Anatomic segmentectomy for stage I non–small-cell lung cancer: Comparison of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open approach

Open thoracotomy versus VATS versus RATS for segmentectomy: a systematic review & Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent trials suggest that more conservative resections such as segmentectomy are non-inferior to more radical approaches. Most segmentectomy can be safely performed using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The clinical benefits of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) remain unclear. We aimed to perform a systematic review evaluating the outcome of open thoracotomy, VATS, and RATS for segmentectomy.

METHODS

A systematic database search was conducted of original articles exploring the outcome of open versus VATS versus RATS segmentectomy in PubMed, EMBASE and SCOPUS. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were hospital readmission, air leak, and post-operative pneumonia respectively.

RESULTS

11 studies were included with a total patient sample size of 7280. There were no differences between the three approaches in terms of 30-day mortality, hospital readmission, air leak, and post-operative pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

There are no significant differences between the three approaches in the clinical outcomes measured. While our analysis demonstrates the potential benefits of RATS, it is important to note that the steep learning curve associated with this technique may impact its wider adoption and efficacy in the community. Further randomised control studies are required to compare the short and long terms results of VATS and RATS approaches.

Three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography in thoracoscopic segmentectomy: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Thoracoscopic segmentectomy is the recommended treatment option for small peripheral pulmonary nodules. To assess the ability of preoperative three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction computed tomography (CT) to shorten the operative time and improve perioperative outcomes in thoracoscopic segmentectomy compared with standard chest CT, we conducted this randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

The DRIVATS study was a multicentre, randomized controlled trial conducted in 3 hospitals between July 2019 and November 2023. Patients with small peripheral pulmonary nodules not reaching segment borders were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 3D reconstruction CT or standard chest CT before thoracoscopic segmentectomy. The primary end-point was operative time. The secondary end-points included incidence of postoperative complications, intraoperative blood loss and operative accident event.

RESULTS

A total of 191 patients were enrolled in this study: 95 in the 3D reconstruction CT group and 96 in the standard chest CT group. All patients underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy except for 1 patient in the standard chest CT group who received a wedge resection. There is no significant difference in operative time between the 3D reconstruction CT group (median, 100 min [interquartile range (IQR), 85-120]) and the standard chest CT group (median, 100 min [IQR, 81-140]) (P = 0.82). Only 1 intraoperative complication occurred in the standard chest CT group. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P = 0.52). Other perioperative outcomes were also similar.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with small peripheral pulmonary nodules not reaching segment borders, the use of 3D reconstruction CT in thoracoscopic segmentectomy was feasible, but it did not result in significant differences in operative time or perioperative outcomes compared to standard chest CT.

Effect of segmental versus lobectomy in minimally invasive surgery on postoperative wound complications in lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis

It is still a matter of debate whether the surgical segmentectomy and lobectomy of lung cancer are comparable in the incidence of perioperative wound complications. An extensive review of the literature through August 2023 was carried out with a critical review of four databases. Following the acceptance and elimination criteria set out in the trial, as well as a qualitative assessment of the literature, this resulted in a review of related research that compared the results of both lobectomy and partial resection in the management of lung cancer. The analysis of the data was performed with the RevMan 5.3 software, and the 95% confidence interval [CI] and odds ratio [OR] were performed with either stationary or random-effect models. It is concluded that the operation time of lobectomy is shorter than that of sectioning in the treatment of segmentectomy (mean difference [MD], -38.62; 95% CI, -41.96, -35.28; p < 0.0001). But the rate of postoperative wound infection (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.18, 2.15; p = 0.45) and intraoperative blood loss (MD, 17.54; 95% CI, -4.19, 39.26; p = 0.11) were not significantly different for them. Thus, for those who have received a pulmonary carcinoma operation, different operative methods might not have an impact on the incidence of postoperative wound infections. The operative procedure appears to have a major impact on the length of the operation in patients.

Regional Anesthesia for Lobectomy and Risk of Pulmonary Complications: A National Safety Quality Improvement Program Propensity-Matching Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether general anesthesia (GA) in conjunction with regional anesthetic (RA) techniques are associated with favorable pulmonary outcomes versus GA alone among patients undergoing lobectomy by either video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or open thoracotomy.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort (2014-2017).

SETTING

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients undergoing lobectomy by either VATS or open thoracotomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Two groups of patients were identified based on the use of GA alone or GA in conjunction with RA (RA+GA) techniques (either neuraxial or peripheral nerve blocks). Both groups were propensity-matched based on pulmonary risk factors. The authors' primary outcome was composite postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC), including pneumonia, reintubation, and failure to wean from the ventilator.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 4,134 VATS (2,067 in GA and 2,067 in RA+GA) and 3,112 thoracotomies (1,556 in GA and 1,556 in RA+GA) were included in the final analysis. Regional anesthetic, as an adjuvant to GA, did not affect the incidence of PPC among patients undergoing lobectomy by VATS (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% CI 0.81-1.43, p = 0.622), as well as in those undergoing lobectomy via thoracotomy (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.93-1.51, p = 0.174). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of readmission rates, length of stay, and mortality at 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The RA techniques were not associated with a lower incidence of pulmonary complications in lobectomy surgery.

Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction in video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy (DRIVATS): A prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Anatomical segmentectomy has been proven to be a viable surgical treatment for small-size peripheral lung nodules. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction computed tomography (CT) has been proposed as an effective approach to overcome the challenges of encountering pulmonary anatomical variations when performing segmentectomy. Therefore, to further investigate the usefulness of preoperative 3D reconstruction CT in segmentectomy, we will conduct this prospective, multicenter randomized controlled DRIVATS study to compare the use of 3D reconstruction CT with standard chest CT in video-assisted segmentectomy (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04004494).

METHODS

This study began in July 2019 and a total of 190 patients will be accrued from three clinical centers within 4 years. The main inclusion criteria are patients with a single peripheral nodule 0.8-2 cm with at least one of the following requirements: (i) histology of adenocarcinoma in situ; (ii) nodule has ≥50% ground-glass appearance on CT; (iii) radiologic surveillance confirms a long doubling time (≥400 days). Surgical procedures include segmental resection of the lesion and mediastinal lymph node sampling (subsegmental resection or combined subsegmental resection will not be included in this study). The primary endpoint is operative time. The secondary endpoints include incidence of change of surgical plan, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rate, operative accident event, incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, length of hospitalization, duration of chest tube placement, postoperative 30-day mortality, dissection of lymph nodes, overall survival, disease-free survival, preoperative lung function, and postoperative lung function.

DISCUSSION

This multicenter DRIVATS study aims to verify the usefulness of preoperative 3D reconstruction CT compared with standard chest CT in segmentectomy. If successfully completed, this multicenter prospective study will provide a higher level of evidence for the use of 3D reconstruction CT in segmentectomy.

Oncologic outcomes of segmentectomy for stage IA radiological solid-predominant lung cancer >2 cm in maximum tumour size

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the outcomes of segmentectomy with those of lobectomy in clinical-stage IA radiological solid-predominant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) >2 cm in maximum tumour size.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for radiological solid-predominant NSCLC >2-3 cm in maximum tumour size with a ground-glass opacity component on thin-section computed tomography. Multivariable or propensity score-matched analyses were performed to control for confounders for survival. Overall survival (OS) was analysed using a Kaplan-Meier estimation.

RESULTS

Of the 215 eligible cases, segmentectomy and lobectomy were performed in 46 and 169 patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that standardized uptake value (hazard ratio: 1.148, 95% confidence interval: 1.032-1.276, P = 0.011) was an independently significant prognosticators of OS, while the operative mode was not associated (hazard ratio: 0.635, 95% confidence interval: 0.132-3.049, P = 0.570). The 5 y-OS was excellent and did not differ significantly between segmentectomy and lobectomy (95.5% vs 90.2%; P = 0.697), which was also shown in the propensity score analysis (96.8% vs 94.0%; P = 0.406), with a median follow-up time of 5.2 years. Locoregional recurrence was found in 2 (4.3%) segmentectomy and 13 (7.7%) lobectomy (P = 0.443). In the subgroup analysis stratified by solid component size, the 5 y-OS was similar between segmentectomy and lobectomy in the c-T1b and c-T1c groups, respectively [c-T1b (n = 163): 94.1% vs 91.8%; P = 0.887 and c-T1c (n = 52): 100% vs 84.9%; P = 0.197].

CONCLUSIONS

Segmentectomy showed similar oncological results compared to lobectomy in solid-predominant NSCLC with a ground-glass opacity component >2-3 cm in maximum tumour size. More prospective randomized trials are needed to adequately expand the indication of anatomic segmentectomy for early-stage NSCLC.

Adoption of Robotic Core Technology in Minimally Invasive Lung Segmentectomy: Review

A recent randomized trial demonstrated the survival superiority of lung segmentectomy over lobectomy in patients with early stage, small-sized lung cancer. Hence, there is a pressing need for thoracic surgeons to gain familiarity with lung segmentectomy. However, lung segmentectomy, especially via minimally invasive surgery, is a technically challenging thoracic surgical procedure. The robotic surgery platform helps surgeons to improve their operative performance based on its core technological features: improved dexterity, precision, and visualization. Herein, we have discussed the key issues related to robotic lung segmentectomy, explicitly focusing on the technical features of complex segmentectomy under difficult conditions. We have also introduced our preferred surgical strategy for robotic lung segmentectomy with specific maneuvers.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 2: systematic review of evidence regarding resection extent in generally healthy patients

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options (lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy, thermal ablation), weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection in generally healthy patients is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons with at least some adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

In healthy patients there is no short-term benefit to sublobar resection vs. lobectomy in randomized and non-randomized comparisons. A detriment in long-term outcomes is demonstrated by adjusted non-randomized comparisons, more marked for wedge than segmentectomy. Quality-of-life data is confounded by the use of video-assisted approaches; evidence suggests the approach has more impact than the resection extent. Differences in pulmonary function tests by resection extent are not clinically meaningful in healthy patients, especially for multi-segmentectomy vs. lobectomy. The margin distance is associated with the risk of recurrence.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding resection extent in healthy patients with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation on which to build a framework for individualized clinical decision-making.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 3: systematic review of evidence regarding surgery in compromised patients or specific tumors

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options [lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), thermal ablation], weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection in older patients, patients with limited pulmonary reserve and favorable tumors is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons (NRCs) with adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

In older patients, perioperative mortality is minimally altered by resection extent and only slightly affected by increasing age; sublobar resection may slightly decrease morbidity. Long-term outcomes are worse after lesser resection; the difference is slightly attenuated with increasing age. Reported short-term outcomes are quite acceptable in (selected) patients with severely limited pulmonary reserve, not clearly altered by resection extent but substantially improved by a minimally invasive approach. Quality-of-life (QOL) and impact on pulmonary function hasn't been well studied, but there appears to be little difference by resection extent in older or compromised patients. Patient selection is paramount but not well defined. Ground-glass and screen-detected tumors exhibit favorable long-term outcomes regardless of resection extent; however solid tumors <1 cm are not a reliably favorable group.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding resection extent in compromised patients and favorable tumors with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation for a framework for individualized decision-making.

Learning curve for completely thoracoscopic anatomic sublobar resection

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive anatomic sublobar resection is increasingly being considered as an alternative to lobectomy in selected cases. However, this remains a technically challenging procedure and only 5 studies evaluating learning curves have been published to date. The aim of this study was to evaluate a single surgeon's learning curve for completely thoracoscopic anatomic sublobar resection.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all thoracoscopic anatomic sublobar resections by one surgeon proficient in VATS lobectomy between January 2015 and January 2020. The primary outcome was operative time. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications, duration of chest tube drainage and length of stay.

RESULTS

There were 67 thoracoscopic anatomic sublobar resections performed in 66 patients. A Time-series plot and Cumulative Sum analysis of operative times showed a drop off after case 32, suggesting achievement of competency. After case 32, mean operative times were decreased (128,59+/- 32,42min. vs 153,63+/-40,16 min, p=0,013) and there was a trend toward decreased blood loss (124,26+/- 76,0 vs 175,0ml+/-141,99, p=0,073). 13,6% of patients had postoperative complications other than air leak and 88,9% of these were Clavien-Dindo class 1-2; postoperative complications were evenly distributed before and after case 32. Cumlulative Sum curves for the duration of chest tube drainage and length of stay did not show any significant change during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that for a surgeon proficient in VATS lobectomy, competency in completely thoracoscopic anatomic sublobar resection can be achieved after 32 cases and can be accomplished in a way that does not compromise perioperative outcomes.

Application of Mimics Medical 21.0 software in thoracoscopic anatomical sublobectomy

BACKGROUND

The anatomical structure of pulmonary segments is complex, and there are many anatomical variations, making the operation more difficult, so we used Mimics Medical 21.0 software for three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA), carefully formulated the surgical plan and on this basis completed the video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical sublobectomy.

METHODS

A total of 38 patients with pulmonary nodules were selected and received video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical sublobectomy after using Mimics Medica 21.0 software for 3D-CTBA.

RESULTS

The mean operative duration was 158.42±20.21 minutes, and the operative hemorrhage was 97.66±22.37 mL. In pathological diagnoses, there were 5 benign cases (13.2%), 9 cases with atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (23.7%), 12 cases with adenocarcinoma in situ (31.6%), 11 cases with minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (28.9%) and 1 case with invasive adenocarcinoma (2.6%); 8.29±0.98 lymph nodes sampled had no metastasis. The chest tube drainage duration and postoperative hospitalstay were 2.47±0.73 days and 5.47±0.73 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Mimics Medical 21.0 software can quickly and accurately complete 3D-CTBA, which is beneficial to formulate a personalized anatomical sublobectomy surgical plan.

A bibliometric analysis of segmentectomy versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer research (1992-2019)

BACKGROUND

This study intends to create a series of scientific maps to quantitatively estimate hot spots and emerging trends in segmentectomy versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) research with bibliometric methods.

METHODS

Articles published on segmentectomy versus lobectomy for NSCLC were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Extracted information was analyzed quantitatively using bibliometric analysis by CiteSpace to find hot spots and frontiers in this research area.

RESULTS

A total of 362 scientific articles on segmentectomy versus lobectomy for NSCLC were collected, and the annual publication rate increased over time from 1992 to 2019. The leading country and the leading institution were the United States and University of Pittsburgh, respectively. Furthermore, the most prolific researchers were, namely, James D. Luketich, Rodney J. Landreneau, Matthew J. Schuchert, Morihito Okada, and David O. Wilson. The analysis of keywords pointed out that carcinoma, bronchogenic carcinoma, limited resection, segmental resection, and morbidity are hot spots and lymph node dissection, minimally invasive surgery, impact, epidemiology, and high risk are research frontiers in this field.

CONCLUSION

Publications related to segmentectomy versus lobectomy for NSCLC have made great achievements based on bibliometric analysis in recent years. However, further research and global collaboration are still required. Finally, we find that segmentectomy for the treatment of NSCLC is receiving much more attention from researchers globally compared with lobectomy in this research area.

Predicting benign, preinvasive, and invasive lung nodules on computed tomography scans using machine learning

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to investigate if machine learning algorithms can predict whether a lung nodule is benign, adenocarcinoma, or its preinvasive subtype from computed tomography images alone.

METHODS

A dataset of chest computed tomography scans containing lung nodules was collected with their pathologic diagnosis from several sources. The dataset was split randomly into training (70%), internal validation (15%), and independent test sets (15%) at the patient level. Two machine learning algorithms were developed, trained, and validated. The first algorithm used the support vector machine model, and the second used deep learning technology: a convolutional neural network. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the classification on the test dataset.

RESULTS

The support vector machine/convolutional neural network-based models classified nodules into 6 categories resulting in an area under the curve of 0.59/0.65 when differentiating atypical adenomatous hyperplasia versus adenocarcinoma in situ, 0.87/0.86 with minimally invasive adenocarcinoma versus invasive adenocarcinoma, 0.76/0.72 atypical adenomatous hyperplasia + adenocarcinoma in situ versus minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, 0.89/0.87 atypical adenomatous hyperplasia + adenocarcinoma in situ versus minimally invasive adenocarcinoma + invasive adenocarcinoma, and 0.93/0.92 atypical adenomatous hyperplasia + adenocarcinoma in situ + minimally invasive adenocarcinoma versus invasive adenocarcinoma. Classifying benign versus atypical adenomatous hyperplasia + adenocarcinoma in situ + minimally invasive adenocarcinoma versus invasive adenocarcinoma resulted in a micro-average area under the curve of 0.93/0.94 for the support vector machine/convolutional neural network models, respectively. The convolutional neural network-based methods had higher sensitivities than the support vector machine-based methods but lower specificities and accuracies.

CONCLUSIONS

The machine learning algorithms demonstrated reasonable performance in differentiating benign versus preinvasive versus invasive adenocarcinoma from computed tomography images alone. However, the prediction accuracy varies across its subtypes. This holds the potential for improved diagnostic capabilities with less-invasive means.

Outcomes of superior segmentectomy versus lower lobectomy for superior segment Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer are equivalent: An analysis of 196 patients at a single, high volume institution

OBJECTIVES

To determine if superior segmentectomy has equivalent overall (OS), disease-free (DFS), and locoregional-recurrence-free survival (LRFS) to lower lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the superior segment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all Stage 1 lower lobectomies for superior segment lesions and superior segmentectomies at our hospital from 2000 to 2018. Comparison statistics and Cox hazard modeling were performed to determine differences between groups and attempt to identify risk factors for OS, DFS, and LRFS.

RESULTS

Superior segmentectomy patients, compared with lower lobectomy patients, had more current smokers, worse forced expiratory volume in 1 s percentage, radiologic emphysema scores, clinically and pathologically smaller tumors, and more occurrences of 0 lymph nodes examined. Outcomes for superior segmentectomy compared with lower lobectomy were equivalent for 5-year OS (67.0% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.70), DFS (56.9% vs. 60.4%, p = 0.59), and LRFS (87.9% vs. 91.3%, p = 0.46). Multivariable Cox modeling lacked utility due to no outcome differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In well-selected patients, superior segmentectomies can have equivalent OS, DFS, and LRFS compared with lower lobectomies of superior segment tumors for early stage lung cancer. Further data are needed to provide better risk estimates.

Sublobar resection for node-negative lung cancer 2-5 cm in size

OBJECTIVES

Sublobar resection (SLR) is an alternative to lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Outcomes following SLR for tumours >2 cm are not well described. We sought to determine the utilization of SLR for stage I tumours >2-5 cm in size and to determine predictors of outcome.

METHODS

We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER)-Medicare database to identify NSCLC patients with primary lung cancer ≥66 years old with stage I cancers >2-5 cm in size. We evaluated overall survival and cancer-specific survival among cohorts undergoing lobectomy versus SLR. Propensity score matching was performed. We compared patient characteristics and survival between groups.

RESULTS

For the study time period (2007-2012), among patients with tumours >2 cm and ≤5 cm (n = 4582), 3890 lobectomies (85%) and 692 SLR (15%) were performed. Patients undergoing SLR were older, had smaller tumours and more comorbidities. Patients undergoing lobectomy were much more likely to have any lymph nodes removed (95.6% vs 65.6%, P < 0.001) and to have >10 nodes removed (29.6% vs 7.5%, P < 0.001). All-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.65, confidence interval (CI) 1.48-1.85] and cancer-specific (HR 1.63, CI 1.29-2.06) mortality were higher following SLR. At 3 years, overall survival (60.9%, CI 57.0-64.6% vs 54.4%, CI 50.4-58.2%) and cancer-specific survival (87.3%, CI 83.5-90.3% vs 76.5%, CI 71.0-81.1%) favoured lobectomy over SLR. In propensity-matched groups, both all-cause (HR 1.27, CI 1.10-1.47) and cancer-specific (HR 1.54, CI 1.11-2.16) mortality rates were higher with SLR.

CONCLUSIONS

In pathologically staged patients, SLR appears inferior to lobectomy for stage I NSCLC 2-5 cm in size. SLR is associated with less extensive lymphadenectomy and with worse survival than lobectomy in this cohort of patients. However, the 76.5% 3-year cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing SLR may exceed that of other localized treatment options for NSCLC. As such, SLR may be an appropriate option for high-risk patients with carefully staged 2-5 cm N0 tumours.

CT-guided hook-wire localization of malignant pulmonary nodules for video assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Objectives

Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) can currently be used to diagnose and treat pulmonary nodules. However, intraoperative location of pulmonary nodules in VATS is challenging due to their small diameter and deep location in the pulmonary parenchyma. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical safety and effectiveness of CT-guided hook-wire for preoperative localization of malignant pulmonary nodules smaller than 1 cm in diameter.

Methods

From February 2017 to January 2018, we collected the data of 80 patients with malignant pulmonary nodules less than 1 cm in diameter who underwent CT-guided hook-wire preoperative localization and VATS surgery. The effectiveness of preoperative localization was evaluated based on surgical duration, success rate of VATS surgery, and localization-related complications.

Results

The diameter of pulmonary nodules were 0.85 ± 0.17 mm with a distance to the pleural surface of 19.66 ± 14.10 mm. The length of the hook-wire in the lung parenchyma was 29.17 ± 13.14 mm and hook-wire dislodgement occurred in 2 patients. Complications included 27 cases of minor pneumothorax and 18 cases of mild parenchymal hemorrhage. A significant correlation was observed between the length of the hook-wire in the lung parenchyma and mild parenchymal hemorrhage (P = 0.044). The average time of hook-wire localization was 9.0 ± 2.6 min and the average operation time for VATS was 89.02 ± 23.35 min without conversion thoracotomy.

Conclusions

CT-guided hook-wire localization of the lesion during VATS resection is safe for malignant pulmonary nodules with diameter less than 1 cm.

A National Analysis of Minimally Invasive Vs Open Segmentectomy for Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The objective of this study was to compare long-term outcomes of open vs minimally invasive (MIS) segmentectomy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which has not been previouslyevaluated using national studies. Outcomes of open vs MIS segmentectomy for clinical T1, N0, M0 NSCLC in the National Cancer Data Base (2010-2015) were evaluated using propensity score matching. Of the 39,351 patients who underwent surgery for stage IA NSCLC from 2010 to 2015, 770 underwent segmentectomy by thoracotomy and 1056 by MIS approach (876 thoracoscopic [VATS], 180 robotic). The MIS to open conversion rate was 6.7% (n = 71). After propensity score matching, all baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the open (n = 683) and MIS (n = 683) groups. When compared to the open group, the MIS group had shorter median length of stay (4 vs 5 days, P< 0.001) and lower 30-day mortality (0.6% vs 1.9%, P = 0.037). There were no significant differences between MIS and open groups with regard to 30-day readmission (5.0% vs 3.7%, P = 0.43), or upstaging from cN0 to pN1/N2/N3 (3.1% vs 3.6%, P = 0.89). The MIS approach was associated with similar long-term overall survival as the open approach (5-year survival: 62.3% vs 63.5%, P = 0.89; multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio: 0.99, 95% Confidence Intervial (CI): 0.82-1.21, P = 0.96). In this national analysis of open vs MIS segmentectomy for clinical stage IA NSCLC, MIS was associated with shorter length of stay and lower perioperative mortality, and similar nodal upstaging and 5-year survival when compared to segmentectomy via thoracotomy. MIS segmentectomy does not appear to compromise oncologic outcomes for clinical stage IA NSCLC.

Five-Year Experience with VATS Versus Thoracotomy Segmentectomy for Lung Tumor Resection

OBJECTIVE

Segmentectomy for lung tumors has been performed with either video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy; however, there is a lack of contemporary, multicenter study that compares both approaches. The aim of this study was to compare the 30-day surgical outcomes of VATS versus thoracotomy for segmentectomy using a large national database.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients who underwent segmentectomy for benign or malignant tumors between 2013 and 2017 were included and divided into 2 groups based on whether they received a thoracotomy or VATS approach. All VATS patients were then into 2 subgroups: early (2013 to 2015) and late (2016 to 2017). Propensity-matched analysis was conducted, and the perioperative variables and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1,785 patients met the inclusion criteria. VATS segmentectomy was associated with shorter hospital stays (3.9 vs 5.8 days, P < 0.001) and higher rates of home discharge (94% vs 89%, P = 0.002) compared to thoracotomy segmentectomy. VATS was also associated with less postoperative pneumonia (2.8% vs 5.8%, P = 0.007), unplanned intubation (1.5% vs 3.5%, P = 0.016), prolonged intubation (0.6% vs 2.7%, P = 0.001), transfusion requirement (1.7% vs 5.8%, P < 0.001), and deep venous thrombosis (0.1% vs 1.1%, P = 0.03). Compared to the earlier VATS group, the late group was associated with less cardiac arrests (0% vs 0.8%, P = 0.025) and shorter hospital stays (3.3 vs 4.2 days, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with thoracotomy, VATS segmentectomy is associated with less postoperative complications and shorter hospital length of stay. VATS segmentectomy has been used more frequently and with improved outcomes.

Uniportal VATS approach to sub-lobar anatomic resections: literature review and personal experience

Surgical scientific literature contains relatively little information regarding the surgical outcomes of anatomic sublobar resections performed with the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) technique. This paper attempts to evaluate the role of U-VATS segmentectomies in the landscape of a minimally invasive approach to the treatment of early stage non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

Preoperative predictors of lymph node metastasis in clinical T1 adenocarcinoma

Background

The subcategory “solid component of tumor” is a new criterion of tumor categories in the updated eighth edition of the TNM classification. Nevertheless, the predictors of lymph node metastasis among patients with clinical T1 adenocarcinoma, based on the TNM classification 8^th edition, remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the preoperative predictors of lymph node metastasis in clinical T1 adenocarcinoma by comparing clinicopathological characteristics between the groups with and without lymph node metastasis.

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational single-center study at the Sendai Kousei Hospital. From January 2012 to September 2019, we included 515 patients who underwent curative lobectomy or segmentectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection among those with clinical T1 adenocarcinoma according to the UICC-TNM staging 8^th edition. They were divided into two groups: those with lymph node metastasis (positive group) and those without (negative group). The clinicopathological factors were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the groups.

Results

In univariate analysis, carcinoembryonic antigen (>5.0 ng/mL) (P=0.0007), maximum standardized uptake (>3.5) (P<0.0001), clinical T factor (T1c) (P<0.0001), and consolidation tumor ratio (>0.85) (P<0.0001) were significant predictors of lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis revealed that maximum standardized uptake SUVmax (>3.5) (odds ratio =10.4, P<0.0001) was independently associated with lymph node metastasis. In univariate analysis, carcinoembryonic antigen (>5.0) (P=0.048) was the only predictor of lymph node metastasis among patients of cT1b, while no parameters were identified as significant predictors among patients of cT1c.

Conclusions

SUVmax and CEA are useful preoperative predictors of lymph node metastases in patients with clinical T1 adenocarcinoma, stratified to T1b and T1c, based on the 8^th TNM classification.

Operative outcomes and long-term survival of robotic-assisted segmentectomy for stage IA lung cancer compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy

Background

Robotic anatomic segmentectomy (RATS) for early-stage lung cancer is being increasingly performed in spite of limited published evidence. To evaluate its safety and oncologic efficacy, we compared the outcomes of both RATS and video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) segmentectomy in patients with small-sized (<2 cm) peripheral stage IA lung cancer.

Methods

From November 2011 to January 2018, a total of 130 patients with resected stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent RATS (n=50) and VATS (n=80) pulmonary segmentectomy were included. Clinicopathologic data, recurrence rate, and survival were recorded.

Results

The demographics, pulmonary function, comorbidity, and tumor size were similar between RATS segmentectomy and VATS segmentectomy. The surgery time, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and blood loss were reduced in the RATS group compared to the VATS group. The number of totally dissected lymph nodes and postoperative complications were similar between the 2 groups. There was no operative mortality. The intensity of narcotic use during hospital stay and the time to return to routine daily activities were also reduced in the RATS group. There was no recurrence observed in the RATS group during the median 38-month follow-up period; meanwhile, during a median 85-month follow-up period in the VATS group, local recurrence and distant recurrence was observed in 2 patients (2.5%) and 3 patients (3.75%) respectively. There was no significant difference in the 5-year recurrence-free survival between the RATS and VATS groups (100% vs. 93.75%; P>0.05).

Conclusions

RATS can be performed safely and effectively in patients with early-stage NSCLC. The reduced narcotic use and earlier return to routine daily activities of RATS patients might reflect its less traumatic nature as compared to VATS. For stage IA disease with small tumors (<2 cm), segmentectomy performed by RATS has better oncologic efficacy when compared to VATS, although in this study, this difference did not reach statistical difference.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Whether video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy and VATS lobectomy provide similar perioperative and oncological outcomes in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of 12 studies comparing outcomes after VATS lobectomy and VATS segmentectomy for stage I NSCLC. Data were analyzed by the RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Disease-free survival (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.33, P = 0.39), overall survival (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.38, P = 0.36), postoperative complications (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.75, P = 0.7), intraoperative blood loss (MD = 3.87, 95% CI - 10.21 to 17.94, P = 0.59), operative time (MD = 10.89, 95% CI - 13.04 to 34.82, P = 0.37), air leak > 5 days (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.17, P = 0.55), and in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 0.39 to 7.16, P = 0.49) were comparable between the groups. Postoperative hospital stay (MD = - 0.69, 95% CI - 1.19 to - 0.19, P = 0.007) and number of dissected lymph nodes (MD = - 6.44, 95%CI - 9.49 to - 3.40, P < 0.0001) were significantly lower in VATS segmentectomy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

VATS segmentectomy and VATS lobectomy provide similar oncological and perioperative outcomes for stage I NSCLC patients. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO and can be accessed at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID = CRD42019133398.

Technique, Outcomes With Navigational Bronchoscopy Using Indocyanine Green for Robotic Segmentectomy

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to present outcomes of robotic segmentectomy and the investigators' preferred technique for nodule localization using indocyanine green both bronchoscopically and intravenously.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients scheduled for robotic segmentectomy from a single surgeon's prospectively collected database.

RESULTS

Between January 2010 and October 2018, there were 245 consecutive patients who underwent planned robotic segmentectomy by one surgeon. Of these 245 patients, 93 (38%) received indocyanine green by electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy, and all 245 received intravenous indocyanine green. Median time for navigational bronchoscopy was 9 minutes. Navigational bronchoscopy with indocyanine green correctly identified the lesion in 80 cases (86%). The preferred technique was as follows: 0.5 mL of 25 mg of indocyanine green diluted in 10 mL of sterile water given bronchoscopically, followed by a 0.5-mL saline flush, staying at least 4 mm from the pleural surface. The remaining 9.5 mL of indocyanine green was administered intravenously after pulmonary artery ligation. An R0 resection was achieved in all 245 patients, a median of 17 lymph nodes were resected, and the average length of stay was 3.1 days (range, 1 to 21 days). Major morbidity occurred in 3 patients, and there were no 30- or 90-day mortalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic segmentectomy is safe, with excellent early clinical outcomes. In this series, electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy and indocyanine green localization were efficient and effective at identifying the target lesion. Intravenous indocyanine green delineated the intersegmental plane.

Comparative study of anatomic lung resection by robotic vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Background

Comparative studies of robotic lung resection are limited. Our study aims to compare short-term and long-term outcomes of anatomic lung resection by robotic or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) from a single surgeon experienced in both approaches.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of consecutive anatomic lung resections by robot or VATS was performed to compare perioperative characteristics and long-term survival.

Results

From December 2010 to June 2015, 61 patients underwent robotic surgery, and 105 patients underwent VATS. Patient demographics were similar except that the VATS group had higher percentage of diabetic patients (robotic 14.75% vs. VATS 30.48%, P=0.0258) and a slightly lower percentage of patients with previous cancer history (robotic 57.38% vs. VATS 40.95%, P=0.0409). The robotic group had a higher rate of prolonged air leak ≥7 d (robotic 14.75% vs. VATS 3.81%; P=0.0161), and a modestly longer length of hospital stay (robotic median of 4.0 days vs. VATS median of 3.0 days, P=0.0123). Other postoperative complications, mortality, nodal upstaging and conversion rate were similar. Disease-free survival was not different. The robotic group appeared to have slightly better overall survival, however, this observation was confounded by a lower percentage of diabetic patients in this group. Further analysis has demonstrated that in non-diabetic patients who underwent either surgery, the overall survival remained similar. The same observation was also made in diabetic patients.

Conclusions

Robotic anatomic lung resection appears to be associated with a higher rate of prolonged air leak (≥7 d), and resulting slightly longer length of hospital stay than VATS. Within the same follow-up period, both the disease-free survival and the overall survival are similar.

Application of intrapulmonary wire combined with intrapleural fibrin glue in preoperative localization of small pulmonary nodules

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the accuracy of the preoperative localization of small nodules by computerized tomography (CT)-guided placing wire and intrapleural fibrin glue near the nodules at 3 days before the operation.

METHODS

From October 2015 to December 2017, a total of 79 patients, who received preoperative localization of small pulmonary nodules and surgical treatment in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Hohhot First Hospital, were enrolled into this study. These patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: methylene blue localization group (n = 47), and modified localization group (n = 32), where the patients received preoperative localization of the small nodules by CT-guided placing wire and intrapleural fibrin glue near the nodule at 3 days before the operation. Localization accuracy, operation time and difficulty in postoperative seeking for pathological specimens were compared between these 2 groups.

RESULTS

In the methylene blue localization group, 3 patients had localization failure due to the intrathoracic diffusion of methylene blue, and the success rate was 93.61%. In the modified localization group, all 32 patients succeeded in the localization, and the success rate was 100%. Operation time and difficulty of finding the specimen was significantly lower in the modified localization group than in the methylene blue localization group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The application of preoperative localization of small nodules by placing wire and intrapleural fibrin glue improves the success rate of resection, reduces operation time and the risk of the operation, and lowers the difficulty of finding pathological specimens after the operation. Hence this operative procedure is worthy of popularization.

Segmentectomia pulmonar anatômica robótica: aspectos técnicos e desfechos

RESUMO Objetivo: relatar nossa experiência inicial com a segmentectomia robótica, descrevendo a técnica operatória, a colocação preferencial dos portais, os resultados iniciais e desfechos. Métodos: dados clínicos de pacientes submetidos à segmentectomia robótica, entre janeiro de 2017 e dezembro de 2018, foram obtidos de um banco de dados prospectivo de cirurgia robótica. Todos os pacientes tinham câncer de pulmão, primário ou secundário, ou doenças benignas, e foram operados usando o sistema Da Vinci com a técnica de três portais mais uma incisão utilitária de 3cm. As estruturas hilares foram dissecadas individualmente e as ligaduras dos ramos arteriais e venosos, dos brônquios segmentares, assim como, a transecção do parênquima, realizadas com grampeadores endoscópicos. Dissecção sistemática dos linfonodos mediastinais foi realizada para os casos de câncer de pulmão não de pequenas células (CPNPC). Resultados: quarenta e nove pacientes, dos quais 33 mulheres, foram submetidos à segmentectomia robótica. A média de idade foi de 68 anos. A maioria dos pacientes tinha CPNPC (n=34), seguido de doença metastática (n=11) e doenças benignas (n=4). Não houve conversão para cirurgia aberta ou vídeo, ou conversão para lobectomia. A mediana do tempo operatório total foi de 160 minutos e do tempo de console foi de 117 minutos. Complicações pós-operatórias ocorreram em nove pacientes (18,3%), dos quais sete (14,2%) tiveram internação prolongada (>7 dias) devido à fístula aérea persistente (n=4; 8,1%) ou complicações abdominais (n=2; 4%). Conclusão: a segmentectomia robótica é um procedimento seguro e viável, oferecendo curto período de internação e baixa morbidade.

Three-dimensional navigation-guided thoracoscopic combined subsegmentectomy for intersegmental pulmonary nodules

Background

Extended or combined segmentectomies are usually adapted for intersegmental pulmonary nodules. This study explored precise combined subsegmentectomy (CSS) under the guidance of three‐dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D‐CTBA).

Methods

The definition of a pulmonary intersegmental nodule was based on a minimum distance between the nodule and the involved intersegmental veins in the preoperative 3D‐CTBA being less than the size of the nodule. Centering on the involved intersegmental vein, two adjacent subsegments belonging to the different segments were combined as a resected unit.

Results

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 47 patients (mean age 53.6 ± 12.3, range: 26–81 years) who underwent CSS. Thirty‐nine (83.0%) nodules were involved in most intersegmental locations of the upper lobes; the remainder in the lower lobes. The mean nodule size was 0.86 ± 0.32 cm; the mean margin width was 2.20 ± 0.38 cm. Pathological stages included: Tis (8 cases), T1mi (16), IA1 (T1aN0M0, 13), and IA2 (T1bN0M0, 5). Pathological diagnoses included: invasive adenocarcinoma (18 cases), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (16), adenocarcinoma in situ (8), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (3), and benign (2). The average operative duration was 190.8 ± 54.9 minutes; operative hemorrhage was 42.7 ± 23.0 mL; 5.8 ± 2.8 lymph nodes dissected had not metastasized; the duration of postoperative chest tube drainage was 3.0 ± 1.8 days; and the postoperative hospital stay was 5.3 ± 2.4 days.

Conclusions

Under 3D navigation, thoracoscopic CSS is a safe technique for intersegmental nodules, sparing more pulmonary parenchyma and ensuring safe margins to achieve anatomical resection.

Is pulmonary metastasectomy beneficial in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? A review of literature

Metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has traditionally carried a dismal prognosis; however with advances in care, it has been shown that pulmonary metastasectomy is a viable therapeutic option in selected patients, palliating symptoms and improving survival. With the increasing incidence of human papilloma virus-related HNSCC and better availability of minimal access surgery, there is a need to better understand the role of pulmonary metastasectomy in the treatment of HNSCC. This article summarizes the literature on indications, results, surgical options and approaches, clinical dilemmas, and controversies associated with pulmonary metastasectomy in HNSCC, to identify suitable candidates and optimize outcomes.

Perioperative outcome after open and thoracoscopic segmentectomy for the treatment of malignant and benign pulmonary lesions: a propensity-matched analysis

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcome of patients receiving anatomic segmentectomy either by open surgery or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). To assess the short-term morbidity of the procedure itself, lung cancer patients in all stages as well as patients with pulmonary metastases and benign lesions scheduled for segmental resection were enrolled in this study.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 445 consecutive patients that underwent segmentectomy either by VATS (n=233) or thoracotomy (n=212) was performed. A propensity-matched analysis was conducted based on age, gender, smoking history, histology, tumor size, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and history of previous pulmonary resections. The matched sample included two groups of 140 patients each.

Results

Both study groups were comparable with respect to age, gender, smoking history, diagnosis, tumor size, pulmonary function and history of previous pulmonary resections. VATS segmentectomy was associated with decreased length of stay (7.4 vs. 9.5 days, P<0.001), drainage treatment time (4.7 vs. 5.9 days, P=0.012) and severe postoperative complications (1.4% vs. 7.1%, P=0.018).

Conclusions

VATS segmentectomy is safe and effective for the treatment of benign and malignant pulmonary lesions. Compared with open thoracotomy, it is associated with shorter hospitalization time and decreased number of severe complications. The preservation of functional lung tissue, combined with a minimally invasive approach, make VATS segmentectomy highly suitable for patients with reduced pulmonary function or severe comorbidities.

From one incision to one port: The surgical technique and the evolution of segmentectomy in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively reviewed the evolution of segmentectomy for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and the feasibility of multi- and single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy.

METHODS

Of 348 patients undergoing surgery for TB, the medical records of 121 patients undergoing segmentectomy between January 1996 and November 2015 were reviewed. Clinical information and computed tomography (CT) image characteristics were investigated and analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients underwent direct or intended thoracotomy. Sixty-four underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy (VATS), including 53 multi-incision thoracoscopic segmentectomy (MITS), and 11 single-incision thoracoscopic segmentectomy (SITS). Thirty-nine were converted to thoracotomy. The intended thoracotomy group had more operative blood loss (p = 0.005) and hospital stay (p = 0.001) than the VATS group although the VATS group had higher grade of cavity (p = 0.007). The intended thoracotomy group did not differ from converted thoracotomy in operative time, blood loss, or hospital stay, and the grade of pleural thickening was higher in the converted thoracotomy group (p = 0.001). The converted thoracotomy group had more operative blood loss, hospital stay, and complication rate than the MITS group (p = 0.001, p<0.001, and p = 0.009, respectively). The MITS group had lower pleural thickening, peribronchial lymph node calcification, cavity, and tuberculoma grading than the converted thoracotomy group (p<0.001, p = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.017, respectively). The SITS group had lower grading in pleural thickening, peribronchial lymph node calcification, and aspergilloma grading than the converted thoracotomy group (p = 0.002, 0.010, and 0.031, respectively). Four patients in the intended thoracotomy group and seven in the converted thoracotomy group had complications compared with three patients in the MITS and two in the SITS group. Risk factors of conversion were pleural thickening and peribronchial lymph node calcification.

CONCLUSION

Although segmentectomy is technically challenging in patients with pulmonary TB, it could be safely performed using MITS or SITS and should be attempted in selected patients. Its efficacy for medical treatment failure needs investigation.

The Feasibility of Thoracoscopic Resection in Bronchiectasis

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgery is the treatment of choice in early-stage lung cancer. However, experience in infectious lung disease, primarily bronchiectasis, is limited probably because of the presence of dense pleural adhesions, multiple lymph nodes, and spiral bronchial arteries. The present study shows our experience of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and segmentectomy in the treatment of bronchiectasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent VATS lobectomy or segmentectomy in our clinic between April 2008 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. Surgery was indicated in patients with radiologic localized bronchiectasis who also had a history of recurrent lower respiratory tract infection or expectorating mucopurulent secretion. The patients were analyzed in terms of age, sex, thoracotomy conversion rate, postoperative drainage amount, chest tube removal time, length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients initially underwent VATS pulmonary anatomic resection and 41 procedures were completed on 40 patients. One patient had bilateral resection. Fifteen patients were male individuals and 26 were female individuals. The average age was 31.4 (15 to 57) years. Forty lobectomies and 1 segmentectomy were performed. The conversion rate was 6.8%. VATS was performed on 28 patients by 3 ports, 8 patients by 2 ports, and 5 patients by a single port. In terms of anatomic resections, 18 patients underwent left lower lobectomy, 8 right lower lobectomy, 8 middle lobectomy, 6 right upper lobectomy, and 1 patient underwent lingular segmentectomy. No major postoperative complication or mortality was observed. Prolonged air leak was observed in 2 patients and subcutaneous emphysema occurred in 2 patients. The average postoperative drainage amount, chest tube removal time, and length of hospital stay were 320 mL, 3.1 (1 to 11) days, and 4.6 (2 to 11) days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

VATS pulmonary resection is a safe, feasible, and effective treatment in the surgery of bronchiectasis with low morbidity and mortality rates. Moreover, because of cosmetic results, patients with benign diseases such as bronchiectasis could be initiated by minimally invasive surgery options just like patients with malignancies.

Uniportal lobectomy and segmentectomy-is it for all?

Technological advances have markedly transformed the philosophy of thoracic surgery in the current era, with notable improvements in patient outcomes with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). More recently, innovations in uniportal VATS approaches have been promising, although robust data on their efficacy is limited. Nonetheless, the lessons learned from experience with the 2-port and 3-port VATS lobectomy and segmentectomy can be applied to further improve the efficacy of uniportal approaches, in terms of achieving oncologic efficacy and improving patient outcomes. This perspective reviews contemporary outcomes of uniportal lobectomy and segmentectomy, highlights our institutional experience, and examines future directions and challenges pertaining to widespread adoption of this innovative technique.

Evaluation of surgical approaches to anatomical segmentectomies: the transition to minimal invasive surgery improves hospital outcomes

Background

We aim to evaluate the transition process from open to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) anatomical segmentectomies in a regional thoracic surgical unit.

Methods

In a retrospective study from January 2013 to December 2015, we identified all anatomical segmentectomies performed in our unit. Pre, peri and postoperative data were compared between the three years (2013, 2014 and 2015) and according to operative approach. Thoracotomy after VATS intraoperative biopsy was considered a conversion for the purposes of the study.

Results

A total of 86 consecutive cases [56 females and 30 males, median age 70 years (range, 43 to 83 years); median FEV1 of 78% predicted (range, 41% to 126%)] were included. There was a significant change in the surgical approach with time. Fifty-two cases underwent VATS (73% via single-port) and 34 open surgeries, including nine conversions. There were no postoperative deaths in the VATS group and one in the open group. Operative outcomes were similar over time with no haemorrhagic events, equivalent R1 resection and nodal stations explored in all lymph node positive patients. In node negative cases however, open surgery was associated with more extensive mediastinal exploration. Patients in 2015 had a shorter hospital stay in comparison to those in previous years [median 4 days (range, 1-15 days) vs. median 6 days (range, 3-27 days), P=0.01]. There were no differences in the incidence of complications or readmissions to hospital over time.

Conclusions

The transition over a short period of time from open to single-port VATS segmentectomy has allowed us to significantly reduce postoperative hospital stay without compromising operative or postoperative outcomes.

Thoracoscopic lobectomy after induction therapy-a paradigm shift?

Video-assisted thoracoscopic approaches (or VATS) have gained significant momentum in the management of locally advanced NSCLC in the current era. Accrual of experiences and concurrent improvements in instrumentation and video technology have further enhanced its role in patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, substantial controversy exists around the notion of mediastinal staging and restaging after induction therapy, the utility of induction chemotherapy versus chemoradiation for N2 disease, and subsequent role of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy following induction therapy. This perspective will closely examine these issues in the context of existing guidelines and contemporary studies.

VATS segmentectomy: past, present, and future

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has gradually been implemented in thoracic surgery, and the VATS approach has now been extended to technically challenging procedures, such as segmentectomy. The definition of VATS segmentectomy is changing over time, and the repertoire of segmentectomy is getting wider with increasing reports on atypical segmentectomy. VATS segmentectomy bears surgical, oncological, and technical advantages; however, there are still areas of controversy, particularly regarding oncological outcomes. The indication of VATS segmentectomy is diverse and is used for treating lung cancer, metastatic lung tumors, or a variety of nonmalignant diseases. It is particularly valuable for the lung-sparing resection of deeply located small nodules or repeated surgery for multiple lung lesions. VATS segmentectomy requires a thorough analysis of segmental anatomy and a tailored preoperative planning with the assessment of surgical margins. Technical challenges include intraoperative navigation, methods to identify and dissect the intersegmental plane, and the prevention of air leakage. This review will discuss the present state of VATS segmentectomy, with a focus on past studies, current indications and techniques, and future view.

Clinical analysis of the impact of sublobectomy on pulmonary function

The present study investigated and analyzed the clinical impact of sublobectomy on pulmonary functions.Changes in pulmonary function before and after sublobectomy were compared to the changes after lobectomy.Changes in the pulmonary function before and after sublobectomy and lobectomy did not exhibit remarkable differences in long-term effects. Surgery-related indexes of the sublobectomy group were significantly lower than those of the lobectomy group (P < .05). The indexes of pulmonary function both before and after surgery in the sublobectomy group were not associated with a significant decrease in the quality of survival based on pulmonary function as the main index (P > .05).Compared with lobectomy, sublobectomy maximally retained the normal healthy pulmonary tissue, with similar local recurrence rate, 5-year recurrence-free survival rate, and 5-year survival rate. Sublobectomy decreased the impact on respiratory functions to the minimum. After the operation, the quality of survival with pulmonary functions as the main index did not decrease significantly. Therefore, sublobectomy could be an appropriate choice for elderly patients with poor cardiopulmonary function or with chronic diseases.

Anatomic thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early-stage lung cancer

Over the past 20 years, there have been significant advancements in thoracoscopic surgical techniques as well as in lung cancer screening protocols, which have identified greater numbers of smaller lung tumors (<2 cm) that are more frequently operable and curable. These advancements have led to new interest in the thoracoscopic (VATS) approach to segmentectomy. This article will discuss the outcomes and technical considerations associated with VATS segmentectomy.

Technique of robotic segmentectomy

Robotic segmentectomy can be a useful technique for patients with suboptimal pulmonary reserve, or for small peripheral stage I tumors. Port placement and conduct of operation is described for the various segmentectomies. Results for robotic segmentectomy are comparable to that for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy.

Comparison of clinical outcomes after thoracoscopic sublobectomy versus lobectomy for Stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although lobectomy has long been considered the standard procedure for Stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the selection of sublobectomy for Stage I NSCLC remains controversial. Amidst growing enthusiasm for minimally invasive surgery, the comparison of clinical outcomes after thoracoscopic sublobectomy versus thoracoscopic lobectomy may be of immense value.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes of patients who underwent thoracoscopic sublobectomy with those who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy for Stage I NSCLC.

METHODS

An electronic search was conducted using five online databases from their dates of inception to February 2014. Hazard ratio (HR) was used in this meta-analysis, calculated from the published survival data.

RESULTS

Eight studies met the selection criteria, including a total of 1613 patients (463 patients underwent thoracoscopic sublobectomy, and 1150 patients underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy). From the available data, compared with thoracoscopic sublobectomy, there was a significant benefit of thoracoscopic lobectomy on OS (HR: 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.90; P = 0.007). However, in subgroup analysis of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy, there was no significant difference in OS (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.76-1.39; P = 0.85) or DFS (HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.67-2.10; P = 0.56) between the two groups. In addition, compared with thoracoscopic wedge resection, there was a significant benefit of thoracoscopic lobectomy on OS (HR: 4.19; 95% CI: 2.19-8.03, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

For Stage I patients, thoracoscopic segmentectomy leads to survival rates comparable to thoracoscopic lobectomy. However, the overall several of thoracoscopic lobectomy is superior to that of wedge resection.

Overall Survival Following Thoracoscopic vs Open Lobectomy for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis

A majority of observational studies on overall survival following thoracoscopic vs open lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer did not demonstrate a significant difference, whereas several meta-analyses on this topic showed a significant difference. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried for studies published in the English language. We searched for meta-analyses and original studies comparing overall survival between thoracoscopic and open lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Our meta-analysis, using random effect models and with a hazard ratio as a measure of effect, was performed on original studies. Publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots of precision and the Egger test. Seven meta-analyses on this topic were found and all of them have shown that thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with significantly more favorable overall survival than open lobectomy, using odds ratio, risk ratio, or risk difference as measures of effect. Our meta-analysis of 11 observational studies demonstrated no significant difference in overall survival between thoracoscopic (n = 2386) and open lobectomy (n = 3494) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (pooled hazard ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.09, P = 0.30). Neither funnel plots of precision nor the Egger test suggested a publication bias. Our meta-analysis, using a hazard ratio as a measure of effect for a time-to-event outcome, did not demonstrate a significant difference in overall survival between thoracoscopic and open lobectomy with the current dataset available in the literature, as opposed to previous meta-analyses.

ReCAP: Detection of Potentially Avoidable Harm in Oncology From Patient Medical Records

PURPOSE

Widespread consensus exists about the importance of addressing patient safety issues in oncology, yet our understanding of the frequency, spectrum, and preventability of adverse events (AEs) across cancer care is limited.

METHODS

We developed a screening tool to detect AEs across cancer care settings through medical record review. Members of the study team reviewed the scientific literature and obtained structured input from an external multidisciplinary panel of clinicians by using a modified Delphi process.

RESULTS

The screening tool comprises 76 triggers-readily identifiable findings to screen for possible AEs that occur during cancer care. Categories of triggers are general care, vital signs, medication related, laboratory tests, other orders, and consultations.

CONCLUSION

Although additional testing is required to assess its performance characteristics, this tool may offer an efficient mechanism for identifying possibly preventable AEs in oncology and serve as an instrument for quality improvement.

Report on First International Workshop on Robotic Surgery in Thoracic Oncology

A workshop of experts from France, Germany, Italy, and the United States took place at Humanitas Research Hospital Milan, Italy, on February 10 and 11, 2016, to examine techniques for and applications of robotic surgery to thoracic oncology. The main topics of presentation and discussion were robotic surgery for lung resection; robot-assisted thymectomy; minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer; new developments in computer-assisted surgery and medical applications of robots; the challenge of costs; and future clinical research in robotic thoracic surgery. The following article summarizes the main contributions to the workshop. The Workshop consensus was that since video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is becoming the mainstream approach to resectable lung cancer in North America and Europe, robotic surgery for thoracic oncology is likely to be embraced by an increasing numbers of thoracic surgeons, since it has technical advantages over VATS, including intuitive movements, tremor filtration, more degrees of manipulative freedom, motion scaling, and high-definition stereoscopic vision. These advantages may make robotic surgery more accessible than VATS to trainees and experienced surgeons and also lead to expanded indications. However, the high costs of robotic surgery and absence of tactile feedback remain obstacles to widespread dissemination. A prospective multicentric randomized trial (NCT02804893) to compare robotic and VATS approaches to stages I and II lung cancer will start shortly.

A novel wireless wearable fluorescence image-guided surgery system

Segmentectomy using indocyanine green (ICG) has become a primary treatment option to achieve a complete resection and preserve lung function in early-stage lung cancer. However, owing to a lack of appropriate intraoperative imaging systems, it is a huge challenge for surgeons to identify the intersegmental plane during the operation, leading to poor prognosis. Thus, we developed a novel wireless wearable fluorescence image-guided surgery system (LIGHTEN) for fast and accurate identification of intersegmental planes in human patients. The system consists of a handle, light source, Google glass and laptop. Application software is written to capture clear real-time images and Google glass is adopted to display with augmented reality. Twelve in vivo studies of pulmonary segmentectomy in swine by intravenous injection of ICG were conducted to test the performance of the system. A distinct black-and-white transition zone image was observed and displayed simultaneously on the Google glass in all swine. The results demonstrated that surgeons using LIGHTEN can effortlessly and quickly discern intersegmental planes during the operation. Our system has enormous potential in helping surgeons to precisely identify intersegmental planes with mobility and high-sensitivity.