Extensive circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection with a new rigid esophagoscope: an animal study

Stricture prevention after extended circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection by injecting autologous keratinocytes in the sheep esophagus

BACKGROUND

During the past decades, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has been developed to treat early intramucosal esophageal cancers and dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. The primary drawback of this method is severe postsurgical esophageal stricture formation. The purpose of this preclinical study was to assess strategies for prevention of this major complication by injecting autologous keratinocytes in the EMR mucosal defect in the sheep model.

METHODS

Circumferential, 6-cm-long EMRs were performed in the esophagus of nine sheep. Autologous keratinocytes were harvested 2 weeks before EMR and cultured. Circumferential resection consisted of two opposite hemicircumferential mucosectomies allowing a widespread resection of 24 cm(2). Immediately after EMR, autologous keratinocytes were endoscopically injected in the mucosal defect. Animals were sacrificed after 6 months.

RESULTS

Circumferential EMRs were successfully performed in all animals. There were no intra- or postoperative complications. None of the animals developed strictures. All animals were sacrificed at 6 months as planned. Histological examinations showed fibrotic changes in 10 % (range 0-25 %) of the circumferential muscularis propria interna layer and 7.2 % (range 0-25 %) in the muscularis propria externa layer at the midportion of the EMR. No circumferential transmural fibrosis was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevention of stricture formation after extensive (6-cm long) circumferential EMR of the sheep esophagus can be achieved by injecting autologous keratinocytes into the wound of the resected mucosal segment.

Initial experience with Barrett's strip endoscopic mucosal excision: a new Barrett's excision device

BACKGROUND

Barrett's mucosa resection techniques are time consuming, often difficult to perform, and used with varying success. This report describes the authors' results with a new device and technique for strip endoscopic mucosal resection (SEMR) using a cold excision blade.

METHODS

A retrospective review of ex vivo and in vivo animal and human esophagi experiments was conducted to develop the essential design characteristics of a transoral strip mucosal excision device. Depth, size, shape, and technique of excision were serially evaluated.

RESULTS

The SEMR device allows precise capsule positioning with satisfactory excision size and depth in ex vivo and in vivo experiments. A total of 10 excisions were performed on five normal ex vivo cadaveric human esophagi. The specimens ranged in size from 3×2.5 to 2.5×2.2 cm. The average specimen thickness was 0.297 mm. For 147 (99.8%) of 150 fields of examination, muscularis mucosa was included. Six additional in vivo experiments demonstrated device safety and feasibility.

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory excision depth was reproducible. Further animal survival experiments and clinical trials will define the role of the SEMR device for patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Extensive (8 to 12 cm2) noncircumferential endoscopic mucosal resection for early esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an appealing method for treating intramucosal esophageal cancer but must comply with the following stringent requirements: proper preoperative staging, complete resection of the lesion, obtaining a resected specimen for histologic analysis of safety margins, and squamous reepithelialization without stricture formation.

METHODS

A rigid esophagoscope was created to resect up to 12 cm(2) of esophageal mucosa in a single specimen and at a constant depth through the submucosa. Under visual control, the esophageal mucosa is sucked into a transparent window and resected with a thin diathermy wire loop in 10 seconds. After extensive preclinical studies in a sheep model, this article reports our early experience in humans.

RESULTS

Twenty-one hemi-circumferential EMRs were performed for 11 dysplastic Barrett's esophagi and 10 early squamous cell carcinomas with no perforation, one hemorrhage controlled by embolization of the left gastric artery, and one incomplete resection. Deep safety margins were clear in 19 of 21 resected specimens (2 patients, unfit for operations, had submucosal invasion of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, respectively). Lateral margins were not clear by definition in 7 circumferential Barrett's esophagi, but were clear in 4 incomplete Barrett's esophagi and 10 early squamous cell carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Large EMRs of 12 cm(2) can safely be performed at the submucosal level in the esophagus. Although feasible in one session, circumferential EMR in humans is not yet advisable because of the risk of stricture formation during the healing phase. The rate of complications of this series of 21 EMRs in humans is acceptable.

The impact of automatic retractors on the esophagus during anterior cervical surgery: an experimental in vivo study in a sheep model

Object

Postoperative dysphagia is a well-recognized complication of the anterior surgical approach to the cervical spine. However, its incidence and etiology remain unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of automatic retractor use on the esophagus and to describe the related pathological changes that might occur during cervical spine surgery.

Methods

A single-level cervical discectomy was performed via an anterior approach in 16 skeletally mature female sheep. Continuous retraction was applied with an automatic retractor system during surgery. The sheep model was chosen because of anatomical similarities to the human esophagus. The esophageal tract in every animal was examined using contrast radiographic examination. Eight animals were killed 3 days after the operation (Group 1). The remaining sheep were killed 4 weeks after the operation (Group 2). The esophagi were removed for histopathological study, which was performed using H & E and Masson trichrome staining. The changes in esophageal innervation were examined with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide diphosphate–diaphorase histochemical staining.

Results

Only 1 animal (a Group 1 sheep) demonstrated any postoperative radiographic abnormality. In Group 1 sheep, histopathological study of the esophagi at the treated level revealed edema between the muscular fibers in the outer longitudinal and inner circular layers of the muscularis propria. At some points, obvious signs of vascular congestion, vascular damage, and inflammation were observed. In the Group 2 animals, there was mild-to-moderate fibrosis extending from the outer surface of the esophagus to the longitudinal layers of the muscularis propria in the area to which retraction had been applied. Enzyme-histochemical staining revealed the presence of normal myenteric plexus and ganglion cells, and nitrergic innervation in all parts of the esophagus wall.

Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrate that direct pressure induced by the medial retractor blade on the esophagus wall leads to local injury. Postoperative dysphagia in human patients who have undergone anterior cervical spine surgery could be a clinical manifestation of this phenomenon.

Extended endoscopic mucosal resection in the esophagus and hypopharynx: a new rigid device

We present a new device allowing for the diagnosis and treatment of extended superficial lesions of the esophagus and hypopharynx such as early squamous cell carcinoma, intestinal metaplasia with high grade intraepithelial neoplasia or early adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus. A new modified rigid esophagoscope (Karl Storz GmbH, Germany) has been designed. A large mucosal area is sucked against a transparent and perforated hemi-cylindrical window. Mucosal resection is performed by an electrical wire loop at a constant depth of 1 +/- 0.1 mm. The resected surface varies from 4 to 12 cm(2). Circumferential resection consists of two opposite individual hemi-circumferential resections. We performed three series of animal trials: hemicircumferential mucosectomies; circumferential resections of variable (2 to 6 cm) length and long-segment mucosectomies with follow-up. Hemi- and circumferential resections could be done in one or two specimens only which allowed precise histological studies. This facilitated easy orientation and analysis of the surgical margins. The deep resection margin was precisely located at the submucosal level, a prerequisite for a safe resection of superficial cancers of the esophagus and hypopharynx.