Preoperative chlorhexidine mouthwash to reduce pneumonia after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dental and oral management in the perioperative period of surgery: A scoping review

Dental and oral management (DOM) is a long-established treatment modality. This scoping review aimed to narratively review previous studies, examine the effects of perioperative DOM, and identify the available evidence. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed electronic database for studies published between January 1, 2000, and March 8, 2022. The search yielded 43 studies, most of which were published in the last 10 years. The results of this study confirmed that improved perioperative oral hygiene is effective in preventing postoperative pneumonia. Our results also suggested that preoperative DOM is effective in preventing postoperative surgical site infections. Perioperative DOM is effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative pneumonia, SSI, and postsurgical complications. Further studies are needed to elucidate the various mechanism of DOM and to examine efficient intervention methods and timing.

The positive effects of preoperative chlorhexidine rinse to reduce postoperative pneumonia after kidney transplantation surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pneumonia is one of the most observed hospital-acquired infections and increases the postoperative mortality rate. Further, it drives the healthcare systems under a severe financial burden. Preventing postoperative pneumonia is an incredibly challenging issue for clinicians. Since immunosuppression therapy, the patients who had kidney transplants are more vulnerable to postoperative infections. There is no data in the scientific literature focusing on the effects of preoperative oral care with chlorhexidine antiseptic solutions on postoperative pneumonia in kidney transplantation surgery cases. In the present research, we studied this topic.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted at our institution between August 2020 and August 2022. Group A: Received 0.12 % chlorhexidine oral rinse preoperatively; Group B: Not received 0.12 % chlorhexidine oral rinse preoperatively. We analyzed the differences between the two trial groups using a chi-square or t-test. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for the categorical data.

RESULTS

Nine patients (17.6 %) were diagnosed with postoperative pneumonia in Group A and fourteen (25.9 %) in Group B (p < 0.05). Hospitalization time of Group B was prolonged (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, significant risk factors associated with postoperative pneumonia were advanced age, diabetes mellitus, smoking, delayed graft function and not gargling with 0.12 % chlorhexidine (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce postoperative pneumonia risk in patients undergoing kidney transplantation surgery, an oral health protocol including 0.12 % chlorhexidine mouth rinse seems beneficial.

Effect of propolis mouthwash on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care unit patients: a comparative randomized triple-blind clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) increases the length of hospitalization and mortality rate. This study aimed to determine the effect of propolis mouthwash on the incidence of VAP in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Triple-blind, comparative randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted over one year, with 110 ICU patients at Imam-Hossein and Bahar hospitals (Shahroud) and Kowsar Hospital (Semnan) in Iran. The intervention group used 15 cc of 0.06% propolis mouthwash solution twice daily at 8 AM and 4 PM for seven days. The control group used 15 cc of 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash at the same times and duration. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, APACHE II, Beck Oral Assessment Scale, and Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (MCPIS).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in demographic information, disease severity, and oral health between the two groups before and after intervention (P > 0.05). The incidence of VAP in the intervention group compared to the control group was 10.9% vs. 30.9% on the third day (P = 0.0166, 95% CI: 0.53-0.83 and RR = 0.35), 23.6% vs. 43.6% on the fifth day (P = 0.0325 and 95% CI: 0.31-0.95 and RR = 0.54), and 25.5% vs. 47.3% on the seventh day (P = 0.0224, 95% CI: 0.32-0.92, and RR = 0.54). The Mann-Whitney indicated the incidence of VAP was significantly lower in the intervention group on the third, fifth, and seventh days.

CONCLUSION

Propolis mouthwash can be considered as an alternative to chlorhexidine mouthwash for ICU patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Propolis mouthwash serves as a simple, economical intervention to potentially reduce incidence of VAP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

(IRCT20110427006318N12, date 02.04.2019).

Practices to prevent non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia: a narrative review

Nosocomial infection has significant consequences in health care, both at the individual level due to increased morbidity and mortality, and at the organizational level due to increased costs. Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is the most common nosocomial infection, and is associated with high excess mortality, frequent use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials and increased length of stay. This review explores the preventative strategies that have been examined in non-ventilator HAP (NV-HAP). The management of aspiration risk, interventions for oral hygiene, role of mobilization and physiotherapy, modification of environmental factors, and vaccination are discussed. Many of these interventions are low risk, acceptable to patients and have good cost-benefit ratios. However, the evidence base for prevention of NV-HAP is weak. This review identifies the lack of a unified research definition, under-recruitment to studies, and variation in intervention and outcome measures as limitations in the existing literature. Given that the core risk factors for acquisition of NV-HAP are increasing, there is an urgent need for research to address the prevention of NV-HAP. This review calls for a unified definition of NV-HAP, and identification of a core outcome set for studies in NV-HAP, and suggests future directions for research in NV-HAP. Improving care for people with NV-HAP will reduce morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs significantly.

Comparative analysis of antibodies to four major periodontal bacteria in respiratory diseases: a cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To make a descriptive comparison of antibodies to four major periodontal bacteria and their relation to the respiratory diseases asthma and bronchitis/emphysema, and to cancer incidence.

METHODS

The serum of a random sample of men with no history of cancer incidence (n=621) was analysed by the ELISA method for antibody levels of four periodontal bacteria; the anaerobes of the so-called red complex Tannerella forsythia (TF), Porphyromonas gingivalis (PG), and Treponema denticola (TD), and the facultative anaerobe Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (AA). The antibody readings were divided into quartiles and the distribution of cases of the relevant diseases as compared with the non-cases. Comparisons of the quartile distributions were by the Pearson χ2 test. Data and serum from the Oslo II study of Norwegian men from 2000 were used. The ELISA analyses were performed on thawed frozen serum. Cancer data from 17.5 years of follow-up were provided by the Norwegian Cancer Registry.

RESULTS

In all, 52 men had reported asthma and 23 men had bronchitis/emphysema at the health screening. Results on cancer incidence are given for all respiratory cancers, n=23, and bronchi and lung cancers separately, n=18. Stratified analyses were performed for the four endpoints showing significant association with low levels of TD antibodies for bronchitis; p=0.035. Both TF and TD were significant for low levels of antibodies among daily smokers; p=0.030 for TF and p<0.001 for TD in the analysis of the full study sample. For PG and AA, no such associations were observed. An association with respiratory cancers was not observed.

CONCLUSION

A low level of TD was associated with bronchitis/emphysema compared with the rest of the cohort. In the total study sample, low levels of antibodies to both TF and TD were associated with daily smoking.

Application progress of nursing intervention in cardiac surgery

As a stressor, cardiac surgery affects the physiology and psychology of patients, as well as their postoperative recovery. Patients tend to worry about cognitive deficiency, pain, discomfort, the risk of death, sleep, complications, and other factors, resulting in stress and anxiety. Moreover, serious adverse events, such as circulatory and respiratory dysfunction and infection, tend to occur after cardiac surgery and increase the economic burden on patients. Therefore, appropriate nursing interventions should be selected to strengthen patients’ cognitive levels, compliance, and postoperative practices to accelerate their recovery, reduce complications, and shorten hospital stays so as to contribute to patients’ lives and health.

Impact of oral/dental disease burden on postoperative infective complications: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the association between dental disease burden and postoperative infective complications (POICs) in patients undergoing major surgical procedures under general anaesthesia.

METHODS

Pre-surgical dental assessment was undertaken on patients planned for major surgery. Demographic and surgical variables including putative risk factors for POICs and POIC status were documented. The univariable association between POIC status and each factor was examined. Those variables associated at P value ≤ 0.2 were candidates for inclusion in multiple logistic regression models. Backward stepwise variable selection was used to identify the independent predictors for POIC in the best fitting logistic regression model. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was used to quantify the model's global classification performance.

RESULTS

Among the 285 patients, 49 patients (17.2%) had POICs. The independent predictors for POIC were expected length of hospital stay (4-6 days; odds ratio [OR] = 4.80, 95% confidence internal [CI]: 1.30-17.70, P = 0.018, 7-9 days; OR = 5.42, 95% CI: 1.51-19.41, P = 0.009, ≥ 10 days; OR = 28.80, 95% CI: 4.12-201.18, P < 0.001), four or more decayed teeth (OR = 6.03, 95% CI: 2.28-15.94, P < 0.001) and visible tongue plaque (OR = 3.21, 95% CI: 1.54-6.70, P = 0.002). The AUC was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85) indicating good discrimination. A simple screening tool for POIC was developed.

CONCLUSIONS/CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In addition to systemic/surgical factors, this study identified clinically detected decayed teeth and visible tongue plaque as independent predictors for POICs. Preoperative dental assessment/care might be beneficial to assess risk for POICs and improve postoperative outcomes.

Poor Oral Health in Trauma Intensive Care Unit Patients: Application of a Novel Oral Health Score

Background: Although oral hygiene in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been shown to reduce hospital-associated infections, baseline and progressive oral health are often not reported because of lack of a standardized tool. The Oral Health Risk Assessment Value Index (OHRAVI) is a comprehensive oral assessment validated by dental providers. This study hypothesizes that non-dental providers can use OHRAVI in trauma ICU patients with minimal training and acceptable inter-rater reliability (IRR). Patients and Methods: Dentulous adult patients in the ICU at a level 1 trauma center were scored, excluding those with severe orofacial trauma. The eight categories of the OHRAVI were scored 0 to 3 (best to worst) with summed total and index (average) score. Index scores 1 or less need routine oral care; greater than 1-2 require moderate care; and greater than 2-3 require extensive oromaxillofacial care. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by two to three raters with Krippendorff's α (≥0.80 for good and ≥0.667 for acceptable). Results: Eighty-four ratings were completed across 34 patients, with 16 patients (47%) scored by all three raters. Ten patients (29%) had an index score <1. The average index score for patients was 1.28 (median, 1.34; range, 0.63-2). Krippendorff's α for index score was 0.86. For individual categories, α ranged from 0.44 to 1, with six of the eight categories achieving an α ≥ 0.667. Conclusions: With minimal training, non-dental providers were able to use OHRAVI with a good IRR for index score and an acceptable/good IRR for most individual categories. This novel, simple, comprehensive oral health score could help standardize oral assessment and facilitate future studies of peri-operative oral hygiene interventions.

Does chlorhexidine reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in ICU patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate chlorhexidine's efficacy in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

SETTINGS

The data were obtained from Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE.

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Only mechanically ventilated patients for at least 48h were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Randomized clinical trials applying any dosage form of chlorhexidine were eligible.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

The relative risk (RR) of the VAP incidence and all-cause mortality was assessed using the random-effects model. The mean difference in days of mechanical ventilation duration and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay were also appraised.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1233 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The oral application of CHX reduced the incidence of VAP (RR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55, 0.97]) and did not show an increase in all-cause mortality (RR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.96, 1.32]).

CONCLUSIONS

CHX proved effective to prevent VAP. However, a conclusion on mortality rates could not be drawn because the quality of the evidence was very low for this outcome.

Short- and long term antibacterial effects of a single rinse with different mouthwashes: A randomized clinical trial

Objectives

Reducing the microbial level in the aerosol created during dental procedures is essential to avoiding infections. The aim of this study was to examine the change in Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and the total bacterial load in human saliva in vivo after a single rinse with different mouthwashes.

Material and methods

One mL of unstimulated saliva was collected from volunteers with poor oral hygiene at baseline and 5 min after a 1-min rinsing with diluted Solumium Oral® (hyper-pure 0.0015% chlorine dioxide; ClO₂), Listerine Total Care®, Corsodyl® (0.2% chlorhexidine-digluconate; CHX), or BioGate Si*CLEAN for bacterial investigation. In a second study, volunteers rinsed with 0.003% ClO₂ or CHX for 1 min, and saliva was collected at baseline, after 5 min, and after 90 min. After plating, the total plate and S. mutans colony numbers were determined.

Results

In the first study, ClO₂ and CHX similarly reduced both total germ and S. mutans numbers, while Listerine Total Care® decreased only the S. mutans counts. BioGate Si*Clean had no effect on either the total germ or S. mutans numbers. In the second study, an increasing tendency toward bacterial regrowth was observed with CHX after 90 min compared to the 5-min value, while no change was measured after ClO₂ rinsing.

Conclusion

Hyper-pure ClO₂ rinsing may be a new promising preventive and therapeutic adjuvant in dental practice, as it is similar in effectiveness to the gold standard CHX-containing mouthwashes, especially in patients concerned with taste or tooth discoloration during oral health therapy.

Pneumonia After Cardiovascular Surgery: Incidence, Risk Factors and Interventions

Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is prevalent in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery, associated with poor clinical outcomes, prolonged hospital stay and increased medical costs. This article aims to clarify the incidence, risk factors, and interventions for POP after cardiovascular surgery. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify previous reports involving POP after cardiovascular surgery. Current situation, predictors and preventive measures on the development of POP were collected and summarized. Many studies showed that POP was prevalent in various cardiovascular surgical types, and predictors varied in different studies, including advanced age, smoking, chronic lung disease, chronic kidney disease, cardiac surgery history, cardiac function, anemia, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, surgical types, cardiopulmonary bypass time, blood transfusion, duration of mechanical ventilation, repeated endotracheal intubation, and some other risk factors. At the same time, several targeted interventions have been widely reported to be effective to reduce the risk of POP and improve prognosis, including preoperative respiratory physiotherapy, oral care and subglottic secretion drainage. Through the review of the current status, risk factors and intervention measures, this article may play an important role in clinical prevention and treatment of POP after cardiovascular surgery.

Guidelines on enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) based on a multimodal perioperative medicine approach in adult cardiac surgery patients with the aim of improving patient satisfaction, reducing postoperative mortality and morbidity, and reducing the length of hospital stay.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 20 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation, SFAR) and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Société française de chirurgie thoracique et cardio-vasculaire, SFCTCV) was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide the assessment of the quality of evidence.

METHODS

Six fields were defined: (1) selection of the patient pathway and its information; (2) preoperative management and rehabilitation; (3) anaesthesia and analgesia for cardiac surgery; (4) surgical strategy for cardiac surgery and bypass management; (5) patient blood management; and (6) postoperative enhanced recovery. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out and analyses were performed using the GRADE approach. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method.

RESULTS

The SFAR/SFCTCV guideline panel provided 33 recommendations on the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump. After three rounds of voting and several amendments, a strong agreement was reached for the 33 recommendations. Of these recommendations, 10 have a high level of evidence (7 GRADE 1+ and 3 GRADE 1-); 19 have a moderate level of evidence (15 GRADE 2+ and 4 GRADE 2-); and 4 are expert opinions. Finally, no recommendations were provided for 3 questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong agreement existed among the experts to provide recommendations to optimise the complete perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

An innovative oral management procedure to reduce postoperative complications

Background

Numerous studies have shown that improving oral hygiene contributes to a reduction in the risk of postoperative complications in patients with head and neck cancer, cardiac disease, and esophageal cancer. However, the beneficial standard for oral management procedures during the perioperative period has not yet been established. Therefore, our aim was to determine whether or not their innovative oral management intervention contributed to a reduction in postoperative complications in lung cancer.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients who underwent lung cancer surgery with lobectomy and pneumonectomy at Kyorin University Hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a perioperative oral management intervention group that underwent lung cancer surgery from April 2016 to March 2018 (n = 164), and a control group without oral management that underwent surgery from April 2014 to March 2016 (n = 199). In particular, our oral management procedure emphasized oral mucosa stimulation to induce saliva discharge as in gum chewing, rather than simply using teeth brushing to reduce oral microbiome. Therefore, our oral management procedure is different from traditional oral care.

Results

This study demonstrated that our oral management practice was associated with a decline in the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia (odds ratio, 0.184; 95% CI, 0.042-0.571; P = .009), postoperative hospital stay duration (β coefficient, −4.272; 95% CI, −6.390 to −2.155; P < .001) and Clavian-Dindo classification grade II or above (odds ratio, 0.503; 95% CI, 0.298-0.835; P = .009).

Conclusions

We propose an innovative new strategy using their unique oral management procedure to reduce postoperative complications resulting from pulmonary resection.

Development and validation of a nomogram model for pneumonia after redo cardiac surgery

AIMS

Postoperative pneumonia (POP) after redo cardiac surgery is prevalent, associated with poor outcome. The aim of this study was to identify independent risk factors for POP after redo cardiac surgery and to develop and validate a prediction model.

METHODS

Adults undergoing redo cardiac surgery from 2016 to 2019 were identified in a single-institution database. Using a 2: 1 ratio, the patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify independent predictors for POP in the training set. A nomogram model was constructed for clinical utility and was validated in the validation set.

RESULTS

POP developed in 72 of the 376 patients (19.1%). Four independent risk factors were identified, including age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, serum creatinine level and intraoperative blood transfusion volume. A nomogram based on the four predictors was constructed, with good discrimination in both the training (c-index: 0.86) and validation sets (c-index: 0.78). The model was well calibrated, with a Hosmer-Lemeshow χ 2 -value of 7.31 ( P   =  0.50) in the training set and 7.41 ( P   =  0.49) in the validation set. The calibration was also good by visual inspection. The decision and clinical impact curves of the nomogram indicated good clinical utility. Three risk intervals were identified based on the nomogram for better risk stratification.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated a nomogram model for POP after redo cardiac surgery. The model may have good clinical utility in risk evaluation and individualized treatment to reduce adverse events. Graphical abstract Incidence, risk factor, and outcomes of postoperative pneumonia after redo cardiac surgery: http://links.lww.com/JCM/A445 .

Comparison of Efficacy of 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Alcohol and 10% Povidone-Iodine-Alcohol against Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections and Bacterial Colonization at Central Venous Catheter Insertion Sites: A Prospective, Single-Center, Open-Label, Crossover Study

An effective antiseptic agent is an essential component of a central venous catheter (CVC) care bundle, to protect against catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). We conducted a trial to compare the incidences of CRBSI and the growth of insertion site flora in patients with CVC using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate−alcohol (CHG) or 10% povidone-iodine−alcohol (PVI) in the CVC care bundle. Patients who were admitted to two medical intensive care units (ICUs) and had CVC placement for >48 h were enrolled. Using a two-way crossover design with two six-month interventions, the ICUs were assigned to use either CHG or PVI in their care bundles. A total of 446 catheters in 390 subjects were enrolled in the study. The detection rate of flora was greater in the PVI group on both day 7 (26.6% versus 6.3%, p < 0.001) and day 14 (43.2% versus 15.8%, p < 0.001). The incidence rate of CRBSI was higher in the PVI group compared to the CHG group (2.15 vs. 0 events per 1000-catheter-days, p = 0.001), although the significance was lost in the multivariate analysis. In conclusion, 2% CHG was superior to 10% PVI in the CVC care bundle in terms of the inhibition of skin flora growth at CVC insertion sites and was potentially associated with lower incidence rates of CRBSI.

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for postoperative pneumonia in adult patients undergoing Stanford type A acute aortic dissection surgery: a case control study

Background

Pneumonia is a common complication after Stanford type A acute aortic dissection surgery (AADS) and contributes significantly to morbidity, mortality, and length of stay. The purpose of this study was to identify independent risk factors associated with pneumonia after AADS and to develop and validate a risk prediction model.

Methods

Adults undergoing AADS between 2016 and 2019 were identified in a single-institution database. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets at a ratio of 2:1. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were included for analysis. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed using significant variables from univariate analysis in the training set. A nomogram was constructed for clinical utility and the model was validated in an independent dataset.

Results

Postoperative pneumonia developed in 170 of 492 patients (34.6%). In the training set, multivariate analysis identified seven independent predictors for pneumonia after AADS including age, smoking history, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal insufficiency, leucocytosis, low platelet count, and intraoperative transfusion of red blood cells. The model demonstrated good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow χ² = 3.31, P = 0.91) and discrimination (C-index = 0.77) in the training set. The model was also well calibrated (Hosmer–Lemeshow χ² = 5.73, P = 0.68) and showed reliable discriminatory ability (C-index = 0.78) in the validation set. By visual inspection, the calibrations were good in both the training and validation sets.

Conclusion

We developed and validated a risk prediction model for pneumonia after AADS. The model may have clinical utility in individualized risk evaluation and perioperative management.

Development and Validation of Nomogram Models for Postoperative Pneumonia in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Cardiac Surgery

Background: Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a frequent complication following cardiac surgery, related to increased morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. The objectives of this study were to investigate the risk factors associated with POP in adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery and to develop and validate nomogram models.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in four cardiac centers in China. Adults operated with elective open-heart surgery from 2016 to 2020 were included. Patients were randomly allocated to training and validation sets by 7:3 ratio. Demographics, comorbidities, laboratory data, surgical factors, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Risk factors for POP were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis. Nomograms were constructed based on the multivariate logistic regression models and were evaluated with calibration, discrimination and decision curve analysis.

Results: A total of 13,380 patients meeting the criteria were included and POP developed in 882 patients (6.6%). The mortality was 2.0%, but it increased significantly in patients with POP (25.1 vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001). Using preoperative and intraoperative variables, we constructed a full nomogram model based on ten independent risk factors and a preoperative nomogram model based on eight preoperative factors. Both nomograms demonstrated good calibration, discrimination, and were well validated. The decision curves indicated significant clinical usefulness. Finally, four risk intervals were defined for better clinical application.

Conclusions: We developed and validated two nomogram models for POP following elective cardiac surgery using preoperative and intraoperative factors, which may be helpful for individualized risk evaluation and prevention decisions.

Effectiveness of chlorhexidine in preventing infections among patients undergoing cardiac surgeries: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Although several meta-analyses reported the impact of chlorhexidine (CHX) use in patients undergoing various types of surgery, no meta-analysis summarized the overall effectiveness of CHX specifically for cardiac surgery. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of CHX on infections after cardiac surgery compared with other cleansers or antiseptics.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to October 2020 for potentially eligible studies: (1) population: patients who underwent cardiac surgery; (2) intervention or exposure: any type of CHX use in the treatment or exposed group; (3) outcome: number of patients with infections; (4) comparison: placebo or other antiseptic agents; (5) English. The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI).

Results

Fourteen studies were included, with 8235 and 6901 patients in the CHX and control groups. CHX was not protective against SSI (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.57–1.04, P = 0.090). CHX was protective for superficial wound infection (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26–0.70, P = 0.001), but not with deep wound infection (P = 0.509). CHX was not protective against urinary tract of infection (P = 0.415) but was protective for bloodstream infection (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.16–0.80, P = 0.012), nosocomial infections (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.44–0.69, P < 0.001), and pneumonia (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.11–0.61, P = 0.002).

Conclusions

In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, CHX does not protect against SSI, deep wound infection, and urinary tract infections but might protect against superficial SSI, bloodstream infection, nosocomial infections, and pneumonia.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-01009-3.

Clinical risk score for postoperative pneumonia following heart valve surgery

Background:

Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is one of the most common infections following heart valve surgery (HVS) and is associated with a significant increase in morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. This study aimed to identify the major risk factors associated with the occurrence of POP following HVS and to derive and validate a clinical risk score.

Methods:

Adults undergoing open HVS between January 2016 and December 2019 at a single institution were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to the derivation and validation sets at 1:1 ratio. A prediction model was developed with multivariable logistic regression analysis in the derivation set. Points were assigned to independent risk factors based on their regression coefficients.

Results:

POP occurred in 316 of the 3853 patients (8.2%). Multivariable analysis identified ten significant predictors for POP in the derivation set, including older age, smoking history, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, poor cardiac function, heart surgery history, longer cardiopulmonary bypass, blood transfusion, and concomitant coronary and/or aortic surgery. A 22-point risk score based on the multivariable model was then generated, demonstrating good discrimination (C-statistic: 0.81), and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ² = 8.234, P = 0.312). The prediction rule also showed adequate discriminative power (C-statistic: 0.83) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ² = 5.606, P = 0.691) in the validation set. Three risk intervals were defined as low-, medium-, and high-risk groups.

Conclusion:

We derived and validated a 22-point risk score for POP following HVS, which may be useful in preventive interventions and risk management.

Trial Registration:

Chictr.org, ChiCTR1900028127; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=46932

Association between perioperative chlorhexidine oral care and postoperative pneumonia in non-cardiac surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pneumonia is the third most common complication after surgery, and its occurrence is associated with a poor prognosis in patients. Perioperative chlorhexidine oral care has been reported to reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, whether perioperative chlorhexidine oral care can reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in noncardiac surgical patients is still unknown. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the association between perioperative chlorhexidine oral care and postoperative pneumonia in noncardiac surgical patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search of PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang Database, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure was conducted to include studies from the inception of each database through March 2021. The reference lists of all included studies were also searched by hand. Eligible studies were published and unpublished randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating the effect of perioperative chlorhexidine oral care on the reported incidence of postoperative pneumonia. Relative risks or odds ratio with their 95% confidence intervals were calculated and risk of bias was assessed for eligible studies.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials with a total of 1,773 patients and 3 observational studies with a total of 12,528 noncardiac surgical patients were included. A total of 621 and 5,904 patients received perioperative chlorhexidine oral care in randomized controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. Six (85%) randomized controlled trials had a high risk of bias, and 2 (67%) observational studies had a high quality. Perioperative chlorhexidine oral care significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in randomized controlled trials (relative risk, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.80; P < .001) and observational studies (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.90; P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative chlorhexidine oral care led by a nurse significantly decreases the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in noncardiac surgical patients and may be more convenient and economical compared with dental professional-led perioperative oral care.

Risk factors for postoperative pneumonia after cardiac surgery: a prediction model

Background

Postoperative pneumonia is the main infectious complication following cardiac surgery and is associated with significant increases in morbidity, mortality and health care costs. The aim of this study was to identify potential risk factors related to the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery and to develop a predictive system.

Methods

Adult patients who underwent open heart surgery in our institution between 2016 and 2019 were enrolled in this study. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were collected and analyzed. A multivariate prediction model for evaluating the risk of postoperative pneumonia was established using logistic regression analysis via forward stepwise selection, and points were assigned to significant risk factors based on their regression coefficient values.

Results

Postoperative pneumonia occurred in 530 of the 5,323 patients (9.96%). Prolonged stays in the postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital, as well as higher mortality (25.66% versus 0.65%), were observed in patients with postoperative pneumonia. Multivariate analysis identified 13 independent risk factors including patient demographics, comorbidities, cardiac function, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration, and blood transfusion. The prediction model showed good discrimination (C-statistic: 0.80) and was well calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ²=7.907, P value =0.443). A 32-point risk score was generated, and then three risk intervals were defined.

Conclusions

We derived and validated a prediction model for postoperative pneumonia after cardiac surgery incorporating 13 easily discernible risk factors. The scoring system may be helpful for individualized risk estimations and clinical decision-making.

Pulmonary Complications of Cardiac Surgery

Cardiothoracic surgery posits an arrangement of large, significant hemodynamic, and physiologic alterations upon the human body, which predisposes a patient to develop pathology. The care of these patients in the postoperative realm requires an astute physician with deep understanding of the cardiopulmonary system, who is able to address subtle developing problems promptly, before the patient suffers further sequelae. In this review, we describe the presentation and management of an assortment of important complications which occur in the pulmonary system. In addition, we aim to shed better light upon how the physiology of a patient responds to the condition of cardiothoracic surgery.

Antiviral mouthwashes: possible benefit for COVID-19 with evidence-based approach

BACKGROUND

The outbreak, and pandemic of COVID-19 causing widespread concerns in all health systems of countries. Virus-carrying aerosols can penetrate the healthy human body and lungs, resulting in rapid transmission. For the first time, in this evidence-based article, the effects of different types of mouthwashes to reduce the viral load were investigated. Also, another aim of this essay is a reduction in viral load in patients with COVID-19 and prevention developing ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Related databases were comprehensively searched for relevant studies. The present study was performed according to the preferred cases for standard systematic reviews (PRISMA).

RESULTS

Five original studies in which the subject matter was directly evaluated were included. Different types of mouthwashes and viruses were investigated in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The antiviral mouthwashes play a certainly important role in reducing the viral load of the salivary virus. In the present study, this importance could be proved in two different aspects, that is, the use of mouthwash before dental procedures to reduce the risk of transmission of the virus to the dental team and the use of this mouthwash in COVID-19 patients to help improve systemic problems associated with oral microbial flora.

The underestimated problem of oral Candida colonization-An observational pilot study in one nursing home

Objectives

Older people are at increased risk of intraoral yeast colonization. In this observational case series, we assessed Candida colonization among nine nursing home residents to investigate possible correlations with their individual characteristics, general health parameters, and oral care. We also described the effect of professional dental cleaning (PDC) including prosthesis cleaning on colonization cases.

Materials and methods

General clinical and oral health was assessed in nine residents, and samples were taken from six oral mucosa sites or prosthetic surfaces. PDC was performed to achieve macroscopically clean results, and residents were re-examined 2 weeks later.

Results

We found that six residents were intraorally colonized with Candida albicans; four also had Candida glabrata. Prostheses were particularly infected. Dementia, multimorbidity, and presence of prostheses reduced oral hygiene ability; requiring assistance for oral hygiene care was a risk indicator for Candida colonization. PDC reduced C. albicans (at the expense of increased C. glabrata) but was not optimal for maintaining Candida reduction.

Conclusion

In this pilot study, Candida colonization is prevalent among nursing home residents, especially those with cognitive impairment, multimorbidity, or reduced oral hygiene capacity. Potential negative effects on general health necessitate diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines. PDC alone did not maintain the reduction in Candida colonization; additional methods for daily oral care are necessary.