Bilateral native lung–sparing lobar transplantation in a canine model

Native upper lobe-sparing living-donor lobar lung transplantation maximizes respiratory function of the donor graft

BACKGROUND

We have developed a novel method for native upper lobe-sparing living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) to overcome a small-for-size graft in standard LDLLT with acceptable results. We hypothesized that grafts implanted with this procedure might work more efficiently than those in standard lobe transplantation.

METHODS

Bilateral LDLLT was performed in 31 patients with a functional graft matching of less than 60% at our institution between August 2008 and December 2015. Of these, 22 patients were available for evaluation of pulmonary function more than 1 year later: 15 undergoing standard LDLLT with less than 60% functional matching and 7 undergoing native upper lobe-sparing LDLLT.

RESULTS

Overall survival at 2 years was 87.5% in the lobe-sparing LDLLT patients and 79.0% in the standard LDLLT patients (p = 0.401). The median forced vital capacity size-matching levels were 50.7% ± 1.6% in the standard LDLLT and 45.2% ± 2.3% in the sparing LDLLT group (p = 0.074). The 1-year and 2-year post-operative volume ratios of inspiration to expiration were significantly different between the 2 groups, at 1.76 and 1.45 after standard LDLLT (p = 0.019) vs 2.41 and 2.23 after lobe-sparing LDLLT (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The grafts in lobe-sparing LDLLT functioned more effectively than those in standard LDLLT. This advantage was associated with the improvement of pulmonary functions.

Outcomes of various transplant procedures (single, sparing, inverted) in living-donor lobar lung transplantation

OBJECTIVES

In standard living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT), the right and left lower lobes from 2 healthy donors are implanted. Because of the difficulty encountered in finding 2 donors with ideal size matching, various transplant procedures have been developed in our institution. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare outcomes of nonstandard LDLLT with standard LDLLT.

METHODS

Between June 2008 and January 2016, we performed 65 LDLLTs for critically ill patients. Functional size matching was performed by estimating graft forced vital capacity based on the donor's measured forced vital capacity and the number of pulmonary segments implanted. For anatomical size matching, 3-dimensional computed tomography volumetry was performed. In cases of oversize mismatch, single-lobe transplant or downsizing transplant was performed. In cases of undersize mismatch, native upper lobe sparing transplant or right-left inverted transplant was performed. In right-left inverted transplants, the donor's right lower lobe was inverted and implanted into the recipient's left chest cavity.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (44.6%) received nonstandard LDLLT, including 12 single-lobe transplants, 7 native upper lobe sparing transplants, 6 right-left inverted transplants, 2 sparing + inverted transplants, and 2 others. Thirty-six patients (57.4%) received standard LDLLT. Three- and five-year survival rates were similar between the 2 groups (89.1% and 76.6% after nonstandard LDLLT vs 78.0% and 71.1% after standard LDLLT, P = .712).

CONCLUSIONS

Various transplant procedures such as single, sparing and inverted transplants are valuable options when 2 donors with ideal size matching are not available for LDLLT.

Sparing Native Upper Lobes in Living-Donor Lobar Lung Transplantation: Five Cases From a Single Center

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) is indicated for rapidly deteriorating patients, and the total volume of two lower lobe grafts must be sufficient for the recipient. To rescue patients with small lobar grafts, we performed five LDLLTs sparing native upper lobes. This strategy was used when upper lobes or segments were preoperatively less impaired. There were no hospital deaths. Extracorporeal circulation time and operative time were similar to those of conventional LDLLTs. The length of intensive care unit stay was also similar. Late complications attributed to the spared lungs were airway infection in one recipient and pneumothorax in two but they were successfully managed. All recipients were discharged without supplemental oxygen. The spared lung volumes measured by volumetry did not change after LDLLT. Lung perfusion scintigraphy performed at 1 year showed remaining perfusion in the spared lungs, although much less than in the grafts. These results suggested that the spared lobes kept adequate space in the thoracic cavity and kept functioning to a limited extent. The new lobar-sparing strategy appears feasible and effective in LDLLT using small grafts for selected patients when the upper lobes or segments are less impaired.