Three-field minimally invasive esophagectomy: current results and technique

Pulse oximetric assessment of anatomical vascular contribution to tissue perfusion in the gastric conduit

BACKGROUND

Tubularized stomach is a common substitute used after oesophageal resection. The risk for gastric conduit ischemia, as well as the mechanisms and dynamics for the occurrence of deficient tissue perfusion during the critical construction of a gastric tube, is poorly understood.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients that underwent oesophagectomy were studied with transmural pulse oximetry of different parts of the stomach, and at predefined preparatory steps during the construction of the gastric conduit.

RESULTS

After ligation of the left gastric artery (LGA), a reduction to 83.5% in tissue saturation was observed. Three patients (10.3%) had a sustained saturation despite ligation at this point. During final preparation of the gastric tube, and after stapling of the minor curvature, saturation fell to 76.5%. Saturation increased significantly to 80.0% 2 h after the stapling, just before construction of the anastomosis (P = 0.021). There was no association between the level of oxygen saturation and the risk of anastomotic dehiscence.

CONCLUSION

During gastric tube construction for oesophageal replacement, conduit perfusion, measured as oxygen saturation with pulse oximetry, decreases significantly. The main cause of this reduction seems to be ligation of the LGA and the final stapling of the gastric tube. Future studies are needed to establish the clinical implications of this finding.

Re-evaluation of the role of thoracoscopic esophagectomy as a Japanese-style radical surgery

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of thoracoscopic surgery in radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

The subjects were 329 consecutive patients who, without preoperative chemoradiotherapy, underwent R0 radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic squamous cell esophageal cancers during 1998-2013. Open thoracotomy was applied in 212 (O), and thoracoscopic surgery in 117 (V). Survivals according to TNM Stages and Efficacy index (EI) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Hospital death rates of O/V were 1.9/0%. The survivals of V according to TNM Stages had significantly better prognosis in TNM6th cStage III and showed not worse prognosis in general. In the analysis using Cox proportional hazards model, "V or O" was a significant prognostic factor indicating better prognosis of V. More bilateral paratracheal lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerves tended to be classified as mediastinal instead of cervical in V. Efficacy index of mediastinal paratracheal nodes was higher in V than in O, while cervical lymphadenectomy maintained high EI.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Though our series have limitations of retrospective study and substantial bias, the feasibility and safety of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy was shown. Higher paratracheal lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerves could be dissected from the mediastinal side in V group. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy, which is regarded as minimally invasive surgery in other countries, is being accepted in Japan mainly in the expectation of more thorough and meticulous lymphadenectomy. At the same time, the dissection range is continuously re-evaluated for safer surgery maintaining radicality.

Better perioperative outcomes in thoracoscopic-esophagectomy with two-lung ventilation in semi-prone position

BACKGROUND

One-lung ventilation (OLV) anesthesia intubation route is often used in patients undergoing thoracoscopic-esophagectomy in semi-prone position. Recently, the two-lung ventilation (TLV) approach becomes popular. However, limited studies have compared the two ventilation approaches in parallel. Here, we report a single-center, retrospective study of comparing TLV and OLV approach in patients undergoing thoracoscopic-esophagectomy in semi-prone position.

METHODS

From January 2013 to November 2014, 147 patients were enrolled into the current study and were given thoracoscopic-esophagectomy in semi-prone position either by OLV or TLV. Intraoperative respiratory functional data and perioperative surgical parameters of the two approaches were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 147 patients, 64 patients received OLV and 83 patients received TLV, and all of them were successfully under gone thoracoscopic procedures without conversion to open thoracotomy. There was no incidence of major intraoperative complications or perioperative death. There were no statistically different in postoperative respiratory complications, either. However, TLV approach resulted in better intraoperative respiratory function (PaCO₂, PaO₂, SaO₂), shorter preparation time for anesthesia induction, less blood loss, shorter thoracoscopic operating time and less postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative respiratory complications and quantity of the resected thoracic lymph node showed no difference between the two ventilation approach (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that TLV intubation approach is superior to OLV approach during the thoracoscopic-esophagectomy in semi-prone position. According to this, TLV approach is a technically feasible, convenient and safe anesthesia induction approach for esophageal cancer surgery.

Thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and enhanced recovery after surgery

Thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy has already become a common procedure of minimally invasive esophagectomy. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a series of ways that use multidisciplinary care methods to minimize surgical stress and hasten recovery. ERAS has obvious advantages in decreasing postoperative complications, shortening postoperative hospital stay, reducing medical costs, and increasing the satisfaction of patients. Under the guidance of ERAS, thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy combined with optimized measures taken in perioperative period will be the future development direction of esophagectomy.

Overall survival analysis of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NAC) followed by esophagectomy are more likely to have negative margins at resection, be downstaged, and have improved overall survival (OS). The specific aim of this study was to analyze OS outcomes using NAC followed by esophagectomy at a single, tertiary care academic medical center.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 106 patients that underwent NAC with platinum-based chemotherapy plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine followed by esophagectomy from September 1996 to May 2011. OS was analyzed by the Kaplan Meier method.

RESULTS

Initial staging determined that of 106 patients, 62% had stage III (n=66), 31% stage II (n=33), and 7% had stage I disease (n=7). Following NAC, 92.5% (n=98) were resected with negative (R0) margins and pathologic staging revealed 59% (n=62) were downstaged, 9% (n=10) were upstaged, and 32% (n=34) remained at the same stage. A pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved in 29% (n=31) of the cohort. Median OS was 35.2 months for all patients, 42 months for downstaged patients, 13 months when upstaged, and 17 months for those who remained at the same stage (P=0.08). OS by histological type was 30 months for adenocarcinoma and 71 months for squamous cell carcinoma (P=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

NAC was effective in downstaging 59% of patients and effectively increased the chance for an R0 resection. These patients, in turn, had improved OS compared to the median OS. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma showed a trend towards more favorable OS.

Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy with lateral-prone position

With 20 years of development, minimally-invasive treatment for esophageal cancer has been widely spread. However, surgeons have not reached consensus about the optimal minimally-invasive operation method, or whether the effect of radical lymph nodes dissection is comparable to the traditional open procedure. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy with lateral-prone position combines the advantages of both lateral position (allowing quick conversion to open procedure) and prone position (good visual area and complete lymphadenectomy). Together with laparoscopic abdominal lymphadenectomy, gastric tube formation and jejunostomy, this approach provides an easier way for minimally-invasive radical esophagectomy. In this article, approaches for thoracoscopic esophagectomy with lateral-prone position and total mediastinal lymphadenectomy, combined with totally laparoscopic gastric mobilization, abdominal lymphadenectomy, gastric tube formation and jejunostomy, will be presented by video instructions. All the procedures were under the rule of radical lymphadenectomy. Cervical lymph nodes dissection and esophago-gastrostomy were the same as those in open procedure, which will not be discussed here.