Carotid artery cannulation in acute aortic dissection with malperfusion

Cannulation strategies in aortic surgery: techniques and decision making

Arterial cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is an important determinant of outcome in aortic surgery. Unlike traditional cardiac operations, aortic pathology may preclude the cannulation of the distal ascending aorta. In other cases, special need of the pathology/operation may demand an alternative cannulation site. Choosing the right cannulation site, especially in type A aortic dissection, is the most crucial initial step. The decision about cannulation sites should be individualized and patient-specific. Various cannulation techniques include femoral, right axillary, innominate, carotid, central aortic, direct true lumen, transapical, and trans-atrial left ventricle cannulation. The ideal cannulation should be easy, quick, and suitable for all clinical scenarios. It should allow smooth conduct of CPB without malperfusion or cerebral embolization. The cannulation strategy should also provide an option for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and it should be free from neurovascular and local site complications. There is no ideal cannulation technique. Each technique has its pros and cons. Excellent results and drawbacks have been reported with each technique. Final selection of the cannulation site is dependent upon several factors. However, a surgeon's familiarity with a particular technique plays a major role in selection. Despite this, there is a definite shift in surgeons' preference from femoral to central cannulation (axillary, carotid, innominate, aortic) over the last few decades. The aim of this review is to give a brief overview of the cannulation techniques in aortic surgery and discuss the decision-making process.

Retrograde Carotid Stenting Using Newly Released Venous Stent for Cerebral Malperfusion in Type A Aortic Dissection

Stanford Type A aortic dissections (TAAD) should be considered for repair, given the involvement of branch vessels which can result in malperfusion, specifically cerebral malperfusion secondary to dissection of the innominate and carotid arteries. This is a case report with a focus on four patients presenting with both acute and chronic symptomatic TAAD, with extension into the innominate and common carotid arteries. In all four cases, the decision to intervene utilizing a hybrid endovascular approach was made to increase perfusion to the brain and alleviate symptoms. Through the use of retrograde carotid stenting utilizing both the VICI venous stent (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) and Abre self-expanding Nitinol stent (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) we obtained good results, specifically absence of symptoms and return to normal function of the patients.

Aggressive strategy to save the brain in a case of acute aortic dissection

The case report by Sicim et al. is the placement of extra-anatomical bypasses in bilateral common carotid arteries. The similar previous reports of the extra-anatomical bypass usually indicate unilateral bypass. Whether or not the Willis' circle is incomplete is difficult to judge during emergency surgery, and the authors' judgment seems to have been correct in the sense that it could maintain cerebral perfusion reliably and quickly. The direct perfusion and extra-anatomical bypass of the carotid artery is a reasonable strategy in patients with cerebral malperfusion.

Evaluation of the GERAADA score for prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

The German Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) score to predict 30-day mortality in patients suffering from acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) was recently introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the GERAADA score's prediction corresponds with the authors' institutional results.

METHODS

All consecutive AADA patients between 2010 and 2020 were included. Retrospective data collection comprised 11 preoperative parameters: age, sex, previous cardiac surgery, inotropic support at referral, resuscitation before surgery, aortic regurgitation, preoperative hemiparesis, intubation/ventilation at referral, preoperative organ malperfusion, extension of aortic dissection and location of primary entry site. Calculations of the GERAADA score were individually performed by a cardiac surgeon blinded to the study for all patients via a web-based application (https://www.dgthg.de/de/GERAADA_Score).

RESULTS

A total of 371 AADA patients were operated at the authors' institution. The mean age was 62.7 ± 13.5 years and 233 (63%) were males. Prediction of 30-day mortality was accurate for the entire study cohort (actual vs predicted 30-day mortality: 15.1% vs 15.7%; P = 0.776) as well as for all 26 subgroups. In addition, preoperative resuscitation (P < 0.001), advanced age (P = 0.042) and other/unknown malperfusion (P = 0.032) were identified as independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The GERAADA score prediction of 30-day mortality after surgery is accurate, easily accessible due to its web-based platform and can be calculated with very basic preoperative clinical parameters. A prospective clinical trial is required to further evaluate the new GERAADA score as a useful tool to allow for improved decision-making in the emergency setting of AADA.

Cannulation strategies in type A aortic dissection: a novel insight narrative review

This review highlights vital details that can be easily overlooked and discuss how to identify and fix failed cannulation from another novel insight. Appropriate arterial cannulation strategy during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in Stanford type A aortic dissection (AAD) is highly necessary to reach satisfactory perfusion effects and appreciable clinical outcomes. Despite several previously published reviews on cannulation strategies in AAD, most focus on the advantages and disadvantages by comparing various cannulation strategies. In fact, most of evidence came from retrospective studies. More importantly, however, some important details and novel approaches maybe overlooked due to variety reasons. These overlooked details also make sense in clinical practice. Papers related to cannulation refer to type AAD were retrieved and analyzed from the PubMed and Medline database. The key words such as “aortic dissection”, “cannula”, “cannulation”, “cannulation strategy”, “cerebral perfusion”, “type I aortic dissection” were conducted and analyzed. In addition, we looked at some new and very significant specific perfusion techniques such as anterograde cerebral perfusion combined with retrograde inferior vena caval perfusion (RIVP) and reperfusion via the right carotid artery before surgery. The arterial cannulation site and strategy should be determined individually. Monitoring measures are very necessary in the whole procedure.

Type A aortic dissection: involvement of carotid artery and impact on cerebral malperfusion

Acute type A aortic dissection is a surgical emergency and management of such pathology can be complex with poor outcomes when there is organ malperfusion. Carotid artery involvement is present in 30% of patients diagnosed with acute type A aortic dissection, and given its emergency and complex nature, there is much controversy regarding the approach, extent of treatment, and timing of the intervention. It is clear that the occurrence of cerebral malperfusion adds an extra layer of complexity to the decision-making framework for treatment. Standardization and validation of the optimal management approach is required, and this should ideally be addressed with large-scale studies. Nonetheless, current literature supports the need for rapid recognition and diagnosis of acute type A aortic dissection with cerebral malperfusion, immediate and extensive surgical repair, and the appropriate use of cerebral perfusion techniques. This paper aims to discuss the current evidence regarding the impact of carotid artery involvement in both the management and outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection.

Treatment strategies for malperfusion syndrome secondary to acute aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

Presenting our experience of treating patients with organ malperfusion secondary to acute aortic dissection.

PATIENTS

Among 383 patients who underwent aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection from 1999 to 2017, 107 patients were operated on because of vascular complications. Fourteen patients had coronary, 50 had brain, 3 had paraplegia, 13 had superior mesenteric artery, 21 had lower limb, and 16 had combined organ malperfusion. Age was 65.8 years.

RESULTS

In coronary malperfusion, three had a preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention, and two had mechanical support. All underwent repair of the aorta. Hospital mortality was 28.5%. Fifty patients had brain malperfusion. Hemiplegia was found in 28 patients, transient ischemic attack in 10, and coma in 12. The level of consciousness was severe in 12, moderate in 18, and mild in 20. Twenty-eight percent died of a stroke. Nine had direct perfusion from the right common carotid artery, and the consciousness level was improved in 5 patients. Eight patients had mesenteric malperfusion. Four patients had a central aorta repair first, and four patients had peripheral intervention first. Three patients had a bypass grafting to the superior mesenteric artery, and one had a catheter intervention. Postoperative mortality was found in four patients due to bowel necrosis and six required resections of the bowel.

CONCLUSION

Acute organ malperfusion caused by the aortic dissection requires accurate and prompt diagnosis to proceed with an appropriate intervention before repairing the central aorta for preventing irreversible organ damage.

sArterial cannulation to establish cardiopulmonary bypass during surgery for acute aortic dissection

A cannulation strategy in surgery for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (AAAD) is integral for patient survival. Femoral cannulation has been the standard option for cannulation; however, there is increasing evidence that retrograde perfusion with femoral cannulation is associated with worse clinical outcomes, and new cannulation sites have been introduced in surgery for AAAD. Although axillary artery cannulation and central cannulation via the ascending aorta have become more popular than femoral access in recent years, adverse events have been reported and shifting cannulation sites during surgery are recommended by some surgeons. Therefore, it is beneficial for surgeons to broaden their knowledge about cannulation technology for AAAD. In this review, we discuss the various methods of cannulation for AAAD.

Cerebral perfusion issues in type A aortic dissection

Stroke events are very common in acute type A aortic dissection. Cerebral malperfusion could manifest at presentation due to prolonged arch vessels hypoperfusion or develop after surgery for inadequate cerebral protection during arch repair. To reduce this detrimental complication there are several adjuncts that can be adopted for cerebral protection such as direct antegrade or retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) and use period of deep to moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest time; however, they are often insufficient as preoperative malperfusion already caused irreversible ischemic damages. The aim of the current review article is to analyze the principal series reporting on neurological injuries during type A aortic dissection to focus on the outcomes according to the type of surgical management and identify possible predictors to better manage this complication.

Direct perfusion of the carotid artery in patients with brain malperfusion secondary to acute aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

Presenting our experience of direct perfusion of the carotid artery in patients with brain malperfusion secondary to acute aortic dissection.

PATIENTS

Among 381 patients who underwent aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection from October 1999 to August 2017, brain malperfusion was recognized in 50 patients. Nine patients had direct perfusion of the right carotid artery in patients with brain malperfusion secondary to acute aortic dissection. Age at surgery was 65.7 ± 13.5 years and three patients were male. Preoperative consciousness level was alert in one patients, drowsy in six, and coma in two. Five patients had preoperative hemiplegia. All patients showed a blood pressure difference between the upper extremities and eight patients showed more than 15% difference of rSO₂. Seven patients had a temporary external active shunt from the femoral artery to the right common carotid artery preoperatively. Two patients had direct perfusion to the right common carotid artery during cardiopulmonary bypass or in the intensive care unit after surgery because of a sudden decrease of rSO₂ and cessation of carotid artery flow. Antegrade cerebral perfusion was used in all patients. Total arch replacement was performed in six patients and hemiarch in three.

RESULTS

The hospital mortality was 33% (3 patients). Causes of death were huge hemispheric brain infarction or anoxic brain damage in two patients and myocardial infarction in one. The postoperative neurological outcome was alert in four, hemiplegia in two, and coma in three, but five patients showed some improvement of neurological signs.

CONCLUSION

Aggressive direct reperfusion of the carotid artery before the aortic repair may reduce neurological complications in patients with preoperative brain malperfusion secondary to acute aortic dissection.

The cannulation strategy in surgery for acute type A dissection

The rates of mortality and morbidity remain high in surgery for acute type A dissection. There is controversy regarding the best cannulation strategy for achieving good clinical results. Each cannulation technique has different anatomical characteristics and a different flow pattern inside the aorta during cardiopulmonary bypass. Some adverse, clinically important outcomes may be related to events at this time. Femoral artery cannulation, axillary artery cannulation, and central aortic cannulation are the three major cannulation strategies that are adopted in many centers in the world. Accumulating results from comparative studies between right axillary artery cannulation and femoral artery cannulation show that right axillary artery cannulation is associated with better clinical outcomes. However, all of the studies have been retrospective, and few studies have compared the results of other combinations of cannulation strategies. Observational studies using newer monitoring techniques clearly show that no perfusion strategy is perfect or free from complications. In summary, the evidence is insufficient to make a strong recommendation regarding cannulation strategies. Based on the fairly consistent results of retrospective studies, more surgeons are tending to switch from a retrograde perfusion strategy to adopt an antegrade perfusion strategy. Regardless of the routine cannulation strategy that is adopted, careful monitoring and a swift response to adverse events are necessary. The further accumulation of evidence is warranted.

Cerebral malperfusion in acute aortic dissection

Cerebral malperfusion in association with acute type A aortic dissection is uncommon but can have a considerable effect on the outcome of treatment. Successful treatment requires the individual and effective removal of each of the factors associated with malperfusion. In addition to the conventional surgical procedures, endovascular treatment has become an option for restoring perfusion. However, artificial perfusion and/or surgical procedures can lead to new malperfusion, which is not necessarily apparent to surgeons and which is difficult to predict. Thus, a number of modalities need to be applied to monitoring the current status of perfusion to enable timely treatment. Since each of the diagnostic modalities has its merits and demerits, one should use them effectively while being mindful of the pitfalls. In addition, a delay in the diagnosis in the pre-hospital stage is an important determinant of the surgical outcomes of aortic dissection. Portable echocardiography, which has been recently developed, may be useful for improving this situation. However, an early diagnosis largely depends on the physician's awareness and basic echocardiography skills. Surgeons should make general physicians aware of this message.

Carotid artery cannulation in aortic surgery

The common carotid artery is not widely used for arterial return in cardiovascular surgery with the use of extracorporeal circulation; however, in our opinion, it is an artery that most ideally fits several criteria for cannulation use. It is easy and very fast to access, even in obese patients, and it is large and strong enough to provide a sufficient arterial return. Moreover, the risk of local injuries and wound infection is extremely low, and finally, the use of the common carotid artery for cannulation is very advantageous for cerebral perfusion in many pathologies of the aortic arch and its branches.

Impact of surgical experience on outcome in surgery of acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

The study was conducted to evaluate our results of acute aortic dissection repair taking into account the impact of surgical experience in aortic surgery.

METHODS

Between August 2002 and March 2013, 162 consecutive patients (mean age: 63 ± 14 years) underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. All patients were operated on by one of the clinic's attending surgeons with wide experience in cardiac surgery (at least 2000 procedures performed personally), however about one-half of the patients (75 patients, 46%) were operated by the aortic team (AT) surgeons with profound experience in complex aortic pathologies. All perioperative data were collected prospectively and retrospective statistical analysis was performed using uni- and multivariate analyses to identify predictors for surgical adverse outcome (AO) containing in-hospital and/or 90-day mortality and new permanent neurological and organ dysfunctions.

RESULTS

AO was observed in 36 patients (22.2%) including in-hospital mortality in 22 (13.6%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified surgery not performed by the AT as the strongest predictor for AO (odds ratio: 14.1; 95% confidence interval: 3.5-55.6; P < 0.0001) followed by any malperfusion, myocardial infarction and creatinine level. Two groups were built according to the surgery performed by the AT (Group AT) or by the surgeons not on the AT (Group No-AT). The comparison of the groups showed no relevant differences regarding the preoperative characteristics, especially compromised consciousness, malperfusion and extent of dissection. Yet, the outcomes in Group AT vs No-AT were significantly different presenting AO: 8.0 vs 34.5% (P < 0.0001), in-hospital mortality: 4.0 vs and 21.8% (P < 0.001), new permanent neurological deficit: 2.7 vs 11.5% (P = 0.03), even if valve-sparing repairs and complete arch replacements were much more frequent in Group AT. The groups also differed considerably in regard to cannulation and perfusion management, which might play a decisive role in surgical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic repair in acute type A dissection, when performed by highly specialized aortic surgeons, offers not only much better outcomes but also provides significantly higher rate of curative albeit valve-sparing aortic repairs. Patient-centred care in referral aortic centres with surgery performed by specialized teams should be striven for to improve surgical results in acute aortic dissection surgery.

Evidence, lack of evidence, controversy, and debate in the provision and performance of the surgery of acute type A aortic dissection

Acute type A aortic dissection is a lethal condition requiring emergency surgery. It has diverse presentations, and the diagnosis can be missed or delayed. Once diagnosed, decisions with regard to initial management, transfer, appropriateness of surgery, timing of operation, and intervention for malperfusion complications are necessary. The goals of surgery are to save life by prevention of pericardial tamponade or intra-pericardial aortic rupture, to resect the primary entry tear, to correct or prevent any malperfusion and aortic valve regurgitation, and if possible to prevent late dissection-related complications in the proximal and downstream aorta. No randomized trials of treatment or techniques have ever been performed, and novel therapies-particularly with regard to extent of surgery-are being devised and implemented, but their role needs to be defined. Overall, except in highly specialized centers, surgical outcomes might be static, and there is abundant room for improvement. By highlighting difficulties and controversies in diagnosis, patient selection, and surgical therapy, our over-arching goal should be to enfranchise more patients for treatment and improve surgical outcomes.

Recommendations for haemodynamic and neurological monitoring in repair of acute type a aortic dissection

During treatment of acute type A aortic dissection there is potential for both pre- and intra-operative malperfusion. There are a number of monitoring strategies that may allow for earlier detection of potentially catastrophic malperfusion (particularly cerebral malperfusion) phenomena available for the anaesthetist and surgeon. This review article sets out to discuss the benefits of the current standard monitoring techniques available as well as desirable/experimental techniques which may serve as adjuncts in the monitoring of these complex patients.

Carotid artery cannulation in aortic surgery

OBJECTIVE

Carotid artery cannulation was initially established at our clinic for surgery of acute aortic dissection, and it became the standard approach for procedures in which circulatory arrest is necessary. The aim of the study was to evaluate this method's efficiency regarding postoperative outcomes after the first 100 procedures.

METHODS

Between July 2002 and October 2005, 100 patients underwent aortic surgery using carotid artery cannulation by a side graft for arterial return with a mean flow rate of 4.6 +/- 0.5 L/min. There were 27 patients with acute and 2 with chronic type A aortic dissection. Sixteen patients had had prior cardiac surgery. During circulatory arrest, the arterial line was used for unilateral cerebral perfusion in moderate hypothermia (mean rectal temperature 28 degrees C +/- 1.6 degrees C) with a mean flow rate of 0.85 +/- 0.2 L/min.

RESULTS

Carotid artery cannulation offered adequate arterial return in all patients. In no case was a switch to another cannulation site necessary for arterial return. Furthermore, no complications related to the cannulation site were observed. One patient with acute dissection and 1 with chronic aneurysm died during the early postoperative course. Thus, 30-day mortality was 2.0% for the whole group and 3.7% for the dissection group. Two patients with severe calcification of the aortic valve had strokes. There were no strokes in the dissection group, although there were preoperative signs of cerebral malperfusion in 4 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid artery cannulation is a fast, safe, and efficient method of arterial cannulation even in very obese patients. In addition, it simplifies the procedure of unilateral cerebral perfusion through the arterial line during circulatory arrest, making it completely unnecessary to interrupt cerebral perfusion.