Intermediate-term results of ascending–descending posterior pericardial bypass of complex aortic coarctation

The anatomic repair of recurrent aortic arch obstruction in children and adolescents

Objective

Surgery for recurrent aortic arch obstruction is highly challenging and publications are rare. The aim of this retrospective, single-center study was to evaluate mortality, complications, and reintervention rate after an anatomic repair.

Methods

Between 1999 and 2022, in total 946 operations on the aortic arch were performed at the Children's Heart Center Linz. In 39 cases, the indication was a recurrent or residual aortic arch obstruction or coarctation in a patient aged 18 years or younger. This is our study cohort. The aorta was reconstructed by a direct anastomosis/autograft in 20 patients, patch in 17 patients, and interposition graft in 2 adolescents. In 32 procedures, cardiopulmonary bypass with whole body perfusion was employed, in 4, antegrade cerebral perfusion was employed, in 2, a left heart bypass was employed, and in 1 no cardiopulmonary bypass was used.

Results

Median (Q1, Q3) age at operation was 253 days (100, 2198 days), weight 7.5 kg (4.5, 17.8 kg). Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 177 minutes (115, 219 minutes), crossclamp time 73 minutes (49, 102 minutes). Three infants died during the hospital stay: 1 with Williams syndrome, 1 with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and 1 with heterotaxia. There was no death due to an arch complication. The main complications were 1 neurologic injury after postoperative resuscitation (Williams syndrome) and 1 permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. During the follow-up period of median 8.1 years (2.6, 12 years) 1 re-reintervention on the aortic arch was necessary.

Conclusions

Sophisticated reoperations on the aortic arch could be performed safely. In children, the growth potential of all segments of the aorta could be sustainably preserved by avoiding interposition or extra-anatomic bypass grafts.

Results of cryopreserved arterial allograft replacement for thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic infections

BACKGROUND

Primary and secondary thoracic aortic infections are rare but associated with high morbidity and mortality. There is currently no consensus on their optimal treatment. Arterial allografts have been shown to be resistant to bacterial colonization. Complete excision of infected material, especially synthetic grafts, combined with in situ aortic repair is considered the best treatment of abdominal aortic infections. The aim of this study was to assess the management of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic infections using arterial allografts.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2017, all patients with thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic native or graft infections underwent complete excision of infected material and in situ arterial allografting. The end points were the early mortality and morbidity rates and early and late rates of reinfection, graft degeneration, and graft-related morbidity.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with a mean age of 65.6 ± 9.2 years were included. Twenty-one (60%) cases experienced graft infections and 14 (40%) experienced native aortic infections. Eight (22.8%) patients had visceral fistulas: 5 (14.4%) prosthetic-esophageal, 1 (2.8%) prosthetic-bronchial, 1 (2.8%) prosthetic-duodenal, and 1 (2.8%) native aortobronchial. In 12 (34.3%) cases, only the descending thoracic aorta was involved; in 23 (65.7%) cases, the thoracoabdominal aorta was involved. Fifteen (42.8%) patients died during the first month or before discharge: 5 of hemorrhage, 4 of multiorgan failure, 3 of ischemic colitis, 2 of pneumonia, and 1 of anastomotic disruption. Eleven (31.5%) patients required early revision surgery: 6 (17.1%) for nongraft-related hemorrhage, 3 (8.6%) for colectomy, 1 (2.9%) for proximal anastomotic disruption, and 1 (2.9%) for tamponade. One (2.9%) patient who died before discharge experienced paraplegia. One (2.9%) patient experienced stroke. Six (17.1%) patients required postoperative dialysis. Among them, four died before discharge. The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 11 ± 10.5 days; the mean length of hospital stay was 32 ± 14 days. During a mean follow-up of 32.3 ± 23.7 months, three allograft-related complications occurred in survivors (15% of late survivors): one proximal and one distal false aneurysm with no evidence of reinfection and one allograft-enteric fistula. The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 49.3% and 42.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rare, aortic infections are highly challenging. Surgical management includes complete excision of infected tissues or grafts. Allografts offer a promising solution to aortic graft infection because they appear to resist reinfection; however, the grafts must be observed indefinitely because of the risk of late graft complications.

Native Aortic Arch Interruption in Adulthood: Surgical Management

Aortic coarctations in adults are mainly represented by recurrent critical narrowing at the site of previous surgical correction, or less frequently by native forms of complex obstructive malformations of the distal arch and isthmus. We present our experience with an unusual form of native adult aortic coarctation presenting as a complete interruption of the aortic arch.

How to best treat infectious complications of open and endovascular thoracic aortic repairs

Infectious complications of open and endovascular procedures for descending thoracic aortic disease are relatively rare, affecting 1% to 6% of treated patients. However, the number of thoracic aortic procedures, especially endovascular, is increasing continuously, and infectious complications involving the graft or endograft have been observed more frequently in recent years. Several causative factors may play a role in thoracic aortic prosthetic infections, including hematogenous seeding, local bacterial translocation, and iatrogenous contamination. In addition, the development of a fistula between the aortic graft and the esophagus or the bronchial tree is a common associated finding, representing a dramatic event that further increases mortality rates and requires multidisciplinary management. Treatment of these conditions is demanding, often including a number of pharmacological, surgical, and endovascular options. Because there are several different surgical strategies and timing modalities that are chosen according to the surgeon's experience, the results of different treatment options are difficult to summarize, and no consensus exists on a standardized paradigm of treatment. In this review, published reports regarding clinical outcomes related to thoracic graft and endograft infections are discussed, including our personal experience with surgical and endovascular management of this condition.

Single center experience of aortic bypass graft for aortic arch obstruction in children

The purpose of this study is to access the outcomes of aortic bypass graft placement in children. This is a retrospective review of all children having aortic bypass graft placement for aortic arch obstruction for the first time between 1982 and 2013 at a single institution. The actuarial survival and the freedom from aortic arch reoperation were calculated and compared between the groups. Seventy consecutive children underwent aortic bypass graft placements. The median age and body weight at the operation were 14 days and 3.6 kg. There were 7 early deaths, 6 late deaths, and 7 heart transplants during the median follow-up of 10.8 years (0.0-31.5 years). The actuarial transplant free survival was 64.7 % at 20 years and the freedom from aortic arch reoperation was 50.5 % at 10 years. Between the children younger than 1 year old and older than 1 year old, there were significant differences in actuarial transplant free survival (56.4 vs. 100 % at 15 years, p = 0.0042) and in the freedom from aortic arch reoperation (18.7 vs. 100 % at 10 years, p < 0.001). The children who received aortic bypass graft larger than 16 mm in size had no aortic arch reoperation at 15 years. The aortic bypass graft placement for aortic arch obstruction can be done with low mortality and morbidity for children who can receive bypass graft larger than 16 mm in size. However, it should be avoided for the neonates and infants except selected situations.

Ascending-to-descending aortic bypass: a simple solution to a complex problem

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of complex aortic coarctation can be associated with significant risks. Extraanatomic bypass may represent a safer alternative.

METHODS

Between January 1985 and December 2012, 80 consecutive patients with complex coarctation underwent ascending-to-descending aortic bypass through a median sternotomy. Patients were a median age of 42 years (range, 15 to 75 years), and 51 (64%) were males. Recurrent coarctation was present in 52 patients (65%), with 6 (8%) having undergone balloon dilatation. Uncontrolled hypertension was present in 63 patients (79%). The most common concomitant pathology was aortic valve stenosis in 21 patients (26%), subaortic stenosis in 10 (13%), and Shone complex in 4 (5%).

RESULTS

There were no early deaths. The most common concomitant procedures were aortic valve replacement, coronary artery bypass grafting, and resection of subaortic stenosis. The mean aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 33 ± 40 and 106 ± 54 minutes, respectively. Morbidity included atrial fibrillation in 17 patients (21%) and reexploration for bleeding in 6 (8%). There was no paraplegia or stroke. Upper extremity blood pressure significantly improved (p < 0.001). Mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 153 ± 26 mm Hg preoperatively to 123 ± 15 mm Hg postoperatively. Mean follow-up was 7 ± 6 years (maximum, 22 years). Late deaths occurred in 5 patients (6%) and were not graft-related. Three patients (4%) required reoperation for repair of periprosthetic regurgitation in 2 and mitral valve replacement in 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The ascending-to-descending aortic bypass can be performed with low morbidity and mortality. It is an effective solution to complex aortic coarctation and represents a safe single-stage approach for patients with concomitant cardiac pathology.

Four different strategies for repair of aortic coarctation accompanied by cardiac lesions

OBJECTIVES

Coarctation accompanied by cardiac lesions is a complex clinical situation due to the presence of two different pathologies that necessitate surgical treatment. An individual strategy, according to the severity of the disease, is important to reduce perioperative mortality and morbidity.

METHODS

We report here on 25 patients with coarctation accompanied by cardiac lesions who were treated by various surgical approaches. Coarctation and associated disease were treated in 14 patients in a single stage by an ascending-to-descending bypass (n = 11) or by a hybrid procedure (n = 3). The remaining 11 patients underwent a two-stage operation for their treatment. Six of these 11 patients who had coronary artery disease or signs of congestive heart failure were first operated for their cardiac disease, whereas in the remaining five patients, who did not have any congestive signs, coarctation repair was performed first.

RESULTS

All the patients were male, between the ages of 20 and 24 years, except for one 45-year-old woman. The mean cross-clamp times, cardiopulmonary bypass times and operation times were 52 ± 14.5, 102.3 ± 28.5 and 174 ± 24.8 min in the extra-anatomical bypass group; 29.8 ± 11.7, 55.5 ± 17.6 and 116 ± 22 min in the two-stage groups and 49 ± 19.8, 63 ± 18.7 and 159 ± 21.3 min in the hybrid patients, respectively. One patient who underwent extra-anatomical bypass died on the 14th postoperative day. There were no events during the follow-up period for the other patients. Also, there were no gradients between the extremities and no graft-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

As a consequence of the progress in the development of endovascular techniques, hybrid treatment is becoming a more popular option for the treatment of coarctation accompanied by cardiac diseases. Two-stage procedures and extra-anatomical bypass might be alternative techniques if endovascular procedures are contraindicated or failing.

Complications of extra-anatomic aortic bypass for complex coarctation and aortic arch hypoplasia

BACKGROUND

We have adopted the extra-anatomic bypass graft as the procedure of choice for the treatment of coarctation and aortic arch hypoplasia in the adult-sized patient. However, we have experienced prolonged chest drainage and have decided to investigate this complication and the morbidity related to this procedure.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2010, 15 extra-anatomic bypass grafts of the aorta were performed in 14 patients. Their hospital records and follow-up data were retrospectively reviewed and compared with those of 14 consecutive patients operated with other conventional techniques over the same time period.

RESULTS

There was no hospital mortality. After the extra-anatomic bypass procedure, patients had longer hospital stay because of prolonged pleural effusions. Four patients developed complications related to persistent effusions leading to reinterventions, which led to mediastinitis in 2 instances. At last follow-up, 2 of 14 patients with extra-anatomic bypass remained hypertensive, while 8 of the 14 patients who underwent other types of repair had arch obstruction, were hypertensive, or both.

CONCLUSIONS

In the adult-sized patient extra-anatomic bypass of the aortic arch relieves arch obstruction more effectively than conventional techniques. However, this technique is fraught with complications related to prolonged effusion drainage that may lead to mediastinitis and reintervention. Its indication should be weighted carefully.

Surgical Repair for Isolated Aortic Interruption in a Young Adult

Interrupted aortic arch (IAA), a rare congenital malformation of the aortic arch, is defined as a loss of luminal continuity between the ascending and descending portions of the aorta. It is rarely diagnosed as an isolated anomaly in adulthood. Surgical repair is feasible through a sternotomy or thoracotomy incision. In this report, we describe the surgical repair of an isolated IAA in a 29-year-old patient by performing an ascending-to-descending aortic bypass via a sternotomy with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Single-stage repair of interrupted aortic arch with simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass in an adult

Interrupted aortic arch is a rare congenital cardiac defect. There are extremely few cases in adults that are reported in the pertinent medical literature. However, single-stage repair of interrupted aortic arch combined with coronary artery disease has been rarely reported. We describe the management of interrupted aortic arch associated with coronary artery disease through single-stage surgical procedure without cardiopulmonary bypass in a 56-year-old woman. The vascular prosthesis was anastomosed between the aortic arch just distal to the origin of the left subclavian artery and the descending thoracic aorta. Then a venous bypass was subsequently formed between the left anterior descending coronary artery, the circumflex artery, and the descending aorta.

Ascending-descending posterior pericardial bypass of complex coarctation of the aorta

Recurrent coarctation or complex aortic arch obstruction can present a surgical challenge. The ascending-descending posterior pericardial aortic bypass offers a safe, reproducible solution for the surgical treatment of complex or recurrent coarctation of the aorta and facilitates concomitant cardiac surgery.

Late outcomes of reintervention on the descending aorta after repair of aortic coarctation

BACKGROUND

After repair of aortic coarctation, patients may develop restenosis, aneurysms, and pseudoaneurysms at the site of prior repair. We assessed the outcomes of late reintervention on the descending aorta after aortic coarctation repair.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From March 1954 to July 2008, 130 patients had operations or endovascular procedures on the descending aorta after previous coarctation repair. We excluded patients who had complex left-sided cardiac lesions or interrupted aortic arch. Mean age at reintervention was 32±24 years and 28% were female. The interval between coarctation repair and reintervention was 17±13 years. Seventy-four percent of patients had hypertension. Reasons for reintervention were restenosis (n=122 [94%]), aneurysm (n=4 [3%]), and pseudoaneurysm (n=4 [3%]). Ninety-five patients (73%) underwent operative procedures including an extra-anatomic conduit (n=41), patch repair (n=32), interposition graft (n=14), end-end anastomosis (n=6), and subclavian flap (n=2). Thirty-five patients underwent endovascular treatment (balloon dilatation, n=22 or stenting, n=13). There was no early mortality. In the surgical group, 5 patients required early reoperation for bleeding and 5 patients had early vocal cord paralysis. One patient in the endovascular group had aortic rupture at the time of intervention requiring urgent operation. Survival was 97% at 10 years. At 5 years, freedom from a second repeat procedure on the descending aorta was 96% in the surgical group and 72% in the endovascular group (P<0.001). Five years after reintervention, fewer patients required treatment for hypertension (57% versus 74%, P<0.001) and a median of 1 antihypertensive medication was prescribed compared with a median of 2 medications preintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative and endovascular management of recoarctation can be performed safely with good late outcomes.

Seventeen-year follow-up after ascending-to-infrarenal aorta bypass for recurrent coarctation in an adult

Anatomic repair of complex aortic coarctation is associated with significant mortality and morbidity, including paraplegia. Extra-anatomic bypass strategies have been developed to reduce these complications and allow the correction of any concomitant conditions during the same operation. We present the case of a woman with uncontrolled hypertension and preductal coarctation of the aorta diagnosed at age 22 who underwent an unsuccessful attempt at primary repair, followed by extra-anatomic bypass from the ascending-to-infrarenal aorta. The patient has remained normotensive, with no additional complications related to the disease or the procedure, during a follow-up of 17 years.

One-stage repair of aortic coarctation and ascending aortic aneurysm by extra-anatomic graft

The best surgical approach for patients presenting with coarctation of the aorta and additional surgical cardiovascular disorders is uncertain. We describe the case of a young man with an aneurysm of the ascending aorta and a bicuspid aortic valve with a moderate insufficiency associated with a coarctation of the aorta. The patient underwent a single-stage procedure where the ascending aorta was replaced, the aortic valve repaired and the coarctation bypassed with an extra-anatomic graft. In our opinion, ascending-to-descending extra-anatomic graft is a good solution to treat these complicated cases.

Off-pump extraanatomic aortic bypass for the treatment of complex aortic coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in surgical and interventional techniques, the optimal surgical treatment of severe aortic (re) coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch is still controversial. Anatomic repair may require extensive dissection, cardiopulmonary bypass, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with their inherent risks. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of off-pump extraanatomic aortic bypass as a surgical alternative to local repair.

METHODS

From February 2000 to December 2005, ten consecutive patients (median age 20 years; range, 11 to 38 years) with severe aortic (re) coarctation (n = 4) and (or) hypoplastic aortic arch (n = 7) underwent off-pump extraanatomic aortic bypass through median sternotomy. All but three patients had undergone previous surgery for coarctation and angioplasty or stenting. Three patients underwent concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta because of an aneurysm using cardiopulmonary bypass.

RESULTS

Postoperative hospital course was uneventful in all patients. There was no perioperative mortality or significant morbidity. During a mean follow-up of 48 +/- 22 months no patient required additional procedures. All patients were free of symptoms; no patient showed signs of heart failure after follow-up. At last follow-up, no patient presented with claudication, nor any patient experienced orthostatic problems due to a steal phenomenon. During follow-up, hypertension resolved in all patients with residual mild hypertension in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump extraanatomic aortic bypass is an attractive treatment option for complex aortic (re) coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch. Perioperative risks are minimized, hypertension is influenced favorably, and midterm survival is event-free.