Borderline left ventricle: Trying to see the forest for the trees

Biventricular Conversion for Hypoplastic Left Heart Variants: An Update

Ongoing concerns with single-ventricle palliation morbidity and poor outcomes from primary biventricular strategies for neonates with borderline left heart structures have led some centers to attempt alternative strategies to obviate the need for ultimate Fontan palliation and limit the risk to the child during the vulnerable neonatal period. In certain patients who are traditionally palliated toward single-ventricle circulation, biventricular circulation is possible. This review aims to delineate the current knowledge regarding converting certain patients with borderline left heart structures from single-ventricle palliation toward biventricular circulation.

Modern advances regarding interatrial communication in congenital heart defects

BACKGROUND

The interatrial communication, one of the most frequent congenital heart defects, represents an important intracardiac shunt between systemic and pulmonary circulations. Direction and magnitude of the interatrial shunting depends upon several features, including defect size, shape and location, pressure difference between right and left atrium, and difference in right and left ventricular compliance.

METHODS

In this review article, the presence or absence of interatrial communication, and its role, have been analyzed, as they can have a critical impact on the cardiovascular physiopathology, and the interatrial communication can prove to be either clinically harmful, useful or indispensable. Accordingly, the utility and role of the interatrial communication in modern congenital, pediatric and adult, disease has evolved, with modification of the indications to close, maintain patency, or create an interatrial communication.

RESULTS

The interatrial communication and shunting can be manipulated to maximize the oxygen delivery to the tissues, accordingly with the underlying congenital heart defect. While not always relevant to patients with bi-ventricular circulations, this becomes extremely important in children and adults with complex congenital heart defects.

CONCLUSIONS

With improving long-term survival for the vast majority of congenital heart patients, an advanced understanding of the role and utility of the interatrial communication, and of all the possibilities of its manipulation, is essential to improve the patient outcomes.

A narrative review of modern approach and outcomes evaluation in congenital heart defects

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to highlight critical advances and innovative approaches to the most challenging clinical situations in congenital heart surgery, to establish a new perspective from which to evaluate current clinical practice patterns and contemporary United States program ranking systems.

BACKGROUND

The past decades have witnessed substantial advances in the treatment of congenital heart defects. New strategies are deeply rooted in calculated risk-taking innovations. Pioneer surgeons developed, improved and refined critical operative skills and techniques to optimize cardiovascular physiology, decrease operative mortality and improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Unfortunately, in the modern surgical era, supportive environments to allow surgeons to make similar gains and innovative contributions remain scarce. In the current practice, overall procedure volume is prioritized to safeguard quality metrics, including hospital survival and length of stay, surgical complications, and neurocognitive outcomes. As a result, exceptional surgical results have become translated and defined by public ranking systems such as the US News and World Report Best Children's Hospital National Ranking (USNWR) and the Congenital Heart Surgery Database of the Society for Thoracic Surgeons (CHSD-STS), primary based upon early post-operative mortality. This reality places surgeons in a vulnerable position where pressure to achieve a high clinical ranking contrasts with a surgeon definition of "acceptable" surgical risk. Currently, the most frequently used risk stratification tools do not factor in important differences in strategies, such as staged palliation versus complete repair, or bi-ventricular versus uni-ventricular physiology. This favors hospitals pursuing multistage surgical approaches, even if the result is worse long-term morbidity, mortality and increased resource utilization. This economy of ranking-based decision-making causes surgeons either avoid operating altogether or accept less advantageous multi-staged treatment strategies for patients with elevated expected mortality. Such an environment also might present much farther-reaching negative impacts on the growth and development of junior surgeons and trainees, as well as on the pursuit of new surgical innovations to aid future generations of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk aversive surgical behavior is creating an environment not favorable for the children born with truly complex congenital heart defects.

KEYWORDS

Biventricular conversion; congenital heart surgery; multidisciplinary approach; risk-stratification; surgical outcomes.