Negative pressure wound treatment improves Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score in mediastinitis allowing a successful elective pectoralis muscle flap closure: Six-year experience of a single protocol

Vacuum-assisted closure therapy for the management of deep sternal wound complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy has become a popular treatment option for wound healing. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the use of VAC therapy as a bridge before the definitive treatment for the management of deep sternal wound complications.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed in PubMed and Embase. Outcomes of interest included mortality, treatment failure, length of hospital stay (LOS), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and cost of treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies involving 1980 patients were included in the quantitative synthesis of this meta-analysis. Patients treated with VAC had significantly lower overall mortality [1738 patients; Risk ratio [RR] = 0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 0.51)], treatment failure [1210 patients; RR = 0.26 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.37)], LOS [498 patients; (standard mean difference = -0.44 (95% CI: -0.81, -0.07)] and ICU stay [309 patients; (standard mean difference = -0.34 (95% CI: -0.67, -0.01)] compared to that of non-VAC patients. VAC therapy was associated with reduced cost of treatment per patient compared with that of non-VAC therapies (reductions of 3600 USD, 6000 USD and 8983 USD in the reported studies).

CONCLUSIONS

VAC therapy as an adjunct in the definitive treatment of patients with deep sternal wound complications was associated with lower mortality, treatment failure, LOS, ICU stay and cost of treatment when compared with a non-VAC approach. Randomised controlled trials would be essential to confirm these findings.

Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Post-Surgical Mediastinitis in Adults Consensus Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular Infections (SEICAV), the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SECTCV) and the Biomedical Research Centre Network for Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES)

This is a consensus document of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular Infections (SEICAV), the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SECTCV) and the Biomedical Research Centre Network for Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES). These three entities have brought together a multidisciplinary group of experts that includes anaesthesiologists, cardiac and cardiothoracic surgeons, clinical microbiologists, infectious diseases and intensive care specialists, internal medicine doctors and radiologists. Despite the clinical and economic consequences of sternal wound infections, to date, there are no specific guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and management of mediastinitis based on a multidisciplinary consensus. The purpose of the present document is to provide evidence-based guidance on the most effective diagnosis and management of patients who have experienced or are at risk of developing a post-surgical mediastinitis infection in order to optimise patient outcomes and the process of care. The intended users of the document are health care providers who help patients make decisions regarding their treatment, aiming to optimise the benefits and minimise any harm as well as the workload.

A Comparison of Negative Pressure and Conventional Therapy in Infected Open Chest Wounds

Background: The role of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the management of open chest wounds is unclear. Our aim was to determine the safety and efficacy of NPWT compared with conventional therapy for open chest wounds. Methods: Ten patients with infected open chest wounds were included in a prospective trial of NPWT after surgical debridement. Their outcomes were compared with those of 11 control patients treated during the same period with surgical debridement and open chest packing only. The control group data were obtained by retrospective review of medical records. Results: The median duration of NPWT was eight days (range 2-29 days), with closure in eight patients (80%). Two patients having NPWT had unveiling of occult pleural fistulas leading to early discontinuation. The patients having NPWT had a shorter median time to closure (7 versus 18 days; p = 0.071) and shorter initial (median 6 versus 20 days; p = 0.026) and total (median 6 versus 25 days; p = 0.024) hospital length of stay. Control patients had higher rates of new-onset atrial fibrillation (46% versus 0; p = 0.035) and septic shock (64% versus 10%; p = 0.024). The chest was either closed or healing at the time of the last visit in 100% of the NPWT patients versus 73% of control patients (p = 0.28). The 1-year survival estimates were 90% for the NPWT patients and 80% for the control patients (p = 0.69). Conclusion: Negative pressure wound therapy is feasible and safe for open infected chest wounds in selected patients compared with open packing alone and may reduce hospital stay duration and major complication rates.

Effect of negative pressure wound therapy followed by tissue flaps for deep sternal wound infection after cardiovascular surgery: propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVES

Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) after cardiovascular surgery via median sternotomy remains a severe complication associated with a drastic decrease in the quality of life. We assessed the risk factors for in-hospital death caused by DSWI and the available treatments for DSWI.

METHODS

Between January 1991 and August 2015, we retrospectively reviewed 73 patients (51 males and 22 females, mean age 67.5 ± 10.3 years) who developed DSWI after cardiovascular surgery via median sternotomy. Pathogenic bacteria mainly comprised methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (49.3%). Fifteen patients (20.5%) died in hospital with DSWI. Treatment of DSWI consisted of open daily irrigation (up to 2006) or negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) (2007 onwards), followed by primary closure or reconstruction of tissue flaps. We assessed the risk factors for in-hospital mortality from DSWI by comparing data from the 15 patients who died and the 58 survivors using propensity score matching analysis of the treatments used for DSWI.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis identified age, use of intra-aortic balloon pumping, prolonged mechanical ventilation, tracheotomy, prolonged intensive care unit stay, postoperative low output syndrome, postoperative myocardial infarction, postoperative renal failure, postoperative use of haemodialysis, postoperative pneumonia, postoperative cerebral disorder, MRSA infection, NPWT and tissue flaps as being associated with in-hospital mortality (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified NPWT (odds ratio, 0.062; 95% confidence interval, 0.004-0.897; P = 0.041) and tissue flaps (odds ratio, 0.022; 95% confidence interval, 0.000-0.960; P = 0.048) as independently associated with reduced in-hospital mortality after DSWI. On comparing 22 patients receiving NPWT with 22 not on NPWT using propensity score matching, patients on NPWT had significantly lower in-hospital mortality than those without NPWT (NPWT vs non-NPWT, 5 vs 36%, P = 0.021). In DSWI infected by MRSA, NPWT significantly reduced the in-hospital mortality caused by DSWI (NPWT vs non-NPWT, 0 vs 52%, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

NPWT and tissue flaps may be favourable factors associated with reduced in-hospital mortality attributable to DSWI. NPWT as a bridge therapy to tissue flaps may play a major role in treating DSWI and improve the prognosis for patients with MRSA-infected DSWI.