Physical and mental recovery after conventional aortic valve surgery

Hospital infections and health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery: a multicenter survey

BACKGROUND

Recent research suggested that hospital infections are a predictive marker for physical non-recovery one year after cardiothoracic surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore whether this risk factor is etiologic. Additional, the influence of a potential effect modifying factor, diabetes mellitus, was investigated.

METHODS

In this multicenter study, patients underwent elective or urgent cardiothoracic surgery between 01-01-2015 and 31-12-2019, and completed pre- and one year post-operative Short Form Health Survey 36/12 quality of life questionnaires. A binary logistic regression model, in which the inverse of the propensity score for infection risk was included as a weight variable, was used. Second, this analysis was stratified for diabetes mellitus status.

RESULTS

8577 patients were included. After weighing for the propensity score, the standardized mean differences of all variables decreased and indicated sufficient balance between the infection and non-infection groups. Hospital infections were found to be a risk factor for non-recovery after cardiothoracic surgery in the original and imputed dataset before weighting. However, after propensity score weighing, hospital infections did not remain significantly associated with recovery (OR for recovery = 0.79; 95% CI [0.60-1.03]; p = 0.077). No significant interaction between diabetes mellitus and hospital infections on recovery was found (p = 0.845).

CONCLUSIONS

This study could not convincingly establish hospital infections as an etiologic risk factor for non-improvement of physical recovery in patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery. In addition, there was no differential effect of hospital infections on non-improvement of physical recovery for patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Trial registration International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ID NL9818; date of registration, 22-10-2021 ( https://trialsearch.who.int/ ).

Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on pre- and post-operative transcatheter aortic valve replacement prognoses

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a relatively new treatment method for aortic stenosis (AS) and has been demonstrated to be suitable for patients with varying risk levels. Indeed, among high-risk patients, TAVR outcomes are comparable to, or even better, than that of the traditional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) method. TAVR outcomes, with respect to post-surgical functional capacity and quality of life, have also been found to be improved, especially when combined with cardiac rehabilitation (CR). CR is a multidisciplinary system, which integrates cardiology with other medical disciplines, such as sports, nutritional, mind-body, and behavioral medicine. It entails the development of appropriate medication, exercise, and diet prescriptions, along with providing psychological support, ensuring the cessation of smoking, and developing risk factor management strategies for cardiovascular disease patients. However, even with CR being able to improve TAVR outcomes and reduce post-surgical mortality rates, it still has largely been underutilized in clinical settings. This article reviews the usage of CR during both pre-and postoperative periods for valvular diseases, and the factors involved in influencing subsequent patient prognoses, thereby providing a direction for subsequent research and clinical applications.

Physical and Mental Recovery after Aortic Valve Surgery in Non-Elderly Patients: Native Valve-Preserving Surgery vs. Prosthetic Valve Replacement

Background: Exercise capacity and patient-reported outcomes are increasingly considered crucial following aortic valve (AV) surgery in non-elderly adults. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the effect of native valve preservation compared with prosthetic valve replacement. Methods: From October 2017 to August 2020, 100 consecutive non-elderly patients undergoing surgery for severe AV disease were included. Exercise capacity and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated upon admission, and 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Results: In total, 72 patients underwent native valve-preserving procedures (AV repair or Ross procedure, NV group), and 28 patients, prosthetic valve replacement (PV group). Native valve preservation was associated with an increased risk of reoperation (weighted hazard ratio: 10.57 (95% CI: 1.24-90.01), p = 0.031). The estimated average treatment effect on six-minute walking distance in NV patients at 1 year was positive, but not significant (35.64 m; 95% CI: -17.03-88.30, adj. p = 0.554). The postoperative physical and mental quality of life was comparable in both groups. Peak oxygen consumption and work rate were better at all assessment time points in NV patients. Marked longitudinal improvements in walking distance (NV, +47 m (adj. p < 0.001); PV, +25 m (adj. p = 0.004)) and physical (NV, +7 points (adj. p = 0.023); PV, +10 points (adj. p = 0.005)) and mental quality of life (NV, +7 points (adj. p < 0.001); PV, +5 points (adj. p = 0.058)) from the preoperative period to the 1-year follow-up were observed. At 1 year, there was a tendency of more NV patients reaching reference values of walking distance. Conclusions: Despite the increased risk of reoperation, physical and mental performance markedly improved after native valve-preserving surgery and was comparable to that after prosthetic aortic valve replacement.

Ansiedade cardíaca no período perioperatório de pacientes submetidos a procedimentos cirúrgicos cardíacos: estudo observacional

RESUMO Objetivo: comparar os sintomas de ansiedade cardíaca em pacientes submetidos às cirurgias de revascularização do miocárdio e de correção de valvopatias no pré-operatório, no dia da alta hospitalar e no primeiro retorno após a alta hospitalar. Métodos: estudo observacional, realizado nas unidades de internação e no ambulatório de um hospital universitário. Os dados foram coletados por entrevistas. Os sintomas de ansiedade cardíaca foram avaliados utilizando o Questionário de Ansiedade Cardíaca. Resultados: observamos o efeito do tempo nos sintomas de ansiedade cardíaca dos pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio no escore total e no domínio “Evitação” na alta e no primeiro retorno. Em pacientes submetidos à correção cirúrgica de valvopatias, observou-se o efeito do tempo nos sintomas apenas no primeiro retorno, quando comparados com o pré-operatório. Conclusão: os achados revelaram o aumento dos sintomas de ansiedade cardíaca no pós-operatório, alta e primeiro retorno, quando comparados com o pré-operatório.

Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patients' expectations: Study protocol of the randomized controlled ValvEx-trial

Introduction

Complete recovery after surgery depends on psychological factors such as preoperative information, expectations, and surgery-associated anxiety. Prior studies have shown that even a short preoperative psychological intervention aiming at optimized expectations (EXPECT) can improve postoperative outcomes in coronary artery bypass patients. However, this intervention may benefit only a small subgroup of heart surgery patients since implementing preoperative psychological interventions into the daily clinical routine is difficult due to the additional time and appointments. It is unclear whether the EXPECT intervention can be shortened and whether heart valve patients would also benefit from interventions that optimize patients' expectations. The multicenter ValvEx trial aims (i) to adapt an effective preoperative psychological intervention (EXPECT) to make it brief enough to be easily integrated into the preoperative routine of heart valve patients and (ii) to examine if the adapted preoperative psychological intervention improves the subjectively perceived illness-related disability (PDI) up to 3 months after surgery.

Materials and analysis

In two German university hospitals, N = 88 heart valve patients who undergo heart surgery are randomized into two groups [standard of care (SOC) vs. standard of care plus interventional expectation manipulation (SOC and EXPECT)] after baseline assessment. Patients in the EXPECT group additionally to standard of care participate in the preoperative psychological intervention (30-40 min), focusing on optimizing expectations and have two booster-telephone calls (4 and 8 weeks after the surgery, approx. 15 min). Both groups have assessments again on the evening before the surgery, 4 to 6 days, and 3 months after the surgery.

Discussion

The trial demonstrates excellent feasibility in the clinical routine and a high interest by the patients.

Ethics and dissemination

The Ethics Committees of the Department of Medicine of the Philipps University of Marburg and the Department of Medicine of the University of Giessen approved the study protocol. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at congresses.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04502121.

Cardiac anxiety in the perioperative period of patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

to compare cardiac anxiety symptoms in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and valve surgery repair in the preoperative period, on the day of hospital discharge and on the first return visit after hospital discharge.

METHODS

an observational study, carried out in inpatient units and in outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Data were collected through interviews. Cardiac anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire.

RESULTS

we observed the effect of time on cardiac anxiety symptoms of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft in the total score and in the "Avoidance" domain at discharge and at the first return visit. In patients undergoing valve repair surgery, the effect of time on symptoms was observed only in the first return visit, when compared with the preoperative period.

CONCLUSION

the findings revealed increased cardiac anxiety symptoms in the postoperative period, discharge and first return, when compared to the preoperative period.

The Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Perioperative Neurocognitive Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine the effect of DEX on delayed dNCR (cognitive dysfunction ≥ 1 week postoperative) after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND

DEX has salutary effects on cognitive outcomes following cardiac surgery, however, studies are limited by inconsistent assessment tools, timing, and definitions of dysfunction. It is imperative to identify accurate point estimates of effect of DEX on clinically relevant changes in cognitive function.

METHODS

Randomized trials of adults undergoing cardiac surgery comparing perioperative DEX to placebo or alternate sedation and assessing cognitive function ≥ 1 week postoperative were included. Data was abstracted by three reviewers independently and in parallel according to PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome is dNCR. To classify as dNCR, cognitive function must decrease by at least the minimal clinically important difference or accepted alternate measure (eg, Reliable Change Index ≥1.96). Bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Data was pooled using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Nine trials (942 participants) were included in qualitative analysis, of which seven were included in the meta-analysis of dNCR. DEX reduced the incidence of dNCR (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.61, P < 0.0001) compared to placebo/no DEX. There was no difference in the incidence of delirium (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.35-1.34, P = 0.27) or incidence of hemodynamic instability (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.59-2.18, P = 0.70) associated with perioperative DEX.

CONCLUSIONS

DEX reduced the incidence of dNCR 1 week after cardiac surgery. Although this meta-analysis demonstrates short term cognitive outcomes are improved after cardiac surgery with perioperative DEX, future trials examining long term cognitive outcomes, using robust cognitive assessments, and new perioperative neurocognitive disorders nomenclature with objective diagnostic criteria are necessary.

Quality of Life Is Improved 1 Year After Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

Quality of life (QoL) is increasingly important in the era of patient-centered outcomes and value-based reimbursement. However most follow-up is limited to 30 days, and long-term data on QoL improvement associated with symptom relief are lacking. Therefore we sought to analyze QoL after cardiac surgery in a nonemergent, all-comers population.

METHODS

Four hundred two patients undergoing routine cardiac surgery at 2 large urban hospitals in the Dallas, Texas area were enrolled. Follow-up was complete for 364 patients. Data were collected from August 2013 to January 2017. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire was administered at baseline, 1 month, and 1 year after surgery. Repeated-measures analysis was used for each domain of the questionnaire for all procedures and stratified by procedure. If time was found to be a significant factor, pairwise analysis was performed with P values adjusted using the Tukey-Kramer method.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase across all domains of Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores for all procedures and for most domains when stratifying by procedure. This increase in QoL was most marked after 1 month. All domain scores increased through 1 year except symptom stability, which peaked at 1 month postsurgery and then regressed at 1 year, suggesting an overall improvement and stabilization of symptoms. The occurrence of complications did not alter this trajectory.

CONCLUSIONS

QoL and other patient-centered outcomes are improved at 1 month and continue to improve throughout the year. Knowledge of these data is important for patient selection, fully informed consent, and shared decision-making.

Protocol for project recovery after cardiac surgery: a single-center cohort study leveraging digital platform to characterise longitudinal patient-reported postoperative recovery patterns

INTRODUCTION

Improving postoperative patient recovery after cardiac surgery is a priority, but our current understanding of individual variations in recovery and factors associated with poor recovery is limited. We are using a health-information exchange platform to collect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and wearable device data to phenotype recovery patterns in the 30-day period after cardiac surgery hospital discharge, to identify factors associated with these phenotypes and to investigate phenotype associations with clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We designed a prospective cohort study to enrol 200 patients undergoing valve, coronary artery bypass graft or aortic surgery at a tertiary centre in the USA. We are enrolling patients postoperatively after the intensive care unit discharge and delivering electronic surveys directly to patients every 3 days for 30 days after hospital discharge. We will conduct medical record reviews to collect patient demographics, comorbidity, operative details and hospital course using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons data definitions. We will use phone interview and medical record review data for adjudication of survival, readmission and complications. We will apply group-based trajectory modelling to the time-series PROM and device data to classify patients into distinct categories of recovery trajectories. We will evaluate whether certain recovery pattern predicts death or hospital readmissions, as well as whether clinical factors predict a patient having poor recovery trajectories. We will evaluate whether early recovery patterns predict the overall trajectory at the patient-level.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Yale Institutional Review Board approved this study. Following the description of the study procedure, we obtain written informed consent from all study participants. The consent form states that all personal information, survey response and any medical records are confidential, will not be shared and are stored in an encrypted database. We plan to publish our study findings in peer-reviewed journals.

Long-Term Outcome and Quality of Life After Biological Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonelderly Adults

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a standard of care in the treatment of aortic stenosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term outcome and quality of life (QoL) after biological AVR in patients younger than 60 years of age.

METHODS

A total of 354 consecutive patients less than or equal to 60 years who underwent biological AVR at our institution (2005-2015) were included. The primary endpoint was actual freedom from AV reintervention, and secondary endpoints were actual freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) as well as mental and physical QoL.

RESULTS

Mean age was 52.3 ± 7.1 years and mean follow-up duration was 78.7 ± 38.1 months. Overall survival at 5, 10, and 12 years was 87.6%, 76.3%, and 63.5%, and actual freedom from AV reintervention was 85.5%, 67.8%, and 52.9%, respectively. Actual freedom from MACCE was 82.8%, 63.2%, and 50.4%, respectively. Cox regression revealed concomitant coronary artery disease (P < .001) and creatinine at baseline (P < .001) as independent predictors of survival, AV reintervention, and MACCE. Physical QoL was similar (P = .427) and mental QoL (P = .005) was significantly better compared with the published age-matched control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Biological AVR in patients less than or equal to 60 years of age is associated with a significant occurrence of actual AV reintervention and MACCE at 10 to 12 years. Mental QoL after biological AVR was superior compared with healthy control subjects. The effect of the most recently developed bioprosthesis, specifically for younger patients, needs to be evaluated. Therefore, a shared decision-making process in prosthetic AV selection is mandatory in AVR patients less than or equal to 60 years of age.

Relationship between emotional states before cardiac valve surgeries with postoperative complications

OBJECTIVE

To investigate associations between preoperative anxiety and depression symptoms and postoperative complications and the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing valve repair surgery.

METHOD

Observational, exploratory and prospective study. The consecutive non-probabilistic sample consisted of patients undergoing their first valve repair surgery. Data were collected from September 2013 to September 2015, in a university hospital in the interior of São Paulo, Brazil. Symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and analyzed using Mann-Whitney and Spearman correlation; alpha was established at 5%.

RESULTS

Among the 70 participants, depressive symptoms were more frequent among women (p=0.042) and among patients experiencing postoperative agitation (p=0.039) Conclusion: In this study, depressive symptoms were associated with being a woman and postoperative agitation; the same was not true in regard to anxiety symptoms.

Characterizing Patient-Centered Postoperative Recovery After Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review

Background

Improving postoperative recovery is important, with a national focus on postacute care, but the volume and quality of evidence in this area are not well characterized. We conducted a systematic review to characterize studies on postoperative recovery after adult cardiac surgery using patient‐reported outcome measures.

Methods and Results

From MEDLINE and Web of Science, studies were included if they prospectively assessed postoperative recovery on adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using patient‐reported outcome measures. Six recovery domains were defined by prior literature: nociceptive symptoms, mental health, physical function, activities of daily living, sleep, and cognitive function. Of the 3432 studies, 105 articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies were small (median sample size, 119), and mostly conducted in single‐center settings (n=81; 77%). Study participants were predominantly men (71%) and white (88%). Coronary artery bypass graft was included in 93% (n=98). Studies commonly selected for elective cases (n=56; 53%) and patients with less comorbidity (n=67; 64%). Median follow‐up duration was 91 (interquartile range, 42–182) days. Studies most commonly assessed 1 domain (n=42; 40%). The studies also varied in the instruments used and differed in their reporting approach. Studies commonly excluded patients who died during the follow‐up period (n=48; 46%), and 45% (n=47) did not specify how those patients were analyzed.

Conclusions

Studies of postoperative patient‐reported outcome measures are low in volume, most often single site without external validation, varied in their approach to missing data, and narrow in the domains and diversity of patients. The evidence base for postoperative patient‐reported outcome measures needs to be strengthened.

Psychiatric disturbances in patients undergoing open-heart surgery

Background

Emotional and behavioral problems have been noted in a considerable number of patients after open-heart surgery. However, great discrepancy exists in the literature regarding the frequency and the course of psychiatric symptoms, cognitive performance, and quality of life among those patients. This prospective study was designed to assess the pre- and postoperative psychiatric profile, as well as the quality of life of patients undergoing open-heart surgery.

Methods

One hundred patients who were prepared for cardiac surgery and met our selection criteria were recruited in this study. Each patient was subjected to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination with selective subtests of Wechsler Adult intelligence scale, and the Short Form 36 questionnaire to assess psychiatric symptoms, cognitive performance, and quality of life respectively. Assessment was done for each of the evaluated items before surgery as well as at 1 week and 6 months postoperatively.

Results

The anxiety and depressive symptoms were significantly lower at 6 months postoperatively than preoperatively. The cognitive performance declined after 1 week, then improved significantly at the 6-month follow-up. The quality of life scale was significantly lower preoperatively than after surgery.

Conclusions

Anxiety and depressive symptoms, which occurred in substantial percentage of patients undergoing open-heart surgery, were gradually improved with time. Cognitive functions showed early deterioration with significant improvement at 6 months. Psychiatric problems had an adverse impact on patients’ quality of life which raised the importance of psychiatric consultation before and after cardiac surgeries to shorten recovery time.

Quality of life after elective cardiac surgery in elderly patients

OBJECTIVES

Cardiac surgery has little effect on life expectancy in elderly patients. Thus, improving the quality of life should be the main factor affecting therapeutic decisions. Most studies on quality of life in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery report improvement but have limitations. Consequently, we assessed improvements in the quality of life of elderly patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery, identified influencing variables and established patterns of mental and physical health variations in the first year postoperatively.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of patients aged 65 or older who underwent elective cardiac surgery between September 2011 and August 2013. The 36-item Short Form (SF-36) surveys were obtained preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The 430 preoperative patients with a mean age of 74 years (SD 5.5 years) comprised 220 men. Most physical health improvements occurred within 3 months and continued to improve significantly until 12 months. Predictive variables for patients showing less improvement were poor preoperative physical health, female sex, older age and longer length of hospital stay. Mental health improved significantly through the third postoperative month. The negative predictive variables were poor preoperative mental health and longer intensive care unit stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients improved both physically and mentally after surgery, and most of the improvement occurred within 3 months post-surgery. These improvement patterns should be taken into account when creating rehabilitation programmes, and patients should be counselled on what improvements can be expected during the first 12 months after surgery.