Reliability of positron emission tomography–computed tomography in identification of mediastinal lymph node status in patients with non–small cell lung cancer

The role of plasma D-dimer levels for predicting lymph node and mediastinal lymph node involvement in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Elevated plasma D-dimer levels have been suggested as a predictor of poor prognosis in NSCLC. But rare study showed the relationship between D-dimer levels and lymph node involvement.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of plasma D-dimer levels in predicting lymph node and mediastinal lymph node involvement in NSCLC.

METHODS

Preoperative plasma D-dimer levels were quantified in 253 NSCLC patients that underwent radical lung resection with systemic lymph node dissection. Patients were classified as lymph node negative (N0) versus lymph node positive (N1 + N2) and mediastinal lymph node negative (N0 + N1) versus mediastinal lymph node positive (N2).

RESULTS

Median plasma D-dimer level was significantly lower in Group N0 (94.0 μg/L) compared to Group N1 + N2 (177.0 μg/L) and in Group N0 + N1 (122.0 μg/L) compared to Group N2 (198.0 μg/L). Similar results were found in patients stratified by age, sex, smoking status and histological type, expect in patients with squamous carcinoma. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for plasma D-dimer levels of N0 versus N1 + N2 showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.757 and when a cutoff value was 124.0 μg/L DDU, the sensitivity and specificity was 0.80 and 0.68. The ROC curve for plasma D-dimer levels of N0 + N1 versus N2 showed an AUC of 0.720 and when a cutoff value was 147.0 μg/L DDU, the sensitivity and specificity was 0.75 and 0.67.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma D-dimer level has utility for predicting lymph node and mediastinal lymph node status in patients with operable NSCLC.

Prognostic factors in operated T3 non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective, single-center study of 129 patients

Background

This study aims to investigate the prognostic factors that affect survival rates and durations in patients with T3 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgery.

Methods

A total of 129 patients with T3 n on-small c ell l ung c ancer (125 males, 4 females; mean age 60±9.3 years; range 23 to 80 years) who were performed surgery in our clinic between January 1997 and December 2013 were evaluated retrospectively in terms of age, gender, type of resection, tumor histopathology, tumor, node and metastasis staging, lymph node invasion, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and recurrence.

Results

During the evaluation, while 61 patients (47.3%) were alive, 68 (52.7%) had lost their lives. One-, two- and five-year survival rates of the study population were 79.8%, 56.9% and 23.2%, respectively. Mean duration of survival was 41.5±4.0 months (range 33.7-49.4 months). Patient's age or tumor histopathology did not affect the duration of survival. Overall duration of survival was significantly longer in patients of stage IIB, patients who had low stages of lymph node invasion, who were performed lobectomy, who received chemotherapy or radiotherapy or who were without recurrence (p<0.05 for each). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that lymph node invasion, presence of recurrence or pneumonectomy, or failure to have been administered chemotherapy increased mortality risk significantly (hazard ratios 0.217, 3.369, 2.791 and 2.254, respectively).

Conclusion

Our findings revealed that lymph node invasion, presence of recurrence or pneumonectomy, or failure to have been administered chemotherapy are poor prognostic factors in T₃ non-small cell lung cancer. Prognostic factors should be taken into consideration during treatment and follow-up periods of patients with T₃ non-small cell lung cancer.

Texture Analysis and Synthesis of Malignant and Benign Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Lung Cancer on Computed Tomography

Texture analysis of computed tomography (CT) imaging has been found useful to distinguish subtle differences, which are in- visible to human eyes, between malignant and benign tissues in cancer patients. This study implemented two complementary methods of texture analysis, known as the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and the experimental semivariogram (SV) with an aim to improve the predictive value of evaluating mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer. The GLCM was explored with the use of a rich set of its derived features, whereas the SV feature was extracted on real and synthesized CT samples of benign and malignant lymph nodes. A distinct advantage of the computer methodology presented herein is the alleviation of the need for an automated precise segmentation of the lymph nodes. Using the logistic regression model, a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 90%, and area under curve of 0.89 were obtained in the test population. A tenfold cross-validation of 70% accuracy of classifying between benign and malignant lymph nodes was obtained using the support vector machines as a pattern classifier. These results are higher than those recently reported in literature with similar studies.

Variations in positron emission tomography-computed tomography findings for patients receiving neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to predict locoregional lymph node (LN) metastases using positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and investigate variations in PET-CT findings for patients receiving neoadjuvant (NT) and non-neoadjuvant (non-NT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Data from 578 consecutive patients from January 2010 to December 2015 who met this study inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent curative and complete resections for NSCLC in a Korean hospital. We analyzed the associations between maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and pathological stage, compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), investigated relationships among SUVmax values, evaluated LN status and compared pathologically negative and positive LNs by SUVmax, and assessed the influence of neoadjuvant therapy on SUVmax. All LNs were analyzed separately for N1 and N2.

RESULTS

(I) For non-NT, we found significantly positive associations between pathological stage and SUVmax (tumor, N1 LN, and N2 LN, all P<0.001). For NT, we found positive correlations between pathological stage and tumor and N2 LN SUVmax, except for N1 LN (tumor P=0.005, N1 LN P=0.981, N2 LN P=0.045); (II) for non-NT, the low SUVmax group had higher DFS and OS than the high SUVmax group (DFS: tumor SUVmax P<0.001, N1 LN SUVmax P=0.002, N2 LN SUVmax P=0.027; OS: tumor SUVmax P<0.001, N1 LN SUVmax P=0.006, N2 LN SUVmax P=0.006). For NT, the low SUVmax group had nonsignificantly higher DFS and OS than the high SUVmax group. When age, sex, and SUVmax were equal, pathological stages were significantly higher for NT than non-NT (P<0.001). Non-NT had significantly higher DFS (P=0.001) and OS (P=0.024) than NT; (III) for non-NT, tumor, N1 LN, and N2 SUVmax were positively associated (all P<0.001). For NT, tumor and N2 SUVmax (P<0.001), and N1 and N2 SUVmax (P=0.025) correlated positively; tumor and N1 LN SUVmax did not (P=0.911); (IV) for non-NT, there was significant cutoff values for prediction of LN metastases using both tumor and LN SUVmax (N1 LN: tumor SUVmax cutoff 5.95, sensitivity 66.3%, specificity 66.0%, area =0.748, P<0.001; N1 LN SUVmax cutoff 2.05, sensitivity 57.83%, specificity 66.43%, area =0.676, P<0.001) (N2 LN: tumor SUVmax cutoff 5.95, sensitivity 63.04%, specificity 63.95%, area =0.726, P<0.001; N2 LN SUVmax cutoff 2.05, sensitivity 65.22%, specificity 69.96%, area =0.678, P<0.001). For NT, no SUVmax values significantly predicted LN metastases; () Pathologically malignant and benign LN SUVmax after neoadjuvant therapy were not different (N1 LN P=0.570, N2 LN P=0.105). For non-NT, pathologically malignant LN SUVmax was significantly higher than pathologically benign LN SUVmax (N1 LN P<0.001, N2 LN P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed variations in PET-CT findings for NT and non-NT, which should be verified for evaluation and management, especially for surgery planning. SUV max is not a reliable predictor of lymphatic involvement after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with NSCLC. Surgery should not be withheld or delayed based on lack of knowledge about variations in PET-CT findings, which must be interpreted in conjunction with other conditions. Further studies on interpretation of PET-CT findings, especially for NT, are needed for better management and prognosis.

The Role of Fluorodeoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Nodal Staging of Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer in Sequential Surgical Algorithm

With nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accurate mediastinal nodal staging is crucial to determine whether a patient is or is not a surgical candidate. Traditionally, computed tomography (CT) and fluorodeoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT are the initial steps followed by tissue sampling through mediastinoscopy and/or thoracotomy, which are invasive procedures. There is controversy regarding the possibility of omission of the invasive diagnostic procedures and solely relying on noninvasive presurgical staging CT and FDG PET/CT results. Eighty-three patients who had PET/CT, mediastinoscopy, and thoracotomy for NSCLC were analyzed. For all lymph nodes that may be sampled by mediastinoscopy, PET/CT sensitivity was 80%, specificity was 86%, positive predictive value was 47%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 97%; and for those in this group whose clinical stage was T1/T2 M0, sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 84%. For lymph nodes accessible only at thoracotomy, sensitivity was 42% and specificity was 88%. FDG PET/CT is accurate in assessing stations 2R/L, 4R/L, and 7 nodes and has the potential to replace mediastinoscopy in the treatment algorithm of T1/T2 M0 disease. A negative PET/CT may potentially prevent the patient from invasive mediastinoscopy given its high NPV. However, a patient with positive PET/CT should undergo tissue biopsy with pathology confirmation.

Pre- and postoperative care for stage I-III NSCLC: Which quality of care indicators are evidence-based?

Identification of evidenced-based Quality of Care (QoC) indicators for lung cancer care is essential to quality improvement. The aim of this review was to identify evidence-based quality indicators for the pre- and postoperative care of stage I-III Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provided by the lung physician. To obtain these indicators, a search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library database was performed. English literature published between 1980 and 2012 was included and search terms regarding 'lung neoplasms', 'quality of care', 'pathology', 'diagnostic methods', 'preoperative and postoperative treatment' were used. The potential indicators were categorized as structure, process or outcome measures and the indicators supported by literature with high evidence level were selected. Five QoC indicators were identified. The use of the positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) results in more accurate mediastinal staging compared to the CT scan. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine Needle Aspiration and Endobronchial Ultrasound-Fine Needle Aspiration are sensitive diagnostic tools for mediastinal staging and reduce futile thoracotomies. Pathological conformation of lung cancer can best be obtained by a combination of cytological and histological diagnostics used during bronchoscopy. For patients with clinical stage III NSCLC, preoperative multimodality treatment (i.e. preoperative chemoradiation) results in superior survival and increased mediastinal downstaging compared to single modality treatment (i.e. preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy). After surgery, the addition of chemotherapy results in a significant survival benefit for patients with pathological stage II and III NSCLC. These five QoC indicators can be used for benchmarking and ultimately quality improvement of lung cancer care.

F-18-FDG-avid lymph node metastasis along preferential lymphatic drainage pathways from the tumor-bearing lung lobe on F-18-FDG PET/CT in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

F-18-FDG-avid lymph node (LN) metastasis may preferentially occur along the lymphatic drainage pathway (LDP) from the tumor-bearing lobe in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on FDG PET/CT. This study evaluated whether the identification of metastatic LNs according to LDP-based visual image interpretation can improve LN staging on FDG PET/CT in these patients.

METHODS

FDG PET/CT study was performed in 265 patients with NSCLC. The presence and LN station of metastatic LNs were determined by surgery or the clinical course. In the LDP-based interpretation, FDG-avid LNs, which were located along the preferential LDP from each tumor-bearing lobe and visually more intense in FDG uptake compared with the remaining LNs straying away from the preferential LDP, were diagnosed as metastatic. The result was compared with the quantitative method using a cutoff value of 2.5 for the maximum standardized uptake value.

RESULTS

Of the total 1031 mediastinal and hilar LN stations with FDG-avid LNs in 265 patients, 179 stations in 66 patients were metastatic and the remaining 852 were benign. All the metastatic LN stations except for 2 stations showing skip metastasis were located along the main preferential LDP or another preferential LDP via a direct anatomic pathway from each tumor-bearing lung lobe. The specificity, accuracy, and PPV for identifying metastatic LN stations by LDP-based interpretation were 97.9, 95.7 and 89.5 %, respectively, which were significantly greater compared with those of 92.7, 90.8 and 70.3 % by the SUV-based method (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that FDG-avid LN metastasis preferentially occurs along the LDP from the tumor-bearing lobe in NSCLC patients. LDP-based visual image interpretation on FDG PET/CT can improve LN staging in these patients.

Endobronchial ultrasound: morphological predictors of benign disease

The objective of this study was to assess the utility of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) morphology of lymph nodes in predicting benign cytology of transbronchial needle aspirates in a prospective observational study. Five ultrasonic morphological characteristics of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes were recorded: size, shape, margins, echogenic appearance and the presence of a central blood vessel. These characteristics were correlated with the final diagnosis. A total of 402 consecutive patients (237 males and 165 females) undergoing EBUS were studied. The final diagnosis was malignant disease in 244 (60.6%) and benign disease in 153 (38.05%) subjects. Out of 740 sampled nodes, in 463 (62.6%) malignant cells were identified, whereas in 270 (36.5%) nodes, no malignant cells were identified. On univariate analysis small size, triangular shape and the presence of a central vessel were predictive of a benign aetiology. In the final multivariate model, a predictive probability of 0.811 (95% CI 0.72-0.91) for benign disease was found if lymph node size was <10 mm and a central vessel was present. Sonographic appearances of lymph nodes improve the predictive probability of EBUS for benign aetiologies, and may reduce the number of nodes requiring sampling and the need for further invasive investigations.

PET-CT for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with suspected resectable non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A major determinant of treatment offered to patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is their intrathoracic (mediastinal) nodal status. If the disease has not spread to the ipsilateral mediastinal nodes, subcarinal (N2) nodes, or both, and the patient is otherwise considered fit for surgery, resection is often the treatment of choice. Planning the optimal treatment is therefore critically dependent on accurate staging of the disease. PET-CT (positron emission tomography-computed tomography) is a non-invasive staging method of the mediastinum, which is increasingly available and used by lung cancer multidisciplinary teams. Although the non-invasive nature of PET-CT constitutes one of its major advantages, PET-CT may be suboptimal in detecting malignancy in normal-sized lymph nodes and in ruling out malignancy in patients with coexisting inflammatory or infectious diseases.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of integrated PET-CT for mediastinal staging of patients with suspected or confirmed NSCLC that is potentially suitable for treatment with curative intent.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to 30 April 2013: The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via OvidSP (from 1946), Embase via OvidSP (from 1974), PreMEDLINE via OvidSP, OpenGrey, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, and the trials register www.clinicaltrials.gov. There were no language or publication status restrictions on the search. We also contacted researchers in the field, checked reference lists, and conducted citation searches (with an end-date of 9 July 2013) of relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective or retrospective cross-sectional studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of integrated PET-CT for diagnosing N2 disease in patients with suspected resectable NSCLC. The studies must have used pathology as the reference standard and reported participants as the unit of analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data pertaining to the study characteristics and the number of true and false positives and true and false negatives for the index test, and they independently assessed the quality of the included studies using QUADAS-2. We calculated sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each study and performed two main analyses based on the criteria for test positivity employed: Activity > background or SUVmax ≥ 2.5 (SUVmax = maximum standardised uptake value), where we fitted a summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using a hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) model for each subset of studies. We identified the average operating point on the SROC curve and computed the average sensitivities and specificities. We checked for heterogeneity and examined the robustness of the meta-analyses through sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 45 studies, and based on the criteria for PET-CT positivity, we categorised the included studies into three groups: Activity > background (18 studies, N = 2823, prevalence of N2 and N3 nodes = 679/2328), SUVmax ≥ 2.5 (12 studies, N = 1656, prevalence of N2 and N3 nodes = 465/1656), and Other/mixed (15 studies, N = 1616, prevalence of N2 to N3 nodes = 400/1616). None of the studies reported (any) adverse events. Under-reporting generally hampered the quality assessment of the studies, and in 30/45 studies, the applicability of the study populations was of high or unclear concern.The summary sensitivity and specificity estimates for the 'Activity > background PET-CT positivity criterion were 77.4% (95% CI 65.3 to 86.1) and 90.1% (95% CI 85.3 to 93.5), respectively, but the accuracy estimates of these studies in ROC space showed a wide prediction region. This indicated high between-study heterogeneity and a relatively large 95% confidence region around the summary value of sensitivity and specificity, denoting a lack of precision. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the overall estimate of sensitivity was especially susceptible to selection bias; reference standard bias; clear definition of test positivity; and to a lesser extent, index test bias and commercial funding bias, with lower combined estimates of sensitivity observed for all the low 'Risk of bias' studies compared with the full analysis.The summary sensitivity and specificity estimates for the SUVmax ≥ 2.5 PET-CT positivity criterion were 81.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 88.9) and 79.4% (95% CI 70 to 86.5), respectively.In this group, the accuracy estimates of these studies in ROC space also showed a very wide prediction region. This indicated very high between-study heterogeneity, and there was a relatively large 95% confidence region around the summary value of sensitivity and specificity, denoting a clear lack of precision. Sensitivity analyses suggested that both overall accuracy estimates were marginally sensitive to flow and timing bias and commercial funding bias, which both lead to slightly lower estimates of sensitivity and specificity.Heterogeneity analyses showed that the accuracy estimates were significantly influenced by country of study origin, percentage of participants with adenocarcinoma, (¹⁸F)-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) dose, type of PET-CT scanner, and study size, but not by study design, consecutive recruitment, attenuation correction, year of publication, or tuberculosis incidence rate per 100,000 population.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review has shown that accuracy of PET-CT is insufficient to allow management based on PET-CT alone. The findings therefore support National Institute for Health and Care (formally 'clinical') Excellence (NICE) guidance on this topic, where PET-CT is used to guide clinicians in the next step: either a biopsy or where negative and nodes are small, directly to surgery. The apparent difference between the two main makes of PET-CT scanner is important and may influence the treatment decision in some circumstances. The differences in PET-CT accuracy estimates between scanner makes, NSCLC subtypes, FDG dose, and country of study origin, along with the general variability of results, suggest that all large centres should actively monitor their accuracy. This is so that they can make reliable decisions based on their own results and identify the populations in which PET-CT is of most use or potentially little value.

Classifications of n2 non-small-cell lung cancer based on the number and rate of metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

Subdivisions of N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases based on metastatic status of mediastinal and non-mediastinal lymph nodes have been proposed. This study aimed to evaluate N2 disease classification by mediastinal lymph nodes alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 187 patients with NSCLC pN1-N2 who were surgically treated to evaluate the proposed classifications: number, rate, nodal zone of metastatic lymph nodes. We evaluated N2 disease classification based on mediastinal lymph nodes alone in 136 pN2 cases.

RESULTS

The number (1-2, 3-5, and 6 ≤) or rate (15%≥, 15%< to 40%>, and 40%≤) classification based on all metastatic lymph nodes was validated by the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. After reclassification by number or rate of metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes alone, a significant difference was maintained among all groups except between the 3-5 and 6 ≤ groups. The 5-year survival rates of the 1-2, 3-5, and 6 ≤ groups were 63.4%, 32.4%, and 18.2%, respectively (1-2 vs. 3-5, P = .015; 3-5 vs. 6 ≤, P = .134). With rate classification, the 5-year survival rates of the 15%≥, 15%-40% (15%< to 40%>), and 40%≤ groups were 56.0%, 27.3%, and 5.04%, respectively (15%≥ vs. 15%-40%, P = .011; 15-40% vs. 40%≤, P = .011). The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient showed a highly significant correlation of metastatic status between mediastinal lymph nodes and all lymph nodes (both P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Classification by number and rate of mediastinal lymph nodes alone enabled subdivision of N2 NSCLC cases. Metastatic status of mediastinal lymph nodes reflects that of all lymph nodes and is prognostic indicators.

Staging lymph node metastases from lung cancer in the mediastinum

BACKGROUND

The presence of tumor metastases in the mediastinum is one of the most important elements in determining the optimal treatment strategy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. This review is aimed at examining the current strategies for investigating lymph node metastases corresponding to an "N2" classification delineated by The International Staging Committee of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC).

METHODS

Extensive review of the existing scientific literature related to the investigation of mediastinal lymph node metastases was undertaken in order to summarize and report current best practices.

CONCLUSIONS

N2 disease is very heterogeneous requiring multiple modalities for thorough investigation. New research is now focusing on better identifying, defining, and classifying lymph node metastases in the mediastinum. Molecular staging and sub-classifying mediastinal lymph node metastases are being actively researched in order to provide better prognostic value and to optimize treatment strategies. Non-invasive imaging, such as PET/CT and minimally invasive techniques such as endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy, are now the lead investigative methods in evaluating the mediastinum for metastatic presence.

A pilot study of 4'-[methyl-11C]-thiothymidine PET/CT for detection of regional lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

4′-[methyl-¹¹C]-thiothymidine (4DST) is a novel positron emission tomography (PET) tracer to assess proliferation of malignancy. The diagnostic abilities of 4DST and 2-deoxy-2-¹⁸ F-fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) for detecting regional lymph node (LN) metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were prospectively compared. In addition, the relationship between the PET result and the patient's prognosis was evaluated.

Methods

A total of 31 patients with NSCLC underwent 4DST PET/computed tomography (CT) and FDG PET/CT. The PET/CT images were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively for focal uptake of each PET tracer, according to the staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Surgical and histological results provided the reference standards. Patients were followed for up to two years to assess disease-free survival.

Results

On a per-lesion basis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for LN staging were 82%, 72%, 32%, 96%, and 73%, respectively, for 4DST, and 29%, 86%, 25%, 88%, and 78%, respectively, for FDG. The sensitivity of 4DST was significantly higher than that of FDG (P < 0.001). The disease-free survival rate with positive 4DST uptake in nodal lesions was 0.35, which was considerably lower than the rate of 0.83 with negative findings (P = 0.04). Among the factors tested, nodal staging by 4DST was the most influential prognostic factor (P = 0.05) in predicting the presence of a previously existing spread lesion or of a recurrence over the course of 2 years.

Conclusion

4DST PET/CT is sensitive for detecting mediastinal lymph node metastasis in NSCLC, but its low specificity is a limitation. However, it may be helpful in predicting the prognosis of NSCLC.

Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Correctly staging lung cancer is important because the treatment options and prognosis differ significantly by stage. Several noninvasive imaging studies and invasive tests are available. Understanding the accuracy, advantages, and disadvantages of the available methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer is critical to decision-making.

METHODS

Test accuracies for the available staging studies were updated from the second iteration of the American College of Chest Physicians Lung Cancer Guidelines. Systematic searches of the MEDLINE database were performed up to June 2012 with the inclusion of selected meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and reviews. Study designs and results are summarized in evidence tables.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of CT scanning for identifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis were approximately 55% and 81%, respectively, confirming that CT scanning has limited ability either to rule in or exclude mediastinal metastasis. For PET scanning, estimates of sensitivity and specificity for identifying mediastinal metastasis were approximately 77% and 86%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that PET scanning is more accurate than CT scanning, but tissue biopsy is still required to confirm PET scan findings. The needle techniques endobronchial ultrasound-needle aspiration, endoscopic ultrasound-needle aspiration, and combined endobronchial ultrasound/endoscopic ultrasound-needle aspiration have sensitivities of approximately 89%, 89%, and 91%, respectively. In direct comparison with surgical staging, needle techniques have emerged as the best first diagnostic tools to obtain tissue. Based on randomized controlled trials, PET or PET-CT scanning is recommended for staging and to detect unsuspected metastatic disease and avoid noncurative resections.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the last iteration of the staging guidelines, PET scanning has assumed a more prominent role both in its use prior to surgery and when evaluating for metastatic disease. Minimally invasive needle techniques to stage the mediastinum have become increasingly accepted and are the tests of first choice to confirm mediastinal disease in accessible lymph node stations. If negative, these needle techniques should be followed by surgical biopsy. All abnormal scans should be confirmed by tissue biopsy (by whatever method is available) to ensure accurate staging. Evidence suggests that more complete staging improves patient outcomes.

The maximum standardized uptake value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography of the primary tumour is a good predictor of pathological nodal involvement in clinical N0 non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) plays an important role in the evaluation of resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, this modality cannot be used to detect histological nodal involvement, which can result in stage-migration for resectable lung cancer. In this study, we tried to evaluate the possibility of predicting histological nodal involvement in patients with NSCLC using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of FDG-PET of the primary tumour instead of that of the lymph nodes.

METHODS

Between February 2008 and September 2011, 898 patients underwent lung cancer surgery at our institute. Among them, we retrospectively analysed 265 patients with clinical N0 NSCLC, who underwent preoperative FDG-PET. The relationships between clinicopathological features, including the findings of FDG-PET and pathological nodal involvement, were investigated. The factors investigated were age, gender, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen titre, maximum tumour dimension, consolidation/tumour dimension ratio (C/T ratio), SUVmax in the primary tumour and smoking history.

RESULTS

Of the 265 clinical N0 NSCLC patients, 214 (80.8%) had pathological N0 status and 27 (10.2%) and 24 (9.0%) had pathological N1 and N2 disease. In a multivariate analysis, the C/T ratio (P = 0.046) and SUVmax of the primary tumour (P = 0.016) were significant predictors of pathological nodal involvement. With regard to pathological N1-2 disease, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive and negative predictive values of mediastinal node involvement in patients with NSCLC with an SUVmax for FDG-PET of 10 or more were 49.0, 83.2, 76.6, 41.0 and 87.3%, respectively. Of the 61 patients with NSCLC with an SUVmax for FDG-PET of 10 or more, 25 (41.0%) had pathological N1-2 disease, while only 26 (12.7%) of the remaining 204 patients with an SUVmax for FDG-PET of <10 had nodal disease (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative nodal status was significantly predicted by the SUVmax of FDG-PET of the primary tumour instead of the lymph nodes themselves. The patients with NSCLC in particular who show strong uptake values of SUVmax in the primary tumour could have occult nodal metastases, and may be indicated for a further preoperative modality for an accurate staging.

Diagnostic value of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer patients

In the recent years, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a new modality for staging non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in detecting metastatic lesions in NSCLC patients. Meta-analysis methods were used to pool sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likehood ratios, diagnostic odd ratios and to construct a summary receiver-operating characteristic curve. Data from included studies were pooled to compare the diagnostic accuracy between PET/CT and PET or CT alone in nodal staging. Totally, 56 studies involving 8,699 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivities and specificities of (18)F-FDG PET/CT were 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-0.78] and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.94) in determining mediastinal nodal staging; 0.71 (95% CI: 0.60-0.80) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88) in intrathoracic staging; 0.78 (95% CI: 0.64-0.87) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94) in intrathoracic staging on a per-node basis. For detecting extrathoracic metastases, the pooled sensitivities and specificities of (18)F-FDG PET/CT were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.47-0.93) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.97) for all extrathoracic metastases; 0.91 (95% CI: 0.80-0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99) for bone metastases. (18)F-FDG PET/CT is beneficial in detecting lymph node metastases and extrathoracic metastases although PET/CT showed low sensitivity in detecting brain metastases. (18)F-FDG PET/CT confers significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than contrast-enhanced CT (both p < 0.01) and higher sensitivity than (18)F-FDG PET in staging NSCLC (p < 0.05).

(18)FDG-PET/CT for detection of mediastinal nodal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucos -e positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)FDG-PET/CT) in detecting mediastinal nodal metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Studies about (18)FDG-PET/CT for detecting mediastinal nodal metastasis in patient with NSCLC were systematically searched in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EBM Review databases from January 1, 2000 to July 26, 2011. A software called "Meta-Disc" was used to obtain pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR), respectively. We also calculated summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, and the Q* index.

RESULTS

20 articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria (3028 eligible patients). The pooled sensitivity, and specificity with 95% confidence interval for PET/CT on a per-patient analysis were 0.719 (0.683-0.753), and 0.898 (0.882-0.912). Corresponding values for PET/CT on a per-nodal-station analysis were 0.610 (0.582-0.636), 0.924 (0.918-0.930). The Q* index estimates under SROC were 0.8464 and 0.8067, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

(18)FDG-PET/CT had more specificity but less sensitivity for mediastinal nodal metastasis in patients with NSCLC.

Diagnostic performance of integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography for mediastinal lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer: a bivariate systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Accurate clinical staging of mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is important in determining therapeutic options and prognoses. Integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) scanning is becoming widely used for MLN staging in patients with NSCLC. We performed a bivariate meta-analysis to determine the pooled sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) of this imaging modality.

METHODS

The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and SpringerLink databases were searched for articles related to PET/CT for MLN staging in patients with NSCLC. SEN and SPE were calculated for every study. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize overall test performance and assess study quality. Potential between-study heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 330 initially identified reports were included in the meta-analysis. When we did not consider the unit of analysis, the pooled weighted SEN and SPE were 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.79) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.94), respectively. In the patient-based data analysis, the pooled weighted SEN was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.65-0.84) and the pooled weighted SPE was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92). In the MLN-based data analysis, the pooled SEN was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.56-0.78) and the pooled SPE was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated PET/CT is a relatively accurate noninvasive imaging technique, with excellent specificity for MLN staging in patients with NSCLC. Nevertheless, current evidence suggests that we should not depend on the results of PET/CT completely for MLN staging in patients with NSCLC.