Intramyocardial delivery of CD133+ bone marrow cells and coronary artery bypass grafting for chronic ischemic heart disease: safety and efficacy studies

Stem Cell Therapy for Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Critical Analysis

In exploring therapeutic options for ischemic heart disease (IHD) and heart failure, cell-based cardiac repair has gained prominence. This systematic review delves into the current state of knowledge surrounding cell-based therapies for cardiac repair. Employing a comprehensive search across relevant databases, the study identifies 35 included studies with diverse cell types and methodologies. Encouragingly, these findings reveal the promise of cell-based therapies in cardiac repair, demonstrating significant enhancements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) across the studies. Mechanisms of action involve growth factors that stimulate angiogenesis, differentiation, and the survival of transplanted cells. Despite these positive outcomes, challenges persist, including low engraftment rates, limitations in cell differentiation, and variations in clinical reproducibility. The optimal dosage and frequency of cell administration remain subjects of debate, with potential benefits from repeated dosing. Additionally, the choice between autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation poses a critical decision. This systematic review underscores the potential of cell-based therapies for cardiac repair, bearing implications for innovative treatments in heart diseases. However, further research is imperative to optimize cell type selection, delivery techniques, and long-term efficacy, fostering a more comprehensive understanding of cell-based cardiac repair.

Intramyocardial Stem Cell Transplantation during Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Safely Improves Cardiac Function: Meta-Analysis of 20 Randomized Clinical Trials

IMSC transplantation during CABG is considered one of the most promising methods to effectively deliver stem cells and has been widely studied in many trials. But the results of outcomes and safety of this modality still vary widely. We conducted this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate not only the outcome but also the safety of this promising method. A meta-analysis was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was undertaken using the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Articles were thoroughly evaluated and analyzed. Twenty publications about IMSC during CABG were included. Primary outcomes were measured using LVEF, LVESV, LVESVI, LVESD, LVEDV, LVEDVI, LVEDD, WMSI, and 6-MWT. Safety measures were depicted by total deaths, MACE, CRD, CVA, myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmia, and cardiac-related readmission. IMSC transplantation during CABG significantly improved LVEF (MD = 3.89%; 95% CI = 1.31% to 6.46%; p = 0.003) and WMSI (MD = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.01-0.56; p = 0.04). Most of the other outcomes showed favorable results for the IMSC group but were not statistically significant. The safety analysis also showed no significant risk difference for IMSC transplantation compared to CABG alone. IMSC during CABG can safely improve cardiac function and tend to improve cardiac volumes and dimensions. The analysis and application of influencing factors that increase patients' responses to IMSC transplantation are important to achieve long-term improvement.

Autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of 22 randomized controlled trials

Background

Although the safety and feasibility of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and bone marrow stem cell (BMSC) transplantation have been established, the effectiveness of this approach compared with CABG alone remains controversial. The aim of this updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to evaluate the efficacy of this procedure.

Methods

A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using studies sourced from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane literature databases to compare patients who received isolated CABG (CABG group) and BMSC transplantation with CABG (BMSC group). 22 studies were included.

Results

A total of 22 relevant publications with 820 patients were included. 432 patients received BMSC transplantation with CABG and 388 patients received isolated CABG. Compared with the CABG group, the BMSC transplantation group exhibited an improvement in the left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (mean difference (MD) = 3.87%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.93–5.80%; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The present evidence suggests that autologous BMSC transplantation for patients undergoing CABG appears to be associated with an improvement in LV function compared with CABG alone. However, heterogeneity in the data suggests that patients respond differently to this therapy. Further research is needed to understand these differences.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-022-01838-2.

Regulation of Endothelial Progenitor Cell Functions in Ischemic Heart Disease: New Therapeutic Targets for Cardiac Remodeling and Repair

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Ischemia and hypoxia following myocardial infarction (MI) cause subsequent cardiomyocyte (CM) loss, cardiac remodeling, and heart failure. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are involved in vasculogenesis, angiogenesis and paracrine effects and thus have important clinical value in alternative processes for repairing damaged hearts. In fact, this study showed that the endogenous repair of EPCs may not be limited to a single cell type. EPC interactions with cardiac cell populations and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in ischemic heart disease can attenuate cardiac inflammation and oxidative stress in a microenvironment, regulate cell survival and apoptosis, nourish CMs, enhance mature neovascularization, alleviate adverse ventricular remodeling after infarction and enhance ventricular function. In this review, we introduce the definition and discuss the origin and biological characteristics of EPCs and summarize the mechanisms of EPC recruitment in ischemic heart disease. We focus on the crosstalk between EPCs and endothelial cells (ECs), smooth muscle cells (SMCs), CMs, cardiac fibroblasts (CFs), cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs), and MSCs during cardiac remodeling and repair. Finally, we discuss the translation of EPC therapy to the clinic and treatment strategies.

Bone Marrow Cells Improve Coronary Flow Reserve in Ischemic Nonrevascularized Myocardium: A MiHeart/IHD Quantitative Perfusion CMR Substudy

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated whether intramyocardial bone marrow-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells (BMCs) increase coronary flow reserve (CFR) in ischemic myocardial regions where direct revascularization was unsuitable.

BACKGROUND

Patients with diffuse coronary artery disease frequently undergo incomplete myocardial revascularization, which increases their risk for future adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The residual regional ischemia related to both untreated epicardial lesions and small vessel disease usually contributes to the disease burden.

METHODS

The MiHeart/IHD study randomized patients with diffuse coronary artery disease undergoing incomplete coronary artery bypass grafting to receive BMCs or placebo in ischemic myocardial regions. After the procedure, 78 patients underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) at 1, 6, and 12 months and were included in this cardiac magnetic resonance substudy with perfusion quantification. Segments were classified as target (injected), adjacent (surrounding the injection site), and remote from injection site.

RESULTS

Of 1,248 segments, 269 were target (22%), 397 (32%) adjacent, and 582 (46%) remote. The target had significantly lower CFR at baseline (1.40 ± 0.79 vs 1.64 ± 0.89 in adjacent and 1.79 ± 0.79 in remote; both P < 0.05). BMCs significantly increased CFR in target and adjacent segments at 6 and 12 months compared with placebo. In target regions, there was a progressive treatment effect (27.1% at 6 months, P = 0.037, 42.2% at 12 months, P = 0.001). In the adjacent segments, CFR increased by 21.8% (P = 0.023) at 6 months, which persisted until 12 months (22.6%; P = 0.022). Remote segments in both the BMC and placebo groups experienced similar improvements in CFR (not significant at 12 months compared with baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

BMCs, injected in severely ischemic regions unsuitable for direct revascularization, led to the largest CFR improvements, which progressed up to 12 months, compared with smaller but persistent CFR changes in adjacent and no improvement in remote segments.

Kardiale Zelltherapie – „lost in translation?“

Die kardiale Zelltherapie hat über zwei Dekaden bewegter Geschichte hinter sich, in denen sich die Wahrnehmung des Herzens als Organ, bestehend aus einer fixierten Zahl terminal differenzierter Kardiomyozyten, fundamental geändert hat. Plötzlich galt bzw. gilt das Myokard als regenerierbar – durch intrinsische Vorläuferzellen, induzierbare Proliferation, aber v. a. durch exogene, transplantierte Zellen. Während die klinische Translation echter Kardiomyozyten, gewonnen durch zelluläre Reprogrammierung, nur langsam vorankommt, wurde eine Vielzahl klinischer Studien mit Zellprodukten somatischen Ursprungs durchgeführt. Diese beruhten zumeist auf Annahmen bzw. experimentell erhobenen Daten bezüglich der Plastizität adulter Vorläuferzellen, die sich im Nachhinein als nichthaltbar erwiesen haben. Dementsprechend waren auch der Ergebnisse der klinischen Studien bei genauer Betrachtung wenig überzeugend, wurden jedoch trotzdem oft ausgesprochen optimistisch dargestellt. Mittlerweile gilt die kardiale Zelltherapie mit Zellen somatischen Ursprungs als gescheitert. Die Etappen dieser Ära zu rekapitulieren, kann helfen, derartige Fehlentwicklungen in Zukunft frühzeitig zu erkennen und zu verhindern.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation for Ischemic Diseases: Mechanisms and Challenges

Ischemic diseases are conditions associated with the restriction or blockage of blood supply to specific tissues. These conditions can cause moderate to severe complications in patients, and can lead to permanent disabilities. Since they are blood vessel-related diseases, ischemic diseases are usually treated with endothelial cells or endothelial progenitor cells that can regenerate new blood vessels. However, in recent years, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown potent bioeffects on angiogenesis, thus playing a role in blood regeneration. Indeed, MSCs can trigger angiogenesis at ischemic sites by several mechanisms related to their trans-differentiation potential. These mechanisms include inhibition of apoptosis, stimulation of angiogenesis via angiogenic growth factors, and regulation of immune responses, as well as regulation of scarring to suppress blood vessel regeneration when needed. However, preclinical and clinical trials of MSC transplantation in ischemic diseases have shown some limitations in terms of treatment efficacy. Such studies have emphasized the current challenges of MSC-based therapies. Treatment efficacy could be enhanced if the limitations were better understood and potentially resolved. This review will summarize some of the strategies by which MSCs have been utilized for ischemic disease treatment, and will highlight some challenges of those applications as well as suggesting some strategies to improve treatment efficacy.

Role of prostaglandin E2 in allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell therapy for cardiac repair

Ischemic heart disease is among the primary causes of cardiovascular-related deaths worldwide. Conventional treatments including surgical interventions and medical therapies aid in preventing further damage to heart muscle but are unable to provide a permanent solution. In recent years, stem cell therapy has emerged as an attractive alternative to restore damaged myocardium after myocardial injury. Allogeneic (donor-derived) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown great promise in preclinical and clinical studies, making them the most widely accepted candidates for cardiac cell therapy. MSCs promote cardiac repair by modulating host immune system and secreting various soluble factors, of which prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is an important one. PGE2 plays a significant role in regulating cardiac remodeling following myocardial injury. In this review, we provide an overview of allogeneic MSCs as candidates for myocardial regeneration with a focus on the role of the PGE2/cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) pathway in mediating these effects.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of infusion of bone marrow derived cell in patients with heart failure: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and cohort studies

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of bone marrow-derived cells (BMC) technology in patients with heart failure and compare it with alternative therapies, including drug therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P), cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D).

Methods: A systematic review study was conducted to identify all clinical studies published by 2017. Using keywords such as "Heart Failure, BMC, Drug Therapy, CRT-D, CRT-P" and combinations of the mentioned words, we searched electronic databases, including Scopus, Cochrane Library, and PubMed. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa. The primary and secondary end-points were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%), failure cases (Number), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVES) (ml), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVED) (ml). Random-effects network meta-analyses were used to conduct a systematic comparison. Statistical analysis was done using STATA.

Results: This network meta-analysis covered a total of 57 final studies and 6694 patients. The Comparative effectiveness of BMC versus CRT-D, Drug, and CRT-P methods indicated the statistically significant superiority of BMC over CRT-P (6.607, 95% CI: 2.92, 10.29) in LVEF index and overall CRT-P (-13.946, 95% CI: -18.59, -9.29) and drug therapy (-4.176, 95% CI: -8.02, -.33) in LVES index. In addition, in terms of LVED index, the BMC had statistically significant differences with CRT-P (-10.187, 95% CI: -18.85, -1.52). BMC was also dominant to all methods in failure cases as a final outcome and the difference was statistically significant i.e. BMC vs CRT-D: 0.529 (0.45, 0.62) and BMC vs Drug: 0.516 (0.44, 0.60). In none of the outcomes, the other methods were statistically more efficacious than BMC. The BMC method was superior or similar to the other methods in all outcomes.

Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the BMC method, in general, and especially in terms of failure cases index, had a higher level of clinical effectiveness. However, due to the lack of data asymmetry, insufficient data and head-to-head studies, BMC in this meta-analysis might be considered as an alternative to existing treatments for heart failure.

Interval estimation of the overall treatment effect in random-effects meta-analyses: Recommendations from a simulation study comparing frequentist, Bayesian, and bootstrap methods

There exists a variety of interval estimators for the overall treatment effect in a random-effects meta-analysis. A recent literature review summarizing existing methods suggested that in most situations, the Hartung-Knapp/Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) method was preferable. However, a quantitative comparison of those methods in a common simulation study is still lacking. Thus, we conduct such a simulation study for continuous and binary outcomes, focusing on the medical field for application. Based on the literature review and some new theoretical considerations, a practicable number of interval estimators is selected for this comparison: the classical normal-approximation interval using the DerSimonian-Laird heterogeneity estimator, the HKSJ interval using either the Paule-Mandel or the Sidik-Jonkman heterogeneity estimator, the Skovgaard higher-order profile likelihood interval, a parametric bootstrap interval, and a Bayesian interval using different priors. We evaluate the performance measures (coverage and interval length) at specific points in the parameter space, that is, not averaging over a prior distribution. In this sense, our study is conducted from a frequentist point of view. We confirm the main finding of the literature review, the general recommendation of the HKSJ method (here with the Sidik-Jonkman heterogeneity estimator). For meta-analyses including only two studies, the high length of the HKSJ interval limits its practical usage. In this case, the Bayesian interval using a weakly informative prior for the heterogeneity may help. Our recommendations are illustrated using a real-world meta-analysis dealing with the efficacy of an intramyocardial bone marrow stem cell transplantation during coronary artery bypass grafting.

The State of Art of Regenerative Therapy in Cardiovascular Ischemic Disease: Biology, Signaling Pathways, and Epigenetics of Endothelial Progenitor Cells

Ischemic heart disease is currently a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Nevertheless, the actual therapeutic scenario does not target myocardial cell regeneration and consequently, the progression toward the late stage of chronic heart failure is common. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are bone marrow-derived stem cells that contribute to the homeostasis of the endothelial wall in acute and chronic ischemic disease. Calcium modulation and other molecular pathways (NOTCH, VEGFR, and CXCR4) contribute to EPC proliferation and differentiation. The present review provides a summary of EPC biology with a particular focus on the regulatory pathways of EPCs and describes promising applications for cardiovascular cell therapy.

Activity of the human immortalized endothelial progenitor cell line HEPC-CB.1 supporting in vitro angiogenesis

The human HEPC-CB.1 cell line with many characteristics of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) was tested for its proangiogenic properties as a potentially therapeutic compound. HEPC-CB.1 cells’ potential to differentiate into endothelial cells was revealed after treating the cells with a mixture of ATRA, cAMP and VEGF, as shown by the reduced expression levels of CD133, CD271 and CD90 antigens, augmentation of CD146 and CD31, and a decrease in cell clonogenicity. The cooperation of HEPC-CB.1 with the endothelial cell line HSkMEC.2 resulted in the formation of a common network. Tube formation was significantly more effective when resulting from HEPC-CB.1 and HSkMEC.2 cell co-culture as compared to a monoculture of each cell line. The exocrine mechanism of HEPC-CB.1 and HSkMEC.2 cross talk by secreted factors was evidenced using the HEPC-CB.1 supernatant to increase the efficacy of HSkMEC.2 tube formation. The proangiogenic factors produced by HEPC-CB.1 were identified using cytokine antibody array. Out of 120 examined factors, the HEPC-CB.1 cell line produced 63, some with known angiogenic activity. As in vivo the angiogenic process occurs at low oxygen tension, it was observed that in hypoxia, the production of defined factors was augmented. The presented results demonstrate that HEPC-CB.1 cells are able to both cooperate and integrate in a newly formed network and produce factors that help the network formation. The results suggest that HEPC-CB.1 cells are indeed endothelial progenitors and may prove to be an effective tool in regenerative medicine.

Dose-Independent Therapeutic Benefit of Bone Marrow Stem Cell Transplantation after MI in Mice

Several cell populations derived from bone marrow (BM) have been shown to possess cardiac regenerative potential. Among these are freshly isolated CD133⁺ hematopoietic as well as culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells. Alternatively, by purifying CD271⁺ cells from BM, mesenchymal progenitors can be enriched without an ex vivo cultivation. With regard to the limited available number of freshly isolated BM-derived stem cells, the effect of the dosage on the therapeutic efficiency is of particular interest. Therefore, in the present pre-clinical study, we investigated human BM-derived CD133⁺ and CD271⁺ stem cells for their cardiac regenerative potential three weeks post-myocardial infarction (MI) in a dose-dependent manner. The improvement of the hemodynamic function as well as cardiac remodeling showed no therapeutic difference after the transplantation of both 100,000 and 500,000 stem cells. Therefore, beneficial stem cell transplantation post-MI is widely independent of the cell dose and detrimental stem cell amplification in vitro can likely be avoided.

Synthetic mRNA Encoding VEGF-A in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Design of a Phase 2a Clinical Trial

Therapeutic angiogenesis may improve outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing surgical revascularization. Angiogenic factors may promote blood vessel growth and regenerate regions of ischemic but viable myocardium. Previous clinical trials of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) gene therapy with DNA or viral vectors demonstrated safety but not efficacy. AZD8601 is VEGF-A₁₆₅ mRNA formulated in biocompatible citrate-buffered saline and optimized for high-efficiency VEGF-A expression with minimal innate immune response. EPICCURE is an ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety of AZD8601 in patients with moderately decreased left ventricular function (ejection fraction 30%–50%) undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. AZD8601 3 mg, 30 mg, or placebo is administered as 30 epicardial injections in a 10-min extension of cardioplegia. Injections are targeted to ischemic but viable myocardial regions in each patient using quantitative ¹⁵O-water positron emission tomography (PET) imaging (stress myocardial blood flow < 2.3 mL/g/min; resting myocardial blood flow > 0.6 mL/g/min). Improvement in regional and global myocardial blood flow quantified with ¹⁵O-water PET is an exploratory efficacy outcome, together with echocardiographic, clinical, functional, and biomarker measures. EPICCURE combines high-efficiency delivery with quantitative targeting and follow-up for robust assessment of the safety and exploratory efficacy of VEGF-A mRNA angiogenesis (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03370887).

GLP: A requirement in cell therapies - perspectives for the cardiovascular field

In biomedical research, enormous progress is being made and new candidates for putative medicinal products emerge. However, most published preclinical data are not conducted according to the standard Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). GLP is mandatory for preclinical analysis of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP) and thereby a prerequisite for planning and conduction of clinical trials. Not inconsiderable numbers of clinical trials are terminated earlier or fail - do inadequate testing strategies or missing specialized assays during the preclinical development contribute to this severe complex of problems? Unfortunately, there is also a lack of access to GLP testing results and OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) GLP guidelines are not yet adjusted to ATMP specialties. Ultimately, GLP offers possibilities to generate reliable and reproducible data. Therefore, this review elucidates different GLP aspects in drug development, speculates on reasons of putative low GLP acceptance in the scientific community and mentions solution proposals.

An overview of the myocardial regeneration potential of cardiac c-Kit+ progenitor cells via PI3K and MAPK signaling pathways

In recent years, several studies have investigated cell transplantation as an innovative strategy to restore cardiac function following heart failure. Previous studies have also shown cardiac progenitor cells as suitable candidates for cardiac cell therapy compared with other stem cells. Cellular kit (c-kit) plays an important role in the survival and migration of cardiac progenitor cells. Like other types of cells, in the heart, cellular responses to various stimuli are mediated via coordinated pathways. Activation of c-kit⁺ cells leads to subsequent activation of several downstream mediators such as PI3K and the MAPK pathways. This review aims to outline current research findings on the role of PI3K/AKT and the MAPK pathways in myocardial regeneration potential of c-kit⁺.

Stem cell paracrine actions in tissue regeneration and potential therapeutic effect in human endometrium: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Determining genetic and paracrine mechanisms behind endometrial regeneration in Asherman's syndrome and endometrial atrophy (AS/EA) patients after autologous CD133⁺ bone marrow-derived stem cell (CD133⁺ BMDSC) transplantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective study using human endometrial biopsies and mouse models.

SETTING

Fundación-IVI, IIS-La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

SAMPLES

Endometrial biopsies collected before and after CD133⁺ BMDSC therapy, from eight women with AS/EA (NCT02144987) from the uterus of five mice with only left horns receiving CD133⁺ BMDSC therapy.

METHODS

In human samples, haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, RNA arrays, PCR validation, and neutrophil elastase (NE) immunohistochemistry (IHQ). In mouse samples, PCR validation and protein immunoarrays.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

H&E microscopic evaluation, RNA expression levels, PCR, and growth/angiogenic factors quantification, NE IHQ signal.

RESULTS

Treatment improved endometrial morphology and thickness for all patients. In human samples, Jun, Serpine1, and Il4 were up-regulated whereas Ccnd1 and Cxcl8 were down-regulated after treatment. The significant decrease of NE signal corroborated Cxcl8 expression. Animal model analysis confirmed human results and revealed a higher expression of pro-angiogenic cytokines (IL18, HGF, MCP-1, MIP2) in treated uterine horns.

CONCLUSIONS

CD133⁺ BMDSC seems to activate several factors through a paracrine mechanism to help tissue regeneration, modifying endometrial behaviour through an immunomodulatory milieu that precedes proliferation and angiogenic processes. Insight into these processes could bring us one step closer to a non-invasive treatment for AS/EA patients.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

CD133⁺ BMDSC therapy regenerates endometrium, modifying the immunological milieu that precedes proliferation and angiogenesis.

Cell therapy trials for heart regeneration - lessons learned and future directions

The effects of cell therapy on heart regeneration in patients with chronic cardiomyopathy have been assessed in several clinical trials. These trials can be categorized as those using noncardiac stem cells, including mesenchymal stem cells, and those using cardiac-committed cells, including KIT⁺ cardiac stem cells, cardiosphere-derived cells, and cardiovascular progenitor cells derived from embryonic stem cells. Although the safety of cell therapies has been consistently reported, their efficacy remains more elusive. Nevertheless, several lessons have been learned that provide useful clues for future studies. This Review summarizes the main outcomes of these studies and draws some perspectives for future cell-based regenerative trials, which are largely based on the primary therapeutic target: remuscularization of chronic myocardial scars by exogenous cells or predominant use of these cells to activate host-associated repair pathways though paracrine signalling. In the first case, the study design should entail delivery of large numbers of cardiac-committed cells, supply of supportive noncardiac cells, and promotion of cell survival and appropriate coupling with endogenous cardiomyocytes. If the primary objective is to harness endogenous repair pathways, then the flexibility of cell type is greater. As the premise is that the transplanted cells need to engraft only transiently, the priority is to optimize their early retention and possibly to switch towards the sole administration of their secretome.

Animal- and human-based evidence for the protective effects of stem cell therapy against cardiovascular disorders

The increasing rate of mortality and morbidity because of cardiac diseases has called for efficient therapeutic needs. With the advancement in cell-based therapies, stem cells are abundantly studied in this area. Nearly, all sources of stem cells are experimented to treat cardiac injuries. Tissue engineering has also backed this technique by providing an advantageous platform to improve stem cell therapy. After in vitro studies, primary treatment-based research studies comprise small and large animal studies. Furthermore, these studies are implemented in human models in the form of clinical trials. Purpose of this review is to highlight the animal- and human-based studies, exploiting various stem cell sources, to treat cardiovascular disorders.

Combined Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery With Bone Marrow Stem Cell Transplantation: Are We There Yet?

BACKGROUND

Although the safety and feasibility of combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and bone marrow stem cell (BMSC) transplantation have been proven, the efficacy of this approach remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of this procedure.

METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched for randomized trials comparing 4-month to 6-month follow-up outcomes in patients who underwent isolated CABG (CABG group) and patients who received BMSC transplantation with CABG (BMSC group). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted across eligible studies. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were utilized to identify sources of data heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirteen trials were eligible, with a total number of 292 patients in the BMSC group and 247 patients in the CABG group. Compared with the CABG group, the BMSC group showed significant improvement of follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction (n = 539, 4.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3%-7.3%; P = .001). The analyzed data showed significant heterogeneity (I² = 74.2%, P < .001). The reduction in scar size (n = 120; -2.2 mL; 95% CI, -18.2 mL to 13.7 mL; P = .44) and the improvement in the 6-minute walk test (n = 212; 41 m; 95% CI, -13 m to 95 m; P = .10) did not reach statistical significance. No significant correlation was found between the number of the injected BMSCs or the method of injection and the change in ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

The present evidence suggests that combined CABG and BMSC transplantation is associated with improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction. However, the heterogeneity in the data suggests variations in patient response to this therapy. Further studies are required to understand these variations.

Circulating Proangiogenic Cells and Proteins in Patients with Glioma and Acute Myocardial Infarction: Differences in Neovascularization between Neoplasia and Tissue Regeneration

Although extensive angiogenesis takes place in glial tumors, antiangiogenic therapies have remained without the expected success. In the peripheral circulation of glioma patients, increased numbers of endothelial precursor cells (EPCs) are present, potentially offering targets for antiangiogenic therapy. However, for an antiangiogenic therapy to be successful, the therapy should specifically target glioma-related EPC subsets and secreted factors only. Here, we compared the EPC subsets and plasma factors in the peripheral circulation of patients with gliomas to acute myocardial infarctions. We investigated the five most important EPC subsets and 21 angiogenesis-related plasma factors in peripheral blood samples of 29 patients with glioma, 14 patients with myocardial infarction, and 20 healthy people as controls, by FACS and Luminex assay. In GBM patients, all EPC subsets were elevated as compared to healthy subjects. In addition, HPC and KDR⁺ cell fractions were higher than in MI, while CD133⁺ and KDR⁺CD133⁺ cell fractions were lower. There were differences in relative EPC fractions between the groups: KDR⁺ cells were the largest fraction in GBM, while CD133⁺ cells were the largest fraction in MI. An increase in glioma malignancy grade coincided with an increase in the KDR⁺ fraction, while the CD133⁺ cell fraction decreased relatively. Most plasma angiogenic factors were higher in GBM than in MI patients. In both MI and GBM, the ratio of CD133⁺ HPCs correlated significantly with elevated levels of MMP9. In the GBM patients, MMP9 correlated strongly with levels of all HPCs. In conclusion, the data demonstrate that EPC traffic in patients with glioma, representing neoplasia, is different from that in myocardial infarction, representing tissue regeneration. Glioma patients may benefit from therapies aimed at lowering KDR⁺ cells and HPCs.

Autologous bone marrow stem cell therapy for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials

Autologous bone marrow stem cell (BMSC) therapy is a novel option for regenerative therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of BMSCs combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to November 22, 2017 for randomized controlled trials on BMSC therapy combined with CABG. Finally, 14 trials with a total of 596 participants were included. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model. Compared with the control group, the BMSC therapy group exhibited an improvement in the left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction from baseline to follow-up [mean difference (MD)=4.36%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.90–6.81%; P<0.01]. Analysis of the pooled results revealed non-significant differences in the LV end-diastolic volume (MD=−6.27 ml; 95% CI: −22.34 to 9.80 ml; P=0.44), LV end-diastolic volume index (MD=−15.11 ml/m²; 95% CI: −31.53 to 1.30 ml/m²; P=0.07), LV end-systolic volume (MD=−11.52 ml; 95% CI: −26.97 to 3.93 ml; P=0.14) and LV end-systolic volume index (MD=−16.56 ml/m²; 95% CI: −37.75 to 4.63 ml/m²; P=0.13) between the BMSC and CABG alone groups. Therefore, autologous BMSC therapy for patients undergoing CABG appears to be associated with an improvement in LV function compared with CABG alone.

The role of stem cells in treating coronary artery disease in 2018

The last decade has witnessed the publication of a number of stem cell clinical trials, primarily using bone marrow-derived cells as the injected cell. Much has been learned through these "first-generation" clinical trials. The advances in our understanding include the following: (1) cell therapy is safe; (2) cell therapy has been mildly effective; and (3) human bone marrow-derived stem cells do not transdifferentiate into cardiomyocytes or new blood vessels. The primary mechanism of action for cell therapy is now believed to be through paracrine effects that include the release of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors that inhibit apoptosis and fibrosis, enhance contractility, and activate endogenous regenerative mechanisms through endogenous circulating or site-specific stem cells. The current direction for clinical trials includes the use of stem cells capable of cardiac lineage.

Cell-Based Therapies for Cardiac Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review of Past and Ongoing Strategies

Despite considerable improvements in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, heart failure (HF) still represents one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Poor prognosis is mostly due to the limited regenerative capacity of the adult human heart, which ultimately leads to left ventricular dysfunction. As a consequence, heart transplantation is virtually the only alternative for many patients. Therefore, novel regenerative approaches are extremely needed, and several attempts have been performed to improve HF patients’ clinical conditions by promoting the replacement of the lost cardiomyocytes and by activating cardiac repair. In particular, cell-based therapies have been shown to possess a great potential for cardiac regeneration. Different cell types have been extensively tested in clinical trials, demonstrating consistent safety results. However, heterogeneous efficacy data have been reported, probably because precise end-points still need to be clearly defined. Moreover, the principal mechanism responsible for these beneficial effects seems to be the paracrine release of antiapoptotic and immunomodulatory molecules from the injected cells. This review covers past and state-of-the-art strategies in cell-based heart regeneration, highlighting the advantages, challenges, and limitations of each approach.

Specific Cell (Re-)Programming: Approaches and Perspectives

Many disorders are manifested by dysfunction of key cell types or their disturbed integration in complex organs. Thereby, adult organ systems often bear restricted self-renewal potential and are incapable of achieving functional regeneration. This underlies the need for novel strategies in the field of cell (re-)programming-based regenerative medicine as well as for drug development in vitro. The regenerative field has been hampered by restricted availability of adult stem cells and the potentially hazardous features of pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Moreover, ethical concerns and legal restrictions regarding the generation and use of ESCs still exist. The establishment of direct reprogramming protocols for various therapeutically valuable somatic cell types has overcome some of these limitations. Meanwhile, new perspectives for safe and efficient generation of different specified somatic cell types have emerged from numerous approaches relying on exogenous expression of lineage-specific transcription factors, coding and noncoding RNAs, and chemical compounds.It should be of highest priority to develop protocols for the production of mature and physiologically functional cells with properties ideally matching those of their endogenous counterparts. Their availability can bring together basic research, drug screening, safety testing, and ultimately clinical trials. Here, we highlight the remarkable successes in cellular (re-)programming, which have greatly advanced the field of regenerative medicine in recent years. In particular, we review recent progress on the generation of cardiomyocyte subtypes, with a focus on cardiac pacemaker cells. Graphical Abstract.

Left ventricular ejection fraction as therapeutic target: is it the ideal marker?

Heart failure (HF) consists the fastest growing clinical cardiac disease. HF patients are categorized on the basis of underlying left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) into HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), reduced LVEF (HFrEF), and mid-range LVEF (HFmrEF). While LVEF is the most commonly used surrogate marker of left ventricular (LV) systolic function, the implementation of two-dimensional echocardiography in estimating this parameter imposes certain caveats on current HF classification. Most importantly, LVEF could fluctuate in repeated measurements or even recover after treatment, thus blunting the borders between proposed categories of HF and enabling upward classification of patients. Under this prism, we sought to summarize possible procedures to improve systolic function in patients with HFrEF either naturally or by the means of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment and devices. Therefore, we reviewed established pharmacotherapy, including beta-blockers, inhibitors of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis, statins, and digoxin as well as novel treatments like sacubitril-valsartan, ranolazine, and ivabradine. In addition, we assessed evidence in favor of cardiac resynchronization therapy and exercise training programs. Finally, innovative therapeutic strategies, including stem cells, xanthine oxidase inhibitors, antibiotic regimens, and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, were also taken into consideration. We concluded that LVEF is subject to changes in HF after intervention and besides the aforementioned HFrEF, HFpEF, and HFmrEF categories, a new entity of HF patients with recovered LVEF should be acknowledged. An improved global and refined LV function assessment by sophisticated imaging modalities and circulating biomarkers is expected to render HF classification more accurate and indicate patients with viable-yet dysfunctional-myocardium and favorable characteristics as the ideal candidates for LVEF recovery by individualized HF therapy.

Protocol for MicroRNA Transfer into Adult Bone Marrow-derived Hematopoietic Stem Cells to Enable Cell Engineering Combined with Magnetic Targeting

While CD133⁺ hematopoietic stem cells (SCs) have been proven to provide high potential in the field of regenerative medicine, their low retention rates after injection into injured tissues as well as the observed massive cell death rates lead to very restricted therapeutic effects. To overcome these limitations, we sought to establish a non-viral based protocol for suitable cell engineering prior to their administration. The modification of human CD133⁺ expressing SCs using microRNA (miR) loaded magnetic polyplexes was addressed with respect to uptake efficiency and safety as well as the targeting potential of the cells. Relying on our protocol, we can achieve high miR uptake rates of 80-90% while the CD133⁺ stem cell properties remain unaffected. Moreover, these modified cells offer the option of magnetic targeting. We describe here a safe and highly efficient procedure for the modification of CD133⁺ SCs. We expect this approach to provide a standard technology for optimization of therapeutic stem cell effects and for monitoring of the administered cell product via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Kidney Diseases

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) are bone marrow derived or tissue-resident cells that play major roles in the maintenance of vascular integrity and repair of endothelial damage. Although EPCs may be capable of directly engrafting and regenerating the endothelium, the most important effects of EPCs seem to be depended on paracrine effects. In recent studies, specific microvesicles and mRNAs have been found to mediate the pro-angiogenic and regenerative effects of EPCs on endothelium. EPC counts have important prognostic implications in cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Uremia and inflammation are associated with lower EPC counts which probably contribute to increased CVD risks in patients with chronic kidney disease. Beneficial effects of the EPC therapies have been shown in studies performed on different models of CVD and kidney diseases such as acute and chronic kidney diseases and glomerulonephritis. However, lack of a clear definition and specific marker of EPCs is the most important problem causing difficulties in interpretation of the results of the studies investigating EPCs.

Regenerative Therapy for Cardiomyopathies

Despite substantial advances in the development of medical and interventional strategies in ischemic and non-ischemic heart diseases, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Stem cell therapy for heart disease has gained traction over the past two decades and is an emerging option for the treatment of myocardial dysfunction. In this review, we summarize the current literature on different types of stem cells and their potential usage in ischemic and non-ischemic heart diseases. We emphasize the clinical utility of stem cells to improve myocardial structural and function, promote microvascular angiogenesis, and diminish scar size and major adverse cardiovascular events. We also discuss the therapeutic potential of microvesicles, such as exosomes, in the treatment of CVDs, which may open novel avenues for further clinical studies.

Stem Cell Therapies in Cardiovascular Disease

Despite considerable advances in medicine, cardiovascular disease is still rising, with ischemic heart disease being the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Thus extensive efforts are continuing to establish effective therapeutic modalities that would improve both quality of life and survival in this patient population. Novel therapies are being investigated not only to protect the myocardium against ischemia-reperfusion injury but also to regenerate the heart. Stem cell therapy, such as potential use of human mesenchymal stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells and their exosomes, will make it possible not only to address molecular mechanisms of cardiac conditioning, but also to develop new therapies for ischemic heart disease. Despite the studies and progress made over the last 15 years on the use of stem cell therapy for cardiovascular disease, the efforts are still in their infancy. Even though the expectations have been high, the findings indicate that most of the clinical trials generally have been small and the results inconclusive. Because of many negative findings, there is certain pessimism that cardiac cell therapy is likely to yield any meaningful results over the next decade or so. Similar to other new technologies, early failures are not unusual and they may be followed by impressive success. Nevertheless, there has been considerable attention to safety by the clinical investigators because the adverse events of stem cell therapy have been impressively rare. In summary, although regenerative biology might not help the cardiovascular patient in the near term, it is destined to do so over the next several decades.

COMPARE CPM-RMI Trial: Intramyocardial Transplantation of Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived CD133+ Cells and MNCs during CABG in Patients with Recent MI: A Phase II/III, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Objective:

The regenerative potential of bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (MNCs) and CD133⁺ stem cells in the heart varies in terms of their pro-angiogenic effects. This phase II/III, multicenter and double-blind trial is designed to compare the functional effects of intramyocardial autologous transplantation of both cell types and placebo in patients with recent myocardial infarction (RMI) post-coronary artery bypass graft.

Materials and Methods:

This was a phase II/III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial COMPARE CPM-RMI (CD133, Placebo, MNCs - recent myocardial infarction) conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki that assessed the safety and efficacy of CD133 and MNCs compared to placebo in patients with RMI. We randomly assigned 77 eligible RMI patients selected from 5 hospitals to receive CD133⁺ cells, MNC, or a placebo. Patients underwent gated single photon emission computed tomography assessments at 6 and 18 months post-intramyocardial transplantation. We tested the normally distributed efficacy outcomes with a mixed analysis of variance model that used the entire data set of baseline and between-group comparisons as well as within subject (time) and group×time interaction terms.

Results:

There were no related serious adverse events reported. The intramyocardial transplantation of both cell types increased left ventricular ejection fraction by 9% [95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.14% to 15.78%, P=0.01] and improved decreased systolic wall thickening by -3.7 (95% CI: -7.07 to -0.42, P=0.03). The CD133 group showed significantly decreased non-viable segments by 75% (P=0.001) compared to the placebo and 60% (P=0.01) compared to the MNC group. We observed this improvement at both the 6- and 18-month time points.

Conclusion:

Intramyocardial injections of CD133⁺ cells or MNCs appeared to be safe and efficient with superiority of CD133+ cells for patients with RMI. Although the sample size precluded a definitive statement about clinical outcomes, these results have provided the basis for larger studies to confirm definitive evidence about the efficacy of these cell types (Registration Number: NCT01167751).

Clinical Benefits of Stem Cells for Chronic Symptomatic Systolic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of the Existing Data and Ongoing Trials

The benefits of stem cell therapy for patients with chronic symptomatic systolic heart failure due to ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM and NICM, respectively) are unclear. We performed a systematic review of major published and ongoing trials of stem cell therapy for systolic heart failure and compared measured clinical outcomes for both types of cardiomyopathy. The majority of the 29 published studies demonstrated clinical benefits of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was improved in the majority of trials after therapy. Cell delivery combined with coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with the greatest improvement in LVEF. Left ventricular end-systolic volume (or diameter), New York Heart Association functional classification, quality of life, and exercise capacity were also improved in most studies after cell therapy. Most ICM trials demonstrated a significant improvement in perfusion defects, infarct size, and myocardial viability. Several larger clinical trials that are in progress employ alternative delivery modes, cell types, and longer follow-up periods. Stem cells are a promising therapeutic modality for patients with heart failure due to ICM or NICM. More data are required from larger blinded trials to determine which combination of cell type and delivery mode will yield the most benefit with avoidance of harm in these patient populations.

Adult Stem Cell Therapy for Cardiac Repair in Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction Leading to Ischemic Heart Failure: An Overview of Evidence from the Recent Clinical Trials

Background:

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) still represent the leading cause of mortality worldwide, despite the remarkable advances in interventional cardiology, cardiac surgery, and modern pharmacotherapy, particularly in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), chronic ischemic heart failure (HF), cardiomyopathy (CM), and the associated left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.

A significant loss of cardiomyocytes that underlies all of these conditions was previously considered irreversible. However, current evidence indicates that the human heart has some potential for repair, and over the past decade, many research studies have been exploring the use of stem cells (SCs) to facilitate restoration of myocardium. Consequently, the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of SC therapy have been reported in many randomized clinical trials (RCTs), using different lineages of adult SCs. Nevertheless, the clinical benefits of SC therapy are not yet well established. In the near future, understanding of the complex interrelations between SCs, paracrine factors, genetic or epigenetic pre-dispositions, and myocardial microenvironment, in the context of an individual patient, will be crucial for translation of this knowledge into practical development of successful, long-term regenerative SC therapeutic applications, in a growing population of patients suffering from previous myocardial in-farction (MI) leading to chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Conclusion:

This overview highlights the therapeutic potential of adult SCs in terms of their possible regenerative capacity, safety, and clinical outcomes, in patients with AMI, and/or subsequent HF (due to chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy). This review was based upon PubMed database search for trials on SC therapy, in patients with AMI and HF, and the main timeframe was set from 2006 to 2016.

(Re-)programming of subtype specific cardiomyocytes

Adult cardiomyocytes (CMs) possess a highly restricted intrinsic regenerative potential - a major barrier to the effective treatment of a range of chronic degenerative cardiac disorders characterized by cellular loss and/or irreversible dysfunction and which underlies the majority of deaths in developed countries. Both stem cell programming and direct cell reprogramming hold promise as novel, potentially curative approaches to address this therapeutic challenge. The advent of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has introduced a second pluripotent stem cell source besides embryonic stem cells (ESCs), enabling even autologous cardiomyocyte production. In addition, the recent achievement of directly reprogramming somatic cells into cardiomyocytes is likely to become of great importance. In either case, different clinical scenarios will require the generation of highly pure, specific cardiac cellular-subtypes. In this review, we discuss these themes as related to the cardiovascular stem cell and programming field, including a focus on the emergent topic of pacemaker cell generation for the development of biological pacemakers and in vitro drug testing.

Stem cells and heart disease - Brake or accelerator?

After two decades of intensive research and attempts of clinical translation, stem cell based therapies for cardiac diseases are not getting closer to clinical success. This review tries to unravel the obstacles and focuses on underlying mechanisms as the target for regenerative therapies. At present, the principal outcome in clinical therapy does not reflect experimental evidence. It seems that the scientific obstacle is a lack of integration of knowledge from tissue repair and disease mechanisms. Recent insights from clinical trials delineate mechanisms of stem cell dysfunction and gene defects in repair mechanisms as cause of atherosclerosis and heart disease. These findings require a redirection of current practice of stem cell therapy and a reset using more detailed analysis of stem cell function interfering with disease mechanisms. To accelerate scientific development the authors suggest intensifying unified computational data analysis and shared data knowledge by using open-access data platforms.

Stem Cell Smart Technology, where are we now and how far we have to go?

Approximately eight million people in the United States have peripheral arterial disease, which increases exponentially with age. There have been a plethora of available treatments including surgery, angioplasty, atherectomy, laser technology, and cell-based therapies. Cell-based therapies were developed in the hope of translating laboratory-based technology into clinical successes. However, clinical results have been disappointing. Infusion or injection for stem cell therapy is still considered experimental and investigational, and major questions on safety and durability have arisen. In no option patients, how can they be treated safely and successfully? In this article, we review contemporary practice for cell therapy, its pitfalls and breakthroughs, and look at the future ahead. We introduce a novel smart system for minimally invasive delivery of cell therapies, which exemplifies the next generation of endovascular solutions to stem cell technology and promises safety, efficacy, and reliability.

Cardiac Function Improvement and Bone Marrow Response -: Outcome Analysis of the Randomized PERFECT Phase III Clinical Trial of Intramyocardial CD133+ Application After Myocardial Infarction

OBJECTIVE

The phase III clinical trial PERFECT was designed to assess clinical safety and efficacy of intramyocardial CD133⁺ bone marrow stem cell treatment combined with CABG for induction of cardiac repair.

DESIGN

Multicentre, double-blinded, randomised placebo controlled trial.

SETTING

The study was conducted across six centres in Germany October 2009 through March 2016 and stopped due slow recruitment after positive interim analysis in March 2015.

PARTICIPANTS

Post-infarction patients with chronic ischemia and reduced LVEF (25-50%).

INTERVENTIONS

Eighty-two patients were randomised to two groups receiving intramyocardial application of 5ml placebo or a suspension of 0.5-5×10⁶ CD133⁺.

OUTCOME

Primary endpoint was delta (∆) LVEF at 180days (d) compared to baseline measured in MRI.

FINDINGS (PRESPECIFIED)

Safety (n=77): 180d survival was 100%, MACE n=2, SAE n=49, without difference between placebo and CD133⁺. Efficacy (n=58): The LVEF improved from baseline LVEF 33.5% by +9.6% at 180d, p=0.001 (n=58). Treatment groups were not different in ∆LVEF (ANCOVA: Placebo +8.8% vs. CD133⁺ +10.4%, ∆CD133⁺vs placebo +2.6%, p=0.4).

FINDINGS (POST HOC)

Responders (R) classified by ∆LVEF≥5% after 180d were 60% of the patients (35/58) in both treatment groups. ∆LVEF in ANCOVA was +17.1% in (R) vs. non-responders (NR) (∆LVEF 0%, n=23). NR were characterized by a preoperative response signature in peripheral blood with reduced CD133⁺ EPC (RvsNR: p=0.005) and thrombocytes (p=0.004) in contrast to increased Erythropoeitin (p=0.02), and SH2B3 mRNA expression (p=0.073). Actuarial computed mean survival time was 76.9±3.32months (R) vs. +72.3±5.0months (NR), HR 0.3 [Cl 0.07-1.2]; p=0.067.Using a machine learning 20 biomarker response parameters were identified allowing preoperative discrimination with an accuracy of 80% (R) and 84% (NR) after 10-fold cross-validation.

INTERPRETATION

The PERFECT trial analysis demonstrates that the regulation of induced cardiac repair is linked to the circulating pool of CD133+ EPC and thrombocytes, associated with SH2B3 gene expression. Based on these findings, responders to cardiac functional improvement may be identified by a peripheral blood biomarker signature.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT00950274.

CD133+ cells are associated with ADIPOCYTOKINES and endothelial dysfunction in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis (HD) patients have increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Impaired stem cell health and adipocytokine metabolism may play important roles in the complex pathophysiological mechanisms of CVD in this patient population. We aimed to investigate the relationships between CD133+ cell counts, adipocytokines and parameters of endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis in HD patients.

METHODS

In 58 chronic HD patients (male/female:28/30, mean age:58 ± 14 years), serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), leptin, adiponectin and resistin were measured by ELISA. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI), carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery were measured. CD133+ cells were counted by flow cytometry (BD FACSCalibur-BD Bioscience,CA).

RESULTS

CD133+ cell counts were inversely associated with FMD (r = -0.39, p = 0.007) and positively correlated with serum resistin (r = 0.45, p < 0.001) and serum TNF-α (r = 0.31, p = 0.02). Serum leptin levels were higher in high CD133 group compared to low CD133 group [32.37(12.74-72.29) vs 15.50(5.38-37.12)ng/mL, p = 0.03]. Serum leptin levels were correlated with TNF-α(r = 0.35, p = 0.009). Serum adiponectin levels were negatively correlated with serum leptin (r = -0.28, p = 0.03). Serum resistin levels were associated with TNF-α (r = 0.54, p < 0.001) and leptin (r = 0.29, p = 0.03). Serum IL-6 levels were significantly associated with LVMI (r = 0.31, p = 0.03). Serum IL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients with carotid plaque compared to patients without plaque [12.75(9.91-28.68) vs 8.27(5.97-14.04) pg/mL, p = 0.02]. In multiple linear regression analysis to determine the factors predicting LogFMD; dialysis vintage, LVMI and LogCD133+ cell counts were included as independent variables(R = 0.57, adjusted R-square = 0.27, p = 0.001). CD133+ cell count and LVMI were found to significantly predict FMD (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04 respectively).

CONCLUSION

CD133+ cells were associated with inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in HD patients. Serum leptin, resistin and TNF-α levels were positively related to CD133+ cell count. Impaired regulation of undifferentiated stem cells and adipocytokines might contribute to endothelial dysfunction in HD patients.

Intramyocardial Delivery of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells and Mechanical Assist Device Implantation in Patients with End-Stage Cardiomyopathy

In end-stage heart failure, mechanical ventricular assist devices (VAD) are being used as bridge-to-transplantation, as a bridge-to-recovery, or as the definitive therapy. We tested the hypothesis that myocardial implantation of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMNC) increases the likelihood of successful weaning from left VAD (LVAD) support. Ten patients (aged 14–60 years) with deteriorating heart function underwent LVAD implantation and concomitant implantation of autologous BMNC. Bone marrow was harvested prior to VAD implantation and BMNC were prepared by density centrifugation. Two patients received a pulsatile, extracorporeal LVAD and eight a nonpulsatile implantable device. Between 52 and 164 × 107 BMNC containing between 1 and 12 × 106 CD34+ cells were injected into the LV myocardium. There was one early and one late death. The median time on LVAD support was 243 days (range 24–498 days). Repeated echocardiographic examinations under increased hemodynamic load revealed a significant improvement of LV function in one patient. Three patients underwent heart transplantation, and four patients remain on LVAD support >1 year without evidence of recovery. Only one patient was successfully weaned from LVAD support after 4 months, and LV function has remained stable ever since. In patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy, intramyocardial injection of BMNC at the time of LVAD implantation does not seem to increase the likelihood of successful weaning from VAD support. Other cell-based strategies should be pursued to harness the potential of cell therapy in LVAD patients.

Intramyocardial fate and effect of iron nanoparticles co-injected with MACS® purified stem cell products

BACKGROUND

Magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS^®) is routinely used to isolate stem cell subpopulations intended for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. In strong contrast, studies examining the amount, effect and intramyocardial distribution of iron nanoparticles used for magnetic cell labelling are missing, although iron excess can cause functional disorders in the heart.

METHODS AND RESULTS

CD133⁺ haematopoietic and CD271⁺ mesenchymal stem cells were purified from bone marrow using automatically and manually MACS^® based systems. Flow cytometric measurements demonstrated a rapid loss of MACS^® MicroBeads from cells under culture conditions, while storage under hypothermic conditions decelerated their detachment. Moreover, an average loading of ∼11 fg iron/cell caused by magnetic labelling was determined in magnetic particle spectroscopy. Importantly, hemodynamic measurements as well as histological examinations using a myocardial ischemia/reperfusion mouse model showed no influence of MACS^® MicroBeads on cardiac regeneration, while the transplantation of stem cells caused a significant improvement. Furthermore, immunostainings demonstrated the clearance of co-injected iron nanoparticles from stem cells and the surrounding heart tissue within 48 h post transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that iron amounts typically co-injected with MACS^® purified stem cells do not harm cardiac functions and are cleared from heart tissue within a few hours. Therefore, we conclude that MACS^® MicroBeads exhibit a good compatibility in the cardiac environment.

Single cell biology beyond the era of antibodies: relevance, challenges, and promises in biomedical research

Research of the past two decades has proved the relevance of single cell biology in basic research and translational medicine. Successful detection and isolation of specific subsets is the key to understand their functional heterogeneity. Antibodies are conventionally used for this purpose, but their relevance in certain contexts is limited. In this review, we discuss some of these contexts, posing bottle neck for different fields of biology including biomedical research. With the advancement of chemistry, several methods have been introduced to overcome these problems. Even though microfluidics and microraft array are newer techniques exploited for single cell biology, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) remains the gold standard technique for isolation of cells for many biomedical applications, like stem cell therapy. Here, we present a comprehensive and comparative account of some of the probes that are useful in FACS. Further, we illustrate how these techniques could be applied in biomedical research. It is postulated that intracellular molecular markers like nucleostemin (GNL3), alkaline phosphatase (ALPL) and HIRA can be used for improving the outcome of cardiac as well as bone regeneration. Another field that could utilize intracellular markers is diagnostics, and we propose the use of specific peptide nucleic acid probes (PNPs) against certain miRNAs for cancer surgical margin prediction. The newer techniques for single cell biology, based on intracellular molecules, will immensely enhance the repertoire of possible markers for the isolation of cell types useful in biomedical research.

Use of Pig as a Model for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapies for Bone Regeneration

Bone is a plastic tissue with a large healing capability. However, extensive bone loss due to disease or trauma requires extreme therapy such as bone grafting or tissue-engineering applications. Presently, bone grafting is the gold standard for bone repair, but presents serious limitations including donor site morbidity, rejection, and limited tissue regeneration. The use of stem cells appears to be a means to overcome such limitations. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) have been the choice thus far for stem cell therapy for bone regeneration. However, adipose-derived stem cells (ASC) have similar immunophenotype, morphology, multilineage potential, and transcriptome compared to BMSC, and both types have demonstrated extensive osteogenic capacity both in vitro and in vivo in several species. The use of scaffolds in combination with stem cells and growth factors provides a valuable tool for guided bone regeneration, especially for complex anatomic defects. Before translation to human medicine, regenerative strategies must be developed in animal models to improve effectiveness and efficiency. The pig presents as a useful model due to similar macro- and microanatomy and favorable logistics of use. This review examines data that provides strong support for the clinical translation of the pig model for bone regeneration.