The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system

The Diagnostic Impact of Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) in Evaluating Lymph Node Involvement in Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health burden, necessitating accurate staging and treatment planning for optimal patient outcomes. Lymph node involvement is a critical determinant of prognosis in CRC, emphasizing the importance of reliable imaging techniques for its evaluation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) has emerged as a cornerstone in CRC imaging, offering high-resolution anatomical detail and vascular assessment. This comprehensive review synthesizes the existing literature to evaluate the diagnostic impact of CECT in assessing lymph node involvement in CRC. Key findings highlight CECT's high sensitivity and specificity in detecting lymph node metastases, facilitating accurate staging and treatment selection. However, challenges such as limited resolution for small lymph nodes and potential false-positives call for a cautious interpretation. Recommendations for clinical practice suggest the integration of CECT into multidisciplinary treatment algorithms, optimizing imaging protocols and enhancing collaboration between radiologists and clinicians. Future research directions include refining imaging protocols, comparative effectiveness studies with emerging modalities, and prospective validation of CECT's prognostic value. Overall, this review stresses the pivotal role of CECT in CRC management and identifies avenues for further advancements in imaging-guided oncology care.

Extended Lymphadenectomy Improves Survival After Induction Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Database

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore the potential value of extended nodal-dissection following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), by analyzing data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

BACKGROUND

A CROSS-trial post-hoc analysis showed that the number of dissected lymph nodes was associated with improved survival in patients undergoing upfront surgery but not in those treated with neoadjuvant CRT.

METHODS

The NCDB was queried (2004-2014) for patients who underwent esophagectomy following induction CRT. Predictors of overall survival (OS) were assessed. The optimal number of dissected LNs associated with highest survival benefit was determined by multiple regression analyses and receiveroperating characteristic curve analysis. The whole cohort was divided into 2 groups based on the predefined cutoff number. The two groups were propensity-matched (PMs).

RESULTS

Esophagectomy following induction-CRT was performed in 14,503 patients. The number of resected nodes was associated with improved OS in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio for every 10 nodes: 0.95 (95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.98). The cutoff number of resected LNs that was associated with the highest survival benefit was 20 nodes. In the PM groups, patients in the "≥20 LNs" group had a 14% relative-increase in OS ( P = 0.002), despite having more advanced pathological stages (stage II-IV: 76% vs 72%, P < 0.001), and higher number of positive nodes (0-2 vs 0-1, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The total number of resected nodes is a significant determinant of improved survival following induction CRT in patients with either node negative or node positive disease. In the matched groups, patients with higher number of resected lymph nodes had higher OS rate, despite having more advanced pathological disease and higher number of resected positive lymph nodes.

Neoadjuvant Anlotinib and chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Short-term results of an open-label, randomized, phase II trial

Background

Clinical benefits of neoadjuvant Anlotinib for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant Anlotinib plus chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for the treatment of patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced ESCC were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant Anlotinib combined with chemotherapy (Anlotinib group) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy alone (nCRT group) with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoint was the R0 surgical resection rate. Secondary endpoints included postoperative pathologic stage, complete response (CR) rate, and safety. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and postoperative complications.

Results

From August 2019 to August 2021, 93 patients were assigned to the nCRT or Anlotinib group. Of the 93 patients, 79 underwent MIE and were finally included in the per-protocol set (nCRT group: n=39; Anlotinib group: n=40). The R0 resection rate was 97.4% for nCRT versus 100.0% for Anlotinib group (p&gt;0.05). Compared with the nCRT group, patients in the Anlotinib group had shorter total operation duration (262.2 ± 39.0 vs. 200.7 ± 25.5 min, p=0.010) and less blood loss (161.3 ± 126.7 vs. 52.4 ± 39.3 mL, p&lt;0.001). No significant differences were found in the postoperative pathologic stage between the Anlotinib group and nCRT group (all p&gt;0.05). Besides, the incidences of AEs (80.0% vs. 92.3%) and postoperative complications (22.5% vs. 30.8%) were similar between the two groups (all p&gt;0.05).

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant Anlotinib plus chemotherapy had a similar safety profile and pathologic response, but better surgical outcomes than nCRT for locally advanced ESCC.

The minimum number of examined lymph nodes for accurate nodal staging and optimal survival of stage T1-2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter cohort with SEER database validation

BACKGROUND

The extent of lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy remains controversial for patients with T1-2 ESCC. The aim of this study was to identify the minimum number of examined lymph node (ELN) for accurate nodal staging and overall survival (OS) of patients with T1-2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with T1-2 ESCC from three institutes between January 2011 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The associations of ELN count with nodal migration and OS were evaluated using multivariable models, and visualized by using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS). Chow test was used to determine the structural breakpoints of ELN count. External validation in the SEER database was performed.

RESULTS

In total, 1537 patients were included. Increased ELNs was associated with an increased likelihood of having positive nodal disease and incremental OS. The minimum numbers of ELNs for accurate nodal staging and optimal survival were 14 and 18 with validation in the SEER database (n = 519), respectively. The prognostic prediction ability of N stage was improved in the group with ≥14 ELNs compared with those with fewer ELNs (iAUC, 0.70 (95%CI 0.66-0.74) versus 0.61(95%CI 0.57-0.65)). The higher prognostic value was found for patients with ≥18 ELNs than those with <18 ELNs (iAUC, 0.78 (95%CI 0.74-0.82) versus 0.73 (95%CI 0.7-0.77)).

CONCLUSION

The minimum numbers of ELNs for accurate nodal staging and optimal survival of stage T1-2 ESCC patients were 14 and 18, respectively.

Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count on Precise Staging and Long-term Survival After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A SEER Database Analysis

Purpose

To identify the optimal number of lymph nodes dissected during esophagectomy following neoadjuvant therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Registry (SEER) database.

Patients and Methods

Patients who underwent neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) plus esophagectomy with EC from 2001–2016 were analyzed retrospectively in the SEER database. We analyzed the correlation between the lymphadenectomy count and nodal stage migration and overall survival (OS) by using a binary logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazards regression. The curves of the odds ratios (ORs) of nodal stage migration and hazard ratios (HRs) of OS were smoothed using the LOWESS technique, and the cutoff points were determined by the Chow test. The OS curves were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Among the 4,710 patients analyzed in the SEER database, a median of 12 lymph nodes (IQR, 7–19) were harvested. There was a significantly proportional increase in nodal stage migration (OR, 1.017; 95% CI, 1.011 to 1.023; P < 0.001) and serial improvements in OS among node-negative patients (HR, 0.983; 95% CI, 0.977 to 0.988; P < 0.001) with an increased ELN count after adjusting for the T stage. The corresponding cutoff point of the 16 ELNs was calculated for the OR of stage migration by the Chow test. For those with node-negative and node-positive diseases, no significant trend of survival benefit that favored a more extensive lymphadenectomy was demonstrated (HR, 1.001; 95% CI, 0.989 to 1.012; P = 0.906; and HR, 0.996; 95% CI, 0.985 to 1.006; P = 0.405, respectively).

Conclusion

On the basis of these results, we recommend that at least 16 ELNs be removed for accurate nodal staging as well as for obtaining a therapeutic benefit after nCRT for EC. Furthermore, once precise nodal staging has been achieved, patient survival does not improve with additional ELN dissection after nCRT, regardless of pathological nodal staging (negative or positive).

Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol

Background: In various cancer types, the first step towards extended metastatic disease is the presence of lymph node metastases. Imaging methods with sufficient diagnostic accuracy are required to personalize treatment. Lymph node metastases can be detected with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but this method needs validation. Here, a workflow is presented, which is designed to compare MRI-visible lymph nodes on a node-to-node basis with histopathology. Methods: In patients with prostate, rectal, periampullary, esophageal, and head-and-neck cancer, in vivo USPIO-enhanced MRI was performed to detect lymph nodes suspicious of harboring metastases. After lymphadenectomy, but before histopathological assessment, a 7 Tesla preclinical ex vivo MRI of the surgical specimen was performed, and in vivo MR images were radiologically matched to ex vivo MR images. Lymph nodes were annotated on the ex vivo MRI for an MR-guided pathological examination of the specimens. Results: Matching lymph nodes of ex vivo MRI to pathology was feasible in all cancer types. The annotated ex vivo MR images enabled a comparison between USPIO-enhanced in vivo MRI and histopathology, which allowed for analyses on a nodal, or at least on a nodal station, basis. Conclusions: A workflow was developed to validate in vivo USPIO-enhanced MRI with histopathology. Guiding the pathologist towards lymph nodes in the resection specimens during histopathological work-up allowed for the analysis at a nodal basis, or at least nodal station basis, of in vivo suspicious lymph nodes with corresponding histopathology, providing direct information for validation of in vivo USPIO-enhanced, MRI-detected lymph nodes.

Postoperative survival effect of the number of examined lymph nodes on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with pathological stage T1–3N0M0

Background

The postoperative survival effect of the number of examined lymph nodes on patients of R0-resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with pathological stage T1–3N0M0 is still unclear.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with pathological stage T1–3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from two cancer databases—our cancer center (N = 707), and Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (N = 151). The primary clinical endpoint was overall survival. The X-tile software was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of the number of examined lymph nodes, and propensity score matching was conducted to reduce selection bias according to the results of X-tile software. The cohort of 151 patients from another database was used for validation.

Results

X-tile software provided an optimal cutoff value of 15 examined lymph nodes based on 707 patients, and 231 pairs of matched patients were included. In the unmatched cohort, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed better overall survival in patients with more than 15 examined lymph nodes (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.566, 95% confidence interval, 0.445–0.720; p < 0.001) compared with patients with 15 or fewer examined lymph nodes. In the validation cohort, patients with more than 15 examined lymph nodes also had better overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.665, p = 0.047).

Conclusions

The number of examined lymph nodes is a significant prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with pathological stage T1–3N0M0, and more than 15 examined lymph nodes are associated with better overall survival. Although the difference is not significant, the survival curve of patients with examined lymph nodes > 30 is better than those with examined lymph nodes 15–30. We believe that the number of examined lymph nodes can provide prognostic guidance for those patients, and the more examined lymph nodes cause lesser occult lymph nodes metastasis and lead to a better prognosis. Therefore, surgeons and pathologists should try to examine as many lymph nodes as possible to evaluate the pathological stage precisely. However, we need more validation from other studies.

Outcomes of robotic esophagectomy

Esophagectomy has long been considered the standard of care for early-stage (≤ T2N0) esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), using a combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach, was first performed in the 1990s and showed significant improvements over open approaches. Refinement of MIE arrived in the form of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) in 2004. MIE is a challenging procedure for which consensus on optimal technique is still elusive. Although nonrobotic MIE confers significant advantages over open approaches, MIE remains associated with stubbornly high rates of complications, including pneumonia, aspiration, arrhythmia, anastomotic leakage, surgical site infection, and vocal cord palsy. RAMIE was envisioned to improve operative-associated morbidity while achieving equivalent or superior oncologic outcomes to nonrobotic MIE. However, owing to RAMIE’s significant upfront costs, steep learning curve, and other requirements, adoption remains less than widespread and convincing evidence supporting its use from well-designed studies is lacking. In this review, we compare operative, oncologic, and quality-of-life outcomes between open esophagectomy, nonrobotic MIE, and RAMIE. Although RAMIE remains a relatively new and underexplored modality, several studies in the literature show that it is feasible and results in similar outcomes to other MIE approaches. Moreover, RAMIE has been associated with favorable patient satisfaction and quality of life.

Characterizing impact of positive lymph node number in endometrial cancer using machine-learning: A better prognostic indicator than FIGO staging?

BACKGROUND

Number of involved lymph nodes (LNs) is a crucial stratification factor in staging of numerous disease sites, but has not been incorporated for endometrial cancer. We evaluated whether number of involved LNs provide improved prognostic value.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with node-positive endometrial adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis were identified in the National Cancer Database. We trained a machine-learning based model of overall survival. Shapley additive explanation values (SHAP) based on the model were used to identify cutoffs of number of LNs involved. Results were validated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

We identified 11,381 patients with endometrial cancer meeting the inclusion criteria. Using the SHAP values, we selected the following thresholds: 1-3 LNs, 4-5 LNs, and 6+ LNs. The 3-year OS was 82.0% for 1-3 LNs, 74.3% for 4-5 LNs (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38; p < 0.001), and 59.9% for 6+ LNs (HR 2.23; p < 0.001). On univariate Cox regression, PA nodal involvement was a significant predictor of OS (HR 1.20; p < 0.001) but was not significant on multivariate analysis when number of LNs was included (HR 1.05; p = 0.273). Additionally, we identified an interaction between adjuvant therapy and number of involved LNs. Patients with 1-3 involved LNs had 3-year OS of 85.2%, 78.7% and 74.2% with chemoradiation (CRT), chemotherapy, and radiation, respectively. Patients with 6+ involved LNs had 3-yr OS of 67.8%, 49.6%, and 48.9% with CRT, chemotherapy, and radiation, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Number of involved LNs is a stronger prognostic and predictive factor compared to PA node involvement.

Role of surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with lymph node positive locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: a national cancer database analysis

Background

Concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgery is a standard of care for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. It remains unclear if surgery following CRT offers any meaningful survival benefit compared to CRT alone in patients with clinical N3 disease who are at the highest risk of developing distant disease relapse.

Methods

We conducted analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to compare overall survival (OS) of patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (cTanyN1-3M0 based on AJCC 7th staging system) who underwent CRT with or without surgery and analyzed outcomes based on the cN stage.

Results

7,520 patients were included in the analysis-74.7% had cN1 disease, 21.1% had cN2 disease, and 4.3% had cN3 disease. The median OS advantage offered by CRT followed by surgery was 22, 15.8, and 9.6 months compared to CRT alone in cN1, cN2, and cN3 patients, respectively. The 5-year OS estimates in the surgical group were 36.9%, 31.6% and 15.9% in cN1, cN2 and cN3 groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Surgery following CRT in patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma leads to improvement in OS, with the largest benefit noted in patients with cN1 and cN2 disease. Surgery following CRT also confers meaningful long-term survival advantage for a subset of cN3 patients.

Comprehensive analysis of prognostic value of lymph node classifications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a large real-world multicenter study

Background:

We aim to assess the prognostic ability of three common lymph node–based staging algorithms, namely, the number of positive lymph nodes (pN), the lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods:

A total of 3902 ESCC patients treated at 10 Chinese institutions between 2003 and 2013 were included, along with 2465 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The prognostic ability of the aforementioned algorithms was evaluated using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (tdROC) curves, R², Harrell’s concordance index (C-index), and the likelihood ratio chi-square score. The primary outcomes included cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and CSS with a competing risk of death by non-ESCC causes.

Results:

LODDS had better prognostic performance than pN or LNR in both continuous and stratified patterns. In the multicenter cohort, the multivariate analysis showed that the model based on LODDS classification was superior to the others in predictive accuracy and discriminatory capacity. Two nomograms integrating LODDS classification and other clinicopathological risk factors associated with OS as well as cancer-specific mortality were constructed and validated in the SEER database. Finally, a novel TN_LODDS classification which incorporates the LODDS classification was built and categorized patients in to three new stages.

Conclusion:

Among the three lymph node–based staging algorithms, LODDS demonstrated the highest discriminative capacity and prognostic accuracy for ESCC patients. The nomograms and novel TN_LODDS classification based on LODDS classification could serve as precise evaluation tools to assist clinicians in estimating the survival time of individual patients and improving clinical outcomes postoperatively in the future.

Unresected small lymph node assessment predicts prognosis for patients with pT3N0M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

The role of unresected small lymph nodes (LNs) which may contain metastases for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) has not been addressed. The aim of the study was to investigate the role of unresected small LNs assessment using computed tomography (CT) in prognostic estimates of pT3N0M0 TESCC patients.

Methods

Between January 2009 and December 2017, 294 patients who underwent esophagectomy with R0 resection at Sichuan Cancer Hospital were retrospectively examined, and the last follow-up time was July 2018. Patients were classified into CT-suspect and CT-negative groups according to the shortest diameter and the shape (axial ratio) of the unresected small LNs on preoperative CT. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare survival differences in prognostic factors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for survival and recurrence.

Results

Eighty-four patients (28.6%) were classified as CT-suspect group according to the diagnostic criteria; survival analysis suggested that CT-suspect group of patients had a relatively poorer prognosis (P<0.05). Cox regression analysis indicated that unresected small LNs status, tumor grade, and postoperative adjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors for patients with pT3N0M0 TESCC (P<0.05). Further analysis shown the rates of total recurrence (TR) and locoregional recurrence (LR) in the CT-suspect group were significantly higher than that in the CT-negative group (TR, P<0.001; LR, P<0.001). Among the LRs, the rate of supraclavicular lymph node recurrence in the CT-suspect group was significantly higher than that in the CT-negative group (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Unresected small lymph node assessment is critically important and predict prognosis for pT3N0M0 TESCC patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02412-1.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by resection for esophageal cancer: clinical outcomes with the 'CROSS-regimen' in daily practice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Since the first results of the Dutch randomized CROSS-trial, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by resection for primary resectable nonmetastatic esophageal cancer (EC) has been implemented as standard curative treatment in the Netherlands. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of this treatment in daily practice in a large academic hospital.

METHODS

Medical records of patients treated for primary resectable nonmetastatic EC between May 2010 and December 2015 at our institution were reviewed. Treatment consisted of five weekly courses of carboplatin (area under the curve 2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) with concurrent external beam radiotherapy (23 fractions of 1.8 Gy), followed by transthoracic or transhiatal resection. Data on survival, progression, acute and late toxicity were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were included. Median follow-up was 43 months. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 29.8-40.2) and 30 (95% CI 19.7-40.3) months, respectively, with corresponding 3-year OS and PFS of 49.6% (95% CI 40.4-58.8) and 45.6% (95% CI 36.6-54.6). Acute toxicity grade ≥3 was observed in 25.5% of patients. Late adverse events grade ≥3 were seen in 24.8%, mostly esophageal stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant CRT followed by resection for primary resectable nonmetastatic EC in daily practice results in a 3-year OS of 49.6% (95% CI 40.4-58.8) and PFS of 45.6% (95% CI 36.6-54.6), compared with 58% (51-65%) and 51% (43-58%) within the CROSS-trial. The slightly poorer survival in our daily practice group might be due to the presence of less favorable patient and tumor characteristics in daily practice, as is to be expected in daily practice. Toxicity was comparable with that in the CROSS-trial and considered acceptable.

Narrative review of the role of gastroenterologist in the diagnosis, treatment and palliation in gastric and gastroesophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer (EC) and gastric cancer (GC) carry a high mortality rate. Unfortunately, a majority of patients are asymptomatic and at the time of diagnosis, the disease may invariably be in its advanced stages with limited curative options. Thus, it is imperative to recognize certain risk factors including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), male gender, pre-existing Barrett’s esophagus, smoking history, obesity, Helicobacter pylori infection, atrophic gastritis among others for both EC and GC, intervene on time with screening and surveillance modalities if indicated and optimize treatment plans. With advances in endoscopic techniques, early neoplastic lesions are increasingly managed by gastroenterologists, offering an alternative to surgery. The gold standard for diagnosis of EC and GC is high definition endoscopy with adequate targeted biopsies. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a key in the staging of early cancers dictating the pathway for treatment options. We also play a key role in palliation cases with the aim to reduce the symptoms like nausea, vomiting and even when possible, restore oral intake and improve nutrition in both advanced GC and EC. This review article discusses the risk factors, diagnostic and endoscopic treatment modalities of early EC and GC and palliation of advanced cancer where gastroenterologists play a key role.

Distribution of lymph node metastases in esophageal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

The distribution of lymph node metastases in esophageal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRTx) is unclear, but may have consequences for radiotherapy and surgery. The aim of this study was to define the distribution of lymph node metastases and relation to the radiation field in patients following nCRTx and esophagectomy.

METHODS

Between April 2014 and August 2015 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy with 2-field lymphadenectomy following nCRTx were included in this prospective observational study. Lymph node stations according to AJCC 7 were separately investigated. The location of lymph node metastases in relation to the radiation field was determined. The primary endpoint was the distribution of lymph node metastases and relation to the radiation field, the secondary endpoints were high-risk stations and risk factors for lymph node metastases and relation to survival.

RESULTS

Fifty consecutive patients were included. Lymph node metastases were found in 60% of patients and most frequently observed in paraesophageal (28%), left gastric artery (24%), and celiac trunk (18%) stations. Fifty-two percent had lymph node metastases within the radiation field. The incidence of lymph node metastases correlated significantly with ypT-stage (p = 0.002), cT-stage (p = 0.005), lymph angioinvasion (p = 0.004), and Mandard (p = 0.002). The number of lymph node metastases was associated with survival in univariable analysis (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.068-1.173, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal adenocarcinoma frequently metastasizes to both the mediastinal and abdominal lymph node stations. In this study, more than half of the patients had lymph node metastases within the radiation field. nCRTx is therefore not a reason to minimize lymphadenectomy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Critical number of lymph node involvement in esophageal and gastric cancer and its impact on long-term survival-A single-center 8-year study

BACKGROUND

Nodal disease in esophageal and gastric cancer is associated with poor survival.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the critical level of lymph node involvement where survival becomes significantly compromised.

METHODS

Survival analyses using multivariable Cox regression and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) were undertaken to determine what number of positive lymph nodes were most sensitive and specific in predicting survival.

RESULTS

A total of 317 patients underwent esophagectomy (n = 190, 59.9%) and gastrectomy (n = 127, 40.1%) for adenocarcinoma. At multivariable analyses, four nodes positivity (irrespective of T-category) was associated with nearly a fivefold increased risk of mortality when compared to node-negative patients (hazard ratio [HR], 4.9; interquartile range 2.0-11.5; P < .001). A positive ratio of up to 50.0% was not associated with worse survival than having four nodes positive (HR, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-8.1; P < .001). ROC analysis demonstrated four lymph nodes positive to have a sensitivity of 80.5%, a specificity of 60.1%, and an accuracy of 77.8 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The absolute number of nodes positive for cancer is more important than the proportion of positive nodes in predicting survival in esophageal/gastric cancer. Four positive lymph nodes are associated with a fivefold increase in mortality. Beyond this, increasing numbers of positive lymph nodes make no appreciable difference to survival.

Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline to assist in clinical decision making for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the more recently published literature (1999-2019) on therapy options for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer and provide recommended care options for this patient population.

RESULTS

Seventeen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Where possible, data were extracted separately for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Multimodality therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is recommended. For the subgroup of patients with adenocarcinoma, preoperative chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy should be offered. For the subgroup of patients with squamous cell carcinoma, preoperative chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy without surgery should be offered. Additional subgroup considerations are provided to assist with implementation of these recommendations. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

How Many Nodes Need to be Removed to Make Esophagectomy an Adequate Cancer Operation, and Does the Number Change When a Patient has Chemoradiotherapy Before Surgery?

INTRODUCTION AND DESIGN

Node dissection during esophagectomy is an important aspect of esophageal cancer staging. Controversy remains as to how many nodes need to be resected in order to properly stage a patient and whether the removal of more nodes carries a stage-independent survival benefit. A review of the literature performed by a group of experts in the subject may help define a minimum accepted number of lymph nodes to be resected in both primary surgery and post-induction therapy scenarios.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The existing evidence generally supports the goal of obtaining a minimum of 15 lymph nodes for pathological examination in both primary surgery and post-induction therapy scenarios.

Achieving adequate lymph node dissection in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinomas by radical lymphadenectomy: Beyond the scope of numbers of harvested lymph nodes

Previous studies have recommended harvesting a large number of lymph nodes (LNs) to improve the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). These studies or clinical guidelines focus on the total harvested LNs during lymphadenectomy; however, the extent of LN dissection (LND) required in patients with ESCCs remains controversial. The present study proposed a novel individualized adequate LND (ALND) strategy to compliment current guidelines to improve individualized therapeutic efficacy. For N0 cases, ALND was defined as an LN harvest of >55% of the LNs from nodal zones adjacent to the tumor location; and for N⁺ cases, ALND was defined as 8, 8, 8, 8 or 16 LNs dissected from the involved cervical, upper, middle, lower and celiac zones, respectively. Retrospective analysis of the ESCC cohort revealed that the ALND was associated with improved patient survival [hazard ratio (HR)=0.45 and 95% CI=0.30–0.66)]. Stratified analyses revealed that the protective role of ALND was prominent, with the exception of higher pN⁺ staged (pN2-3) cases (HR=0.52, 95% CI=0.23–1.18). Furthermore, ALND was associated with improved survival in local diseases (T1-3/N0-1; HR=0.50, 95% CI=0.30–0.84) and locally advanced diseases (T4/Nany or T1-3/N2-3; HR=0.32, 95% CI=0.15–0.68). These findings suggested that the proposed ALND strategy may effectively improve the survival of patients with ESCC.

Novel imaging techniques in staging oesophageal cancer

The survival of oesophageal cancer is poor as most patients present with advanced disease. Radiological staging of oesophageal cancer is complex but is fundamental to clinical management. Accurate staging investigations are vitally important to guide treatment decisions and optimise patient outcomes. A combination of baseline computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and positron emission tomography (PET) are currently used for initial treatment decisions. The potential value of these imaging modalities to re-stage disease, monitor response and alter treatment is currently being investigated. This review presents an essential update on the accuracy of oesophageal cancer staging investigations, their use in re-staging after neo-adjuvant therapy and introduces evolving imaging techniques, including novel biomarkers that have clinical potential in oesophageal cancer.

Prognostic value of the number of negative lymph nodes in esophageal carcinoma without lymphatic metastasis

Background

The impact of the number of negative lymph nodes (LNs) on survival in patients with esophageal cancer remains a controversial issue. This study investigated the association between the number of resected LNs and the prognosis of patients with node‐negative esophageal carcinoma.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of the data of 429 patients who underwent esophagectomy with modern two‐field lymphadenectomy for the treatment of esophageal cancer between January 1998 and December 2008. Histopathology showed no LN involvement in the patient sample. The prognostic impact of the number of negative LNs and the clinicopathological factors were analyzed.

Results

The overall median survival time and the one, three, and five‐year overall survival rates were 63.0 months and 78.5%, 64.0%, and 51.2%, respectively. Survival analysis confirmed that the number of negative LNs and the depth of tumor invasion were independent prognostic factors. Patients with a high number of negative LNs had a better overall survival rate than patients with a low number of negative LNs (P < 0.001). Patients with dissected LNs > 14 for pT1 tumors (P < 0.001) and > 19 for pT2–3 tumors (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively) had better long‐term survival outcomes.

Conclusions

The number of negative LNs is an independent prognostic factor for node‐negative esophageal carcinoma. Extended LN dissection is recommended to improve the survival of patients with node‐negative esophageal carcinoma.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the prediction of survival in patients with advanced esophageal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising treatment strategy for advanced esophageal cancer. However, measures of NAC response assessment and prognostic prediction have not yet been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of combined ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). A total of 77 patients with stage IB-IV esophageal cancer who were treated with NAC followed by curative resection were retrospectively analyzed. PET/CT was performed before and after NAC and 56 patients were clinical responders. The pretreatment maximal standardized uptake value (pre-SUV_max), post-SUV_max and %SUV_max were 11.3±5.8, 5.1±4.8 and 49.0±35.1%, respectively, for the main tumors (T) and 4.3±2.8, 2.5±1.9 and 67.0±39.6%, respectively, for the metastatic nodes (N). Among the preoperatively available factors, clinical response (P=0.018), post-SUV_max-N (P=0.0001) and %SUV_max-T (P=0.0031) were significant prognostic factors by univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis identified post-SUV_max-N as the only significant prognostic predictor (P=0.0254). Patients with a post-SUV_max-N of <3.0 exhibited significantly fewer pathological metastatic nodes and better disease-free survival compared with patients with a post-SUV_max-N >3.0. Therefore, post-SUV_max-N may be a useful prognostic predictor in patients with advanced esophageal cancer who are treated with NAC followed by surgery.

Nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis to predict overall survival in patients with stage IIB-III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy

We have developed statistical models for predicting survival in patients with stage IIB-III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and assessing the efficacy of adjuvant treatment. From a retrospective review of 3,636 patients, we created a database of 1,004 patients with stage IIB-III thoracic ESCC who underwent esophagectomy with or without postoperative radiation. Using a multivariate Cox regression model, we assessed the prognostic impact of clinical and histological factors on overall survival (OS). Logistic analysis was performed to identify factors to include in a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to predict 5-year OS. The nomogram was evaluated internally based on the concordance index (C-index) and a calibration plot. The median survival time in the training dataset was 30.9 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 33.9%. T stage, differentiated grade, adjuvant treatment, tumor location, lymph node metastatic ratio (LNMR), and the presence of vascular carcinomatous thrombi were statistically significant predictors of 5-year OS. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.70 (95% CI 0.67-0.73). RPA resulted in a three-class stratification: class 1, LNMR ≤ 0.15 with adjuvant treatment; class 2, LNMR ≤ 0.15 without adjuvant treatment and LNMR > 0.15 with adjuvant treatment; and class 3, LNMR > 0.15 without adjuvant treatment. The three classes were statistically significant for OS (P < 0.001). Thus, the nomogram and RPA models predicted the prognosis of stage IIB-III ESCC patients and could be used in decision-making and clinical trials.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and feasible for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

The advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by open esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has been widely recognized. However, the safety and feasibility of NAC for patients receiving minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential impact of prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the clinical outcome of MIE by comparing two groups of patients, MIE alone and NAC plus MIE.

Methods

From May 2013 to July 2017, 124 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent MIE in our department, with 57 cases receiving NAC plus MIE and 67 cases receiving MIE alone. Perioperative parameters and short‐term postoperative survival were compared between these two groups to evaluate the safety and feasibility of NAC given before MIE.

Results

The group with NAC plus MIE had slightly longer operating time, more blood loss, higher morbidity, increased chance of surgical intensive care unit stay, and longer surgical intensive care unit stay time than the group with MIE alone. However, there was no statistically significant difference between these two groups (P > 0.05). The number of lymph nodes harvested was similar in the two groups without significant difference (P > 0.05). The overall survival was not significantly different between these two groups either (P > 0.05), although before surgery the clinical stage of the group with NAC plus MIE was more advanced than the group with MIE alone.

Conclusions

NAC followed by MIE is safe and feasible for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. NAC does not negatively impact the therapeutic outcome of MIE.

Submucosal Invasive Depth Predicts Lymph Node Metastasis and Poor Prognosis in Submucosal Invasive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in submucosal invasive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SM-ESCC) is a prognostic factor. The aim of this study was to identify a histopathologic predictor of LNM in SM-ESCC.

METHODS

In total, 108 patients who underwent an esophagectomy and lymph node dissection without preoperative therapy and who were pathologically diagnosed with SM-ESCC were enrolled in this study. Relationships between several clinicopathologic factors and LNM were examined.

RESULTS

A multivariate analysis revealed that a tumor size of 35 mm or more (P = .0025), submucosal invasive depth (SID) of 2,000 μm or more (P = .013), and lymphatic infiltration (P < .0001) were significant independent predictors of LNM. In addition, there were significant differences in recurrence-free survival curves between patients with SID less than 2,000 μm or not (P = .029) and tumor size less than 35 mm or not (P = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that SID may predict not only LNM but also poor prognosis.

Analysis of the causes of failure after radical surgery in patients with PT3N0M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and consideration of postoperative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Five-year overall survival rate of TESCC after surgery is low (approximately 30% to 60%), so it is meaningful to discuss the significance of PORT.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the data of 227 patients with _PT₃N₀M₀ esophageal cancer (EC). The failure pattern after surgery was analyzed. Difference of adjuvant PORT in patients with _PT₃N₀M₀ TESCC and the appropriate population were explored based on the relevant studies.

RESULTS

There were 58 cases with intrathoracic locoregional recurrence (LRR) after radical surgery and 27 cases with distant metastasis, including 10 cases of recurrence. The recurrence rate of mediastinal lymph nodes in the thoracic cavity was 50.0%. Univariate analysis revealed that compared with patients with middle and lower thoracic EC, the 3/5-year survival rate of patients with upper thoracic EC was significantly lower, accompanied with remarkably higher thoracic LRR. Compared with those with moderately- and well-differentiated TESCC, the 3/5-year survival rate of patients with poorly differentiated TESCC was significantly lower, whereas the distant metastasis rate was notably higher. Multivariate analysis revealed that different lesion locations and different pathologic differentiation were the independent prognostic factors. The lesion location and degree of differentiation were the independent influencing factors for thoracic LRR and distant metastasis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The intrathoracic LRR is the major failure pattern for patients with _PT₃N₀M₀ TESCC after conventional two-field lymphadenectomy. In addition, recurrence rate of _PT₃N₀M₀ TESCC was significantly higher in upper thoracic EC than in middle and lower thoracic EC. PORT is recommended to patients with _PT₃N₀M₀ upper TESCC.

Oncologic Quality Indicators in Thoracic Surgery

This article outlines a structure for assessing thoracic surgical quality and provides an overview of evidence-based quality metrics for surgical care in both lung cancer and esophageal cancer, with a focus on process and outcome measures in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative setting.

The prognostic value of nodal skip metastasis in resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of nodal skip metastasis (NSM) to identify the risk factors that influence NSM and to assess the prognostic value of NSM in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Patients and methods

Between January 2009 and December 2013, 285 patients with ESCC with positive lymph nodes who underwent complete resection were enrolled.

Results

For the entire group, NSM occurred in 32.3% (92/285) of patients. The median survival time and 5-year survival rate in the NSM group were 28 months and 12.0%, respectively, compared with 36.3 months and 25.0%, respectively, in the non-NSM group (P=0.008). Both N stage (P=0.001) and T stage (P=0.014) were associated with the incidence of NSM. NSM (P=0.008), T stage (P=0.000), and N stage (P=0.000) were independent prognostic factors for survival. In the NSM group, T stage (P=0.014) and N stage (P=0.000) were independent prognostic factors for survival.

Conclusion

It was concluded that NSM is common in ESCC and is associated with poor survival.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer according to the location of the tumor: Experience of 251 patients

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is increasingly used for the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, the ideal approach of MIE is not yet standardized. We explore the ideal approach of MIE according to the location of the tumor and compare the clinical outcomes between patients with cancer arising in the upper third of the esophagus and those with tumors involving the middle and lower third of the esophagus.

METHODS

We included patients with esophageal carcinoma and had clear indications for MIE. For cancer arising in the upper third of the esophagus, MIE McKeown approach was performed. For tumors involving the middle and lower third of the esophagus, MIE Ivor Lewis approach was adopted.

RESULTS

Of the 251 patients included in this analysis, 200 patients underwent Ivor-Lewis MIE and 51 patients underwent McKeown MIE. The incidence of anastomotic leak, anastomotic stenosis and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was significantly higher in the McKeown MIE group than that in the Ivor Lewis MIE group. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.2% (n = 1) in the McKeown MIE group. Lymph nodes harvested were significantly more in the MIE-McKeown group than in Ivor Lewis MIE group (P < 0.05). The median follow-up period was 15 months (1-25 months) and the overall survival rate at 1 year stratified by pathologic stage at esophagectomy was 95.9% (stage 1), 83.8% (stage II), 73.4% (stage III).

CONCLUSIONS

MIE for esophageal cancer according to the location and clinical stage of the tumor will decrease all postoperative complications and may yield the greatest benefit from surgery.

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND SURVIVAL ANALYSIS IN ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA

Background:

Despite recent advances in diagnosis and treatment, esophageal cancer still has high mortality. Prognostic factors associated with patient and with disease itself are multiple and poorly explored.

Aim:

Assess prognostic variables in esophageal cancer patients.

Methods:

Retrospective review of all patients with esophageal cancer in an oncology referral center. They were divided according to histological diagnosis (444 squamous cell carcinoma patients and 105 adenocarcinoma), and their demographic, pathological and clinical characteristics were analyzed and compared to clinical stage and overall survival.

Results:

No difference was noted between squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma overall survival curves. Squamous cell carcinoma presented 22.8% survival after five years against 20.2% for adenocarcinoma. When considering only patients treated with curative intent resection, after five years squamous cell carcinoma survival rate was 56.6 and adenocarcinoma, 58%. In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, poor differentiation histology and tumor size were associated with worse oncology stage, but this was not evidenced in adenocarcinoma.

Conclusion:

Weight loss (kg), BMI variation (kg/m²) and percentage of weight loss are factors that predict worse stage at diagnosis in the squamous cell carcinoma. In adenocarcinoma, these findings were not statistically significant.

Is endoscopic ultrasound examination necessary in the management of esophageal cancer?

Despite substantial efforts at early diagnosis, accurate staging and advanced treatments, esophageal cancer (EC) continues to be an ominous disease worldwide. Risk factors for esophageal carcinomas include obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hard-alcohol use and tobacco smoking. Five-year survival rates have improved from 5% to 20% since the 1970s, the result of advances in diagnostic staging and treatment. As the most sensitive test for locoregional staging of EC, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) influences the development of an optimal oncologic treatment plan for a significant minority of patients with early cancers, which appropriately balances the risks and benefits of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. EUS is costly, and may not be available at all centers. Thus, the yield of EUS needs to be thoughtfully considered for each patient. Localized intramucosal cancers occasionally require endoscopic resection (ER) for histologic staging or treatment; EUS evaluation may detect suspicious lymph nodes prior to exposing the patient to the risks of ER. Although positron emission tomography (PET) has been increasingly utilized in staging EC, it may be unnecessary for clinical staging of early, localized EC and carries the risk of false-positive metastasis (over staging). In EC patients with evidence of advanced disease, EUS or PET may be used to define the radiotherapy field. Multimodality staging with EUS, cross-sectional imaging and histopathologic analysis of ER, remains the standard-of-care in the evaluation of early esophageal cancers. Herein, published data regarding use of EUS for intramucosal, local, regional and metastatic esophageal cancers are reviewed. An algorithm to illustrate the current use of EUS at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center is presented.

Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Prediction of lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is very important to have prognostic significance. The objective of this study which involved a relatively large number of ESCC patients was to investigate the correlated factors for lymph node metastasis and prognosis in ESCC. We analyzed a retrospective review of 446 patients with ESCC treated by esophagectomy between January 2010 and July 2016. The relationship between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological parameters were analyzed. The association between overall survival and clinicopathological factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariable Cox regression models. In the present study, 36.8% esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients were histologically shown to have lymph node metastasis. Lymph node metastasis was closely correlated with tumor differentiation (p=0.016), perineural invasion (p=0.022), advanced stage tumor (p<0.001) and venous invasion (p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that patients with tumor size, higher T stage, perineuronal invasion, lymph node metastasis, N stage and LNR higher than 0.2 had unfavorable prognosis (p<0.05). The univariate analysis revealed for overall survival that tumor size, pathological stage, perineuronal invasion, lymph metastasis, N stage, involved LNR were relevant prognostic indicators. Furthermore, tumor size, lymph metastasis, N stage and LNR could as independent prognostic factors.

Supraclavicular and/or celiac lymph node metastases from thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma did not compromise survival following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery

This study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of supraclavicular and/or celiac lymph node (LN) metastases in locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) and surgery. Among the total 199 patients, 75 (37.7%) had supraclavicular and/or celiac LN metastasis. Surgery was performed following NACRT in 168 patients (84.4%). After the median 18.7 (1.0-147.2) months’ follow-up, 2-year rates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in all patients were 48.1% and 65.7%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, negative surgical margin (p < 0.001), ypT0 stage (p = 0.004), and ypN0 stage (p = 0.020) were significantly favorable factors for PFS, and negative surgical margin (p < 0.001) was the only significantly favorable factor for OS. Metastasis to the supraclavicular and/or celiac LNs was significant factor neither for PFS (p = 0.311) nor OS (p = 0.515). Supraclavicular and/or celiac LN metastasis did not compromise the clinical outcomes following NACRT and surgery.

Clinical outcomes of elderly patients (≥70 years) with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy: A retrospective analysis from a single cancer institute

A retrospective analysis was conducted to investigate outcomes of elderly patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent surgery or chemoradiotherapy (CRT).We performed a retrospective review of the records of elderly patients (≥70 years) with resectable ESCC who underwent esophagectomy or CRT between January 2009 and March 2013. According to the main treatment strategy, patients were allocated into either surgery group or CRT group. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model, respectively.A total of 188 patients were enrolled. Eighty-eight patients underwent esophagectomy, and 100 patients underwent CRT. The median age of the patients was 73 years (range, 70-81 years) in the surgery group and 76 years (range, 70-88 years) in the CRT group. The median survival time (MST) for the whole cohort was 25.6 months, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 69.2%, 36.1%, and 21.9%, respectively. The MST in the surgery group and the CRT group was 36 months and 15 months, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates in the surgery group were 82.4%, 49.0%, and 33.3%, compared to 58.0%, 24.1%, and 7.8% in the CRT group (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node status (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.598, P = 0.011) and treatment strategies (HR = 0.538, P = 0.001) were independent and significant prognostic factors for OS in elderly patients.Surgery was the main treatment strategy for elderly patients with ESCC. Advanced age and comorbidities should not be the cause for elderly patients to avoid aggressive regimens. Delivered therapeutic approaches should be individualized on the basis of carefully evaluating the balance of benefits, risks, and life expectancy.

Prognostic Factors for Locoregional Recurrence in Patients with Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Radical Two-Field Lymph Node Dissection: Results from Long-Term Follow-Up

OBJECTIVE

To aim of this study was to determine the clinical and biological prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing radical two-field lymph node dissection (2FLD).

METHODS

A total of 462 patients diagnosed with thoracic ESCC underwent radical esophagectomy between March 2001 and May 2010 at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center. Clinical characteristics, CD44 expression, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels were evaluated in 198 patients who underwent R0 dissection with long-term follow-up. Partial Cox regression analysis with leave-one-out cross-validation was performed to validate the selected risk factors.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 54 months, the 5-year local failure-free survival (LFFS) rate of 198 patients was 62.5%. Multivariate analysis revealed that T stage (p = 0.043), pathological positive tumor above the carina (p = 0.000), CD44 expression level (p = 0.045) and TIL level (p = 0.007) were prognostic factors for LFFS, while the Cox model with risk scores had an area under the curve value of 83.6% for the prediction of 5-year LFFS. The best cut-off value (sum score = 11.19) was used to determine the high- and low-risk groups, with patients at high risk having a significantly shorter 5-year LFFS than patients at low risk (p = 0.000). The LRR pattern revealed significantly high incidences of recurrent disease at the supraclavicular and cervical sites, mediastinum (above the carina), and anastomosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our predictive model was able to distinguish between patients at high risk for LRR and patients at low risk for LRR. LRR primarily involved the upper thorax and this area must be considered in future study designs for radical trimodality treatment.

Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Survival for esophageal cancer has improved over the past four decades, probably as a result of a combination of more accurate staging, improved surgical outcomes, advances in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies, and the increasing implementation of multimodality treatment. Surgical resection still remains the mainstay in the treatment of localized esophageal adenocarcinoma. Multiple techniques have been described for esophagectomy, which are based on either a transthoracic or transhiatal approach. Despite proponents of each technique touting potential advantages such as superior oncologic resection with more extensive transthoracic lymphadenectomy compared to the relatively limited morbidity and mortality with a transhiatal resection, the superiority of one technique over another is not clear and may be relegated to a topic of historical significance in the era of minimally invasive surgery. With the increased acceptance of neoadjuvant multimodality therapy, both approaches have been shown to have acceptable outcomes. And in the hands of experienced surgeons, both techniques can provide excellent short-term results. Moreover, surgeon and hospital volume have shown to be strongly associated with improved operative morbidity and oncologic outcomes, which may supersede the type of approach selected for an individual patient.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Transhiatal Esophagectomy (LATE) for Carcinoma of the Esophagus

Total laparoscopic approach for the management of carcinoma of the esophagus has not gained much popularity due to its complexity. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, feasibility, and outcome of laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (LATE) for patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. This retrospective study involves a total of 26 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus who were considered for LATE by a single surgical team from January 2010 to September 2014. The median (range) age was 55 years (35-72), and male to female ratio was 20:6. The median (range) operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were 300 min (180-660), 300 ml (100-500), and 11.5 days (8-25), respectively. Pulmonary complications and cervical anastomotic leak (including one patient with conduit necrosis) occurred in eight (30.7 %) and three (11.5 %) patients, respectively. AJCC stage (7th ed.) was IIA in 12 (46.15 %), IIB in 10 (38.46 %), IIIA in 3 (11.53 %), and IIIB in 1 (3.84 %) patient. Surgical resection margin was negative in all but one patient (3.8 %). The median (range) number of lymph nodes (LN) retrieved was 13 (8-28). During a median follow-up 19 months (8-39), five patients (19.23 %) developed recurrence and three (11.5 %) of them died. LATE is a safe and feasible for the management of selected patients with carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus.

Proposed Modification of Nodal Staging as an Alternative to the Seventh Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System Improves the Prognostic Prediction in the Resected Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis staging system for esophageal cancer defined N classification based on the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs). However, this classification might neglect the extent of LNs metastasis. This study aimed to revise N classification based on the extent of LNs metastasis and propose a modification to the current AJCC staging system for better representing the prognostic characteristics of Chinese esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1993 ESCC patients who underwent curative resection. The proposed N categories based on the number of LNs metastasis stations were compared with the current staging system by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradients of two staging systems were compared using likelihood ratio χ statistics and Akaike information criterion calculations.

RESULTS

The survival differences were not significant for N2 versus N3 category (p = 0.231) and stages IIIB versus IIIC (p = 0.713) based on the 7th AJCC staging system. When the modified staging system was adopted, the survival difference for N2 versus N3 and IIIB versus IIIC could be well discriminated. Statistical analysis showed that the modified staging system had higher likelihood ratio χ scores and smaller Akaike information criterion values than the 7th AJCC staging system, which represented the optimum prognostic stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified staging system with the revised N categories based on the number of LNs metastasis stations better predicts the survival of Chinese ESCC population than the 7th AJCC staging system. Further studies are required to confirm this result.

Involved-field radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: theory and practice

Esophageal carcinoma (EC) is characterized by a high rate of lymph node metastasis and its spread pattern is not always predictable. Chemoradiotherapy has an important role in the treatment of EC in both the inoperable and the pre-operative settings. However, regarding the target volume for radiation, different clinical practices exist. Theoretically, in addition to the clinical target volume administered to the gross lesion, it might seem logical to deliver a certain dose to the uninvolved regional lymph node area at risk for microscopic disease. However, in practice, it is difficult because of the intolerance of normal tissue to radiotherapy (RT), particularly if all regions containing the cervical, mediastinal, and upper abdominal nodes are covered. To date, the use of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) is still controversial in the field of radiotherapy. Some investigators use involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) in order to reduce treatment-related toxicities. It is thought that micrometastases can be controlled, to some extent, by chemotherapy and the abscopal effects of radiation. It is the presence of overtly involved lymph nodes rather than the micrometastatic nodes negatively affects survival in patients with EC. In another hand, lymph nodes stationed near primary tumors also receive considerable incidental irradiation doses that may contribute to the elimination of subclinical lesions. These data indicate that an irradiation volume covering only the gross tumor is appropriate. When using ENI or IFRT, very few patients experience solitary regional node failure and out-of-field lymph node failure is not common. Primary tumor recurrence and distant metastases, rather than regional lymph node failure, affect the overall survival in patients with EC. The available evidence indicates that the use of ENI seems to prevent or delay regional nodal relapse rather than improve survival. In a word, these data suggest that IFRT is feasible in EC patients.

Impact of number of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-positive lymph nodes on survival of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

[(18) F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET has been used to evaluate the response of primary tumours to neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer. The clinical significance of the number of PET-positive nodes before and after therapy has not been investigated previously.

METHODS

[(18) F]FDG-PET was performed before and 2-3 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to identify the number of PET-positive nodes, and these numbers were assessed in relation to metabolic changes in the primary tumour.

RESULTS

Of 302 patients in total, 90 had no PET-positive nodes, 83 had one, 59 had two and 70 patients had three or more positive nodes before therapy. After treatment, the numbers were: none in 207 patients, one in 59, two in 20 and three or more in 16 patients. The number of PET-positive nodes after treatment was influenced by both the number of PET-positive nodes before therapy and the response to preoperative therapy, and correlated with the number of metastatic lymph nodes. Overall survival was longer in patients who had no PET-positive nodes after treatment than in those who had one or more. Multivariable analysis identified the numbers of PET-positive nodes before and after chemotherapy as independent prognostic factors, together with clinical response, tumour depth and lymph node involvement.

CONCLUSION

The number of PET-positive nodes after treatment correlated with survival in patients with oesophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The revised American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition) improves prognostic stratification after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Staging for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma lacked sufficient prognostic accuracy and was revised. We compared survival prognostication between American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 6th and 7th editions.

METHODS

We abstracted data for 836 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (n = 256 neoadjuvant). Monotonicity and strength of survival trends, by stage, were assessed (log-rank test of trend chi-square statistic) and compared using permutation testing. Overall survival (Cox regression) and model fit (Akaike Information Criterion) were determined.

RESULTS

A greater log-rank test of trend statistic indicated stronger survival trends by stage in AJCC 7th (152.872 vs 167.623; permutation test P < .001) edition. Greater Cox likelihood chi-square value (162.957 vs 173.951) and lower Akaike Information Criterion (4,831.011 vs 4,820.016) indicated better model fit. Superior performance was also shown after neoadjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

AJCC 7th edition staging for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma provides superior prognostic stratification after minimally invasive esophagectomy, overall and after neoadjuvant therapy compared with AJCC 6th edition.

Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The optimal extent of lymphadenectomy in patients with esophageal cancer is controversial. This study aimed to examine the therapeutic value of lymph node (LN) dissection for each LN station in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

In 304 patients with ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Efficacy Index (EI) was calculated by multiplying the incidence of metastasis by the 3-year survival rate of patients with positive nodes for each LN station.

RESULTS

Prognosis was better in responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than non-responders (3-year survival; 66.3% vs 48.1%, P = 0.0035). The total number of resected LNs did not affect survival although the number of positive LNs did. The number of resected LNs did not correlate with the number of metastatic LNs. Cardiac LN and recurrent nerve LN showed high EI, irrespective of tumor location. EI for each LN station did not vary according to the response to neoadjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that therapeutic value of each LN was not affected by preoperative chemotherapy. The location of resected LNs rather than the total number of resected LNs may be more important to maximize the survival benefit of lymphadenectomy.

Radical Lymph Node Dissection in Primary Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Subtotal esophagectomy with radical lymph node dissection (RLND) remains an effective therapeutic strategy for localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, controversy exists regarding the extent to which RLND should be performed. We reappraised the prognostic impact and accurate nodal staging of RLND in ESCC.

METHODS

The data from 101 ESCC patients (mean age, 57.5 years; 93 men) who underwent primary subtotal esophagectomy were retrospectively collected. Candidate variables, including the number of total dissected lymph nodes (TDLN [subgrouped into TDLN less than 13, TDLN 13 to 40, and TDLN more than 40]), were evaluated to determine their prognostic impacts and hazard ratio (HR).

RESULTS

Fewer TDLN (p < 0.001; HR 9.011, 2.449, and 1.000 for TDLN less than 13, TDLN 13 to 40, and TDLN more than 40, respectively), tumor length exceeding 3.5 cm (p < 0.001; HR 3.321), resection margin invasion (p < 0.001; HR 14.493), and positive nodal status (p = 0.002; HR 2.730) were independent predictors of a poor prognosis. Considering the 54 node-negative patients, more TDLN correlated with improved survival (p = 0.001). Risk analysis demonstrated that one fewer TDLN could contribute to an increased HR of 1.047 (p = 0.014). However, RLND involving more TDLN appeared to lose the prognostic impact for the 47 node-positive patients (p = 0.072). Furthermore, the number of positive dissected lymph nodes remained at approximately 4 if the number of TDLN exceeded 20.

CONCLUSIONS

For N-negative or N-positive ESCC patients undergoing primary surgical resection, the number of TDLN influenced their prognosis or nodal staging accuracy, respectively. At least 20 TDLN were necessary for N-positive patients.