Influence of donor brain death duration on outcomes following heart transplantation: A United Network for Organ Sharing Registry analysis

Better liver transplant outcomes by donor interventions?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Donor risk factors and events surrounding donation impact the quantity and quality of grafts generated to meet liver transplant waitlist demands. Donor interventions represent an opportunity to mitigate injury and risk factors within donors themselves. The purpose of this review is to describe issues to address among donation after brain death, donation after circulatory determination of death, and living donors directly, for the sake of optimizing relevant outcomes among donors and recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies on donor management practices and high-level evidence supporting specific interventions are scarce. Nonetheless, for donation after brain death (DBD), critical care principles are employed to correct cardiocirculatory compromise, impaired tissue oxygenation and perfusion, and neurohormonal deficits. As well, certain treatments as well as marginally prolonging duration of brain death among otherwise stable donors may help improve posttransplant outcomes. In donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD), interventions are performed to limit warm ischemia and reverse its adverse effects. Finally, dietary and exercise programs have improved donation outcomes for both standard as well as overweight living donor (LD) candidates, while minimally invasive surgical techniques may offer improved outcomes among LD themselves.

SUMMARY

Donor interventions represent means to improve liver transplant yield and outcomes of liver donors and grafts.

No Evidence of Progressive Proinflammatory Cytokine Storm in Brain-dead Organ Donors-A Time-course Analysis Using Clinical Samples

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplantation is a cost-effective treatment for end-stage organ failure. Organ donation after brain death is an important source of transplanted organs. Data are limited on the effects of brain injury or donor management on grafts. The consensus view has been that brain death creates a progressively proinflammatory environment. We aimed to investigate time-course changes across a range of cytokines in a donation after brain death cohort of donors who died of intracranial hemorrhage without any other systemic source of inflammation.

METHODS

A donor cohort was defined using the UK Quality in Organ Donation biobank. Serum levels of proteins involved in proinflammatory and brain injury pathways (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, complement C5a, neuron-specific enolase, and glial fibrillary acidic protein) were measured from admission to organ recovery. Moving median analysis was used to combine donor trajectories and delineate a time-course.

RESULTS

A cohort of 27 donors with brain death duration between 10 and 30 h was created, with 24 donors contributing to the time-course analysis. We observed no increase in tumor necrosis factor-alpha or interleukin-6 throughout the donor management period. Neuronal injury marker and complement C5a remain high from admission to organ recovery, whereas glial fibrillary acidic protein rises around the confirmation of brain death.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of a progressive rise of proinflammatory mediators with prolonged duration of brain death, questioning the hypothesis of a progressively proinflammatory environment. Furthermore, the proposed approach allows us to study chronological changes and identify biomarkers or target pathways when logistical or ethical considerations limit sample availability.

The decedent model: A new paradigm for de-risking high stakes clinical trials like xenotransplantation

The first 2 living recipients of pig hearts died unexpectedly within 2 months, despite both recipients receiving what over 30 years of nonhuman primate (NHP) research would suggest were the optimal gene edits and immunosuppression to ensure success. These results prompt us to question how faithfully data from the NHP model translate into human outcomes. Before attempting any further heart xenotransplants in living humans, it is highly advisable to gain a more comprehensive understanding of why the promising preclinical NHP data did not accurately predict outcomes in humans. It is also unlikely that additional NHP data will provide more information that would de-risk a xenoheart clinical trial because these cases were based on the best practices from the most successful NHP results to date. Although imperfect, the decedent model offers a complementary avenue to determine appropriate treatment regimens to control the human immune response to xenografts and better understand the biologic differences between humans and NHP that could lead to such starkly contrasting outcomes. Herein, we explore the potential benefits and drawbacks of the decedent model and contrast it to the advantages and disadvantages of the extensive body of data generated in the NHP xenoheart transplantation model.

Association of Procurement Time With Pancreas Transplant Outcomes in Brain-Dead Donors

A brain-death-induced cytokine storm damages organs in an organ donor. However, a longer time period between declaration of brain death and organ procurement (procurement interval) is associated with improved outcomes in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation. The aim of this study was to find the optimal procurement interval for pancreas transplantation. Association of procurement interval with pancreas graft outcomes was analyzed using multivariable models adjusted for variables possibly affecting procurement interval and outcomes. Altogether 10,119 pancreas transplantations were included from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. The median follow-up was 3.2 (IQR 1.01-6.50) years. During the first year, 832 (9.0%) grafts were lost, including 555 (6.0%) within the first 30 days. Longer procurement interval was associated with increased death-censored graft survival in a multivariable model (HR 0.944 95% CI 0.917-0.972, per 10-h increase, p < 0.001). A decreasing hazard of graft loss was observed also with 1-year, but not with 30-day graft survival. During 1-year follow-up, 953 (12.1%) patients had an acute rejection, and longer procurement interval was also associated with less acute rejections (OR 0.937 95% CI 0.900-0.976, per 10-h increase, p = 0.002) in the multivariable model. In conclusion, longer procurement interval is associated with improved long-term outcomes in pancreas transplantation.

Cardiovascular mechanism of donor brain death and heart recipient survival

BACKGROUND

Heart donation after donor brain death from cardiac arrest despite successful resuscitation may be associated with worse recipient outcomes due to potential graft ischemia or underlying rhythmic/structural defects. However, selected grafts from such donors often have normal cardiac function and anatomy. We investigated whether a cardiovascular mechanism of donor brain death (CV-DBD) was associated with worse recipient outcomes.

METHODS

We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for first-time, single-organ, adult (age 18+) heart transplant recipients and their associated donors between January 2005 and March 2021. Recipients were stratified by donor status (CV-DBD vs. non-CV-DBD). We performed multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling to ascertain whether receiving a CV-DBD graft was independently associated with mortality.

RESULTS

Of 35,833 included recipients, 2,702 (7.5%) received CV-DBD grafts. The associated donors were significantly more likely to be female, older, and have a history of diabetes, hypertension, and substance use (all p < .001). On unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis, CV-DBD recipients had a significantly reduced median survival than non-CV-DBD recipients (12.0 vs. 13.1 years, log-rank p = .04). However, after adjusting for donor/recipient age, recipient comorbidities, annualized center volume, and transplantation era, CV-DBD organ status was not associated with recipient mortality (hazard ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.96-1.13, p = .28).

CONCLUSION

In this analysis of over 35,000 heart transplants, CV-DBD status was not associated with adjusted recipient survival. Donor brain death due to cardiac arrest should not be an absolute contraindication to heart donation, although graft function should be carefully assessed before transplantation.

Timing of Organ Procurement From Brain-Dead Donors Associates With Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After Liver Transplantation

Brain death-induced cytokine storm is thought to harm transplantable organs. However, longer procurement times have been associated with non-inferior or better outcomes in kidney, heart, and lung transplants, while optimal procurement time for liver allografts is unknown. Our aim was to analyze the association of time interval from brain death to organ procurement with liver allograft outcomes in two nationwide cohorts. The association of procurement interval with graft survival and short-term complications was analysed in multivariable models. Altogether 643 and 58,017 orthotopic liver transplantations from brain-dead donors were included from Finland between June 2004 and December 2017 and the US between January 2008 and August 2018, respectively. Median time from brain death to organ procurement was 10.5 h in Finland and 34.6 h in the US. Longer interval associated with better graft survival (non-linearly, p = 0.016) and less acute rejections (OR 0.935 95% CI 0.894–0.978) in the US cohort, and better early allograft function (p = 0.005; Beta −0.048 95% CI −0.085 −(−0.011)) in the Finnish cohort, in multivariable models adjusted with Donor Risk Index, recipient age, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and indication for transplantation. Progressive liver injury after brain death is unlikely. Rushing to recover seems unnecessary; rest and repair might prove beneficial.

Involvement of GPR37L1 in murine blood pressure regulation and human cardiac disease pathophysiology

Multiple mouse lines lacking the orphan G protein-coupled receptor, GPR37L1, have elicited disparate cardiovascular phenotypes. The first Gpr37l1 knockout mice study to be published reported a marked elevation in systolic blood pressure (SBP; ∼60 mmHg), revealing a potential therapeutic opportunity. The phenotype differed from our own independently generated knockout line, where male mice exhibited equivalent baseline blood pressure to wild type. Here, we attempted to reproduce the first study by characterizing the cardiovascular phenotype of both the original knockout and transgenic lines alongside a C57BL/6J control line, using the same method of blood pressure measurement. The present study supports the findings from our independently developed Gpr37l1 knockout line, finding that SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are not different in the original Gpr37l1 knockout male mice (SBP: 130.9 ± 5.3 mmHg; DBP: 90.7 ± 3.0 mmHg) compared with C57BL/6J mice (SBP: 123.1 ± 4.1 mmHg; DBP: 87.0 ± 2.7 mmHg). Instead, we attribute the apparent hypertension of the knockout line originally described to comparison with a seemingly hypotensive transgenic line (SBP 103.7 ± 5.0 mmHg; DBP 71.9 ± 3.7 mmHg). Additionally, we quantified myocardial GPR37L1 transcript in humans, which was suggested to be downregulated in cardiovascular disease. We found that GPR37L1 has very low native transcript levels in human myocardium and that expression is not different in tissue samples from patients with heart failure compared with sex-matched healthy control tissue. These findings indicate that cardiac GPR37L1 expression is unlikely to contribute to the pathophysiology of human heart failure.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study characterizes systolic blood pressure (SBP) in a Gpr37l1 knockout mouse line, which was previously reported to have ∼60 mmHg higher SBP compared with a transgenic line. We observed only a ∼27 mmHg SBP difference between the lines. However, when compared with C57BL/6J mice, knockout mice showed no difference in SBP. We also investigated GPR37L1 mRNA abundance in human hearts and observed no difference between healthy and failing heart samples.

The Association of Time to Organ Procurement on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Transplant centers in Europe aim to minimize the time from brain death to organ procurement (procurement delay), but evidence to justify this is scarce. In the United States, procurement times are significantly longer. Our objective was to analyze how procurement delay associates with kidney allograft outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Kidney transplantations from brain-dead donors were retrospectively analyzed from the Finnish Kidney Transplant Registry and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients in the United States. Multivariable models were adjusted with donor and recipient characteristics, and the relationship between procurement delay and outcomes was modeled with cubic spline functions.

RESULTS

In total, 2388 and 101,474 kidney transplantations in Finland and the United States were included, respectively. The median procurement delay was 9.8 hours (interquartile range, 7.8-12.4) in Finland and 34.8 hours (interquartile range, 26.3-46.3) in the United States. A nonlinear association was observed between procurement delay and the risk of delayed graft function, with highest risk seen in short and very long procurement delays. In multivariable models, the lowest risk of delayed graft function was associated with procurement delay between 20 and 50 hours. In multivariable models, longer procurement delay was linearly associated with lower risk of graft loss (hazard ratio, 0.90/1 h longer; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 0.92; P<0.001). Acute rejection rates, for which data were only available from Finland, were not associated with procurement delay.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer procurement delay was associated with noninferior or even better kidney allograft outcomes.

Optimisation of the organ donor and effects on transplanted organs: a narrative review on current practice and future directions

Mortality remains high for patients on the waiting list for organ transplantation. A marked imbalance between the number of available organs and recipients that need to be transplanted persists. Organs from deceased donors are often declined due to perceived and actual suboptimal quality. Adequate donor management offers an opportunity to reduce organ injury and maximise the number of organs than can be offered in order to respect the donor's altruistic gift. The cornerstones of management include: correction of hypovolaemia; maintenance of organ perfusion; prompt treatment of diabetes insipidus; corticosteroid therapy; and lung protective ventilation. The interventions used to deliver these goals are largely based on pathophysiological rationale or extrapolations from general critical care patients. There is currently insufficient high-quality evidence that has assessed whether any interventions in the donor after brain death may actually improve immediate post-transplant function and long-term graft survival or recipient survival after transplantation. Improvements in our understanding of the underlying mechanisms following brain death, in particular the role of immunological and metabolic changes in donors, offer promising future therapeutic opportunities to increase organ utilisation. Establishing a UK donor management research programme involves consideration of ethical, logistical and legal issues that will benefit transplanted patients while respecting the wishes of donors and their families.