Carotid artery and jugular vein cannulation in aortic redo surgery

Reoperative Aortic Arch Surgery under Mild Systemic Hypothermia: Two-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

 The aim of the study was to assess the indications, surgical strategies, and outcomes after reoperative aortic arch surgery performed generally under mild hypothermia.

METHODS

 Ninety consecutive patients (60 males, mean age, 55 ± 16 years) underwent open reoperative aortic arch surgery after previous cardiac aortic surgery. The indications included chronic-progressive arch aneurysm (55.5%), chronic aortic dissection (17.8%), contained arch rupture (16.7%), and graft infection (10%). The reoperation was performed through a repeat sternotomy (96%) or clamshell thoracotomy (4%) using antegrade cerebral perfusion under mild systemic hypothermia (28.9 ± 2.5°C) in all except three patients.

RESULTS

 The surgery comprised hemiarch or total arch replacement in 41 (46%) and 49 (54%) patients, respectively. The distal extension included classic or frozen elephant trunk technique, each in 12 patients, and total descending aorta replacement in 4 patients. Operative mortality was 6 (6.7%) among all patients, with age identified as the only independent predictor of operative mortality (p = 0.05). Permanent and transient neurologic deficits occurred in 1% and 9% of the patients, respectively. Estimated survival at 8 years was 59 ± 8% with advanced heart failure predictive for late mortality (p = 0.014). Freedom from second reoperation or intervention on the aorta was 78 ± 6% at 8 years, with most of these events occurring downstream in patients with chronic degenerative aneurysms.

CONCLUSION

 Aortic arch reoperations performed using antegrade cerebral perfusion under mild systemic hypothermia offer favorable operative outcomes with an exceptionally low rate of neurologic morbidity without any difference between hemiarch and complex arch procedures.

Intra-aortic balloon clamp for safe resternotomy in a patient with a giant aneurysm of sinuses of Valsalva

Despite advances in surgical techniques and postoperative medical management, the mortality rates for cardiac reoperations remain high. The risk is most commonly associated with failed resternotomy complicated by fatal injury to the myocardium or its structures. This short case report documents the first use of an endoluminal balloon occlusive device in order to prevent aneurysmal sack damage and coronary vessel injury in a patient with a giant aortic aneurysm after failed aortic surgery. The safe aortic occlusion allowed for closed-chest cardioplegia delivery and subsequent aortic unloading, thus facilitating a difficult but uneventful resternotomy.

Treatment of a giant ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm presenting as a presternal pulsatile protrusion almost perforating through the skin

Aortic pseudoaneurysms have the potential for eroding bony structures in the chest, including the sternum, over time. Here, we report the case of a 54-year old woman with a giant pseudoaneurysm of the ascending aorta, 19 years after aortic root (mechanical conduit) and hemiarch replacement. The patient presented to her primary-care physician with a pulsatile presternal subcutaneous protrusion in the midline of her median sternotomy scar. We performed a challenging midline resternotomy after the establishment of a surgical safety net for cerebral and visceral organ protection followed by a supracoronary ascending and hemiarch replacement including a reinsertion of the coronary ostia employing selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and mild systemic hypothermic circulatory arrest. We discuss here the specific surgical considerations of this case.