A new staging system for thymoma—will it improve outcomes?

On the Histologic Classification of Thymoma

The classification of thymoma continues to be a source of controversy in pathology. The difficulties in histologic classification are evident from the number of proposals that have been offered over the years, as well as for the continuous changes and modifications introduced by the World Health Organization to their classification system over the past 20 years. We analyze here some of the issues involved in the classification of these tumors and the difficulties encountered for practicing pathologists in deciphering the "letters and numbers" system devised by the World Health Organization. We would like to propose an alternate approach to thymoma histologic classification that capitalizes on the basic observation of their cytologic features and incorporates the pattern of growth resulting from the interplay of the tumor cells with other cellular constituents as a secondary characteristic. The proposed histologic classification provides a simplified, reproducible means of histologically categorizing these tumors and can be easily understood by most practicing pathologists in simple and clear morphologic terms.

Classification and staging of thymoma

The appropriate therapy and prognosis of patients with thymic malignancies is decisively influenced by the local extent and dissemination of the tumor. For this reason, a staging system that reflects these factors is essential. Mainly the Masaoka-Koga classification, which was introduced in 1994, has been applied for this purpose. The rarity of thymic malignancies makes it difficult not only to establish internationally standardized diagnostics and treatment, but also to progress staging. Besides, efforts were made to adapt the classification into a tumor-node-metastasis-based (TNM) system for standardization with the staging of other tumor entities. The 2017 published 8th edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors introduced several adjustments based on a proposal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) and the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG). Compared to the Masaoka-Koga classification, surgically good resectable tumor involvements like pericardium, mediastinal fat or mediastinal pleura have been shifted to lower stages. Thus, even more than in Masaoka-Koga classification, tumors are basically divided into completely resectable and thus surgically treatable tumors (stage I, II, IIIA) and advanced stages (stage IIIB, IVA and IVB) that require multimodal therapy.

A nomogram for predicting recurrence after complete resection for thymic epithelial tumors based on the TNM classification: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the predictive ability between the Masaoka-Koga (M-K) staging system and the 8th TNM staging system for the recurrence of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). In addition, a nomogram was developed on the basis of the proposed TNM classification to predict individual recurrence rate.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 445 patients who underwent complete resection (R0) of TETs between January 2000 and February 2013. Concordance index (C-index) was used as a statistical indicator to quantify the prediction power of the prediction models.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, tumor stage and WHO classification were independent recurrence factors in a predictive model on the basis of M-K and TNM stage. The TNM model showed higher C-index than the M-K model (0.837 vs 0.817). The nomogram, on the basis of the TNM model, revealed a highly predictive performance, with a bootstrap-corrected C-index of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

A predictive model based on the 8th TNM stage was slightly better than that based on M-K stage with respect to recurrence after R0 of TETs. The proposed nomogram could be applied to estimate the individual recurrence rate and make decisions for proper surveillance.

Evaluation of the new TNM-staging system for thymic malignancies: impact on indication and survival

Background

The objective of this study is the evaluation of the Masaoka-Koga and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC)/International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) proposal for the new TNM-staging system on clinical implementation and prognosis of thymic malignancies.

Methods

A retrospective study of 76 patients who underwent surgery between January 2005 and December 2015 for thymoma. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to determine overall and recurrence-free survival rates.

Results

Indication for surgery was primary mediastinal tumor (n = 55), pleural manifestation (n = 17), or mediastinal recurrence (n = 4) after surgery for thymoma. Early Masaoka-Koga stages I (n = 9) and II (n = 14) shifted to the new stage I (n = 23). Advanced stages III (Masaoka-Koga: n = 20; ITMIG/IASLC: n = 17) and IV (Masaoka-Koga: n = 33; ITMIG/IASLC: n = 35) remained nearly similar and were associated with higher levels of WHO stages. Within each staging system, the survival curves differed significantly with the best 5-year survival in early stages I and II (91%). Survival for stage IV (70 to 77%) was significantly better compared to stage III (49 to 54%). Early stages had a significant longer recurrence-free survival (86 to 90%) than advanced stages III and IV (55 to 56%).

Conclusions

The proportion of patients with IASLC/ITMIG stage I increased remarkably, whereas the distribution in advanced stages III and IV was nearly similar. The new TNM-staging system presents a clinically useful and applicable system, which can be used for indication, stage-adapted therapy, and prediction of prognosis for overall and recurrence-free survival.