1
|
Hermans BP, Poos SEM, van Dort DIM, Evers J, Li WWL, van der Heijden EHFM, Verhagen AFTM, van Goor H, Ten Broek RPG. Evaluating and developing sealants for the prevention of pulmonary air leakage: A systematic review of animal models. Lab Anim 2023; 57:504-517. [PMID: 37032637 DOI: 10.1177/00236772231164873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
Sealants may provide a solution for pulmonary air leakage (PAL), but their clinical application is debatable. For sealant comparison, standardized animal models are lacking. This systematic review aims to assess methodology and quality of animal models for PAL and sealant evaluation. All animal models investigating lung sealing devices (e.g., staplers, glues, energy devices) to prevent or treat PAL were retrieved systematically from Embase, Pubmed and Web of science. Methodological study characteristics, risk of bias, reporting quality and publication bias were assessed. A total of 71 studies were included (N = 75 experiments, N = 1659 animals). Six different species and 18 strains were described; 92% of experiments used healthy animals, disease models were used in only six studies. Lesions to produce PAL were heterogenous, and only 11 studies used a previously reported technique, encompassing N = 5 unique lesions. Clinically relevant outcomes were used in the minority of studies (imaging 16%, air leak 10.7%, air leak duration 4%). Reporting quality was poor, but revealed an upward trend per decade. Overall, high risk of bias was present, and only 18.7% used a negative control group. All but one study without control groups claimed positive outcomes (95.8%), in contrast to 84.3% using positive or negative control groups, which also concluded equivocal, adverse or inconclusive outcomes. In conclusion, animal studies evaluating sealants for prevention of PAL are heterogenous and of poor reporting quality. Using negative control groups, disease models and quantifiable outcomes seem important to increase validity and relevance. Further research is needed to reach consensus for model development and standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bob P Hermans
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Cardio-thoracic surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Steven E M Poos
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of General surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniël I M van Dort
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Cardio-thoracic surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jort Evers
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Cardio-thoracic surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wilson W L Li
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Cardio-thoracic surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Erik H F M van der Heijden
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Pulmonology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ad F T M Verhagen
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Cardio-thoracic surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Harry van Goor
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of General surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P G Ten Broek
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of General surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ceylan KC, Batıhan G, Kaya ŞÖ, Usluer O, Gürsoy S. Treatment of Bronchiectasis in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery: 10-Year Experience in a Single Center. Indian J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-021-02765-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
3
|
Massard G, Olland A, Falcoz PE. Do we need complementary locoregional analgesia in patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgical procedures? J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:1318-1319. [PMID: 29708160 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gilbert Massard
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Anne Olland
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oparka JD, Walker WS. The application of capnography to differentiate peri-chest tube air leak from parenchymal leak following pulmonary surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 3:219-20. [PMID: 24790853 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319x.2014.03.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2013] [Accepted: 02/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Prolonged air leak is a common complication of pulmonary resection. However, while a bubbling chest drain is commonly related to parenchymal air leakage, it may also be caused by air entering the pleural cavity via an incomplete seal of the tissues at the chest tube insertion site. Examination alone is not sufficient to guide the surgeon as to which of the above complications is responsible for drain bubbling. We describe a simple method, whereby a CO2 monitoring device is attached to the chest drain to determine whether the air loss observed is in fact due to a pulmonary air leak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan D Oparka
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - William S Walker
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fuller C. Reduction of intraoperative air leaks with Progel in pulmonary resection: a comprehensive review. J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 8:90. [PMID: 23590942 PMCID: PMC3658883 DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2012] [Accepted: 11/02/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Intraoperative alveolar air leaks (IOALs) occur in 75% of patients during pulmonary resection. Despite routine use of sutures and stapling devices, they remain a significant problem in the daily practice of thoracic surgery. Air leaks that persist beyond postoperative day 5 often result in increased costs and complications. Several large meta-analyses have determined that sealants as a class reduce postoperative air leak duration and time to chest drain removal, but these results did not necessarily correlate with a reduction in length of postoperative hospital stay. These analyses grouped surgical sealants together of necessity, but differences in efficacy may exist due to the differing product characteristics, study protocols, surgical procedures, and study endpoints. Progel, currently the only pleural surgical sealant FDA-approved for use in lung resection, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in two controlled clinical studies and superiority over standard air leak closure methods in reducing IOALs and length of hospital stay. This paper will review these findings and report on real-world experience with this recently approved pleural sealant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clark Fuller
- Esophageal Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hashimoto A, Kuwabara M, Hirasaki Y, Tsujimoto H, Torii T, Nakamura T, Hagiwara A. Reduction of air leaks in a canine model of pulmonary resection with a new staple-line buttress. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142:366-71. [PMID: 21664626 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2010] [Revised: 04/13/2011] [Accepted: 05/05/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|