Commentary: To wrap or not to wrap-Have we now come full circle?

Modified aortic root anastomosis and the frozen elephant trunk technique using an integrated tetra-furcate graft to repair type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the preferred treatment for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (STAAD); however, due to the complexity of the procedure, cardiac ischaemia and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time are longer than general heart surgery, leading to complications. In this present study, we used an integrated tetra-furcate graft for both modified aortic root and distal arch anastomoses (frozen elephant trunk technique, [FET]), and investigated postoperative outcomes associated with this technique in patients with STAAD.

METHODS

We included a total of 140 patients who underwent total arch replacement and FET between January 2019 and June 2022 in the present study, 41 patients who underwent the modified technique, and 99 who underwent the graft eversion technique. We subsequently analyzed the perioperative outcomes to compare the differences between the two techniques.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in regards to the preoperative characteristics; however, the intraoperative CPB, cardiac ischaemia, and operation times of the modified technique group were significantly shorter than those of the eversion technique group (P = 0.02, P = 0.01, and P = 0.04, respectively), as were postoperative hypoxaemia, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and ventilation times (P = 0.04, P = 0.03, and P = 0.04, respectively). Additionally, the degree of postoperative bilirubin elevation was milder in the modified technique group (P = 0.002 for direct bilirubin and P = 0.01 for indirect bilirubin).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified anastomosis technique can significantly shorten CPB, cardiac ischemia, and operation times, and reduce the intraoperative FFP transfusion and postoperative hypoxemia times. This modified technique, therefore, is worth utilizing for patients with STAAD.

Mid-term Patency of the Great Saphenous Bypass to Aorta vs. Non-aortic Arteries in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery With Concomitant CABG

Background: Stanford type A aortic dissection (STAAD) is often associated with coronary artery problems requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the prognosis of different proximal graft locations remains unclear.

Methods: From May 2015 to April 2020, 62 patients with acute STAAD who underwent aortic surgery concomitant with CABG were enrolled in our study. Aortic bypass was defined as connecting the proximal end of the vein bridge to the artificial aorta (SVG-AO); non-aortic bypass was defined as connecting the proximal end of the vein bridge to a non-aorta vessel, including left subclavian artery, left common carotid artery, and right brachiocephalic artery (non-SVG-AO). We compared early- and mid-term results between patients in the above two groups. Early results included death and bleeding, and mid-term results graft patency, aortic-related events, and bleeding. Grafts were evaluated by post-operative coronary computed tomography angiography. According to the Fitzgibbon classification, grade A (graft stenosis <50%) is considered a patent graft. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess differences between aortic and non-aortic bypass in STAAD.

Results: SVG-AO and non-SVG-AO were performed in 15 and 47 patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in death (log-rank test, p = 0.426) or bleeding (p = 0.766) between the two groups in the short term. One year of follow-up was completed in 37 patients (eight in the SVG-AO group and 29 in the non-SVG-AO group), among which 14/15 (93.3%) grafts were patent in the SVG-AO group and 32/33 (97.0%) grafts in the non-SVG-AO at 1 week, without a significant difference (p = 0.532). At 3 months, 12/13 (92.3%) grafts were patent in the SVG-AO group and 16/32 (50.0%) grafts in the non-SVG-AO, with a significant difference (p = 0.015), and 12/13 (92.3%) grafts in the SVG-AO group and 15/32 (46.9%) grafts in the non-SVG-AO group were patents, with a significant difference. Multivariate analysis showed proximal aortic bypass and dual anticoagulation to be protective factors for the 1-year patency of grafts.

Conclusion: In patients requiring aortic dissection surgery with concomitant CABG, no differencess' between SVG-AO and SVG-non-AO in early outcomes were detected, but SVG-AO may have higher mid-term patency.