Aggressive and minimally invasive surgery for pulmonary metastasis of sarcoma

Improving survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for sarcoma: analysis of prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Metastatic sarcoma confers a grave prognosis to patients and poses a management dilemma for clinicians. Pulmonary metastasectomy is frequently performed for the recurrence of sarcomatous tumours in the lung, but the evidence-base is poor. No guidelines exist to inform clinicians on appropriate patient selection and surgical technique.

AIM

This review aims to establish and analyse the most important prognostic factors for survival post pulmonary metastasectomy for recurrent sarcoma. We summarise the key tumour, peri-operative and patient characteristics that should guide surgical management.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature utilising OVID Medline and PubMed databases was conducted to identify all relevant research within the past 15 years. We evaluated all articles that specifically studied sarcoma patients (both bone and soft tissue).

CONCLUSION

Disease-free interval and tumour burden remain important prognostic factors, while tumour grade is likely not significant. VATS is a safe and viable alternative to thoracotomy without sacrificing survival outcomes. No single peri-operative characteristic provides useful prognostic information in isolation.

Sarcoma Pulmonary Metastatic Disease: Still a Chance for Cure

Tumors of soft tissue origin are not common but are increasing in incidence. Given the rare and heterogeneous nature of the disease, deciding on an effective treatment approach to the patient can be challenging. Approximately 20-50% of patients with sarcoma will develop metastases to the lung via hematogenous spread. Despite improvements in systemic therapy options for patients with metastatic disease to the lung, surgical resection of metastases is often the preferred option in patients who are safe surgical candidates. Clearance of metastatic disease with surgical resection has been proven to be cost-effective and can improve chances for long term survival. Deciding on who may benefit from surgical resection is best achieved in a multidisciplinary setting.

Impact of Intraoperative Molecular Imaging after Fluorescent-Guided Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) has been shown to improve lesion detection during pulmonary sarcomatous metastasectomy. Our goal in this study was to evaluate whether data garnered from IMI-guided resection of pulmonary sarcoma metastasis translate to improved patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty-two of 65 consecutive patients with a previous history of sarcomas found to have pulmonary nodules during screening were enrolled in a nonrandomized clinical trial. Patients underwent TumorGlow the day before surgery. Data on patient demographics, tumor biologic characteristics, preoperative assessment, and survival were included in the study analysis and compared with institutional historical data of patients who underwent metastasectomy without IMI. p values < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

IMI detected 42 additional lesions in 31 patients (59%) compared with the non-IMI cohort where 25% percent of patients had additional lesions detected using tactile and visual feedback only (p < 0.05). Median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with IMI-guided pulmonary sarcoma metastasectomy was 36 months vs 28.6 months in the historical cohort (p < 0.05). IMI-guided pulmonary sarcoma metastasectomy had recurrence in the lung with a median time of 18 months compared with non-IMI group at 13 months (p < 0.05). Patients with synchronous lesions in the IMI group underwent systemic therapy at a statistically higher rate and tended to undergo routine screening at shorter interval.

CONCLUSIONS

IMI identifies a subset of sarcoma patients during pulmonary metastasectomy who have aggressive disease and informs the medical oncologist to pursue more aggressive systemic therapy. In this setting, IMI can serve both as a diagnostic and prognostic tool without conferring additional risk to the patient.

Comparison of Percutaneous Image-Guided Microwave and Cryoablation for Sarcoma Lung Metastases: 10-Year Experience

Background: Outcomes between percutaneous microwave (MWA) and cryoablation of sarcoma lung metastases have not been compared to our knowledge. Objective: To compare technical success, complications, local tumor control, and overall survival (OS) following MWA versus cryoablation of sarcoma lung metastases. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 27 patients (16 women, 11 men; median age 64 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score 0-2) who underwent 39 percutaneous CT-guided ablation sessions (21 MWA, 18 cryoablation; 1-4 sessions per patient) to treat 65 sarcoma lung metastases (median 1 tumor per patient, range 1-12; median tumor diameter 11 mm, range 5-33 mm; 25% non-peripheral) from 2009 to 2021. We compared complications by ablation modality using generalized-estimating equations. We evaluated ablation modality, tumor size, and location (peripheral vs non-peripheral) in relation to local tumor progression using proportional Cox hazard models with death as competing risk. We estimated OS using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Primary technical success was 97% for both modalities. Median follow-up was 23 months (range: 1-102 months; interquartile range: 12, 44 months). A total of 7/61 (12%) tumors progressed. Estimated 1-year and 2-year local control rates were, for tumors >1 cm, 97% and 95% following MWA versus 99% and 98% following cryoablation, and for tumors ≤1 cm, 74% and 62% following MWA versus 86% and 79% following cryoablation. Tumor size ≤1 cm was associated with decreased cumulative incidence of local progression (p =.048); ablation modality and tumor location were not associated with progression (p =.86; p =.54). Complications (CTCAE grade ≤3) occurred in 17/39 sessions (44%), prompting chest tube placement in nine (23%). No complications with grade ≥4 occurred. OS at 1-, 2-, and 3-years was 100%, 89%, and 82%, respectively. Conclusion: High primary technical success, local control, and OS support MWA and cryoablation for treating sarcoma lung metastases. Ablation modality and tumor location did not affect local progression. Treatment failure was low, especially for small tumors. No life-threatening complications occurred. Clinical Impact: Percutaneous MWA and cryoablation are both suited for treatment of sarcoma lung metastases, especially for tumors ≤1 cm, whether peripheral or non-peripheral. Complications, if they occur, are not life-threatening.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in bone and soft tissue sarcoma with metastasis to the lung

 

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the outcomes of sarcoma patients with lung metastases who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy (PM), compared to patients who underwent medical management alone. The secondary objective was to compare survival after PM between variables of interest.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 565 sarcoma patients with confirmed, isolated pulmonary metastasis identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 2010 and 2015. 1:4 propensity score matching was used to select PM and non-PM groups. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse prognostic factors of disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Of the eligible 565 patients, 59 PM patients were matched to 202 non-PM patients in a final ratio of 3.4. After propensity matching, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between PM and non-PM patients. The median DFS after PM was 32 months (interquartile range 18–59), compared to 20 months (interquartile range 7–40) in patients without PM (P = 0.032). Using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, metastasectomy (hazard ratio 0.536, 95% confidence interval 0.33–0.85; P = 0.008) was associated with improved DFS. In a subset analysis of patients who underwent PM only, the median DFS was longer in males compared to females (P = 0.021), as well as in bone sarcoma compared to soft tissue sarcoma (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

For sarcoma patients with metastatic lung disease, PM appears to improve the prognosis compared to medical management. Furthermore, there may be a survival association with gender and tumour origin in patients who underwent PM. These data may be used to inform the surgical indications and eligibility criteria for metastasectomy in this setting.

Results of redo pulmonary metastasectomy

Repeat surgical resection (redo) for pulmonary metastases is a questionable, albeit intriguing topic. We performed an extensive review of the literature, to specifically analyze results of redo pulmonary metastasectomies. We reviewed a total of 3,523 papers. Among these, 2,019 were excluded for redundancy and 1,105 because they were not completely retrievable. Out of 399 eligible papers, 183 had missing information or missing abstract, while 96 lacked data on survival. A total of 120 papers dated from 1991 onwards were finally included. Data regarding mortality, major morbidity, prognostic factors and long-term survivals of the first redo pulmonary metastasectomies were retrieved and analyzed. Homogeneity of data was affected by the lack of guidelines for redo pulmonary metastasectomy and the risks of bias when comparing different studies has to be considered. According to the histology sub-types, redo metastasectomies papers were grouped as: colorectal (n=42), sarcomas (n=36), others (n=20) and all histologies (n=22); the total number of patients was 3,015. Data about chemotherapy were reported in half of the papers, whereas targeted or immunotherapy in 9. None of these associated therapies, except chemotherapy in two records, did significantly modify outcomes. Disease-free interval before the redo procedure was the prevailing prognostic factor and nearly all papers showed a significant correlation between patients’ comorbidities and prognosis. No perioperative mortality was reported, while perioperative major morbidity was overall quite low. Where available, overall survival after the first redo metastasectomy ranged from 10 to 72 months, with a 5-years survival of approximately 50%. The site of first recurrence after the redo procedure was mainly lung. Despite the data retrievable from literature are heterogeneous and confounding, we can state that redo lung metastasectomy is worthwhile when the lesions are resectable and the perioperative risk is low. At present, there are no “non-surgical” therapeutic options to replace redo pulmonary metastasectomies.

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a novel independent prognostic factor for multiple metastatic lung tumors from various sarcomas

PURPOSE

Sarcomas are among the most refractory malignant tumors and often recur as pulmonary metastasis. Although the presence of a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been associated with the prognosis of several malignancies, the relationship between the NLR and sarcoma with pulmonary metastasis is unclear. We investigated the impact of the NLR in patients who underwent surgical resection for metastatic lung tumors from various sarcomas.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 158 patients with metastatic lung tumors from various sarcomas, who underwent initial pulmonary metastasectomy between 2006 and 2015. We examined the clinicopathological variables, including the NLR and the characteristics of surgical procedures. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors were evaluated by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed significantly better survival of the group with an NLR < 2.26 immediately before the most recent pulmonary metastasectomy, in addition to such factors as the largest resected lesion being < 22 mm, a disease-free interval of > 2 years, and 3 or more pulmonary metastasectomies.

CONCLUSION

The NLR immediately before the most recent pulmonary metastasectomy is a novel independent prognostic factor, which may be helpful when considering repeated pulmonary metastasectomy.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for sarcoma-survival and prognostic analysis

Background

Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) has commonly been performed in patients with controlled metastatic sarcoma. We reviewed our single-institution experience with pulmonary resections for sarcoma to analyse clinical outcome and to identify prognostic factors associated with patient survival.

Methods

All sarcoma patients undergoing curative intent PM between 2008 and 2014 were retrospectively analysed. Factors related to primary tumour, metastases, applied therapy, systematic inflammation and preoperative nutritional condition, associated with survival after PM were evaluated using the univariable Cox proportional hazard model. Cut-off values of continuous variables were determined by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

In total, 33 patients (19 male and 14 female, median age 55 years) underwent PM for metastatic sarcoma. There were no perioperative deaths; major complications occurred in 5 (15.2%) patients. The median interval between the treatment of primary tumour and PM was 16 months (range, 0-171 months). The median size of the largest pulmonary lesion was 1.3 cm. Mean follow-up was 37 months (range, 1-100 months) and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate after first PM was 40.4%. Resection was complete (R0) in 31 (93.9%) patients. In univariable analysis, a shorter interoperative interval [<30 months, hazard ratio (HR) 5.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-22.19] and grade 3 (G3) sarcoma (HR 3.52, 95% CI: 1.01-12.25) were significant negative prognosticators.

Conclusions

Despite the lack of randomized controlled trials PM for sarcomatous disease is a reasonable therapeutic option with acceptable survival in a selected patient population. In sarcoma patients with a shorter interoperative interval and G3 tumour, shorter survival after PM can be expected.

Management of Sarcoma Metastases to the Lung

For decades, surgical resection of pulmonary metastases has been performed; despite limited randomized data, surgery is increasingly accepted as an integral part in the management of metastatic disease. Long-term results indicate resection is potentially curative with significantly improved survival following complete resection. Recurrence, however, is not uncommon with many patients undergoing repeat resection. With advancing surgical technique and adjuvant therapies, patients with high or recurrent tumor burden are increasingly afforded disease control and potential cure. In this review, the prognostic characteristics of pulmonary metastases from sarcoma, preoperative evaluation, operative technique, long-term outcomes, and management of complex patients are highlighted.

Survival and prognostic factors following pulmonary metastasectomy for sarcoma

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with a marked propensity to metastasize to the lungs. Chemotherapy offers only a limited benefit in metastatic disease, whereas lung metastasectomy, in selected cases, can lead to long-term survival. Other local ablative techniques and hybrid therapies have been proposed. A multidisciplinary setting is of paramount importance for choosing the most appropriate treatment for each case. There is no randomized controlled trial providing formal evidence of the effectiveness of lung metastasectomy. Main areas of controversy concern the selection of surgical candidates, the operative approach and the role of chemotherapy. Five-year survival rates range from 15% to 50.9%, as reported mainly in retrospective case-series in which several prognostic factors were identified. In this article, the authors review the surgical management of sarcoma metastases to the lung, with a particular focus on the outcomes and prognostic factors associated with long-term survival after resection. The role of chemotherapy and other adjunctive therapies is also discussed.

Percutaneous thermal ablation: A new treatment line in the multidisciplinary management of metastatic leiomyosarcoma?

BACKGROUND

The role of percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) in the multidisciplinary management of metastatic leiomyosarcoma (LMS) has not been thoroughly evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single institution retrospective review of all patients with LMS metastases treated with PTA from June 2004 to December 2014. Iterative PTAs were performed as a multifocal treatment for all recurrent or residual macroscopic metastases discovered on imaging after completion of systemic treatment, or alternatively as a targeted treatment of selective metastases found to be progressive on systemic treatment. The primary endpoint was the time to untreatable progression (TTUP), recorded as the time elapsed between the first PTA and the re-initiation of systemic chemotherapy to treat disease progression. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, the 1, 3 and 5-year survival rates, and local control rate.

RESULTS

A total of 93 LMS metastases (average diameter 18.2 mm, range 3-45 mm) were successfully treated in 30 patients over 50 treatment sessions with a median follow-up of 34.6 months. The median TTUP was 14.2 months (range 2.4-122.8). The median overall survival after PTA was 48.3 months and the 1, 3 and 5-year overall survival rates were 96.7% (95%CI 84.3-100.0%), 62.0% (95%CI 45.8-84.0%), and 28.3% (95%CI 13.5-59.1%) respectively. Local control rate at 1 year was 95.2% and at 3 years was 89.4%.

CONCLUSION

Iterative PTA is an effective treatment line option for appropriately selected patients with metastatic LMS that can delay re-initiation of systemic chemotherapy.