Upfront surgery as first-line therapy in selected patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

Prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival in resected pathologic N2-stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with upfront surgery

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment for pathological N2 (pN2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is definitive chemoradiation. Surgery might be beneficial for resectable pN2 disease, so we investigated the recurrence-free interval of upfront surgery for selected patients with resectable pN2 disease.

METHODS

The clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with pN2 NSCLC who underwent upfront anatomical resection at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from 2011 January to 2019 December were retrospectively reviewed. A Cox regression model was used to identify prognostic factors of recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

In total, 84 patients after curative lung anatomic resection were analyzed, with a 44-month median survival. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 63.1%, 31.3%, and 19.9%, respectively, with a median RFS of 18.9 months. Multivariable cox regression analysis identified that the significant predictor for RFS was a tumor size of more than 3 cm (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.74, 95% CI, 1.07-2.83, p = 0.027). Visceral pleural invasion, LN harvest number, tumor stage, and N2 status including single zone (N2a) or multiple zones (N2b) were not prognostic factors in this study.

CONCLUSION

Upfront surgery for resectable N2 disease achieved favorable outcomes in selected patients, especially better recurrence control with limited tumor size. Therapeutic advances might encourage surgeons to aggressive intervention.

Upfront surgery for N2 NSCLC: a large retrospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

The optimal sequence and combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain undefined. The aim of our study was to compare two treatment options for N2 NSCLC-induction therapy with subsequent surgery versus upfront surgery with adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 405 patients with N2 disease in two centers, between January 2010 and December 2016. They were divided into two groups: the Induction Group, composed of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the Upfront surgery Group, composed of patients who underwent surgery as first-line therapy. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed, and 52 patients were included in each group. Primary endpoints were: recurrence, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

After the PSM, no differences were observed in general characteristics, perioperative results, rates and severity of complications, and histopathology results. Seventeen patients (32.7%) of the induction group and 21 (40.4%) of the upfront surgery group had mediastinal lymph nodal involvement with skipping (p = 0.415). Recurrence rate was not different between the two groups (57.7% vs 50.0%, p = 0.478). No differences were observed in terms of OS (40.98 ± 35.78 vs 37.0 ± 40.69 months, p = 0.246) and DFS (29.67 ± 36.01 vs 27.96 ± 40.08 months, p = 0.697). The multivariable analysis identified the pT stage and skipping lymph node metastasis as independent predictive factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy does not appear inferior in terms of recurrence, OS and DFS, compared to induction chemotherapy with subsequent surgery.

Long-Term Outcomes of Selected Patients with IIIA-N2 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Upfront Surgical Resection

BACKGROUND

Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a diverse group that requires multimodality treatment. The aim of this study was to report the long-term outcomes for patients with IIIA-N2 disease.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of cases with IIIA-N2 (T1-2N2) NSCLC who underwent upfront surgery. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to assess the impact of various variables on survival.

RESULTS

A total of 475 patients were ultimately included. With a median follow-up time of 108 months, the 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 42.2% and 27.7%, respectively. R0 resection was found to be associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and OS compared with R1/R2 resection (p = 0.041 for PFS; p = 0.015 for OS). Patients with single-station N2 disease demonstrated significantly better PFS and OS than those with multiple-station N2 disease (p < 0.001 for PFS; p = 0.002 for OS). Following surgical resection, adjuvant therapy was significantly correlated with prolonged PFS and OS compared with those patients without any treatment. However, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS between chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy (p = 0.915 for PFS; p = 0.287 for OS). Patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion had significantly improved OS compared with those with L858R (p = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows promising long-term outcomes for selected patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC treated with upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, especially those with R0 resection and single-station N2. This study sheds light on the potential management and treatment options for this challenging population.

Clinical management of stage III non-small cell lung cancer in India: An expert consensus statement

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is considered the most common type of lung cancer (>80% of all lung cancers); patients are often diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease. The management of NSCLC is considered challenging owing to variations in size, an extension of the tumors, involvement patterns, and classification. Although adequate literature and guidelines are available on the management of NSCLC in several countries, an Indian perspective on stage III NSCLC management is lacking. We used the modified Delphi approach to form consensus statements. A thorough literature search was done. The authors then convened and deliberated over published literature, available guidelines, and clinical judgment. Recommendation statements were formed for different clinical scenarios. These statements were sent as a form of survey to other oncologists, and their responses were recorded and mentioned. Evidence-based statements were formed for diagnosing and managing stage III NSCLC. These recommendation statements cover various aspects-surgical, radiation, and medical treatment in various clinical scenarios including adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and consolidation therapies.

Survival outcome of upfront surgery for clinical single-station N2 non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Pathological N2 (pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is diverse; its treatment depends on the clinical N (cN) status. We aimed to determine the efficacy of upfront surgery for cN2pN2 NSCLC.

METHODS

The study included 43 cN2pN2 NSCLC patients who underwent upfront surgery at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between 2002 and 2017. Survival outcome, focusing on cN2 status, was retrospectively investigated. Mediastinal lymph nodes were pre-operatively evaluated using computed tomography and positron emission tomography. Surgical eligibility criteria included single-station cN2. N2 with N1 and skip N2 were defined as N2 with and without ipsilateral hilar lymph node metastasis, respectively. A platinum-doublet regimen was used for adjuvant chemotherapy. Survival curves were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

Clinical-skip N2 and cN2 with N1 cases included 22 and 21 patients, respectively. Twenty-three patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up duration was 73 months. Clinical-skip N2 had a significantly better 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) than cN2 with N1 (58.3 vs 28.6%, P = 0.038) and was an independent favorable RFS predictor. Recurrence within 18 months occurred in 71% of cN2 with N1 cases. Five-year overall survival and RFS rates in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy vs those without adjuvant chemotherapy were 82.2 vs 41.9% (P = 0.019) and 56.5 vs 28.0% (P = 0.049), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical-skip N2 had an excellent prognosis, and upfront surgery was acceptable. Conversely, upfront surgery followed by chemotherapy is not recommended for cN2 with N1 patients because of early recurrence.

[Review for N2 Sub-staging in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Patients with N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were heterogeneous groups and required further stratification. The International Society for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) divided N2 into three sub-stages: N2 at a single station without N1 involvement (N2a1), N2 at a single station with N1 involvement (N2a2), and N2 at multiple stations (N2b). These new descriptors significantly distinguished the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence pattern of patients with different N2 sub-stages. The OS and DFS of N2a1 were not sufficiently distinguished from N1 at multiple stations (N1b). The OS and DFS of N2a2 were intermediate between those of N2a1 and N2b. Current evidence did not support the further subdivision of the N2b. The main recurrence pattern of N2a1, N2a2 and N2b were distant metastasis, and the risks of distant metastasis increased successively. N2a1 patients were at low risk of locoregional recurrence, which could not be reduced by postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). N2a2 and N2b patients had a similar higher risk of locoregional recurrence, which could be reduced to a similar level of N2a1 patients by PORT.
.

Long-term clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of upfront surgery as a first-line therapy in biopsy-proven clinical N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Multimodality therapy offers the best opportunity to improve pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis. This paper aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes and the prognostic factors of upfront surgery as first-line therapy in biopsy-proven clinical N2.

Methods

Retrospective review of biopsy-proven cN2 NSCLC patients operated between 2007 and 2017. Upfront surgery was considered if the primary tumour was deemed completely resectable, with mediastinal nodal involvement confined to a single station and no preoperative evidence of extranodal tumour invasion.

Results

Two hundred eighty-five patients who underwent radical resections were included. One hundred fifty-nine patients (55.8%) received induction chemotherapy. At follow-up completion, 127 (44.6%) patients had died. For the induction chemotherapy group, the median overall survival (OS) was 49 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 38–70 months], and the 5-year OS was 44.4%. The median and 5-year OS for the up front surgery group was 66 months (95% CI: 40–119 months) and 66.3%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment approaches (p = 0.48). One hundred thirty-four patients (47.0%) developed recurrence. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 5 years was 17% (95% CI: 11–25%) for induction chemotherapy and 22% (95% CI: 9–32%) for upfront surgery; there were no statistically significant differences between groups (p = 0.93). No significant differences were observed based on the clinical N status (OS, p = 0.36; RFS, p = 0.65).

Conclusions

Upfront surgery as first-line therapy for biopsy-proven cN2 NSCLC showed favourable clinical outcomes, similar to those obtained after induction chemotherapy followed by surgery. Therefore, it should be considered one of the multimodality treatment options in resectable N2 NSCLC.

A decision support framework for postoperative radiotherapy in patients with pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) plays a highly controversial role in pathological N2 (pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) disease. Recent studies reveal that not all patients can benefit from PORT. Further research is needed to identify predictors of PORT.

METHODS

A total of 1044 pathologic stage T1-3N2M0 NSCLC patients were analyzed. Risk factors of distant metastasis were identified by the log-rank tests and the multivariable Cox models. We integrated risk factors of distant metastasis and our previously published loco-regional recurrence (LRR) related prognostic index into a decision support framework (DSF) to predict the outcomes of PORT. An independent cohort was used to validate the DSF.

RESULTS

We defined patients with more than two of three identified LRR-related features (heavy cigarette smoking history, clinical N2 status, and more than four positive lymph nodes) as a high LRR risk group. We found the high-intermediate-risk histological type (with micropapillary and/or solid components) was associated with a higher risk of distant metastasis (HR=1.207, 95% CI 1.062 to 1.371, P=0.0129), but not LRR. We built the DSF by combining these two types of features. Patients were stratified into four groups by using the DSF. PORT significantly improved OS only in the subgroup without high-risk histological features (without micropapillary or solid components) and with a high risk for LRR (three-year OS: 66.7% in the PORT group vs. 50.2% in the non-PORT group; P=0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

A particular pN2 subgroup with a high risk of LRR and without micropapillary or solid components could benefit from PORT.

Lobectomy Versus Sublobectomy in Stage IIIA/N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Background

The role lobectomy plays in stage IIIA/N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial for a long time. What’s more, no previous study concentrates on whether sublobectomy can improve survival outcome for these patients, so we performed this population-based study to investigate whether stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC can benefit from these two surgery types and compare survival outcomes after lobectomy and sublobectomy.

Methods

A total of 21,638 patients diagnosed with stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database matched our selection criteria. The study cohort included patients who received no surgery (n = 15,951), sublobectomy (n = 628) and lobectomy (n = 5,059). Kaplan–Meier method, Cox regression analyses, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox regression were used to illustrate the influence of sublobectomy and lobectomy on overall survival (OS) rates in the study cohort and compare these two surgery types.

Results

Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed sublobectomy [HR: 0.584 (95%CI: 0.531–0.644), P-value <0.001; IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.619 (95%CI: 0.605–0.633), P-value <0.001] and lobectomy [HR: 0.439 (95%CI: 0.420–0.459), P-value <0.001; IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.441 (95%CI: 0.431–0.451), P-value <0.001] were both related to better OS rates compared with no surgery, and lobectomy exhibited better survival than sublobectomy [HR: 0.751 (95%CI: 0.680–0.830), P-value <0.001; IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.713 (95%CI: 0.696–0.731), P-value <0.001]. Moreover, the results in subgroup analyses based on age, tumor size and radiotherapy and chemotherapy strategy in all study cohort were consistent.

Conclusion

Stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients could benefit from sublobectomy or lobectomy, and lobectomy provided better OS rates than sublobectomy.

Lymph Node Parameters Predict Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Efficacy and Disease-Free Survival in Pathologic N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Pathologic N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is prominently intrinsically heterogeneous. We aimed to identify homogeneous prognostic subgroups and evaluate the role of different adjuvant treatments. We retrospectively collected patients with resected pathologic T1-3N2M0 NSCLC from the Shanghai Chest Hospital as the primary cohort and randomly allocated them (3:1) to the training set and the validation set 1. We had patients from the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center as an external validation cohort (validation set 2) with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. Variables significantly related to disease-free survival (DFS) were used to build an adaptive Elastic-Net Cox regression model. Nomogram was used to visualize the model. The discriminative and calibration abilities of the model were assessed by time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and calibration curves. The primary cohort consisted of 1,312 patients. Tumor size, histology, grade, skip N2, involved N2 stations, lymph node ratio (LNR), and adjuvant treatment pattern were identified as significant variables associated with DFS and integrated into the adaptive Elastic-Net Cox regression model. A nomogram was developed to predict DFS. The model showed good discrimination (the median AUC in the validation set 1: 0.66, range 0.62 to 0.71; validation set 2: 0.66, range 0.61 to 0.73). We developed and validated a nomogram that contains multiple variables describing lymph node status (skip N2, involved N2 stations, and LNR) to predict the DFS of patients with resected pathologic N2 NSCLC. Through this model, we could identify a subtype of NSCLC with a more malignant clinical biological behavior and found that this subtype remained at high risk of disease recurrence after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Prognostic index for estimating the survival benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in pathologic N2 non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world validation study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with resected pathologic N2 (pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with different locoregional recurrence (LRR) risks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The primary cohort and validation cohort were retrieved from two independent medical centres. Data for all consecutive patients with completely resected pathologic stage T1-3N2M0 NSCLC were analysed. Patients without PORT in the primary cohort were identified as a training set. Significant prognostic factors for LRR were identified by the Fine-Gray model to develop a prognostic index (PI) in the training set.

RESULTS

The primary cohort consisted of 357 patients who met the eligibility criteria (training set, 287 patients without PORT). The external validation cohort consisted of 1044 patients who met the eligibility criteria (validation set, 711 patients without PORT). Heavy cigarette smoking history, clinical N2 status (cN2), and the number of positive lymph nodes >4 were identified as independent risk factors. The PI was computed as follows: PI＝0.8*smoking history＋0.5*cN2＋0.7*the number of involved lymph nodes (reference level was assigned the value 1 and risk level the value 2). In the low-risk group (PI score< = 3), PORT showed a trend towards decreased LRR rates but not significantly improved overall survival (OS). In the high-risk group (PI score>3), PORT significantly reduced the risk of LRR and improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

We constructed and validated a PI to predict individually the effect of PORT in patients with completely resected pN2 NSCLC. Patients with a higher PI score can benefit from PORT in terms of OS.

Primary Tumor Resection Improves Survival for EGFR-TKI-Treated Patients With Occult M1a Lung Adenocarcinoma

Background

The role of primary tumor resection in occult M1a lung adenocarcinoma remains unclear, especially for patients receiving targeted therapy. The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of primary tumor resection on overall survival (OS) in lung adenocarcinoma patients with occult pleural disseminations receiving targeted therapy.

Methods

Lung adenocarcinoma patients with intraoperatively-confirmed occult pleural dissemination (M1a), who hospitalized in the Department of Thoracic Surgery in Fudan Shanghai Cancer Center from May 2008 to December 2017 and received EGFR-TKIs therapy, were enrolled. Log-rank tests were used to compare the survival differences between groups.

Results

34 patients receiving EGFR-TKIs were enrolled. The majority of them were never smokers (29/34, 85.3%). Among the enrolled patients, 20 (58.8%) patients underwent primary tumor resection, while 14 (41.2%) patients not. There was no distributional difference of baselines between patients undergoing and not undergoing primary tumor resection. Further analyses demonstrated that the patients undergoing primary tumor resection had a prolonged OS compared with those not (log-rank P= 0.042). The 2-year and 5-year OS for patients receiving primary tumor resection and EGFR-TKIs was 90.0% and 60.1%.

Conclusions

Primary tumor resection was associated with improved survival in patients with occult intraoperatively-confirmed M1a adenocarcinoma receiving EGFR-TKIs.

Prognostic Factor and Clinical Outcome in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Study Based on Real-World Clinical Data in the Korean Population

Purpose

The optimal treatment for patients with stage III non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors and clinical outcome in stage III NSCLC using real-world clinical data in the Korean population.

Materials and Methods

Among 8,110 patients with lung cancer selected from 52 hospitals in Korea during 2014–2016, only patients with stage III NSCLC were recruited and analyzed. A standardized protocol was used to collect clinical information and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors for mortality.

Results

A total of 1,383 patients (46.5% had squamous cell carcinoma and 40.9% had adenocarcinoma) with stage III NSCLC were enrolled, and their median age was 70 years. Regarding clinical stage, 548 patients (39.6%) had stage IIIA, 517 (37.4%) had stage IIIB, and 318 (23.0%) had stage IIIC. Pertaining to the initial treatment method, the surgery group (median survival period, 36 months) showed better survival outcomes than the non-surgical treatment group (median survival period, 18 months; p=0.001) in patients with stage IIIA. Moreover, among patients with stage IIIB and stage IIIC, those who received concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CCRT; median survival period, 24 months) showed better survival outcomes than those who received chemotherapy (median survival period, 11 months), or radiation therapy (median survival period, 10 months; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

While surgery might be feasible as the initial treatment option in patients with stage IIIA NSCLC, CCRT showed a beneficial role in patients with stage IIIB and IIIC NSCLC.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy might be a feasible alternative for surgically resectable pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

The majority of previous studies of the clinical outcome of video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus open lobectomy for pathological N2 non‐small cell lung cancer (pN2 NSCLC) have been single‐center experiences with small patient numbers. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate these procedures but in a large cohort of Chinese patients with pathological N2 NSCLC in real‐world conditions.

Methods

Patients who underwent lobectomy for pN2 NSCLC by either VATS or thoracotomy were retrospectively reviewed from 10 tertiary hospitals between January 2014 and September 2017. Perioperative outcomes and overall survival of the patients were analyzed. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify potential prognostic factors. Propensity‐score analysis was performed to reduce cofounding biases and compare the clinical outcomes between both groups.

Results

Among 2144 pN2 NSCLC, 1244 patients were managed by VATS and 900 by open procedure. A total of 305 (24.5%) and 344 patients died during VATS and the thoracotomy group during a median follow‐up of 16.7 and 15.6 months, respectively. VATS lobectomy patients had better overall survival when compared with those undergoing the open procedure (P < 0.0001). Multivariate COX regression analysis showed VATS lobectomy independently favored overall survival (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.621–0.896, P = 0.0017). Better perioperative outcomes, including less blood loss, shorter drainage time and hospital stay, were also observed in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy (P < 0.05). After propensity‐score matching, 169 patients in each group were analyzed, and no survival difference were found between the two groups. Less blood loss was observed in the VATS group, but there was a longer operation time.

Conclusions

VATS lobectomy might be a feasible alternative to conventional open surgery for resectable pN2 NSCLC.

Key points

Significant findings of the study: VATS lobectomy has comparative OS in pN2 NSCLC versus open procedure in resectable patients.

What this study adds: VATS lobectomy might be feasible for pN2 NSCLC.

Is invasive mediastinal staging necessary in intermediate risk patients with negative PET/CT?

Background

Tumor involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes is of high importance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Invasive mediastinal staging is recommended in selected patients without evidence of mediastinal involvement on staging by imaging. In the present study we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of invasive mediastinal staging in reducing pN2, its impact on survival and the risk factors for occult pN2.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC tumors larger than 3 cm, central tumors or cN1 cases treated in our institution between 2013 and 2018 were prospectively included in the study. Incidence of pN2 and overall survival was compared among invasively staged (IS) and non-invasively staged groups (NIS). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors of pN2.

Results

A total of 201 patients were included in the study, 79 (39.3%) of whom were not invasively staged (NIS group) and 122 (60.7%) were invasively staged (IS group). Incidence of cN1 and mean PET/CT uptake was different among both groups. Prevalence of pN2 was similar in both groups (7.6% in NIS vs. 12.6% in IS; P>0.05). Median survival in IS-pN2 patients was 11 months longer than in NIS-pN2 group (33.6 vs. 22.5 months; P=0.245). cN1 emerged as the only a risk factor for pN2.

Conclusions

Invasive staging does not reduce the incidence of pN2. However, this finding could be biased because in our series cN1 patients were more often staged and cN1 has been detected as a risk factor for pN2. In addition patient better selection after invasive staging might have an impact on overall survival. To conclude, invasive mediastinal staging in intermediate risk patients for positive mediastinal nodes is justified.

Resectable IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): In Search for the Proper Treatment

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer accounts for one third of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the time of initial diagnosis and presents with a wide range of clinical and pathological heterogeneity. To date, the combined multimodality approach involving both local and systemic control is the gold standard for these patients, since occult distant micrometastatic disease should always be suspected. With the rapid increase in treatment options, the need for an interdisciplinary discussion involving oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists and radiologists has become essential. Surgery should be recommended to patients with non-bulky, discrete, or single-level N2 involvement and be included in the multimodality treatment. Resectable stage IIIA patients have been the subject of a number of clinical trials and retrospective analysis, discussing the efficiency and survival benefits on patients treated with the available therapeutic approaches. However, most of them have some limitations due to their retrospective nature, lack of exact pretreatment staging, and the involvement of heterogeneous populations leading to the awareness that each patient should undergo a tailored therapy in light of the nature of his tumor, its extension and his performance status.

The utility of endosonography for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer in patients with radiological N0 disease

OBJECTIVES

Recent practice guidelines recommend endosonography for patients with radiological N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when the primary tumors are >3 cm in diameter or centrally located. However, any role for endosonography remains debatable. We evaluated the utility of endosonography in patients with radiological N0 NSCLC based on tumor centrality, diameter and histology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent staging endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) with or without transesophageal bronchoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) for radiological N0 NSCLC were retrospectively investigated using prospectively collected endosonography data. The radiological N0 stage was defined by node diameter as evident on computed tomography images and ¹⁸F-FDG uptake using integrated positron emission tomography-computed tomography.

RESULTS

In total of 168 patients, the median size of the primary tumor was 39 mm, and 41 % of tumors were centrally located. The prevalence of occult mediastinal metastases was 11.3 % (19/168). The sensitivity of endosonography in terms of diagnosing occult mediastinal metastases was only 47 % (9/19); 6 of 10 patients with false-negative endosonography data exhibited metastases in accessible nodes. The diagnostic performance of endosonography did not differ by tumor centrality or diameter. Patients with adenocarcinoma histology showed higher prevalence of occult mediastinal metastases and higher false-negative results in endosonography compared with those with non-adenocarcinoma histology.

CONCLUSION

Not all patients with radiological N0 NSCLC benefit from endosonography, given the low prevalence of occult mediastinal metastases and the poor sensitivity of endosonography in this population. The strategy of invasive mediastinal staging needs to be tailored considering the histology of the tumor in this population.

Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group Expert Consensus Statement on Optimal Management of Stage III NSCLC

Stage III NSCLC represents a heterogeneous disease for which optimal treatment continues to pose a clinical challenge. Recent changes in the American Joint Commission on Cancer staging to the eighth edition has led to a shift in TNM stage grouping and redefined the subcategories (IIIA-C) in stage III NSCLC for better prognostication. Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy has remained standard-of-care for stage III NSCLC for almost 2 decades, contemporary considerations include the impact of different molecular subsets of NSCLC, and the roles of tyrosine kinase inhibitors post-definitive therapy and of immune checkpoint inhibitors following chemoradiotherapy. With rapid evolution of diagnostic algorithms and expanding treatment options, the need for interdisciplinary input involving multiple specialists (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists, radiologists, pathologists and thoracic surgeons) has become increasingly important. The unique demographics of Asian NSCLC pose further challenges when applying clinical trial data into clinical practice. This includes differences in smoking rates, prevalence of oncogenic driver mutations, and access to health care resources including molecular testing, prompting the need for critical review of existing data and identification of current gaps. In this expert consensus statement by the Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group, an interdisciplinary group of experts representing Hong Kong, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, and Mainland China was convened. Standard clinical practices for stage III NSCLC across different Asian countries were discussed from initial diagnosis and staging through to multi-modality approaches including surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy.

Distinct Prognostic Factors in Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Radiologic Part-Solid or Solid Lesions

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have indicated that the presence of ground-glass opacity (GGO) components is associated with favorable survival. The purpose of this study was to reveal the prognostic value of GGO components and differences in prognostic factors for part-solid and solid lesions in invasive stage I NSCLC.

METHODS

The cases of 2010 patients with completely resected invasive pathological stage I NSCLC were reviewed according to the eighth edition of the TNM classification. Patients were categorized into the pure-GGO, part-solid, and solid groups based on consolidation-to-tumor ratio. Cox multivariate proportional hazard analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors in each group.

RESULTS

Of the 2010 patients, 146 (7.3%) were in the pure-GGO group, 732 (36.4%) were in the part-solid group, and 1132 (56.3%) were in the solid group. Cox multivariate analyses revealed that GGO absence was a strong independent risk factor for worse recurrence-free survival (p < 0.001). For the pure-GGO group, there was no recurrence in spite of the invasive stage. For the part-solid group, visceral pleural invasion could not predict recurrence-free survival in general (p = 0.514) or in each tumor size group (for tumors size ≤1 cm, p = 0.664; for tumors size >1 to 2 cm, p = 0.456; for tumors size >2 to 3 cm, p = 0.900; and for tumors size >3 to 4 cm, p = 0.397). For the solid group, adenocarcinoma subtype was not a prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival in general (p = 0.162) or in each tumor size group (for tumors size ≤ 2 cm, p = 0.092; for tumors size >2 to 3 cm, p = 0.330; and for tumors size >3 to 4 cm, p = 0.885).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of GGO components was a strong predictor in patients with invasive pathological stage I NSCLC. Risk factors were distinct in the part-solid and solid groups. There was no prognostic value of visceral pleural invasion in the part-solid group. Adenocarcinoma subtype did not have prognostic value in the solid group.

Risk analyses of N2 lymph-node metastases in patients with T1 non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-center real-world observational study in China

PURPOSE

N2 lymph-node metastases occur in approximately 6-17% of the patients with T1-2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical characteristics of N2 patients are not fully understood.

METHODS

This retrospective, multi-center analysis included T1 NSCLC patients receiving surgical resection during a period from Jan 2nd, 2014 to Dec 27th, 2017. The diagnosis was pathologically verified in all cases. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to analyze the factors that are associated with pN2 lymph-node metastases.

RESULTS

A total of 10,885 patients (48.4% men; 84.7% adenocarcinoma) were included in the analysis. The mean age was 59.0 ± 9.9 years. The mean tumor size was 1.8 ± 0.8 cm. Of the patients, 3260 (29.9%) were smokers or ex-smokers. Lymph-node metastases were verified in 1808 (16.6%) patients, and 1167 (10.7%) patients had N2 lymph-node metastases. The multivariate analyses indicated that larger tumor size, lower differentiation, CEA level ≥ 5 ng/mL, vascular invasion (+), and pleural involvement (+) were associated with higher percentages of N2 lymph-node metastases (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the significant association between N2 lymph-node metastases and tumor size and differentiation, CEA levels, and status of vascular invasion and pleural involvement.

Treatment rationale and design of the induction chemotherapy and adjuvant thoracic radiation in resectable N2-3A/3B non-small cell lung cancer (ICAT) study

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy for stage N2-3A/3B non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial owing to its heterogeneity. Although multimodal therapy is considered the standard therapeutic approach for stage N2-3A/3B resectable NSCLC patients, the optimal combination strategy still needs to be clarified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 25 male and female patients aged between 20 and 75 years with stage N2-3A/3B resectable NSCLC will be included. Eligible patients will undergo tri-modality therapy comprising induction chemotherapy (3 cycles of combination therapy with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel), followed by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Recruitment was commenced in April 2017, with a planned last follow-up in March 2024. As of May 2019, 1 subject has been enrolled. The primary endpoint is the treatment completion rate. The secondary endpoints are objective response rate (ORR) of induction chemotherapy, treatment-related adverse event, recurrence-free survival (RFS) time, and overall survival (OS) time. RFS and OS time will be calculated as the time from this study registration to first recurrence and all-cause death, respectively.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine and all the participating hospitals. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before registration, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study results will be disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number UMIN000025010 and jRCT1051180028.

A prognostic score system with lymph node ratio in stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The survival of patients with IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer after surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is heterogeneous. The aim of this study is to form a prognostic system and a heat map method to visualize the overall survival rates in those patients.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate Cox hazards regression models and the associated Wald Chi square coefficient were used to form the prognostic score system. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to determine the cutoff values of lymph node ratio and prognostic score in SEER cohort and validated in FDUSCC cohort. Meanwhile, a heat map method was used to visualize the overall survival probabilities of 3, 5 and 10 years for individual patient of both cohorts.

RESULTS

Lymph node ratio (with cutoff of 0.36) significantly correlates with overall survival of these patients. In addition, in patients with the same level of N2 disease, lymph node ratio still significantly affects survival. Also, after the multivariate analysis in SEER cohort, six factors were independent prognostic factors including age, sex, type of surgery, size, lymph node ratio and differentiation. A prognostic sore system with these factors (with cutoff of 12) was validated as a predictor for overall survival in FDUSCC cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This prognostic score system including lymph node ratio can predict the survival rates of IIIA-N2 patient after surgery and post-operative chemotherapy. Lymph node ratio could be a useful supplementation in TNM stage classification for IIIA-N2 patients. The heat map method can visualize the predicted overall survival of an individual patient.

The lymph node status and histologic subtypes influenced the effect of postoperative radiotherapy on patients with N2 positive IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and subgroups which derived benefit from PORT.

METHODS

A total of 576 patients with pathological IIIA-N2 NSCLC, who underwent complete resection, were identified. Propensity score matching (PSM) methods were used to balance the patients' characteristics between two groups. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared between PORT and non-PORT patients.

RESULTS

On multivariable analysis, improved OS remained correlated with younger age, single N2 station involvement, less positive lymph nodes, and chemotherapy. After PSM, 121 PROT patients and 242 non-PORT patients were matched. PORT was not associated improved patients' OS (P = 0.735) or RFS ( P = 0.483). For patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy (POCT), PORT could improve OS in single N2 station involved patients (HR: 0.572, 95%CI: 0.312 to 1.05, P = 0.040). Patients with papillary predominant adenocarcinoma also benefited from PORT with an increase in OS (HR: 0.350, 95%CI: 0.126 to 0.972, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with completely resected IIIA-N2 NSCLC, mediastinal lymph node metastasis and histologic subtypes could influence the effect of PORT. Single N2 station involvement and papillary predominant subtype were predictors of benefit from PORT.

Predicting prognosis of post-chemotherapy patients with resected IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Recently, nomogram has been widely used in cancer prognoses. However, the predicting model for post-chemotherapy patients with resected IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) still remains scarce. Here, we tried to develop nomograms for predicting the recurrence and survival of these patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed our database from October 2007 to May 2013 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. 437 qualified patients were included. Univariable and multivariable analyses of cox regression were performed successively to select prognostic factors and nomograms for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were developed. Concordance indexes (C-index) and calibration curves were created to measure the consistency between predicted and actual survivals. Finally, risk group stratifications according to risk scores calculated from nomograms were delineated.

Results

With a total of 437 patients, five independent prognostic factors related to RFS and two to OS were selected to develop nomograms, respectively. Both 3- and 5-year RFS and OS calibration curves indicated a moderate concordance between the predicted and actual outcomes, consisted with the C-index 0.656 (95% CI: 0.626-0.687) for RFS and 0.651 (95% CI: 0.611-0.691) for OS. Different risk groups showed significant differences in RFS and OS.

Conclusions

We developed nomograms of RFS and OS for predicting recurrence and survival of post-chemotherapy patients with resected IIIA NSCLC. These nomograms could help doctors more easily estimate the prognosis and choose optimal decisions for individual during clinical practices.