Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with positive lymph nodes benefit from extended radical lymphadenectomy

Machine learning to predict occult metastatic lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerves in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) metastasizes in an unpredictable fashion to adjacent lymph nodes, including those along the recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs). This study is to apply machine learning (ML) for prediction of RLN node metastasis in ESCC.

METHODS

The dataset contained 3352 surgically treated ESCC patients whose RLN lymph nodes were removed and pathologically evaluated. Using their baseline and pathological features, ML models were established to predict RLN node metastasis on each side with or without the node status of the contralateral side. Models were trained to achieve at least 90% negative predictive value (NPV) in fivefold cross-validation. The importance of each feature was measured by the permutation score.

RESULTS

Tumor metastases were found in 17.0% RLN lymph nodes on the right and 10.8% on the left. In both tasks, the performance of each model was comparable, with a mean area under the curve ranging from 0.731 to 0.739 (without contralateral RLN node status) and from 0.744 to 0.748 (with contralateral status). All models showed approximately 90% NPV scores, suggesting proper generalizability. The pathology status of chest paraesophgeal nodes and tumor depth had the highest impacts on the risk of RLN node metastasis in both models.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the feasibility of ML in predicting RLN node metastasis in ESCC. These models may potentially be used intraoperatively to spare RLN node dissection in low-risk patients, thereby minimizing adverse events associated with RLN injuries.

Left versus right approach for middle and lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched study

Background

Despite superior short-term outcomes, there is considerable debate about the oncological efficacy of the left approach esophagectomy for middle and lower squamous esophageal carcinoma (ESCC). A propensity score-matched retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the left approach's short- and long-term effects.

Methods

We recorded data from patients with ESCC who underwent curative resection via the left or right approach between January 2010 and December 2015. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and maximally selected rank statistics (MSRS) were utilized to determine the appropriate number of lymph nodes to resect during esophagectomy.

Results

One hundred and forty-eight ESCC patients underwent esophagectomy via the right approach, and 108 underwent the left approach esophagectomy. After PSM, the left approach esophagectomy showed statistically significant superiority in operative time and time to oral intake, and there was a trend toward a shorter length of hospital stay. Fewer cervical, upper thoracic, and recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes were harvested via the left approach than the right approach; the total number of lymph nodes harvested via the left and right approaches was similar. Similar long-term survival outcomes were achieved. MSRS suggested that at least 25 lymph nodes are needed to be resected during esophagectomy to improve survival in N0 patients.

Conclusions

The left approach esophagectomy might facilitate postoperative recovery in patients with middle and lower ESCC. With adequate lymphadenectomy, the left approach esophagectomy might achieve similar long-term outcomes for middle and lower ESCC patients.

Patterns of Recurrence After Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has been proven to be a feasible surgical approach for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to investigate the recurrence pattern and potential risk factors after RAMIE. Consecutive patients with ESCC who received RAMIE with McKeown technique at a single Esophageal Cancer Institute from November 2015 to September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with available data, radical resection (R0), and a minimum 2-year follow-up period were eligible for the recurrence analysis. Risk factors of recurrence were examined by logistic regression analysis. R0 resection was achieved in 95.1% of patients (310/326). Of the 298 eligible patients with a median follow-up period of 30.6 months, recurrence was recognized in 95 patients (31.9%), with 4 (1.3%) local-only, 40 (13.4%) regional-only, 44 (14.8%) hematogenous-only and 7 (2.3%) combined recurrences. Cervical lymph nodes and lungs were the most frequent sites of regional and hematogenous recurrence, respectively. The median disease-free interval until recurrence was 12.1 (range 1.7-37.6) months and 83.2% of relapses occurred within 2 years after surgery. Multivariable analysis indicated that tumor in the upper esophagus, larger tumor length and positive lymph nodes as independent risk factors for recurrence. Hematogenous recurrence is the prevailing pattern after RAMIE for ESCC. For patients with advanced disease, neoadjuvant therapy is a key factor in reducing recurrence rather than surgical approaches.

Esophagectomy With Three-Field Versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

The optimal extent of lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy remains unclear. In this trial, we aim to clarify whether three-field (cervical-thoracic-abdominal) lymphadenectomy improved patient survival over two-field (thoracic-abdominal) lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Between March 2013 and November 2016, a total of 400 patients with middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer were included and randomly assigned to undergo esophagectomy with either three- or two-field lymphadenectomy at a 1:1 ratio. Analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were similar in the two arms. The median follow-up time was 55 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52-58). OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.019, 95% CI: 0.727-1.428, p = 0.912) and the disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 0.868, 95% CI: 0.636-1.184, p = 0.371) were comparable between the two arms. The cumulative 5-year OS was 63% in the three-field arm, as compared with 63% in the two-field arm; 5-year DFS was 59% and 53%, respectively. On the basis of whether the patients had mediastinal or abdominal lymph node metastasis or not, OS was also comparable between the two arms. In this cohort, only advanced tumor stage (pathologic TNM stages III-IV) was identified as the risk factor associated with reduced OS (HR = 3.330, 95% CI: 2.140-5.183, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer, there was no improvement in OS or DFS after esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy over two-field lymphadenectomy.

Three-field versus two-field lymphadenectomy in transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: short-term outcomes of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The benefit and harm of three-field lymphadenectomy for oesophageal cancer are still unknown. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and morbidity and mortality between three- and two-field lymphadenectomy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Between March 2013 and November 2016, patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the middle or distal oesophagus were assigned randomly to open oesophagectomy with three-field (cervical-thoracic-abdominal) or two-field (thoracic-abdominal) lymphadenectomy. No chemo(radio) therapy was given before surgery. This paper reports on the secondary outcomes of the study: pathology and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Some 400 patients were randomized, 200 in each group. A median of 37 (i.q.r. 30-49) lymph nodes were dissected in the three-field group, compared with 24 (18-30) in the two-field group (P < 0·001). Some 43 of 200 patients (21·5 per cent) in the three-field group had cervical lymph node metastasis. More patients in the three-field group had pN3 disease: 21 of 200 (10·5 per cent) versus 10 of 200 (5·0 per cent) (P = 0·040). The rate and severity of postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups, except that six patients in the three-field arm needed reintubation compared with none in the two-field group (3·0 versus 0 per cent; P = 0·030). The 90-day mortality rate was 0 per cent in the three-field group and 0·5 per cent (1 patient) in the two-field group (P = 1·000).

CONCLUSION

Oesophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy increased the number of lymph nodes dissected and led to stage migration owing to a 21·5 per cent rate of cervical lymph node metastasis. Postoperative complications were largely comparable between two- and three-field lymphadenectomy. Registration number: NCT01807936 ( https://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Does [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography have a role in cervical nodal staging for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

OBJECTIVE

Accurate nodal staging is crucial for esophageal cancer. A prospective study was performed to assess the value of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis (LNM) of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

From June 2018 to November 2018, 110 patients with resectable esophageal cancer were prospectively enrolled. Esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy was performed after FDG-PET/CT scanning. The primary end point was cervical LNM determined via postoperative histologic examination. The sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy (AC) of FDG-PET/CT for the assessment of LNM were determined using histologic results as reference standards.

RESULTS

Positive lymph nodes as determined via FDG-PET/CT were detected in 61 patients (55.5%), of whom 13 (11.8%) had positive cervical lymph nodes. After surgery, 59 patients (53.6%) exhibited pathologic LNM, of whom 20 (18.2%) had cervical LNM. SE, SP, PPV, NPV, and AC were 65.6%, 61.2%, 67.8%, 58.8%, and 63.6%, respectively, with regards to diagnosing overall LNM, and were 45.0%, 95.6%, 69.2%, 88.7%, and 86.4%, respectively, for diagnosing cervical LNM. Of the 110 patients, 90 underwent both FDG-PET/CT scanning and ultrasonography in the neck, and there were no significant differences in SE, SP, PPV, NPV, or AC with respect to cervical LNM diagnosis between FDG-PET/CT and ultrasonography.

CONCLUSIONS

For cervical LNM of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, FDG-PET/CT scanning exhibited high specificity but low sensitivity, suggesting that it is of limited value for this purpose.