1
|
Nappi F. Native Infective Endocarditis: A State-of-the-Art-Review. Microorganisms 2024; 12:1481. [PMID: 39065249 PMCID: PMC11278776 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12071481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Revised: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Native valve infective endocarditis (NVE) is a global phenomenon, defined by infection of a native heart valve and involving the endocardial surface. The causes and epidemiology of the disease have evolved in recent decades, with a doubling of the average patient age. A higher incidence was observed in patients with implanted cardiac devices that can result in right-sided infection of the tricuspid valve. The microbiology of the disease has also changed. Previously, staphylococci, which are most often associated with health-care contact and invasive procedures, were the most common cause of the disease. This has now been superseded by streptococci. While innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have emerged, mortality rates have not improved and remain at 30%, which is higher than that for many cancer diagnoses. The lack of randomized trials and logistical constraints impede clinical management, and long-standing controversies such as the use of antibiotic prophylaxis persist. This state of the art review addresses clinical practice, controversies, and strategies to combat this potentially devastating disease. A multidisciplinary team will be established to provide care for patients with presumptive NVE. The composition of the team will include specialists in cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, and infectious disease. The prompt administration of combination antimicrobial therapy is essential for effective NVE treatment. Additionally, a meticulous evaluation of each patient is necessary in order to identify any indications for immediate valve surgery. With the intention of promoting a more comprehensive understanding of the procedural management of native infective endocarditis and to furnish clinicians with a reference, the current evidence for the utilization of distinct strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of NVE are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, 93200 Saint-Denis, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nappi F, Avtaar Singh SS, Jitendra V, Fiore A. Bridging Molecular and Clinical Sciences to Achieve the Best Treatment of Enterococcus faecalis Endocarditis. Microorganisms 2023; 11:2604. [PMID: 37894262 PMCID: PMC10609379 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is a commensal bacterium that causes various infections in surgical sites, the urinary tract, and blood. The bacterium is becoming a significant concern because it tends to affect the elderly population, which has a high prevalence of undiagnosed degenerative valvular disease and is often subjected to invasive procedures and implanted medical devices. The bacterium's actions are influenced by specific characteristics like pili activity and biofilm formation. This resistance significantly impedes the effectiveness of numerous antibiotic therapies, particularly in cases of endocarditis. While current guidelines recommend antimicrobial therapy, the emergence of resistant strains has introduced complexity in managing these patients, especially with the increasing use of transcatheter therapies for those who are not suitable for surgery. Presentations of the condition are often varied and associated with generalised symptoms, which may pose a diagnostic challenge. We share our encounter with a case study that concerns an octogenarian who had a TAVI valve and developed endocarditis. We also conducted a literature review to identify the essential treatment algorithms for such cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, 93200 Saint-Denis, France
| | | | - Vikram Jitendra
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK;
| | - Antonio Fiore
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 94000 Creteil, France;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nappi F, Schoell T, Spadaccio C, Acar C, da Costa FDA. A Literature Review on the Use of Aortic Allografts in Modern Cardiac Surgery for the Treatment of Infective Endocarditis: Is There Clear Evidence or Is It Merely a Perception? Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1980. [PMID: 37895362 PMCID: PMC10608498 DOI: 10.3390/life13101980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Infective valve endocarditis is caused by different pathogens and 60% of those involve the aortic valve with valve failure. Although S. aureus is recognized as the most frequently isolated causative bacterium associated with IE in high-income countries, Gram-positive cocci nevertheless play a crucial role in promoting infection in relation to their adhesive matrix molecules. The presence of pili on the surface of Gram-positive bacteria such as in different strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus spp., grants these causative pathogens a great offensive capacity due to the formation of biofilms and resistance to antibiotics. The indications and timing of surgery in endocarditis are debated as well as the choice of the ideal valve substitute to replace the diseased valve(s) when repair is not possible. We reviewed the literature and elaborated a systematic approach to endocarditis management based on clinical, microbiological, and anatomopathological variables known to affect postoperative outcomes with the aim to stratify the patients and orient decision making. From this review emerges significant findings on the risk of infection in the allograft used in patients with endocarditis and no endocarditis etiology suggesting that the use of allografts has proved safety and effectiveness in patients with both pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, 93200 Saint-Denis, France;
| | - Thibaut Schoell
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, 93200 Saint-Denis, France;
| | - Cristiano Spadaccio
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Center, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool FY3 8NP, UK;
| | - Christophe Acar
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Boulevard de Hôpital 47-83, 75013 Paris, France;
| | - Francisco Diniz Affonso da Costa
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Instituto de Neurologia e Cardiologia de Curitiba—INC Cardio, Curitiba 81210-310, Parana, Brazil;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nappi F, Avtaar Singh SS. Host-Bacterium Interaction Mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus Endocarditis: A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11068. [PMID: 37446247 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241311068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Staphylococci sp. are the most commonly associated pathogens in infective endocarditis, especially within high-income nations. This along with the increasing burden of healthcare, aging populations, and the protracted infection courses, contribute to a significant challenge for healthcare systems. A systematic review was conducted using relevant search criteria from PubMed, Ovid's version of MEDLINE, and EMBASE, and data were tabulated from randomized controlled trials (RCT), observational cohort studies, meta-analysis, and basic research articles. The review was registered with the OSF register of systematic reviews and followed the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final systematic review. The role of Staphylococcus aureus and its interaction with the protective shield and host protection functions was identified and highlighted in several studies. The interaction between infective endocarditis pathogens, vascular endothelium, and blood constituents was also explored, giving rise to the potential use of antiplatelets as preventative and/or curative agents. Several factors allow Staphylococcus aureus infections to proliferate within the host with numerous promoting and perpetuating agents. The complex interaction with the hosts' innate immunity also potentiates its virulence. The goal of this study is to attain a better understanding on the molecular pathways involved in infective endocarditis supported by S. aureus and whether therapeutic avenues for the prevention and treatment of IE can be obtained. The use of antibiotic-treated allogeneic tissues have marked antibacterial action, thereby becoming the ideal substitute in native and prosthetic valvular infections. However, the development of effective vaccines against S. aureus still requires in-depth studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, 93200 Saint-Denis, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
The New Challenge for Heart Endocarditis: From Conventional Prosthesis to New Devices and Platforms for the Treatment of Structural Heart Disease. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:7302165. [PMID: 34222484 PMCID: PMC8219429 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7302165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Infective endocarditis is a sinister condition with considerable morbidity and mortality. Its relevance in the current era is compounded by the increased use of implanted devices such as replacement valves or cardiac implantable electronic devices. These infections are caused by multiple different bacteria with different virulence, pathogenicity, and antimicrobial resistance. Unlike in native endocarditis, the presence of foreign tissue permits sustenance by inflammatory and thrombotic processes as the artificial surfaces promote inflammatory responses and hypercoagulability. Prevention of these infections has been suggested with the use of homografts in combination with antibiotics. Others have attempted to use "low fouling coats" with little clinical success thus far. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis plays a pivotal part in reducing the incidence of prosthesis-related endocarditis. This remains especially crucial with the increasing use of transcatheter heart valve therapies. The widespread use of cardiac implantable electronic devices such as permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices has also heralded a noticeable increase in cases of infectious endocarditis affecting complex equipment which can be difficult to treat. Multimodality strategies are needed with input from surgeons and cardiologists to ensure treatment is both prompt and successful, tailored to the individual needs of the patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Benedetto U, Spadaccio C, Gentile F, Moon MR, Nappi F. A narrative review of early surgery versus conventional treatment for infective endocarditis: do we have an answer? ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1626. [PMID: 33437825 PMCID: PMC7791236 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The most appropriate strategy and timing for surgery in infective endocarditis (IE) remains an argument of debate. Despite some authors promote the adoption of an early surgical approach (within 48 hours) to limit mortality and complications, no robust randomized trials are available on this argument and the evidence on this subject remain at the "expert opinion" level. Additionally, the different messages promulgated by the American and European guidelines contributed to fuel confusion regarding the relative priority of the surgical over medical therapy in IE. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines individuates three level of urgency: emergency surgery, to be performed within 24 hours; urgent surgery, recommended within a few days; elective surgery to be performed after 1-2 weeks of antibiotic therapy. Urgent surgery is recommended for most cases of IE. In the American Heart Association (AHA)'s guidelines define early surgery as "during the initial hospitalization and before completion of a full course of antibiotics." Some of the available evidences showed that are no proven benefits in delaying surgery if a definite diagnosis of IE has been established. However, this argument is controversial across the literature and several factors including the center specific experience can play a role in decision-making. In this review the latest evidences on IE clinical and surgical characteristics along with the current studies on the adoption of an early surgical approach are analyzed to clarify whether enough evidence is available to inform an update of the guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Benedetto
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Cristiano Spadaccio
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.,Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Marc R Moon
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Benedetto U, Avtaar Singh SS, Spadaccio C, Moon MR, Nappi F. A narrative review of the interpretation of guidelines for the treatment of infective endocarditis. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1623. [PMID: 33437822 PMCID: PMC7791230 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The recommendations of the current guidelines and the position papers of professional societies from the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons (ESC), the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society of Thoracic Surgeon (ACC/AHA/STS) and American Association of Thoracic Surgeon (AATS) regarding management of patients with valvular heart endocarditis were updated over the past decade. However, some of the recommendations appear to contradict one another. Given the changing paradigms on how the disease manifests, our aim was to review the respective guidelines and highlight these differences whilst drawing attention to the subsequent studies from which they were derived. In particular, concerns regarding antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy, imaging modality for diagnosis and follow-up, cerebrovascular sequalae and timing of surgery are appraised in detail. We also identified the novel techniques used such as transcatheter therapies and advances in imaging modalities used for diagnosis and treatment of this condition. The lack of randomised control trials (RCTs) does raise several issues regarding applicability of findings in day-to-day practice. Therefore, the focus of upcoming studies should be on clearly defined multicenter RCTs to provide more robust evidence for the management and treatment of infective endocarditis as future guidelines will be based on the outcomes of these trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Benedetto
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.,Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Cristiano Spadaccio
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.,Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Marc R Moon
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pollari F, Spadaccio C, Cuomo M, Chello M, Nenna A, Fischlein T, Nappi F. Sharing of decision-making for infective endocarditis surgery: a narrative review of clinical and ethical implications. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1624. [PMID: 33437823 PMCID: PMC7791252 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Infective endocarditis (IE) is nowadays one of the most challenging disease in cardiac surgery because of its multifaceted clinical and anatomical presentation. Despite the many clinical and surgical advances achieved in the past 60 years, there is a lack of evidence regarding the ideal strategy. The present review aims to investigate and highlight two main novel concepts for the decision-making of the best substitute. Firstly, the concept of an "endocarditis team": a coordinated multidisciplinary effort in the diagnostic work-up, especially in conditions of high risk of embolization or clinical deterioration. A good "endocarditis team" has the role to overcome such problem, in order to ensure a prompt and balanced strategy. Secondly, which ethical considerations are required to drive the choice of valvular substitute. The choice of best valve substitute is a relevant issue of debate, not only with operative but also prognostic and accordingly ethical aftermaths. Many different solutions have been developed to substitute the infected valve. Among these: mechanical prosthesis (MP), biological stented prosthesis (BP), sutureless bioprosthesis and cryopreserved homografts (CHs). Patients need to be informed in detail about the technical issues pertaining the use of these valve substitute. We will discuss the evidences regarding the risk of recurrent infections or future potentially severe calcification of aortic homograft valve and wall (in other words, the failure of the homograft) and the difficulties in managing the reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pollari
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Klinikum Nürnberg-Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Cristiano Spadaccio
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.,Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Michela Cuomo
- Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Massimo Chello
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Nenna
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Theodor Fischlein
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Klinikum Nürnberg-Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nappi F, Avtaar Singh SS, Timofeeva I. Learning From Controversy: Contemporary Surgical Management of Aortic Valve Endocarditis. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-CARDIOLOGY 2020; 14:1179546820960729. [PMID: 33088184 PMCID: PMC7545763 DOI: 10.1177/1179546820960729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Aortic valve replacement is the commonest cardiac surgical operation performed worldwide for infective endocarditis (IE). Long-term durability and avoidance of infection relapse are goals of the procedure. However, no detailed guidelines on prosthesis selection and surgical strategies guided by the comprehensive evaluation of the extension of the infection and its microbiological characteristics, clinical profile of the patient, and risk of infection recurrence are currently available. Conventional mechanical or stented xenografts are the preferred choice for localized aortic infection. However, in cases of complex IE with the involvement of the root or the aortomitral continuity, the use of homograft is suggested according to the surgeon and center experience. Homograft use should be counterbalanced against the risk of structural degeneration. Prosthetic bioroot or prosthetic valved conduit (mechanical and bioprosthetic) are also potentially suitable alternatives. Further development of preservation techniques enabling longer durability of allogenic substitutes is required. We evaluate the current evidence for the use of valve substitutes in aortic valve endocarditis and propose an evidence-based algorithm to guide the choice of therapy. We performed a systemic review to clarify the contemporary surgical management of aortic valve endocarditis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| | - Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Irina Timofeeva
- Department of Imaging, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nappi F, Spadaccio C, Chello M. Aortic homografts: Should we really lose the opportunity? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 157:e245-e246. [PMID: 31288368 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Accepted: 11/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| | - Cristiano Spadaccio
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Massimo Chello
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nappi F, Singh SSA, Lusini M, Nenna A, Gambardella I, Chello M. The use of allogenic and autologous tissue to treat aortic valve endocarditis. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:491. [PMID: 31700927 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.08.76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The surgical treatment of aortic valve endocarditis (AVE) is generally performed using conventional mechanical or biological xenograft prosthesis, with limited use of aortic homograft (Ao-Homo) or pulmonary autograft (PA). Clinical evidence has demonstrated a clear contradiction between the proven benefits of Ao-Homo and PA in the context of infection and the very limited use of allogenic or autologous tissue in everyday clinical practice. This review aims to summarize the most recent and relevant literature in order to foster the scientific debate on the use of the use of allogenic and autologous tissue to treat AVE. The decisional process of the Heart Team should also include the preferences of the patient, his/her family, the general cardiologist or primary care physician. The use of allogenic or autologous valve substitute is beneficial if there is a high risk of recurrence of infection, avoiding extensive adhesiolysis and debridement of synthetic material. In any case, those procedures should be performed by highly trained centers to optimize outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| | | | - Mario Lusini
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Nenna
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Chello
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bando K. Proposal for building an infrastructure for international randomized, control trials and a comprehensive registry of infective endocarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 155:73-74. [PMID: 29245207 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ko Bando
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nappi F, Spadaccio C. Mitral valve endocarditis—Unrealized expectations for repair of mitral valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 158:e31-e32. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2018] [Revised: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
14
|
Nappi F, Spadaccio C, Dreyfus J, Attias D, Acar C, Bando K. Mitral endocarditis: A new management framework. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 156:1486-1495.e4. [PMID: 29884490 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2017] [Revised: 03/17/2018] [Accepted: 03/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Nappi
- Cardiac Surgery Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France.
| | - Cristiano Spadaccio
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Julien Dreyfus
- Cardiology department Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| | - David Attias
- Cardiology department Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Acar
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hôpital de la Salpétrière, Paris, France
| | - Ko Bando
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim JB, Sundt TM. Weak evidence, strong opinions, and high expectations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 154:1901-1902. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
16
|
Hussain ST, Blackstone EH, Pettersson GB. Allografts remain a cornerstone of surgical treatment of invasive and destructive aortic valve infective endocarditis: Surgeon and technique do matter! J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 154:1900-1901.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/08/2017] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|