequently seen together and represent a clinical dilemma. Even though both issues may be amenable to surgical management, combining lung transplant with surgical valve repair is rarely done and theoretically associated with increased morbidity and mortality risks, especially in elderly patients. Here, we describe 2 patients presenting with end-stage lung disease and significant aortic stenosis who were successfully bridged to lung transplant via transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Patient 1 was a 66-year-old man who underwent a double lung transplant 56 days after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Patient 2 was a 70-year-old man who underwent a single right lung transplant 103 days after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Both patients had uneventful postoperative courses and are alive at the 1-year time point with excellent performance status. This report suggests that transcatheter aortic valve replacement may favorably impact lung transplant candidacy for patients with end-stage lung disease in the setting of severe aortic stenosis, likely representing a better alternative to concomitant aortic valve replacement and lung transplant in elderly patients.

Coronary artery disease in lung transplant patients

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a pathology often found in patients with end-stage lung disease. Although in the past CAD might have been considered an absolute contraindication, modern revascularization techniques have helped increase the number of transplants performed in this population. However, discrepancies in the guidelines for perioperative evaluation and risk mitigation strategies for the ischemic cardiac burden are present in the current literature. This is a review of the available data regarding perioperative evaluation, revascularization tactics, postoperative management, and survival rate that patients with different grades of coronary artery disease present after lung transplantation.

Coronary revascularization in lung transplant recipients with concomitant coronary artery disease

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is not uncommon among lung transplant candidates. Several small, single-center series have suggested that short-term outcomes are acceptable in selected patients who undergo coronary revascularization prior to, or concomitant with, lung transplantation. Our objective was to evaluate perioperative and intermediate-term outcomes in this patient population at our institution. We performed a retrospective, observational cohort analysis of 898 lung transplant recipients between 1997 and 2010. Pediatric, multivisceral, lobar or repeat transplantations were excluded, resulting in 791 patients for comparative analysis, of which 49 (median age 62, 79.6% bilateral transplant) underwent concurrent coronary artery bypass and 38 (median age 64, 63.2% bilateral transplant) received preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Perioperative mortality, overall unadjusted survival and adjusted hazard ratio for cumulative risk of death were similar among both revascularization groups as well as controls. The rate of postoperative major adverse cardiac events was also similar among groups; however, concurrent coronary artery bypass was associated with longer postoperative length of stay, more time in the intensive care unit and more postoperative days requiring ventilator support. These results suggest that patients with CAD need not be excluded from lung transplantation. Preferential consideration should be given to preoperative PCI when feasible.

Role of Transesophageal Echocardiography in Perioperative Patient Management of Lung Transplantation Surgery

Lung transplantation is the only option for patients with end-stage lung disease. Chronic obstructive lung disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis and primary pulmonary hypertension are few common indications for lung transplantation. Patients with end-stage lung disease may have pre-existing cardiovascular compromise related to pulmonary hypertension and other cardiovascular lesions, such as coronary artery disease or valvular heart disease. Preoperative evaluation and optimization of hemodynamics is expected to improve outcomes from lung transplantation. Intraoperative hemodynamic instability is common during lung transplantation and requires highest level of cardiovascular monitoring. After transplantation, vascular anastomosis should be evaluated for flow patterns to rule out obstruction from stenosis or thrombosis. Postoperative complications are common and include bleeding, cardiac failure and hypoxemia from right to left shunt. Primary graft dysfunction may necessitate mechanical cardiorespiratory support. Transesophageal echocardiography plays a central role in preoperative evaluation, intraoperative hemodynamic management, evaluation of pulmonary vascular anastomosis, diagnosis of postoperative complications and also in the critical care management of mechanical cardiorespiratory support.

How to cite this article

Subramaniam K, Esper SA. Role of Transesophageal Echocardiography in Perioperative Patient Management of Lung Transplantation Surgery. J Perioper Echocardiogr 2013;1(2):48-56.

Combining tricuspid valve repair with double lung transplantation in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension, tricuspid regurgitation, and right ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Concomitant tricuspid valve repair (TVR) and double lung transplantation (DLTx) has been a surgical option at our institution since 2004 in an attempt to improve the outcome of DLTx for end-stage pulmonary hypertension, severe tricuspid regurgitation, and right ventricle (RV) dysfunction. This study is a review of that single institutional experience.

METHODS

Consecutive cases of concomitant TVR and DLTx performed between 2004 and 2009 (TVR group, n = 20) were retrospectively compared with cases of DLTx alone for severe pulmonary hypertension without TVR (non-TVR group, n = 58).

RESULTS

There was one in-hospital death in the TVR group. The 90-day and 1- and 3-year survival rates for the TVR group were 90%, 75%, and 65%, respectively, which were not significantly different from those for the non-TVR group. The TVR group required less inotropic support and less prolonged mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Follow-up echocardiography demonstrated immediate elimination of both volume and pressure overload in the RV and tricuspid regurgitation in the TVR group. Notably, there was a significantly lower incidence of primary graft dysfunction following transplantation in the TVR group (P < .05). Pulmonary functional improvement shown by an FEV(1) increase after 6 months was also significantly better in the TVR group (40% vs 20%, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined TVR and DLTx procedures were successfully performed without an increase in morbidity or mortality and contributed to decreased primary graft dysfunction. In our experience, this combined operative approach achieves clinical outcomes equal or superior to the outcomes seen in DLTx patients without RV dysfunction and severe tricuspid regurgitation.

[Perioperative treatment of a man receiving a left-lung transplant combined with coronary revascularization without use of extracorporeal circulation: with a brief review of pathophysiology and the literature]

Patients with significant coronary artery disease were once traditionally rejected as candidates for lung transplants because of higher risk of morbidity and mortality. We report the case of a man who received a left lung transplant and coronary revascularization without extracorporeal circulation in a combined surgical procedure after being diagnosed with significant coronary disease during the preoperative study for acceptance as a candidate for lung transplantation. We review the history of such combination procedures, which are changing clinicians' attitudes as to appropriate therapeutic approaches to take for complex patients. We also discuss the possible advantages of performing surgery without extracorporeal circulation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a combined procedure that took place in a Spanish hospital.

Cardiopulmonary bypass as an adjunct for the noncardiac surgeon

The use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in noncardiac surgical settings has been increasingly developed and has greatly benefited noncardiac surgeon. A few years after the advent of CPB as well as profound hypothermic circulatory arrest in the early years, it was employed by neurosurgeons in cerebrovascular surgery and by general thoracic surgeons in carinal tumor resection. Indications for CPB were extended and modified year after year. It has facilitated not only the surgical management by surgeons of lesions that cannot be managed safely and effectively by conventional techniques, or conventional techniques carry significant risks to the patient, but also the preservation of the viability of multiple organ procurement, the practice of isolated limb perfusion for the treatment of malignancies of the extremities, and emergent cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Owing to the complications arising from CPB and profound hypothermic circulatory arrest, such as postoperative bleeding, coagulopathy, and neurologic deficits, efforts have been made to avoid these common hazards. Thus, innovative techniques including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, percutaneous cardiopulmonary support, venovenous bypass, normothermic CPB, and minimally invasive approaches have emerged and played an important role as alternatives of standard CPB in decreasing morbidity and mortality and improving survival.

Early cardiac tamponade due to tension pneumopericardium after bilateral lung transplantation

We report the case of a 42-year-old woman who developed severe hemodynamic instability with marked arterial pulsed pressure variation in the early course of bilateral lung transplantation. The diagnosis of tension pneumopericardium was made on Day 2 post-operatively based on chest X-ray and echocardiography. Transoesophageal echocardiography revealed both a cardiac tamponade and a right-to-left shunt via a patent foramen ovale. The treatment and mechanisms of these two rare complications are discussed.

Lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe recent advances in lung transplantation relevant to anesthesiologists.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is recent literature describing medical, surgical, anesthetic and critical care of lung transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

There have been substantial changes in preoperative selection and preparation of lung transplant recipients; these include donation after cardiac death, and improved lung-preservation solutions. Newer immunosuppression regimens have been successfully evaluated in clinical trials. Particular advances in anesthesia include endorsement of fluid restriction in thoracic surgery, greater use of transesophageal echocardiography, and postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Cardiac procedures in lung transplant recipients do not increase mortality in selected patients

BACKGROUND

Associated comorbidities in potential lung transplant recipients may significantly impact operative morbidity and mortality. We undertook this review to specifically study whether patients who underwent associated cardiac procedures either before (as a prerequisite) or during their lung transplantation had different outcomes when compared with the overall cohort of lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent lung transplantation at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio from January 1994 to June 2004. The records of these patients were analyzed for patient-days on the ventilator, hospital length of stay, operative morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival. The patients were then divided into two groups and compared: patients who had a cardiac intervention either prerequisite to or concurrent with their transplant (group C, n = 13) and patients who did not (group NC [no cardiac intervention], n = 120).

RESULTS

Although the median length of stay was longer in group C when compared with group NC, the number of patient-days on the ventilator and the operative morbidity and mortality were similar for both groups. Likewise, overall long-term survival was not significantly different (Kaplan-Meier method, p = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who are otherwise deemed to be good candidates for lung transplantation but are found to have an associated cardiac condition that could adversely affect their candidacy may still be considered for transplantation in selected cases if the cardiac abnormality can be addressed either before or during transplantation.