Creating an ideal “off-test mode” for rotary left ventricular assist devices: Establishing a safe and appropriate weaning protocol after myocardial recovery

Recovery From Exhaustion of the Frank-Starling Mechanism by Mechanical Unloading With a Continuous-Flow Ventricular Assist Device

BACKGROUND

We describe our original left ventricular assist device (LVAD) speed ramp and volume loading test designed to evaluate native heart function under continuous-flow LVAD support.Methods and Results:LVAD speed was decreased in 4 stages from the patient's optimal speed to the minimum setting for each device. Under minimal LVAD support, patients were subjected to saline loading (body weight [kg]×10 mL in 15 min). Echocardiographic and hemodynamic data were obtained at each stage of the LVAD speed ramp and every 3 min during saline loading. Patients were divided into Recovery (with successful LVAD removal; n=8) and Non-recovery (others; n=31) groups. During testing, increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure caused by volume loading was milder in the Recovery than Non-recovery group (repeated measures analysis of variance; group effect, P=0.0069; time effect, P<0.0001; interaction effect, P=0.0173). Increased cardiac output from volume loading was significantly higher in the Recovery than Non-recovery group (group effect, P=0.0124; time effect, P<0.0001; interaction effect, P=0.0091). Therefore, the Frank-Starling curve of the Recovery group was located upward and to the left of that of the Non-recovery group.

CONCLUSIONS

The LVAD speed ramp and volume loading test facilitates the precise evaluation of native heart function during continuous-flow LVAD support.

Use of continuous flow ventricular assist devices in patients with heart failure and a normal ejection fraction: a computer-simulation study

OBJECTIVES

Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices are used in end-stage systolic heart failure. However, about one half of the patients with heart failure exhibit diastolic dysfunction with a normal ejection fraction. In the present study, the possible hemodynamic consequences of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices use for these patients were investigated.

METHODS

A previously developed cardiovascular model was modified to reproduce the peculiar hemodynamics of heart failure with a normal ejection fraction. The model was based on and validated with patient data derived from the published data. A continuous flow left ventricular assist device model was included and the hemodynamic effects of pump support evaluated at rest and during exercise.

RESULTS

The model accurately reproduced the published data both at rest and during exercise, leading to simulated hemodynamic values within the standard deviations of patient variability. At rest, pump support decreased the end-diastolic left ventricular pressure (6 vs 15 mm Hg) and volume (88 vs 135 mL). During exercise, maximal pump support substantially unloaded the left ventricle (end-diastolic pressure, 14 vs 35 mm Hg; volume, 133 vs 158 mL) and the pulmonary venous circulation (left atrial pressure, 12 vs 24 mm Hg) and resulted in a slight increase in cardiac output (11.7 vs 9.9 L/min).

CONCLUSIONS

The simulation results suggested that continuous flow left ventricular assist devices improve the hemodynamics in patients with heart failure and a normal ejection fraction. For an optimal use of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices, low speeds should be maintained at rest, to avoid suction. However, during physical activity, higher speeds are needed to prevent an abnormal increase in the ventricular filling pressures typical of patients with heart failure and a normal ejection fraction.