Early results with annular support in reconstruction of the bicuspid aortic valve

Midterm Results of an Algorithmic 3-Pronged Approach to Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated midterm outcomes of a 3-pronged algorithm for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair. Valve-sparing root reimplantation (VSRR) was performed for patients with aortic root dilatation. In those without a root aneurysm, external subannular ring (ESAR) was performed for annuli ≥28 mm and subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA) for annuli <28 mm.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 242 patients undergoing primary BAV repair from April 29, 2004, to March 1, 2023, at a single institution. Primary end points were mortality, structural valve degeneration (SVD), which was defined as a composite of more than moderate aortic insufficiency or severe aortic stenosis, and reintervention.

RESULTS

The algorithm was used to treat 201 patients; of these, 130 underwent VSRR, 35 had ESAR, and 36 underwent SCA. Most were men with mean age of 43.8 years (SD, 12.0 years), which was similar between groups. Preoperative aortic insufficiency more than moderate was more common for ESAR compared with VSRR and SCA (74.3% vs 37.7% vs 44.4%, P < .001). At 30 days, mortality was 0.8% (n = 1) for VSRR and 0% for ESAR and SCA. At 6 years, overall Kaplan-Meier survival was 98.9% (95% CI, 97.3%-100%), with no differences between groups (P = .5). The cumulative incidence of SVD was 4.7% (95% CI, 0.1%-9.2%) for VSRR, 6.4% (95% CI, 0%-14.6%) for ESAR, and 0% for SCA (P = .4). Similarly, the cumulative incidence of reintervention with all-cause mortality as a competing risk was 2.2% (95% CI, 0.4%-6.9%), 6.1% (95% CI, 1%-17.9%), and 0% for VSRR, ESAR, and SCA, respectively (P = .506).

CONCLUSIONS

A 3-pronged algorithmic approach to BAV repair results in excellent survival and freedom from reoperation at 6 years.

A 3D-Printed Externally Adjustable Symmetrically Extensible (EASE) Aortic Annuloplasty Ring for Root Repair and Aortic Valve Regurgitation

PURPOSE

The valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) procedure was developed to preserve the aortic valve apparatus to replace aneurysmal aortic roots with synthetic grafts and to eliminate associated aortic regurgitation (AR). However, residual post-repair AR is not uncommon and has been found to be associated with recurrent AR and future reoperation.

METHODS

We designed and manufactured a 3D-printed, external adjustable symmetrically extensible (EASE) aortic annuloplasty ring that can symmetrically reduce the aortic annulus diameter via a radial constriction, compliant mechanism. An ex vivo porcine VSARR model with annular dilation and AR was developed (n = 4) and used for hemodynamic, echocardiography, and high-speed videography data collection.

RESULTS

After ring annuloplasty repair using the EASE aortic ring, the regurgitant fraction decreased from 23.6 ± 6.9% from the VSARR model to 7.4 ± 5.6% (p = 0.05), which was similar to that measured from baseline with a regurgitant fraction of 10.2 ± 3.9% (p = 0.34). The leaflet coaptation height after annuloplasty repair also significantly increased from that measured in VSARR model (0.4 ± 0.1 cm) to 0.9 ± 0.1 cm (p = 0.0004), a level similar to that measured in baseline (1.1 ± 0.1 cm, p = 0.28).

CONCLUSION

Using an ex vivo VSARR model, the EASE ring successfully reduced AR by reducing the annular diameter and improving leaflet coaptation. With its broad applicability and ease of use, this device has the potential to have a significant impact on patients suffering worldwide from AR due to root aneurysms.

Bicuspid aortic valve repair-current techniques, outcomes, challenges, and future perspectives

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart condition that can lead to some valve-related complications, such as aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation, and is often associated with aortic root dilation. With the development and refinement of BAV repair techniques over the past three decades, surgical repair of BAV has emerged as an effective treatment option, offering symptomatic relief and improved outcomes. This review aims to summarize the current techniques, outcomes, and challenges of BAV repair, and to provide potential future perspectives in the field.

Aortic root anatomy after aortic valve reimplantation

OBJECTIVE

During the last decade, special concerns have been raised about the anatomic relationships among the sinotubular junction, ventricular-aortic junction, and virtual basal ring to improve the results of root reconstruction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the in vivo anatomy of the aortic root after reimplantation with the Valsalva graft and the anatomic relationship between its components.

METHODS

We analyzed 10 consecutive patients with tricuspid aortic valves who underwent reimplantation with the Valsalva graft between September and December 2019. Surgical clips were applied as markers at the level of proximal annular knots and at the distal reimplanted commissures on the neo-sinotubular junction. Electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography scan of the aortic root was performed. Coordinates of the markers were exported on a 3-dimensional modeling software, and the distances between the virtual basal ring and the Dacron graft basal landmarks were measured.

RESULTS

The mean heights of Dacron graft basal landmarks from virtual basal ring were right-left commissure 7.1 ± 5.1 mm; right sinus 4.7 ± 4.1 mm; right-noncoronary commissure 2.8 ± 2.2 mm; noncoronary sinus 1.4 ± 1.6 mm; left-noncoronary commissure 2.2 ± 2.3 mm; and left sinus 2.0 ± 0.9 mm. The mean planar distances of basal Dacron graft landmarks from virtual basal ring (thickness) were right-left commissure 5.3 ± 3.1 mm; right sinus 2.8 ± 1.4 mm; right-noncoronary commissure 2.2 ± 1.5 mm; noncoronary sinus 1.5 ± 1.5 mm; left-noncoronary commissure 1.3 ± 1.0 mm; and left sinus 3.4 ± 2.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

After reimplantation, despite a complete dissection of the root, slight asymmetry of graft proximal seating exists. The inner annuloplasty is on the virtual basal ring, and the proximal edge of the Dacron graft is on the ventricular-aortic junction at a slightly different thickness and height along the annular circumference. At the level of the right sinus and left/right commissure, the Dacron graft is higher than the virtual basal ring and the relative wall thickness is increased. The annular stabilization is unaffected.

Reimplantation versus aortic ring annuloplasty in bicuspid valve with borderline aortic root ectasia

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Minimally invasive aortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty

OBJECTIVES

As aortic valve repair (AVr) for aortic insufficiency (AI) expands, minimally invasive (Mi) approaches are increasingly being applied. Cardiac surgical techniques can be more difficult through small incisions, and this report analyzes medium-term outcomes for MiAVr facilitated by geometric ring annuloplasty.

METHODS

Since 2013, 58 patients were selected for AVr through upper sternotomy third-interspace incisions. The average age was 58.9 ± 15.4 (mean ± SD) years, 71% were male, and preoperative AI grade was 3.6 ± 0.8. Sixty-two percent (36/58) had a proximal aortic replacement for ascending aortic aneurysms (n = 26) and/or remodeling grafts for aortic root aneurysms (n = 10). Annuloplasty rings were placed subannularly (69% trileaflet; 31% bicuspid), and leaflet procedures were performed in 70%. The average ring diameter was 21.6 ± 1.4 mm, and the average aortic clamp time was 113 ± 35 min.

RESULTS

After repair, AI grade fell to an average of 0.5 ± 0.6 (p < .0001), with a mean valve gradient of 12.5 ± 7.1 mmHg. No operative mortalities or major complications occurred. Three patients required reoperations for bleeding, and two had pacemakers. At an average follow-up of 38 months (maximal 88 months), three late deaths and no valve-related complications were observed. Four patients required reoperative aortic valve replacement over follow-up, and Kaplan-Meier survival and freedom from reoperation both exceeded 80% at 88 months. At the last follow-up, the average AI grade was 0.7 ± 0.7, and the mean valve gradient was 12.7 ± 6.3 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

Geometric ring annuloplasty was safe and seemed to facilitate performing AVr ± proximal aortic replacement through Mi incisions. Hemodynamic improvements were significant, medium-term clinical outcomes were acceptable, and results could improve further with experience.

Geometric characteristics of bicuspid aortic valves

OBJECTIVE

We studied the coaptation angles α and β in bicuspid aortic valve geometry from computed tomography scan images.

METHODS

In 45 patients, we calculated the coaptation angle α (the angle between the nonfused commissures crossing the center of coaptation), angle β (between the nonfused commissures crossing the center of the reference circle), angles γ1 and γ2 and ε1 and ε2 (angle between the nonfused commissures and the coaptation point at the raphe or the perfect midpoint, respectively), the length of the raphe, the absolute and relative sinuses' surfaces (relative to the perfect circle and the percentage exceeding the ideal circle). Spearman correlation was employed to investigate the associations among all parameters.

RESULTS

The coaptation angles α and β were significantly different (P < .001). We found a significant correlation of α with the length of the raphe (P = .008), whereas β was dependent on the position of the commissures. Both γ1 and γ2 (P = .04), or ε1 and ε2 (P < .001) significantly differed from each other and ε2 was the most constant angle, although its size geometrically depends on β. The noncoronary was the largest sinus, and β was the primary determinant of its increased size in bicuspid aortic valves with righ/left fusion pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

The coaptation angle α is influenced by the length of the raphe, whereas angle β is dependent on the position of the commissures. The position of the raphe can vary and is not always situated in the middle of the free edge. The position of the right/non commissure is variable, whereas the right/left commissure is more fixed.

Effect of Valve Height on the Opening and Closing Performance of the Aortic Valve Under Aortic Root Dilatation

Patients with aortic valve disease can suffer from valve insufficiency after valve repair surgery due to aortic root dilatation. The paper investigates the effect of valve height (Hv) on the aortic valve opening and closing in order to select the appropriate range of Hv for smoother blood flow through the aortic valve and valve closure completely in the case of continuous aortic root dilatation. A total of 20 parameterized three-dimensional models of the aortic root were constructed following clinical surgical guidance. Aortic annulus diameter (DAA) was separately set to 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30 mm to simulate aortic root dilatation. H_V value was separately set to 13.5, 14, 14.5, and 15 mm to simulate aortic valve alterations in surgery. Time-varying pressure loads were applied to the valve, vessel wall of the ascending aorta, and left ventricle. Then, finite element analysis software was employed to simulate the movement and mechanics of the aortic root. The feasible design range of the valve size was evaluated using maximum stress, geometric orifice area (GOA), and leaflet contact force. The results show that the valve was incompletely closed when H_V was 13.5 mm and D_AA was 29 or 30 mm. The GOA of the valve was small when H_V was 15 mm and D_AA was 26 or 27 mm. The corresponding values of the other models were within the normal range. Compared with the model with an H_V of 14 mm, the model with an H_V of 14.5 mm could effectively reduce maximum stress and had relatively larger GOA and less change in contact force. As a result, valve height affects the performance of aortic valve opening and closing. Smaller H_V is adapted to smaller D_AA and vice versa. When H_V is 14.5 mm, the valve is well adapted to the dilatation of the aortic root to enhance repair durability. Therefore, more attention should be paid to H_V in surgical planning.

A modern approach to aortic valve insufficiency: Aortic root restoration via HAART 300 internal annuloplasty ring

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

HAART 300 is an internal geometric annuloplasty ring. The safety and efficacy of this novel device in aortic valve (AV) repair in a single referral center are reported.

METHODS

Twenty patients with trileaflet AV insufficiency with ascending aorta and/or aortic root enlargement were included. Subannular implantation was performed to correct annular dilatation, whereas concomitant leaflet repair was performed whenever required. All but two patients also received ascending aorta replacement, whereas selective sinus replacement was performed in all but five patients.

RESULTS

Follow-up was for a maximum of 3.8 years and a mean of 2.2 years. Mean age was 54.2 years old. Moderate to severe preoperative AV insufficiency was noted in 75% of patients, whereas 70% of them had an ascending aorta over 45 mm. One patient was lost from follow-up. Overall mortality as well as major complication rates were zero. Early postoperatively, no more than mild AV regurgitation was detected, whereas only one patient appeared with moderate AV regurgitation during our 2.2-year follow-up. New York Heart Association class was also significantly lower compared to preoperative values and valve gradients remained low at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Geometric ring annuloplasty is a safe and effective valve sparing approach to deal with AV insufficiency contributing to overall root reconstruction. Short-term results are excellent rendering this easily reproducible and versatile method very attractive.

Aortic Valve Repair in Annular Dilatation: External Versus Internal Suture Annuloplasty

BACKGROUND

Annuloplasty is essential in aortic valve repair. The most appropriate technique is, however, highly controversial. We aimed to evaluate changes in postoperative annulus diameter on serial echocardiography after external and internal suture annuloplasty.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed serial transthoracic echocardiography of consecutive patients from our institutional aortic valve repair registry who had received suture annuloplasty. Mid-systolic annulus diameter was measured on parasternal long-axis view preoperatively, at discharge, 3-6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively. Primary endpoint was the prevalence of annulus re-dilatation. Secondary endpoints were the correlation between annulus re-dilatation and (1) external vs. internal technique and (2) reoccurrence of aortic insufficiency (AI)≥2.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients (mean age 43±13 years, 91% male) underwent aortic valve repair including external (n=27) or internal (n=43) suture annuloplasty between February 2016 and November 2019. Mean follow-up was 17±11 (3-50) months. Mean preoperative annulus diameter of 29.7±2.8 (23.8-37.8) mm was significantly reduced to 22.7±2.9 (16.7-31.7) mm, p<0.001 at discharge and increased to 23.8±2.3 (20.9-27.0) mm, p=0.037 during follow-up. The mild increase in postoperative annulus diameter did not correlate with the reoccurrence of AI≥2. Preoperative annulus was significantly larger in the external group (external: 30.6±3.2 mm; internal: 29.1±2.5 mm; p=0.032). However, we found no significant difference in postoperative annulus increase rate between both techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Although mild, a significant continuous increase of annulus diameter after suture annuloplasty was seen which did not correlate with the reoccurrence of AI≥2 at mid-term follow-up. Annulus re-dilatation was comparable between external and internal technique.

Root Reimplantation and Aortic Annuloplasty With External Ring in Bicuspid Aortic Valve: An Anatomical Comparison

Aortic annuloplasty has demonstrated to be a protective factor in valve-sparing root replacement and aortic valve repair. Both reimplantation for aortic root aneurysms and external ring annuloplasty for isolated aortic regurgitation have demonstrated good long-term results. The aim of this anatomical study is to compare aortic reimplantation with Valsalva graft with aortic external ring annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valves, analyzing their morphological features with CT scan. We selected 56 patients with bicuspid aortic valve who underwent reimplantation procedure with Valsalva graft or external ring annuloplasty; after propensity-matching, 2 homogeneous groups of 10 patients each were obtained. Through multiplanar ECG-gated CT-Scan reconstructions, pre- and postoperative, aortic annular, and valve geometrical characteristics were compared (diameters, perimeter, area and ellipticity index for the annulus; effective height, coaptation length and commissural height for the valve). Aortic root volume was also analyzed. Postoperative comparison of the two groups showed similar geometric features of the aortic annulus in terms of major and minor diameters, perimeter, area and ellipticity index. Analysis of valve's parameters showed similar results in terms of effective height and coaptation length (respectively 10.9 ± 2.1 mm and 7.5 ± 1.9 mm in External Ring group and 10.1 ± 2.0 mm and 7.6 ± 1.6 mm in the Reimplantation group). Both techniques achieve an efficient annuloplasty with similar anatomical results on bicuspid the aortic valves. The stability of these results needs to be confirmed by long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up.

Isolated aortic insufficiency valve repair with external ring annuloplasty: a standardized approach

OBJECTIVES

Aortic valve (AV) insufficiency with normal root and ascending aorta is most frequently treated by valve replacement with significant prosthetic-related complications and reduced life expectancy. We compared the outcomes of a new standardized isolated AV repair approach using an external aortic annuloplasty ring at the subvalvular level (single ring annuloplasty) and the role of an additional supravalvular ring at the sinotubular junction (double ring annuloplasty).

METHODS

Single centre data were collected from the Aortic Valve Insufficiency and ascending aorta Aneurysm InternATiOnal Registry (AVIATOR) between 2003 and 2017. A total of 93 patients (56 single ring and 37 double ring) underwent isolated AV repair.

RESULTS

The overall 30-day mortality rate and the need for a permanent pacemaker were 1% and 2%, respectively. The overall survival rate at 6 years was similar for sex- and age-matched members of the general population (89% vs 95%; P = 0.1) and did not differ between the double and single ring groups (82% vs 93%; P = 0.4) at 6 years. There were no thromboembolic or bleeding events in the entire cohort. However, at 6 years, the cumulative incidence of valve-related reintervention was 26% in the single ring annuloplasty group compared to 3% in the double ring annuloplasty (P = 0.02) group. Similarly, at 6 years, the cumulative incidence of moderate-to-severe (>2) aortic insufficiency was 30% in the single ring annuloplasty group compared to 0% in the double ring annuloplasty group (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized AV repair with external ring annuloplasty has a survival rate similar to that of the general population. The additional stabilization of the sinotubular junction with a second supravalvular ring (double ring annuloplasty) is associated with better outcomes compared to single subvalvular annuloplasty. It can be considered as a first line intervention for patients with isolated aortic insufficiency and pliable leaflets.

Early and Late-Term Follow-Up Results of Patients Diagnosed with Aortic Aneurysm or Aortic Dissection with Aortic Regurgitation Undergoing Aortic Valve Repair or Valve-Sparing Aortic Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Valve-reimplantation and remodelling techniques used in aortic reconstruction provide successful early, mid, and long-term results. We present our early and late-term experience with 110 patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) who underwent aortic valve repair (AVr) or valve-sparing aortic root surgeries (VSARS) due to aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm.

METHODS

Nine hundred eighty-two patients who underwent aneurysm or dissection surgery and aortic valve surgery between April 1997 and January 2017 were analysed using the patient database. A total of 110 patients with AR who underwent AVr or VSARS due to aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm were included in the study.

RESULTS

In the postoperative period, a decrease was observed in AR compared to the preoperative period (P<0.001); there was an increase in postoperative ejection fraction (EF) compared to the preoperative values (P<0.005) and a significant decrease in postoperative left ventricle diameters compared to the preoperative values (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed one, two, four, and five-year freedom from moderate-severe AR as 95%, 91%, 87%, and 70%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation in one, two, and five years were 97.9%, 93.6%, and 81%, respectively. Eight patients (7.4%) underwent AVr during follow-up. Out of the remaining 100 patients, 13 (12%) had minimum AR, 52 (48%) had 1st-2nd degree AR, and 35 (32%) had 2nd-3rd degree AR during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

For the purpose of maintaining the native valve tissue, preserving the EF and the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, valve-sparing surgeries should be preferred for appropriate patients.

Leaflet Dimensions as a Guide to Remodeling Annuloplasty During Aortic Valve Repair

OBJECTIVE

In chronic aortic insufficiency (AI), the method and degree of annular downsizing required to achieve durable coaptation in aortic valve repair (AVr) remains poorly defined. This study evaluated the relationship between leaflet size and annular diameter to predict adequate annular sizing in remodeling AVr.

METHODS

Under regulatory supervision, 74 patients with chronic tri-leaflet AI underwent AVr using ring annuloplasty and leaflet reconstruction. Fifty-four (73%) had ascending aortic (n = 25) and/or root (n = 29) aneurysms, and aortic grafts were sized 5 to 7 mm larger than the rings. Intraoperatively, leaflet free-edge length (FEL) was measured with special ball sizers positioned in the coronary sinus, and "normal" annular diameter was predicted from the validated formula: Required "normal" diameter = FEL/1.5. "Normal" annular diameters predicted from FEL were compared with pathologic diameters measured intraoperatively with Hegar dilators, and both were correlated with gender, age, and BSA.

RESULTS

Average age was 62.1 ± 13.3 years (mean ± SD), 73% (54/74) were male, and 96% (71/74) had moderate-to-severe AI. All patients had annular dilatation, with a pathologic diameter 26.6 ± 2.3 mm before repair, and a predicted "normal" diameter of 21.7 ± 1.7 mm (P < 0.001). Both predicted and pathologic annular diameters were larger in men (P < 0.001), but no relationship existed with age. BSA correlated with both predicted and pathologic diameters, although variability was large.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a simple validated method to predict "normal" annular diameter, all patients with chronic AI have some degree of annular dilatation. This finding implies that most AVr should include annuloplasty, with adequate and precise annular reduction based on leaflet size.

Aortic Root Remodeling in Acute Aortic Dissection

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term results of remodeling in acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) to define operative risk and root and valve stability.

METHODS

Between October 1995 and December 2018, a total of 352 patients were treated surgically for AADA. Of these, 90 patients with AADA (<2 weeks from onset; age: 57 ± 15 years; 70 males) with a root diameter of >43 to 45 mm (depending on patient size) (48 ± 4.1 mm) underwent aortic root remodeling and were analyzed further. As the control group, we chose the patients with normally sized aortic roots who had been treated by tubular replacement only (n = 227). Other procedures were performed in 35 cases.

RESULTS

Early mortality was 9% in the remodeling group versus 15% in the tubular ascending aortic replacement (TAR). Actuarial survival at 10 and 15 years was 68 ± 5% and 58.3 ± 6.4%, respectively, in the root remodeling group versus 68 ± 4% and 66 ± 4% in the TAR group (p = 0.99). Freedom from reoperation on the aortic valve or root was 95 ± 3% at 10 years and at 89 ± 6% at 15 years. Freedom from proximal reoperation after TAR at 10 and 15 years was 93 ± 3% and 91 ± 3% (n = 31 patients at risk), respectively, not statistically different from that after remodeling (p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term stability of aortic root remodeling for enlarged roots with AADA was comparable to TAR preserving a normal aortic root.

The Ross procedure versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in young patients: a decision analysis

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to determine the range of perioperative mortality rates associated with the Ross procedure that results in a life expectancy similar to that seen with mechanical aortic valve replacement (mAVR) in young patients with aortic valve disease.

METHODS

A fully probabilistic Markov microsimulation model with 1000 outer loops and 10 000 inner loops was constructed to compare gain in life expectancy and quality-adjusted life years between the index treatment with the Ross procedure versus mAVR for a theoretical cohort of young patients with aortic valve disease. Inputs for early deaths and late complications (death, stroke, bleeding, reoperation) were obtained from a single-centre study of 208 propensity score matched patients. In the primary analysis, the perioperative mortality rate for the Ross procedure was varied by increments of 0.5% to determine its impact on life expectancy and quality-adjusted life years. A 2-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine simultaneously the impact of the Ross reoperation rate and Ross reoperative mortality rate on life expectancy.

RESULTS

Life expectancy was improved with the Ross procedure when the perioperative mortality rate with the Ross procedure was <2.5% and was equivalent to mAVR when the mortality rate was 2.5% to 5%. Similarly, when the perioperative mortality rate of the Ross procedure was between 4% and 5.5%, the quality-adjusted life years gained were similar between the Ross procedure and mAVR. Life expectancy was improved when the Ross procedure reoperative mortality rate was <7% at an incidence of Ross reoperations of 18% at 20 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved life expectancy can be expected with the Ross procedure when the operative mortality rate is less than 2.5%.

Outcomes of Florida Sleeve Procedure in Patients with Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve

OBJECTIVE

Outcomes of the Florida Sleeve (FS) procedure in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have not been reported before. We compared outcomes of the FS procedure between patients with BAV and those with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV).

METHODS

From May 1, 2002 to January 1, 2016, 177 patients including 18 BAV and 159 TAV underwent the FS procedure. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and echocardiographic measurements were compared between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier and life-table analyses were used to evaluate survival and freedom from reintervention rates.

RESULTS

Mean ± standard deviation age and aortic root diameter were comparable in BAV and TAV groups, 47.83 ± 11.19 versus 49.59 ± 15.79 years (P = 0.55) and 56.57 ± 6.18 versus 55.17 ± 8.84 mm (P = 0.46), respectively. The 30-day mortality and stroke rates were zero in the BAV group and 1.88% (n = 3) in the TAV group (P = 1.00). One patient (5.55%) in the BAV group and 8 (5.03%) patients in the TAV group needed permanent pacemaker implantation (P = 0.62). Freedom from reoperation was 93% in the BAV group and 99% in the TAV group at 8 years (P = 0.041). Patient survival rate was 100% in the BAV group and 91% in the TAV group at 8 years (P = 0.42). Freedom from aortic insufficiency greater than mild was 93% in the BAV group and 96.5% in the TAV group at 5 years (P = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study reporting outcomes of the FS procedure in patients with BAV. This technique is feasible, and the results appear to be durable when compared to patients with TAV.

Unicuspid Aortic Valve Repair Using Geometric Ring Annuloplasty

BACKGROUND

Unicuspid aortic valves (Sievers type 2 bicuspid) are characterized by major fusion and clefting of the right-left coronary commissure, and minor fusion of the right-noncoronary commissure. Repair has been difficult because of two fusions, variable relative sinus sizes, and peripheral leaflet deficiencies or tears after balloon valvuloplasty.

METHODS

Twenty unicuspid aortic valves patients underwent valve repair in nine institutions. Right-left major fusion and right-noncoronary minor fusion occurred in 17 of 20 (85%). Commissurotomy was performed on the minor fusion, and a bicuspid annuloplasty ring with circular base geometry and two 180-degree subcommissural posts was sutured beneath the annulus, equalizing the annular circumferences of the fused and nonfused cusps. The nonfused leaflet was plicated, and the cleft in the major fusion was closed linearly until leaflet effective heights and lengths became greater than 8 mm and equal, respectively.

RESULTS

Average age (mean ± SD) was 22.3 ± 12.3 years (range, 13 to 58), 12 of 20 (60%) were symptomatic, 10 of 20 (50%) required aortic aneurysm resection. Pre-repair hemodynamic data included mean systolic valve gradient 25.8 ± 12.9 mm Hg, aortic insufficiency grade 2.9 ± 1.2, and annular diameter 24.7 ± 3.3 mm. No mortality or major complications occurred. Post-repair annular (ring) size was 20.5 ± 1.3 mm, mean gradient fell to 16.2 ± 5.9 mm Hg, and aortic insufficiency grade decreased to 0.1 ± 0.3 (P < .001). At an average follow-up of 11 months (range, 1 to 22), all 20 patients were asymptomatic and had returned to full activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic ring annuloplasty reduced annular diameter effectively, recruiting more leaflet to midline coaptation. Minor fusion commissurotomy and annular remodeling to 180-degree commissures converted UAV repair to a simple and reproducible procedure.

Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair: Causes of Valve Failure and Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Repair of bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) for aortic regurgitation (AR) has favorable outcomes, but the impact of natural disease progression on durability of repair is uncertain. We evaluated causes of reoperation and compared outcomes of BAV repair to those of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).

METHODS

Between January 1993 and December 2016, 113 patients had BAV repair at our institution for significant AR. Operative notes and pathology reports were studied to identify late causes of repair failure. For comparison with AVR, we utilized propensity score weighting with the score derived from preoperative and operative characteristics using gradient boosting machine model.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients had late AVR after initial repair. Causes of late valve dysfunction included calcification or fibrosis of the cusps (68%), concomitant replacement addressing moderate degree of aortic valve disease to avoid future operation (20%), and cusp prolapse (12%). Pathological evaluation of these excised valves reported calcification and fibrosis in 88% of the valves. Ten-year survival of patients undergoing BAV repair was 91% compared with 90% for patients undergoing AVR with a mechanical valve and 79% for AVR with a bioprosthesis (P = .6). Incidence of reoperation after AVR with a bioprosthesis was similar to risk after repair whereas AVR with mechanical valve showed significant advantage.

CONCLUSIONS

Disease progression with calcification or fibrosis is the most common cause of valve failure after initial repair of BAV. Clinical outcomes of BAV repair for severe AR appear superior to AVR with bioprosthesis.

Reexamining remodelling in children

OBJECTIVES

Some studies have suggested that root remodelling is unsuitable as valve-sparing aortic root replacement in children because of the increased risk of valve failure. This study reviewed our experience with root remodelling in children.

METHODS

All patients who underwent root remodelling at the age of ≤18 years between 1999 and 2016 were evaluated. In 2004, cusp effective height was measured intraoperatively and prolapse was corrected with central plication on the cusp. Suture annuloplasty was introduced after 2009 for annular dilatation.

RESULTS

There were 17 consecutive patients. The median age at operation was 14 (2.8-18) years. Aortic valve morphology was tricuspid in 10 patients, bicuspid in 5 patients, unicuspid in 1 patient and a pulmonary autograft in 1 patient. Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome and other connective tissue diseases were present in 11, 1 and 2 patients, respectively. Five patients had more than moderate aortic regurgitation. The median graft size used for root remodelling was 24 (18-26) mm. Cusp repair and annuloplasty were performed in 15 and 14 patients, respectively. The mean follow-up time was 6.5 ± 4.3 years. One patient with preoperatively severely depressed ventricular function died in the hospital from persistent heart failure. One patient (operated on before 2004) required aortic valve reoperation due to cusp prolapse. One patient with a unicuspid valve had developed moderate aortic regurgitation, and the other 14 patients had mild or less regurgitation. The median diameter of the sinus of Valsalva at the last follow-up was 36 (30-43) mm, Z-score of 1.5 (-3.5 to 3.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Root remodelling can be performed in children with favourable results by appropriate cusp repair and annuloplasty.

Bicuspid aortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty: A first-in-humans pilot trial

OBJECTIVE

As bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair evolves, more effective annular reduction and stabilization could be advantageous. A geometric annuloplasty ring has been developed, and 2-year regulatory outcomes of a first-in-humans pilot trial are reported.

METHODS

A prospective first-in-humans trial of BAV ring annuloplasty was completed in 16 patients. Patient age was 44.4 ± 11.3 (mean ± standard deviation) years, preoperative aortic insufficiency grade was 2.5 ± 1.0, New York Heart Association class 1.8 ± 0.4, and mean systolic gradient 13.4 ± 12.9 mm Hg. Three patients had Sievers type 0 BAV, 11 had type 1, and 2 were type 2. The Dacron-covered titanium rings had circular base geometry with 180° subcommissural posts and were implanted subannularly. Leaflets were reconstructed using plication/cleft closure, creating an effective height of ≥8 mm, even if modest gradients were induced.

RESULTS

Mean pre-repair annular diameter was 28.6 ± 3.3 mm, and the average ring diameter was 22.3 ± 1.6 mm. All valves required leaflet plication/reconstruction; pericardium was avoided; and 7 patients had aortic replacement for aneurysms. No early mortalities or major complications occurred. Two patients required early prosthetic valve replacement for technical errors, and all were between 24-38 months' postoperative at follow-up. No late mortalities or valve-related complications occurred, and all patients reverted to New York Heart Association class I. Aortic insufficiency reduction was significant to grade 0.9 ± 0.5 at 2-years (P < .0001). Mean valve gradients were acceptable (13.3 ± 5.0 mm Hg at 2 years; overall P = .11) and tended to fall over time (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Geometric ring annuloplasty was safe and effective for BAV repair. AI reduction was significant, valve gradients were satisfactory, and clinical outcomes were excellent. Geometric ring annuloplasty could simplify and standardize BAV repair.

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Full online-only version

Bicuspid aortic valve disease is the most common congenital cardiac disorder, being present in 1% to 2% of the general population. Associated aortopathy is a common finding in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease, with thoracic aortic dilation noted in approximately 40% of patients in referral centers. Several previous consensus statements and guidelines have addressed the management of bicuspid aortic valve-associated aortopathy, but none focused entirely on this disease process. The current guidelines cover all major aspects of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy, including natural history, phenotypic expression, histology and molecular pathomechanisms, imaging, indications for surgery, surveillance, and follow-up, and recommendations for future research. It is intended to provide clinicians with a current and comprehensive review of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy and to guide the daily management of these complex patients.

Transcatheter aortic valve-in-ring implantation: feasibility in an acute, preclinical, pilot trial

OBJECTIVES

The HAART ring device has been introduced as a novel strategy to facilitate aortic valve repair. This rigid, elliptical device aims to restore normal leaflet configuration and to provide annular stabilization in the setting of aortic regurgitation. The goal of this preclinical study is to evaluate the in vivo feasibility of 'aortic valve-in-ring' transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

METHODS

Six animals {landrace pigs, 87.6 [standard deviation (SD) 4.5] kg} underwent HAART ring implantation (5 cases #19 mm and 1 case #21 mm) via full sternotomy with cardiopulmonary bypass. Seven transfemoral TAVR implantations were performed with the Medtronic EvolutR prosthesis to assess the sizing and outcome (5 cases #23 mm, 1 case #26 mm and 1 case #29 mm).

RESULTS

TAVR implantation was successful in 6 of 7 attempts. Post-dilatation was performed in 1 case without damage of the ring or the valve. One embolization occurred due to oversizing (EvolutR valve 29 mm in HAART ring 19 mm). No clinically relevant postimplantation gradient [7.6 (SD 4.0) mmHg] or regurgitation was detected by invasive and echocardiographic measurements. Postoperative computed tomography scans revealed good device configuration.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter aortic valve-in-ring implantation of a self-expandable TAVR into a rigid aortic annuloplasty ring after aortic valve repair appears feasible. Proper sizing and correct depth of implantation are crucial.

Bicuspid aortic valve repair: systematic review on long-term outcomes

Background

Many patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) develop aortic regurgitation but are not considered for valve repair. This is partly due to limited long term data regarding repair durability. The purpose of the review is to summarize the long-term (1 year) outcomes of BAV repair.

Methods

A systematic review was performed to evaluate durability and survival following BAV repair. OVID SP versions of MEDLINE and Embase were searched using 'aortic valve', 'bicuspid', 'repair', 'David' 'Yacoub', 'reimplantation' and 'remodeling'.

Results

Initial search produced 770 abstracts, reduced to 92 full papers for review after excluding duplications and abstract review for relevance. Twenty-six studies met full inclusion criteria. BAV repair revealed low operative mortality, with excellent 5-year survival, and low freedom from reoperation. Differences in surgical technique between reimplantation and remodeling do not appear to confer protection against reintervention. Systematic assessment of cusp height and annular stabilization in some form do appear to favor improved long term durability. Leaflet calcification is associated with higher rates of reintervention.

Conclusions

BAV repair is associated with acceptable long term survival. Ongoing standardized outcome assessments will further refine surgical techniques associated with excellent repair durability.

Comparison of Dacron ring and suture annuloplasty for aortic valve repair-a porcine study

Background

A subvalvular annuloplasty is often used for aortic valve repair in patients with isolated aortic regurgitation with aortic annulus dilatation. Our aim was to characterize and compare annulus geometry and dynamics of the Dacron ring and suture annuloplasty and compare it with the native aortic annulus under standardized conditions.

Methods

We randomized 29 pigs of 80 kg into a Dacron ring group, a suture annuloplasty group and a native control group. The assessment was performed using sonomicrometry crystals for evaluation of dynamic geometry, and pressure measurements and echocardiography to evaluate valve performance.

Results

Aortic annulus area (AAA) was significantly reduced in the Dacron and Suture group compared with the Native group. Expansibility was similar and within normal physiologic limits in all three groups (Native: 12%±7%; Dacron: 11%±3%; Suture: 10%±4%). The largest segmental expansion was observed at the right coronary sinus (RC) in the Native and Dacron group but in the Suture group there was no significant difference between segments. The aortic annulus was primarily oval in systole and became more circular in diastole in the Native and Dacron group, however, in the Suture group, the sphericity remained relatively unchanged throughout the cardiac cycle.

Conclusions

This study is the first to describe and compare detailed segmental geometry of the Dacron ring and suture annuloplasty in a standardized porcine model. The two annuloplasties effectively downsized the aortic annulus, while expansibility was maintained. Each annuloplasty had its own geometrical characteristics, but the Dacron ring was more similar to the native aortic annulus than the suture annuloplasty. This study suggests that the Dacron ring offers a more physiological and standardized support by mimicking the geometry and dynamics of the native aortic annulus and thus is a preferable choice over the suture annuloplasty for valve-sparing aortic root procedures.

Geometry of cusp and root determines aortic valve function

The aortic valve is the functional unit of cusp and root. Various geometrical and functional analyses for the aortic valve unit have been executed to understand normal valve configuration and improve aortic valve repair. Different concepts and procedures have then been proposed for reparative approach, and aortic valve repair is still not standardized like mitral valve repair. It has become apparent, however, that interpretation of the geometry of the aortic cusp and root and its appropriate application to operative strategy lead to creating a functioning aortic valve. Herein, the aortic valve geometry and its clinical implications are reviewed to provide information for the selection of appropriate operative strategies.

New Flexible Internal Annular Fixation Rings for Tricuspid Aortic Valves

OBJECTIVES

Although aortic annulus repair has a long history, there are still no ideal devices to control an aortic annulus. We have developed a new method involving the use of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft with the support of a metallic ring holder during implantation from inside an aorta, with no dissection of the surrounding aortic annulus.

METHODS

We used aortic annular rings of 18 to 24 mm made of Gore-Tex tubed grafts (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) and metallic ring holder. After cutting the graft circumferentially to a 5-mm thickness, it was compressed manually to decrease the thickness. Then, a metallic ring holder corresponding to the graft size was inserted into the graft. The metallic ring holder was fixed to the graft with one 4-0 monofilament suture using 6 holes and the side trench on the metallic ring holder. The proper size for the graft was determined, and the appropriate annuloplasty ring was selected. A row of 4-0 double-needle braided sutures with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene spaghettis was sewn from the aortic side into the left ventricular outflow tract with a horizontal mattress stitch. After all sutures around the annulus were placed, they were tied down and the metallic ring holder was removed. The leaflets were repaired if necessary.

RESULTS

A total of 9 patients with tricuspid aortic valve have undergone this procedure since January 2015. The sizes of the aortic annular rings were 20 mm ( n = 3), 22 mm ( n = 5), and 24 mm ( n = 2). Aortic leaflets were repaired in 6 patients (6 central plications). Concomitant procedures were total aortic arch replacement ( n = 2), mitral valve repair ( n = 2), tricuspid valve repair ( n = 1), and coronary artery bypass grafting ( n = 2). There were no hospital deaths and no major morbidities. All patients were checked for mild or less than mild aortic regurgitation during the mean follow-up period of 13 months. Postoperative echocardiograms showed excellent peak pressure gradients compared with preoperative echocardiograms. Postoperative cardiac computed tomography scans were performed in 6 patients. The discrepancies between the ring size used and postoperative annular size were <1-mm diameter in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This new flexible ring is easy to use to fix an aortic annulus from the inside. Early results reveal excellent control of aortic regurgitation with the projected annular size. Further investigations are needed to ensure the effectiveness of the ring.

Aortic root remodeling in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves-long-term results

Background

Root remodeling is one form of valve-preserving root replacement to treat patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) and root aneurysm. We have consistently used it for patients with and without connective tissue disease and different aortic valve morphologies. The objective of this retrospective study was to review 23 years of experience with root remodeling.

Methods and patients

Between 10/95 and 9/2018, 1004 of 1038 root remodeling procedures were performed in patients with tricuspid (n = 589) or bicuspid (n = 414) anatomy of the aortic valve in our institution. Aortic aneurysm was present in 932 cases, 73 procedures were performed for acute aortic dissection type A. The severity of aortic regurgitation ranged from grade I to grade IV (mean 2.5 ± 0.8).

Results

All patients underwent root remodeling, concomitant operations were performed in 433, and cusp repair in 883 instances. Hospital mortality was 2%. Overall freedom from reoperation was 92% at 10 years and 89% at 15 years. It was 94% for tricuspid valves at 10 and 15 years, and 88% for bicuspid aortic valves at 10 years and 80% at 15 years (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

In conclusion, root remodeling is a viable option in valve-preserving root replacement. If combined with careful assessment and, if necessary, correction of aortic valve form reproducible restoration of aortic valve function can be achieved.

Geometric Ring Annuloplasty for Aortic Valve Repair During Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: Two-Year Clinical Trial Results

OBJECTIVE

An aortic annuloplasty ring could be useful for aortic valve repair. This trial evaluated intermediate-term outcomes of internal geometric ring annuloplasty for repair of trileaflet and bicuspid aortic insufficiency associated with ascending aortic and/or aortic root aneurysms.

METHODS

Under regulatory supervision, 47 patients with aortic insufficiency and ascending aortic (n = 22) and/or aortic root (n = 25) aneurysms were managed with aortic valve repair and aneurysm resection. Valve repair was performed using trileaflet (n = 40) or bicuspid (n = 7) internal geometric rings, together with leaflet reconstruction. Ascending aortic and/or remodeling root replacements were accomplished with Dacron grafts 5 to 7 mm larger than the rings. An Echo Core Lab provided independent echocardiographic assessments, and changes over time were evaluated by Friedman tests.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD age was 60 ± 14 years, 57% (27/47) were male, 15% (7/47) had bicuspid valves, 87% (41/47) had moderate-to-severe aortic insufficiency, and 13% (6/47) had mild aortic insufficiency. All patients had annular dilatation, with a mean ± SD of 26.5 ± 2.6 mm before repair, and mean ± SD ring sizes were 21.7 ± 1.7 mm. Follow-up was 42 months (mean = 27 months). No operative mortality or valve-related complications occurred. Two patients died beyond 1 year from nonvalve-related causes. One patient required valve replacement for repair failure. Survival free of complications or valve replacement was 94% at 2 years. Significant reduction in aortic insufficiency and New York Heart Association class were observed (P < 0.0001), and valve gradients remained low. No heart block or direct ring complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

In preliminary regulatory studies, aortic ring annuloplasty seemed safe and effective during aortic aneurysm surgery. This approach could help standardize aortic valve repair.

Comparison of the Dacron ring and suture annuloplasty for aortic root repair: an in vitro evaluation

OBJECTIVES

Increasing evidence shows that annular stabilization is essential in most aortic valve repair procedures. However, a standardized comparison of the 2 commonly used annuloplasty procedures is lacking. We hypothesized that the Dacron ring is more rigid than the polytetrafluoroethylene suture, whereas both procedures decrease annular dimensions. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of the ring and suture techniques with native aortic roots in vitro.

METHODS

Eighteen aortic roots explanted from 80-kg pigs were randomized into a Dacron ring group, a suture annuloplasty group and a native control group. Each sample was tested in a pulsatile in vitro model with a force transducer attached to the aortic annulus to obtain radial force measurements, and annular dynamics was evaluated using 2-dimensional echography.

RESULTS

Among the 2 annuloplasty procedures, only the Dacron ring group provided a significant reduction in the annular diameter compared with the native group (P < 0.006). Both annuloplasty procedures significantly reduced the geometric orifice area, tenting area and sinus diameter while increasing the coaptation length compared with the native group. Systolic annular distension was retained between groups, although the total radial forces were significantly reduced in the procedure groups compared with the native group (ring 1.07 ± 0.45 N, suture 1.13 ± 0.39 N and native 3.55 ± 1.34 N, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although both annuloplasty procedures increase coaptation length and decrease geometric orifice area, a significant downsizing of the annulus was achieved using the Dacron ring only. The systolic annular distension was similar to the native aortic root, whereas the radial annular forces were evenly decreased by both annuloplasty procedures. Long-term studies are needed to disclose any difference in long-term effect of the annuloplasty procedures.

Aortic Valvuloplasty or Rootplasty for Aortic Regurgitation

At present, aortic valvuloplasty is considered an effective procedure for treatment of aortic regurgitation in pediatric patients. It has encouraging mid- and long-term results. The improved outcome is primarily related to better understanding of the functional anatomy of the normal valve and the different factors that alter it. It is also related to the realization that outcome after valvuloplasty is dependent on comprehensive repair of all of the involved components of the aortic root. Refinement in preoperative diagnosis has helped identify these abnormal components and focus the surgical approach on the needed reconstruction. Although the technical aspects of valvuloplasty are well defined, suboptimal long-term results still occur in some cases because the patch material used for valve repair can become fibrotic or calcified. This review summarizes the surgical approach to and the management of the different abnormal root components in pediatric patients with significant aortic valve regurgitation.

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement

Despite the obvious advantages of the preservation of a normal aortic valve during aortic root replacement, the complexity of valve sparing procedures prevents a number of cardiac surgeons from incorporating them into their practice. The aim of this protocol is to describe a simplified and user-friendly technique of an aortic valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) procedure by re-implantation of the aortic valve. Proper selection of patients and limitations of the technique are discussed. In 54 consecutive patients, normal appearing aortic valves were re-implanted in a commercially available polyester prosthesis with pre-shaped sinuses by a simplified and standardized technique. Placement of the first row of the proximal suture line, choice of the prosthesis size, and adjustment of the height of the commissures of the patient to the fixed height of the sinus portion of the prosthesis were slightly modified from the reference techniques with the aim of increasing its feasibility for use by other cardiac surgeons. Early mortality and morbidity as well as 5-year survival, freedom from aortic valve reoperation, and freedom from recurrent moderate regurgitation were collected in all patients. Thirty-day mortality, re-sternotomy for bleeding, re-sternotomy for mediastinitis, and the incidence of stroke were very low, 1.8% for each (1 of 54). No patient required permanent pace-maker implantation. At 5 years, survival, freedom from aortic valve reoperation, and freedom from recurrent moderate regurgitation were 97.5%, 95.2%, and 91.6%, respectively. Mid-term results of our standardized technique of re-implantation of the aortic valve for valve-sparing aortic root replacement are very good and compare with more complex techniques reported by experienced surgeons. By following the present protocol of the standardized re-implantation technique, a greater number of cardiac surgeons can perform this procedure with comparable good results.

A novel system for the treatment of aortic annular dilation: an ex vivo investigation

OBJECTIVES

The main reason for aortic repair failures is recurrent annular dilatation. The fibrous portion of left ventricular outflow tract dilates. A novel device was designed to tackle this problem.

METHODS

The device consists of an internal ring applied at the aortic annulus plus an external flexible band at the level of the aortic root. The internal ring has a semi-rigid portion (40%, placed at ventriculo-arterial junction) and a flexible portion to allow it to conform along the curves of the non-coronary/right coronary leaflet and right coronary/left coronary leaflet commissures. The external band acts as a reinforcement to the internal ring. A pulsatile mock loop capable of housing porcine aortic valve was used. Working conditions were 60 bpm of heart rate, 75 of stroke volumes and 120-80 mmHg of simulated pressure. Mean gradient, effective orifice area, annular diameter, coaptation height and length were recorded on 11 aortic root units (ARUs). High-speed video and standard echocardiographic images were also recorded. All data were acquired in the following conditions: (i) basal (untreated ARU); (ii) pathological condition (left coronary/non-coronary triangle was dilated by suturing an aortic patch); and (iii) ARU treated with the device.

RESULTS

Gradients and effective orifice area were respectively 0.9 ± 0.64 mmHg and 3.1 ± 0.7cm2 (pathological) and 3.7 ± 1.1 mmHg and 1.5 ± 0.2cm2 (treated, P < 0.05). Left coronary/non-coronary diameter decreased from 2.4 ± 0.2 cm (pathological) to 2.0 ± 0.2 (treated, P < 0.05). Coaptation length and height were fully restored to basal values following treatment. Visual inspection showed proper dynamics of the leaflet, confirmed by high-speed video and echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS

The device allowed for restoring physiologic-like coaptation in the experimental model, without inducing clinically relevant worsening of the haemodynamics of the treated ARU.