Commentary: The many roads traveled in tetralogy of Fallot repair

Evaluating variation in pre-operative evaluation and planning for children undergoing atrial or ventricular septal defect repair

BACKGROUND

CHD care is resource-intensive. Unwarranted variation in care may increase cost and result in poorer health outcomes. We hypothesise that process variation exists within the pre-operative evaluation and planning process for children undergoing repair of atrial septal defect or ventricular septal defect and that substantial variation occurs in a small number of care points.

METHODS

From interviews with staff of an integrated congenital heart centre, an initial process map was constructed. A retrospective chart review of patients with isolated surgical atrial septal defect and ventricular septal defect repair from 7/1/2018 through 11/1/2020 informed revisions of the process map. The map was assessed for points of consistency and variability.

RESULTS

Thirty-two surgical atrial septal defect/ventricular septal defect repair patients were identified. Ten (31%) were reviewed by interventional cardiology before surgical review. Of these, 6(60%) had a failed catheter-based closure and 4 (40%) were deemed inappropriate for catheter-based closure. Thirty (94%) were reviewed in case conference, all attended surgical clinic, and none were admitted prior to surgery. The process map from interviews alone identified surgery rescheduling as a point of major variability; however, chart review revealed this was not as prominent a source of variability as pre-operative interventional cardiology review.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variation in the pre-operative evaluation and planning process for surgical atrial septal defect/ventricular septal defect patients was identified. If such process variation is widespread through CHD care, it may contribute to variations in outcome and cost previously documented within CHD surgery. Future research will focus on determining whether the variation is warranted or unwarranted, associated health outcomes and cost variation attributed to these variations in care processes.

Impact of operator experience and volume on outcomes after complete repair for tetralogy of Fallot

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of individual operator experience on outcomes after complete repair for tetralogy of Fallot.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients who underwent TOF repair at a single institution were included and compared according to whether the primary operator was an experienced, high-volume operator (defined as an operator who performed at least 20 surgical procedures for congenital heart disease defined as complex by the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery classification per year for at least 3 consecutive years). The primary outcome was defined as a composite of death, or reintervention, or significant annular peak gradient, or significant pulmonary regurgitation. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards model analyses were used to assess the relationships between operator experience and outcomes.

RESULTS

From January 2012 to December 2017, a total of 1760 patients with primary diagnosis of TOF underwent TOF repair by 37 operators. Of these, 5 operators (13.5%) were considered experienced, and 32 (86.5%) were considered less experienced. Complete follow-up data were available for 1728 complete repair for TOF patients with a median follow-up duration of 49 months; in 611 patients (35.4%), the surgery was performed by experienced operators, and in 1117 patients (64.6%), the surgery was performed by less experienced operators. Adjusted risks for the primary outcome and significant pulmonary regurgitation were lower for patients who were treated by experienced operators, both at discharge [adjusted odds ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.90; adjusted odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.78, respectively] and at follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.97; adjusted hazard ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.87, respectively). The trend for the primary outcome during follow-up remained unchanged, even in most subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased surgeon experience is associated with improved risk-adjusted outcomes. These results have potentially important implications for individual training, quality improvement and hospital programmes in the context of complete repair for TOF.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

http://www.chictr.org.cn number, ChiCTR2000033234.