Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: Assessment of 12-year performance

Recent Advances in the Modification and Improvement of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves

Valvular heart disease (VHD) has become a burden and a growing public health problem in humans, causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. An increasing number of patients with severe VHD need to undergo heart valve replacement surgery, and artificial heart valves are in high demand. However, allogeneic valves from donors are lacking and cannot meet clinical practice needs. A mechanical heart valve can activate the coagulation pathway after contact with blood after implantation in the cardiovascular system, leading to thrombosis. Therefore, bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) are still a promising way to solve this problem. However, there are still challenges in the use of BHVs. For example, their longevity is still unsatisfactory due to the defects, such as thrombosis, structural valve degeneration, calcification, insufficient re-endothelialization, and the inflammatory response. Therefore, strategies and methods are needed to effectively improve the biocompatibility and longevity of BHVs. This review describes the recent research advances in BHVs and strategies to improve their biocompatibility and longevity.

Three-year outcomes of surgical valve replacement with Dafodil™ pericardial bioprosthesis: Dafodil™-1 trial

Background

The Dafodil™-1 trial was designed to evaluate the clinical safety and performance of Dafodil™ pericardial bioprosthesis for replacing diseased native or prosthetic aortic or mitral valves in patients with advanced valvular heart disease (VHD).

Methods

The Dafodil™-1 trial was a prospective, multicenter, first-in-human clinical trial. Patients were enrolled if they had advanced VHD requiring aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) with or without concomitant valve surgery and having surgical risk scores <4%. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke; and hemodynamics were analyzed.

Results

A total of 136 patients (aortic: 67 and mitral: 69) were enrolled in the trial (with mean age-AVR group: 60.2 ± 8.3 years and MVR group: 49.7 ± 14.4 years). A total of 134 patients (aortic: 66 and mitral: 68) completed the 3-year follow-up (total 300 per 100 patient-years of follow-up). The AVR group demonstrated a significant reduction in the mean pressure gradients from 51.2 ± 24.1 mmHg at baseline to 11.1 ± 6.0 mmHg at the 3-year follow-up (p < 0.0001). The mean effective orifice area (EOA) improved from baseline (0.9 ± 0.6 cm2) to 3-year follow-up (1.8 ± 0.4 cm2) (p < 0.0001). In the MVR group, the mean indexed EOA (iEOA) increased significantly from baseline (0.7 ± 0.4 cm2/m2) to 3-year follow-up (1.1 ± 0.4 cm2/m2) (p < 0.001). There was significant improvement in New York Heart Association functional class and mean SF-12 scores in both groups. At 3-year follow-up, the MACE incidence was 2.3% per 100 patient-years (1.3% strokes per 100 patient-years and 1.3% deaths per 100 patient-years) for AVR group and 4.7% per 100 patient-years (0.6% strokes per 100 patient-years and 4.0% deaths per 100 patient-years) for MVR group. No cases of MI, structural valve deterioration and prosthetic valve endocarditis were reported. The AVR and MVR groups achieved 89.6% and 79.7% MACE-free survival, respectively at 3-year follow-up.

Conclusions

The Dafodil™-1 trial demonstrated satisfactory outcomes of clinical safety, hemodynamic performance, and quality-of-life metrics. Additionally, no incidence of structural valve deterioration and very low rates of valve thrombosis during the 3-year follow-up period of Dafodil™-1 first-in-human trial indicated acceptable valve durability up to three years and similar outcomes are warranted for longer follow-ups as a primary goal.

Clinical Trial Registration Number

https://www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/showallp.php?mid1=18377&EncHid=&userName=CTRI/2017/07/009008, CTRI/2017/07/009008.

Mid-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement using a mosaic porcine bioprosthesis with concomitant mitral valve repair

This study retrospectively evaluated the mid-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) using a stented porcine aortic valve bioprosthesis (Mosaic; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) with concomitant mitral valve (MV) repair. From 1999 to 2014, 157 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 75 [70-79] years; 47% women) underwent SAVR with concomitant MV repair (SAVR + MV repair), and 1045 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 76 [70-80] years; 54% women) underwent SAVR only at 10 centers in Japan as part of the long-term multicenter Japan Mosaic valve (J-MOVE) study. The 5-year overall survival rate was 81.5% ± 4.1% in the SAVR + MV repair group and 85.1% ± 1.4% in the SAVR only group, and the 8-year overall survival rates were 75.2% ± 5.7% and 78.1% ± 2.1%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed no significant difference in the survival rates between the two groups (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.40; P = 0.576). Among women with mild or moderate mitral regurgitation who were not receiving dialysis, those who underwent SAVR + MV repair, were aged > 75 years, and had a preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction of 30-75% tended to have a lower mortality risk. In conclusion, this subgroup analysis of the J-MOVE cohort showed relevant mid-term outcomes after SAVR + MV repair.

Left ventricular remodeling and long-term outcomes of aortic stenosis patients receiving 19 mm Mosaic

Mosaic valve shows higher pressure gradient after aortic valve replacement compared to other same size labeled prostheses in postoperative echocardiogram. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term echocardiogram findings and long-term clinical outcomes of patients receiving a 19 mm Mosaic. Forty-six aortic stenosis patients receiving 19 mm Mosaic and 112 patients receiving either 19 mm Magna or Inspiris, who underwent mid-term follow-up echocardiogram were included in the study. Mid-term hemodynamic measurements evaluated by trans-thoracic echocardiogram and long-term outcomes were compared. Patients receiving Mosaic were significantly older (Mosaic: 76 ± 5.1 years vs. Magna/Inspiris: 74 ± 5.5 years, p = 0.046) and had smaller body surface area (Mosaic: 1.40 ± 0.114m2 vs. Magna/Inspiris: 1.48 ± 0.143m2, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in comorbidities and medications. Post-operative echocardiogram performed at 1 week after the surgery showed higher maximum pressure gradient in patients receiving Mosaic (Mosaic: 38 ± 13.5 mmHg vs. Magna/Inspiris: 31 ± 10.7 mmHg, p = 0.002). Furthermore, mid-term echocardiogram follow-up performed at median duration of 53 ± 14.9 months after the surgery continuously showed higher maximum pressure gradient in patients receiving Mosaic (Mosaic: 45 ± 15.6 mmHg vs. Magna/Inspiris: 32 ± 13.0 mmHg, p < 0.001). However, there were no significant difference in changes in left ventricular mass from baseline in both groups. Kaplan-Meyer curve also showed no difference in long-term mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event between the two groups. Although the pressure gradient across the valve evaluated by echocardiogram was higher in 19 mm Mosaic compared to 19 mm Magna/Inspiris, there were no significant differences in left ventricular remodeling and long-term outcomes between the two groups.

Development potential of extracellular matrix hydrogels as hemostatic materials

The entry of subcutaneous extracellular matrix proteins into the circulation is a key step in hemostasis initiation after vascular injury. However, in cases of severe trauma, extracellular matrix proteins are unable to cover the wound, making it difficult to effectively initiate hemostasis and resulting in a series of bleeding events. Acellular-treated extracellular matrix (ECM) hydrogels are widely used in regenerative medicine and can effectively promote tissue repair due to their high mimic nature and excellent biocompatibility. ECM hydrogels contain high concentrations of extracellular matrix proteins, including collagen, fibronectin, and laminin, which can simulate subcutaneous extracellular matrix components and participate in the hemostatic process. Therefore, it has unique advantages as a hemostatic material. This paper first reviewed the preparation, composition and structure of extracellular hydrogels, as well as their mechanical properties and safety, and then analyzed the hemostatic mechanism of the hydrogels to provide a reference for the application and research, and development of ECM hydrogels in the field of hemostasis.

Isolated aortic valve replacement with bio-prostheses in patients age 50 to 65 years: a decade of statewide data on cost and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for choice of replacement valve-mechanical versus bio-prosthetic, are well established for patients aged <50 and >65 years. We studied the trends and implications of aortic valve replacement (AVR) with mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve in patients aged 50 to 65 years.

METHODS

STS and cost database of 17 centers for isolated AVR surgery were analyzed by dividing them into bioprosthetic valve (BV) or mechanical valve (MV) groups.

RESULTS

From 2002 to 2011, 3,690 patients had AVR, 18.6% with MV and 81.4% with BV. Use of BV for all ages increased from 71.5% in 2002 to 87% in 2011. There were 1127 (30.5%) patients in the age group 50-65 years. Use of BV in this group almost doubled, 39.6% in 2002 to 76.8% in 2011. Mean age of patients in BV group was higher (59.2±4.2 years vs. 56.7±4.3 years, P≤0.0001). Preoperative renal failure, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease favored use of BV, whereas preoperative atrial fibrillation favored AVR with MV. Mortality (MV 2.2% vs. BV 2.36%) and other postoperative outcomes between the groups were similar. Cost of valve replacement increased for both groups (MV $26,191 in 2002 to $42,592 in 2011; BV $27,404 in 2002 to $44,257 in 2011).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of bioprostheses for AVR has increased; this change is more pronounced in patients aged 50-65 years. Specific preoperative risk factors influence the choice of valve for AVR. Postoperative outcomes between the two groups were similar. Long-term implications of this changing practice, in particular, reoperation for bioprosthetic valve degeneration should be examined.

Long-Term Outcomes of the Mosaic Mitral Porcine Bioprosthesis in Japan - Results From the Japan Mosaic Valve Long-Term Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

This study retrospectively evaluated the long-term patient outcomes and durability of the Mosaic mitral porcine bioprosthesis in the Japan Mosaic valve long-term multicenter study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The medical records of 390 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement with the Mosaic bioprosthesis at 10 centers in Japan (1999-2014) were reviewed. Patient data were collected using the Research Electronic Data Capture software. Patient survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) and valve-related reoperation and death were determined using actuarial methods. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of the cohort was 73 (69-77) years. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 4.83 (1.84-8.26) years. The longest follow-up period was 15.8 years. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.4%. The 12-year actuarial survival rate was 54.1±4.5%, and the freedom from valve-related death was 85.3±3.4%. The freedom from reoperation at 12 years was 74.3±5.7%. The freedom from SVD at 12 years was 81.4±6.6% for patients aged ≥65 years and 71.6±11.1% for those aged <65 years. The median (IQR) mean pressure gradient was 4.1 (3.0-6.0) and 5.6 (4.0-6.7) mmHg at 1 and 10 years, respectively. The median (IQR) effective orifice area was 1.7 (1.4-2.0) and 1.4 (1.2-1.6) cm2at 1 and 10 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis offered satisfactory long-term outcomes for up to 12 years.

Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction of Double Valve Re-Replacement Using Bioprosthesis

We present a case of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction after double valve re-replacement with bioprostheses. A 72-year-old man, who had undergone double valve replacement (DVR) with bioprosthetic valves 9 years previously, underwent re-replacement of valves because of structural valve deterioration. However, owing to LVOT obstruction related to the bioprosthesis in the mitral position, acute pulmonary edema occurred immediately after surgery. LVOT obstruction was diagnosed by emergent cardiac catheterization. So prompt re-replacement surgery using a mechanical prosthesis was performed.

Hemodynamic and clinical performance of the 25-mm Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position

The 25-mm Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis (MB25) is the smallest bioprosthesis that has been approved for use in the mitral position in Japan. Various studies have reported satisfactory hemodynamic performance and good long-term outcomes of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis. However, the hemodynamic and clinical performances of the MB25 in the mitral position remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic and clinical performance of the MB25 in mitral valve replacement (MVR). Twenty patients who underwent MVR using the MB25 between February 2013 and April 2018 were studied. We evaluated the hemodynamic performance of the MB25, cardiac chamber size, cardiac function, and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) using echocardiography during follow-up. The study outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality. Sixteen patients (80%) had a patient prosthesis mismatch defined as an index effective orifice area of ≤ 1.2 cm²/m². The left atrial dimension was significantly reduced after surgery (p = 0.0282). The mean pressure gradients (MPG) in the mitral position were 5.5 ± 1.7 mmHg at discharge and 4.2 ± 1.3 mmHg at 1 year postoperatively. The MPG in the mitral position significantly decreased during the follow-up period (p = 0.0489). Systolic PAP significantly improved postoperatively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 87, 79, and 70%, respectively. No cardiac death occurred. There were no MACEs or reports of structural valve degeneration during the follow-up period. The hemodynamic and clinical performances of the MB25 in the mitral position were satisfactory as the smallest biological mitral valve. The MB25 is a reasonable option for MVR to reduce the surgical difficulty in high-risk patients with an advanced age, a small body size or MAC and when recurrent MVR or complex procedures are performed.

Late results after mitral valve replacement with Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger

OBJECTIVES

Although in younger patients indications for biological prosthesis implantation in mitral valve replacement remain controversial, recently bioprostheses use increased considerably. We present late results obtained with the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2017, 67 mitral Mosaic bioprostheses were implanted in patients aged 65 years or younger (58.5 ± 6.4 years). Follow-up extended up to 13 years. Survival, freedom from structural valve degeneration, endocarditis, thromboembolic events and reoperation were considered as main clinical end points evaluated at 1, 5 and 10 years.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 4.7 ± 2.8 years. Overall mortality rate was 12%. At 1, 5 and 10 years, survival was 94 ± 3%, 89 ± 4% and 77 ± 9%, respectively. Freedom from structural valve degeneration was 100%, 94 ± 4% and 71 ± 21%. Freedom from endocarditis was 95 ± 3%, 90 ± 6% and 84 ± 8%. Freedom from thromboembolic events was 94 ± 3%, 90 ± 5% and 90 ± 5%. Freedom from reoperation was 94 ± 3%, 87 ± 5% and 65 ± 19%.

CONCLUSIONS

Mosaic bioprosthesis appears a valid mitral valve substitute even when employed in ≤65-year-old patients.

Long-Term Outcomes of the Mosaic Aortic Porcine Bioprosthesis in Japan - Results From the Japan Mosaic Valve Long-Term Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

This study retrospectively evaluated the long-term patient outcomes and durability of the Mosaic aortic porcine bioprosthesis in the Japan Mosaic valve long-term multicenter study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed the records of 1,202 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with the Mosaic bioprosthesis at 10 centers in Japan (1999-2014). Patient data were collected using Research Electronic Data Capture. Patient survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) and valve-related reoperation and death were determined by actuarial methods. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of the cohort was 76 (70-80) years. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 3.52 (1.71-5.35) years. The longest follow-up was 15.8 years. The 30-day mortality rate was 2.3%. The 12-year actuarial survival rate was 59.9±7.5%, and the freedom from valve-related death was 81.1±7.9%. The freedom from reoperation was 86.4±2.6% at 12 years. The freedom from SVD at 12 years was 93.5±2.9% for patients aged ≥65 years and 98.2±1.8% for those aged <65 years. The median (IQR) systolic pressure gradient was 17 (12-23) and 19 (12-25) mmHg at 1 and 10 years, respectively. The median (IQR) effective orifice area was 1.2 (1.1-1.5) and 1.1 (1-1.5) cm2at 1 and 10 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis showed satisfactory long-term outcomes over 12 years.

Clinical outcomes and hemodynamic performance of Dafodil™ aortic and mitral pericardial bioprosthesis: 1-year results from Dafodil-1 first-in-human trial

BACKGROUND

Bioprosthesis has been increasingly implanted for the treatment of transvalvular disease across the world. A new Dafodil™ pericardial bioprosthesis (Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., India) recently approved by Conformité Européenne (CE) is a tri-leaflet, stented, bovine valve. The purpose of Dafodil-1 first-in-human trial was to evaluate clinical safety and performance (including hemodynamic parameters) of the Dafodil pericardial bioprosthesis in patients who underwent aortic or mitral valve replacement.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter clinical trial enrolled 60 patients (Aortic: 30 patients; Mitral: 30 patients) from seven sites across India. Safety endpoints were early (≤30 days) and late (> 30 days) mortality and valve-related morbidity. The performance endpoints were hemodynamic performance, improvement in NYHA functional class, and change in the quality of life using SF-12v1 health survey.

RESULTS

From July 2017 to July 2018, 60 patients underwent implantation of the Dafodil pericardial bioprosthesis. Post-operatively, NYHA functional class significantly improved in all the patients (Aortic: 90% NYHA class-I and 10% NYHA class-II; Mitral: 96.55% NYHA class-I and 3.45% NYHA class-II; P < 0.001). There was no death in aortic valve replacement patients till 12-month. In mitral valve replacement patients, early mortalities occurred in three patients, and late mortality occurred in one patient; none of these were valve-related. Freedom from all-cause mortality reported was 93.33% at 12-month. Mean aortic pressure gradient decreased from 52.71 ± 24.47 mmHg [with 0.89 ± 0.70 cm² effective orifice area (EOA)] pre-operatively to 14.49 ± 6.58 mmHg (EOA: 1.85 ± 0.27 cm²) at 12-month. Overall, the mitral mean pressure gradient and EOA were 4.41 ± 1.69 mmHg and 2.67 ± 0.48 cm², respectively, at 12-month. Significant improvement (P < 0.05) in the patients' quality of life was reported at all follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical safety and performance of the Dafodil pericardial bioprosthesis were favourable at 12-month. Moreover, a study with a larger patient population and longer follow-up is warranted to further assess the device.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dafodil-1 trial has been prospectively registered on 10/07/2017 under Clinical Trial Registry-India (http://www.ctri.nic.in). (Registration number: CTRI/2017/07/009008).

Long-Term Outcomes of Mosaic Versus Perimount Mitral Replacements: 17-Year Follow-Up of 940 Implants

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare long-term outcomes of Mosaic (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) porcine mitral valves to Carpentier-Edwards (Edwards Lifesciences, Irving, CA) bovine pericardial mitral valves.

METHODS

From 2001 through 2017 at a single institution, 940 patients received a mitral bioprosthesis, of which 463 (49.3%) were porcine and 477 (50.7%) were bovine pericardial. Retrospective review of the procedure and the postoperative clinical course, including echocardiography, through August 2018 were analyzed. All consecutive mitral valve replacements over the study period were included. Follow-up was 99% (929 patients) complete for a total of 6045 patient-years (mean, 6.4 ± 4.5 years). A propensity-matched cohort of 802 mitral bioprosthesis was used for outcome analyses.

RESULTS

Operative mortality of the 940 patients was 5.4% (n = 51) and incidence of postoperative stroke was 2.1% (n = 20). Overall survival of the propensity-matched patients at 10 and 15 years was 49.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.5%-53.7%) and 23.3% (95% CI 17.9%-29.3%), respectively. Survival at 15 years was 24.0% (95% CI 18.0%-30.5%) for porcine and 16.5% (95% CI 5.5%-32.6%) for bovine implants, which was not significantly different (P = .67). Overall cumulative incidence for reoperative structural valve deterioration at 15 years was 7.9% (95% CI 4.7%-12.3%) for porcine valves versus 13.2% (95% CI 8.1%-19.5%) for pericardial valves (P < .001). For patients age younger than 65 years, structural valve deterioration at 15 years was 15.8% (95% CI 7.4%-27.0%) versus 30.2% (95% CI 15.1%-46.8%) for porcine and pericardial valves, respectively (P = .009). Overall average time to reoperation for structural valve deterioration for porcine valves was 11.1 ± 2.3 years vs 6.8 ± 2.3 years for bovine pericardial valves (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In long-term follow-up, of patients younger than 65 years of age undergoing mitral valve replacement, bovine pericardial valves experienced earlier and more frequent structural valve deterioration than porcine valves.

Hemodynamic Performance and Outcomes of Mosaic Valve for Aortic Stenosis with Decreased Left Ventricular Function: Results from J-MOVE Study

We evaluated impact of a small-sized Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis on hemodynamic performance and outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a Japan multicenter cohort. Of 1,202 patients enrolled, 105 (8.7%) who had LVEF < 50% and AS underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR). Fifty-two patients received Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis ≤ 21 mm (S-AVR), and 53 received a bioprosthesis ≥ 23 mm (L-AVR). The median follow-up period was 3.1 [1.2, 5.1] years. At 5 years, LVEF significantly improved from median 41.2 [33.8, 45.9]% to 64.2 [49.8, 72.5]% in S-AVR (p < 0.001) and from median 43.2 [37.3, 46.8]% to 61.2 [47.2, 68.0]% in L-AVR (p < 0.001). The left ventricular mass index significantly decreased from median 158.4 [122.2, 194.9] to 110.0 [83.6, 129.4] gm/m in S-AVR (p < 0.001) and from median 169.8 [132.2, 203.6] to 109.6 [101.8, 132.4] gm/m in L-AVR (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between S-AVR and L-AVR groups regarding freedom from cardiac death (93.1 ± 3.9% vs. 96.2 ± 3.8%; p = 0.119) and valve-related death (97.6 ± 2.4% vs. 100.0 ± 0.0%; p = 0.953). Clinical outcomes and improved hemodynamic performance were similar in both groups.

Trifecta has lower gradient and less prosthesis-patient mismatch than Mosaic Ultra in the aortic position: A prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE

When aortic valve replacement is needed, a biological valve is usually implanted in patients older than age 60 to 65 years. A large valvular opening area is important to avoid prosthesis-patient mismatch and facilitate reverse left ventricular remodeling. The Trifecta biological valve (St Jude Medical, St Paul, Minn) is, because of its design, believed to reduce transvalvular gradient compared with other biological valves, especially in smaller annuli. Several retrospective studies have compared transvalvular gradients of implanted valves prostheses using the respective manufacturers given size and not the actual annulus size measured by a metric sizer. This makes comparison of the hemodynamic properties of different valve brands and sizes difficult. We therefore performed a prospective randomized study, using the same metric sizer to measure annulus size, and compared hemodynamic profiles of the Trifecta to our standard Mosaic Ultra biological valve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn).

METHODS

Ninety elective patients with small to medium annulus diameter undergoing aortic valve replacement were randomized to either Trifecta or Mosaic Ultra. After native valve removal and decalcification, a Hegar-sizer was used to measure true annulus size. Then the largest possible valve of either brand was implanted according to the randomization protocol. Echocardiography was performed 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Baseline parameters of the 2 cohorts were comparable. There were lower transvalvular gradients in the Trifecta compared with the Mosaic Ultra group for the given annulus sizes. Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch was present in 28% of patients in the Mosaic group and 3% of patients in the Trifecta group.

CONCLUSIONS

Trifecta showed lower transvalvular gradients and less severe prosthesis-patient mismatch compared with Mosaic Ultra for the given annulus sizes. ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: 2011/2596/REK.

Midterm Clinical Outcomes of the St Jude Medical Epic Porcine Bioprosthesis in the Mitral Position

BACKGROUND

The aim of this single-center study was to report the midterm clinical outcomes and hemodynamic performance of the St Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis, a tricomposite glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine bioprosthesis, in mitral position. Methods and Results: Between January 2011 and March 2017, 117 patients (62 men, 55 women; mean age, 66.7±12.8 years) who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) with the Epic valve were retrospectively analyzed for early and mid-term morbidity and mortality. The mean follow-up period was 2.6±1.7 years. Three operative deaths occurred, and the operative mortality rate was 2.6%. Sixteen patients died during the follow-up period. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, freedom from all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 5-year follow-up were 80.9% and 54.8%, respectively. There were 6 reoperations: 2 for structural valve deterioration (SVD), 2 for prosthetic valve endocarditis, and 2 for thrombosis. Freedom from valve-related reoperation and SVD at 5 years were 89.0% and 93.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, age ≥71 years (HR, 6.78; 95% CI: 2.12-25.2, P<0.01), and NYHA functional class ≥III (HR, 3.20; 95% CI: 1.03-10.4, P=0.04) were independent predictors for all-cause death. Mean mitral pressure gradient at 1 year and 2 years were 5.1±1.9 mmHg and 4.5±1.4 mmHg, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mid-term clinical results and durability of the Epic valve in the mitral position are satisfactory.

Sudden bioprostethic mitral valve dysfunction years after implantation: 3 cases and review of the literature

Mitral valve replacement is a common procedure. Degeneration of the valve is a complication that usually develops progressively. We discuss three cases of patients who underwent mitral valve replacement by means of a porcine bioprosthesis and who developed sudden and severe mitral regurgitation years after implantation.

A Genomics-Based Model for Prediction of Severe Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Calcification

Severe bioprosthetic mitral valve calcification is a significant problem in cardiovascular surgery. Unfortunately, clinical markers did not demonstrate efficacy in prediction of severe bioprosthetic mitral valve calcification. Here, we examined whether a genomics-based approach is efficient in predicting the risk of severe bioprosthetic mitral valve calcification. A total of 124 consecutive Russian patients who underwent mitral valve replacement surgery were recruited. We investigated the associations of the inherited variation in innate immunity, lipid metabolism and calcium metabolism genes with severe bioprosthetic mitral valve calcification. Genotyping was conducted utilizing the TaqMan assay. Eight gene polymorphisms were significantly associated with severe bioprosthetic mitral valve calcification and were therefore included into stepwise logistic regression which identified male gender, the T/T genotype of the rs3775073 polymorphism within the TLR6 gene, the C/T genotype of the rs2229238 polymorphism within the IL6R gene, and the A/A genotype of the rs10455872 polymorphism within the LPA gene as independent predictors of severe bioprosthetic mitral valve calcification. The developed genomics-based model had fair predictive value with area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.73. In conclusion, our genomics-based approach is efficient for the prediction of severe bioprosthetic mitral valve calcification.

The Mosaic Mitral Valve Bioprosthesis: A Long-Term Clinical and Hemodynamic Follow-Up

We reviewed the cases of 100 patients (mean age, 73 ± 10 yr; 64 men) who had mitral valve replacement with a Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis from 1995 through 2011. The mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was 3 ± 0.7, and 52 patients were in atrial fibrillation. Prosthetic sizes were chiefly 27 mm (50 patients) and 29 mm (40 patients). Follow-up ended in December 2012 and is 97% complete, with a cumulative duration of 611 patient-years (mean duration, 6 ± 4.6 yr; maximum, 17.7 yr). The early mortality rate was 10% (6% in elective patients); late deaths occurred in 31 patients (5 valve-related). Actuarial survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 74% ± 5%, 50% ± 6%, and 37% ± 8%. The mean NYHA class in survivors was 1.4 ± 0.6 (P <0.0001). Thromboembolic episodes occurred in 4 patients, with an actuarial freedom at 15 years of 91% ± 5%. No cases of endocarditis were observed. Four patients needed reoperation, 2 for structural failure, and 1 each for perivalvular leakage and valve thrombosis. Actuarial freedom from structural failure and from reoperation, respectively, was 93% ± 5% and 91% ± 5% at 15 years. Echocardiographic follow-up in 24 patients with 27-mm prostheses showed a mean gradient of 5 ± 1.7 mmHg and an effective orifice area of 1.57 ± 0.3 cm(2); in 16 patients with 29-mm prostheses, the mean gradient was 4.5 ± 1.9 mmHg, and the effective orifice area, 1.63 ± 0.4 cm(2). During nearly 17 years of follow-up, the Mosaic bioprosthesis has shown good overall clinical and hemodynamic performance after mitral valve replacement.

Subvalvular Pannus Overgrowth after Mosaic Bioprosthesis Implantation in the Aortic Position

PURPOSE

Although pannus overgrowth by itself was not the pathology of structural valve deterioration (SVD), it might be related to reoperation for SVD of the bioprostheses.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing reoperation for SVD after implantation of the third-generation Mosaic aortic bioprosthesis and macroscopic appearance of the explanted valves was examined to detect the presence of pannus.

RESULTS

There were 10 patients and the age for the initial aortic valve replacement was 72 ± 10 years old. The duration of durability was 9.9 ± 2.0 years. Deteriorated valve presented stenosis (valvular area of 0.96 ± 0.20 cm(2); pressure gradient of 60 ± 23 mmHg). Coexisting regurgitant flow was detected in two cases. Macroscopically, subvalvular pannus overgrowth was detected in 8 cases (80%). The proportion of overgrowth from the annulus was almost even and pannus overgrowth created subvalvular membrane, which restricted the area especially for each commissure. In contrast, opening and mobility of each leaflet was not severely limited and pannus overgrowth would restrict the area, especially for each commissure. In other two cases with regurgitation, tear of the leaflet on the stent strut was detected and mild calcification of each leaflet restricted opening.

CONCLUSION

In patients with the Mosaic aortic bioprosthesis, pannus overgrowth was the major cause for reoperation.

Late haemodynamic performance and survival after aortic valve replacement with the Mosaic bioprosthesis

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to evaluate the long-term haemodynamic performance of the Mosaic aortic bioprosthesis. Secondary objectives were to investigate the long-term survival, the rate of aortic valve reoperations, and the rate of prosthesis-patient mismatch and its effect on long-term survival.

METHODS

We included all patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with a Mosaic bioprosthesis at our institution between 2002 and 2008. Valve haemodynamics were assessed by transthoracic echocardiography as mean and peak pressure gradients. Patient characteristics and outcomes were collected from charts and national registers.

RESULTS

We included 355 patients and echocardiographic evaluation was performed at early follow-up in 340 patients (96%) and at late follow-up in 161 patients (45%). The mean follow-up time was 7.1 (maximum 11.7) years. The unadjusted survival at 1, 5 and 10 years was 92, 79 and 42%, respectively. At the early postoperative echocardiography, the peak pressure gradient was 39.9 mmHg (SD 14.4) and the mean pressure gradient was 21.1 mmHg (SD 7.7) and, on late echocardiography, the peak pressure gradient was 38.6 mmHg (SD 15.6) and the mean pressure gradient was 22.5 mmHg (SD 10.1). Moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch was found in 250 (70%) and 49 patients (14%), respectively, but was not significantly associated with mortality in multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the Mosaic aortic bioprosthesis had acceptable clinical performance at late follow-up. However, a substantial proportion of patients had high transvalvular gradients or moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch, although neither were significantly associated with long-term survival in our population.

Late survival after aortic valve replacement with the perimount versus the mosaic bioprosthesis

BACKGROUND

The objective was to compare late survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) versus a Mosaic bioprosthesis (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN). Secondary objectives were to compare early mortality, the rate of reoperation, and the effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on late survival.

METHODS

The design was a population-based cohort study including all patients who underwent AVR with a Perimount or Mosaic bioprosthesis at our institution between 2002 and 2010. Baseline, operative characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected from patient charts and national registers. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We analyzed the unadjusted and multivariable adjusted association between valve type and late survival.

RESULTS

In total, 1,219 patients received the Perimount (n=864) or the Mosaic (n=355) bioprosthesis. During a mean follow-up of 4.2 and 6.9 years, there were 193 and 177 deaths in the Perimount and Mosaic groups, respectively. The unadjusted 1-, 5-, and 8-year survival was 93%, 78%, and 63%, respectively, in the Perimount group and 92%, 80%, and 57%, respectively, in the Mosaic group (p=0.971).There was no significant association between valve choice and all-cause mortality in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.11). Freedom from aortic valve reoperation was similar between the groups. No significant association was found between severe PPM and late mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant difference in late survival after AVR with a Perimount bioprosthesis compared with a Mosaic bioprosthesis. Even though severe PPM was more common in the Mosaic group, it did not affect the late survival or the frequency of reoperation.

Current status and future perspectives of prosthetic valve selection for aortic valve replacement

Aortic valve abnormality is the most frequent form of valvular heart disease. Notably, aortic stenosis in the elderly population has been increasingly common. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) using prosthetic valve has been still believed as a gold standard surgical intervention for various types of diseased aortic valve. The numerous reports and studies evaluating the clinical outcomes and durability of prosthesis were revealed, however, prosthesis selection for AVR is still debated. In twenty-first century, paradigm shift of prosthesis preference might be emerged from mechanical valves to bioprosthesis due to the development of the technology. Moreover, transcatheter aortic valve implantation accelerated among the worldwide trends. It could be developed having the potential to reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with high-risk traditional AVR. After the current guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease, we should consider the valve choice in various patients' profile setting. This review summarizes the current status of prosthesis selection and future perspectives of ideal aortic valve intervention, including minimal invasive care.

Structural valve deterioration of porcine bioprosthesis soon after mitral valve repair and replacement

An 81-year-old woman, who had undergone mitral valve replacement (MVR) with a porcine bioprosthesis after mitral valve repair, presented with hemolysis 4 years and 6 months after MVR. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed trivial mitral regurgitation, which was diagnosed based on the observed perivalvular leakage. Hemolysis gradually increased, and she developed dyspnea and edema 2 years after the appearance of mitral regurgitation. We performed a reoperation. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after intubation showed no perivalvular leakage of the mitral prosthesis, but transvalvular leakage through a leaflet perforation was present. The leaflets of the bioprosthesis had slit-shaped perforations at their hinges. There was no sign of infection on the leaflet or annulus. We implanted a new bioprosthesis after removal of the deteriorated valve. The postoperative course was uneventful. Microscopic examination verified collagen degeneration, histiocyte infiltration, and hyalinization. It is important to perform TEE to rule out structural valve deterioration (SVD) even when regurgitation occurs soon after valve replacement.

5-year experience with transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

The study sought to describe the authors' experience with mitral transapical transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation (TVIV).

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of mitral biological prostheses are being implanted in clinical practice. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation may be a lower risk alternative treatment for high-risk patients with mitral valve degeneration.

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive patients with severe mitral bioprosthetic valve dysfunction underwent transapical mitral TVIV between July 2007 and September 2012. Bioprosthetic failure was secondary to stenosis in 6 (26.1%), regurgitation in 9 (39.1%), and combined in 8 (34.8%) patients.

RESULTS

All patients were elderly (mean age 81 ± 6 years) and at high-risk for conventional redo surgery (Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 12.1 ± 6.8%). Successful transapical mitral TVIV was accomplished in all patients using balloon expandable valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) with no intraoperative major complications. One (4.4%) major stroke and 6 (26.1%) major bleeds were reported during hospitalization. Mitral transvalvular gradient significantly decreased from 11.1 ± 4.6 mm Hg to 6.9 ± 2.2 mm Hg following the procedure (p < 0.01). Intervalvular mitral regurgitation was absent (47.8%) or mild (52.2%) in all cases after mitral TVIV. No cases of transvalvular regurgitation were seen. All patients were alive on 30-day follow-up. At a median follow-up of 753 days (interquartile range: 376 to 1,119 days) survival was 90.4%. One patient underwent successful mitral TVIV reintervention at 2 months due to atrial migration of the transcatheter valve. All patients alive were in New York Heart Association functional class I/II with good prosthetic valve performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for dysfunctional biological mitral prosthesis can be performed with minimal operative morbidity and mortality and favorable midterm clinical and hemodynamic outcomes.

Randomized trial of carpentier-edwards supraannular prosthesis versus mosaic aortic prosthesis: 6 year results

BACKGROUND

This study prospectively compares the clinical performance of 2 stented porcine aortic bioprostheses: the Carpentier-Edwards supraannular aortic valve (CE-SAV) from Edwards Lifesciences (Irvine, CA) and the Mosaic valve from Medtronic Corp (Minneapolis, MN). We believe it is the only study of this kind.

METHODS

Four hundred three patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) between January 2001 and March 2005 were prospectively randomized to receive either the CE-SAV (n = 197) or the Mosaic (n = 206) prosthesis. All patients are being followed annually.

RESULTS

The patients in the 2 groups were comparable with respect to their preoperative demographics, EuroSCORE, and their intraoperative characteristics concerning cardiopulmonary bypass. The mean follow-up period was 6 ± 0.25 years, with a total follow-up of 2,418 patient-years. There have been a total of 64 (32.5%) deaths in the group receiving CE-SAV valves and 85 (41.3%) deaths in the group receiving Mosaic valves. The 5-year survival in the 2 groups was 77.7 % and 73.3%, respectively (p = 0.36). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of structural valve deterioration (SVD) (p = 0.16), paraprosthetic leak (p = 0.13), thromboembolism (p = 0.25), endocarditis (p = 0.68), and freedom from reoperation at 5 years (p = 0.27). Echocardiographic data suggests a trend for lower valve gradients across the 23-mm CE-SAV prostheses compared with similar-sized Mosaic prostheses.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical performance between CE-SAV and Mosaic aortic prostheses at 6 years after implantation.