Can papillary muscle interventions improve mitral valve repair durability for ischemic mitral regurgitation?

Application of polymer-mesh device to remodel left ventricular-mitral valve apparatus in ischemic mitral regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) results from ischemic left ventricular (LV) distortion and remodeling, which displaces the papillary muscles and tethers the mitral valve leaflets apically. The aim of this experimental study was to examine efficacy of an adjustable novel polymer filled mesh (poly-mesh) device to reverse LV remodeling and reduce IMR.

METHODS

Acute (N = 8) and chronic (8 weeks; N = 5) sheep models of IMR were studied. IMR was produced by ligation of circumflex branches to create myocardial infarction. An adjustable poly-mesh device was attached to infarcted myocardium in acute and chronic IMR models and compared with untreated sham sheep. Two- and 3-dimensional echocardiography and hemodynamic measurements were performed at baseline, post IMR, and post poly-mesh (humanely killed).

RESULTS

In acute models, moderate IMR developed in all sheep and decreased to trace/mild (vena contracta: 0.50 ± 0.09 cm to 0.26 ± 0.12 cm; P < .01) after poly-mesh. In chronic models, IMR decreased in all sheep after poly-mesh, and this reduction persisted over 8 weeks (vena contracta: 0.42 ± 0.09 cm to 0.08 ± 0.12 cm; P < .01) with significant increase in the slope of end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (1.1 ± 0.5 mm Hg/mL to 2.9 ± 0.7 mm Hg/mL; P < .05). There was a significant reduction in LV volumes from chronic IMR to euthanasia stage with poly-mesh compared with sham group (%end-diastolic volume change -20 ± 11 vs 15% ± 16%, P < .01; %end-systolic volume change -14% ± 19% vs 22% ± 22%, P < .05; poly-mesh vs sham group) consistent with reverse remodeling.

CONCLUSIONS

An adjustable polymer filled mesh device reduces IMR and prevents continued LV remodeling during chronic follow-up.

Is subvalvular repair worthwhile in severe ischemic mitral regurgitation? Subanalysis of the Papillary Muscle Approximation trial

OBJECTIVE

The symmetry of mitral valve tethering and regional left ventricle wall dysfunction are reported to play a fundamental role in the outcomes and long-term durability of surgical repair in ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). We recently demonstrated in a randomized clinical trial (the Papillary Muscle Approximation trial) the superiority of papillary muscle approximation (PMA) in combination with standard restrictive annuloplasty (RA) in severe IMR over annuloplasty alone in terms of adverse left ventricular remodeling and mitral regurgitation (MR) recurrence. This approach, however, failed to produce a survival advantage and was still plagued by a high incidence of reoperation. We therefore performed a subanalysis of the PMA trial on the basis of preoperative parameters to elucidate the value of subvalvular surgery in certain subcategories of patients with the aim of creating a decisional algorithm on the best operative strategy.

METHODS

We performed a subanalysis of PMA trial, evaluating 96 patients with severe IMR and eligible for myocardial revascularization randomized to PMA + RA (n = 48) versus RA alone (n = 48) in association with coronary artery bypass grafting. Endpoints included left ventricular remodeling, MR recurrence, overall mortality, reoperation, and a composite cardiac endpoint (cardiac death, stroke, reintervention, hospitalization for heart failure, or New York Heart Association class worsening). Stratification variables were preoperative symmetry of mitral valve tethering and regional wall motion abnormality.

RESULTS

PMA improved ventricular remodeling and recurrence of MR in both preoperative symmetric and asymmetric tethering and in case of inferior wall dyskinesia but did not produce an additional benefit in anterolateral wall dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative symmetric and asymmetric tethering and isolated inferior wall dyskinesia are an indication for subvalvular apparatus surgery in IMR.