Commentary: Yin and Yang: Antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapies to prevent vein graft thrombosis and atherosclerosis after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Thrombogenic Properties of Arterial Elastic Laminae

Elastic laminae, an elastin-based, layered extracellular matrix structure in the media of arteries, can inhibit leukocyte adhesion and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, exhibiting anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombogenic properties. These properties prevent inflammatory and thrombogenic activities in the arterial media, constituting a mechanism for the maintenance of the structural integrity of the arterial wall in vascular disorders. The biological basis for these properties is the elastin-induced activation of inhibitory signaling pathways, involving the inhibitory cell receptor signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα) and Src homology 2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 1 (SHP1). The activation of these molecules causes deactivation of cell adhesion- and proliferation-regulatory signaling mechanisms. Given such anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombogenic properties, elastic laminae and elastin-based materials have potential for use in vascular reconstruction.

Ticagrelor versus aspirin 2 years after coronary bypass: Observational analysis from the TARGET trial

BACKGROUND

Compared to conventional aspirin therapy, ticagrelor did not improve vein graft patency 1 year after coronary bypass surgery (CABG) in the ticagrelor antiplatelet therapy to reduce graft events and thrombosis (TARGET) trial. However, it is unknown whether ticagrelor may impact graft patency long-term following surgery.

METHODS

In the TARGET multicenter trial, 250 CABG patients were randomized to aspirin 81 mg or ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily. In this observational analysis, 2 years after surgery, vein graft occlusion and clinical events were compared among subjects who agreed to a second year of double-blind study drug administration (N = 156).

RESULTS

Two-year graft assessment was performed for 142 patients (80 aspirin patients, 62 ticagrelor patients, 425 total grafts), with an overall 2-year graft occlusion rate of 10.6%. Vein graft occlusion at 2 years, the primary outcome of this study, did not significantly differ between the two groups (15.7% vs. 13.2%, aspirin vs. ticagrelor, p = .71). The incidence of vein grafts with any disease (stenosis or occlusion) did not significantly differ between the groups (19.4% vs. 19.8%, aspirin vs. ticagrelor, p = 1.00), and the number of patients with vein graft disease did not significantly differ between the groups (30.0% vs. 29.0%, aspirin vs. ticagrelor, p = 1.00). Vein grafts developing new disease did not significantly differ between the two groups (1.5% vs. 3.8%, aspirin vs. ticagrelor, p = .41). Freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years was similar between the groups (p = .75).

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional aspirin therapy, ticagrelor did not significantly reduce vein graft disease 2 years after CABG.

Ticagrelor versus aspirin and vein graft patency after coronary bypass: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy prevents saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusion and improves outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, the optimal postoperative antiplatelet regimen remains unclear. The goal of the Ticagrelor Antiplatelet Therapy to Reduce Graft Events and Thrombosis (TARGET) trial was to assess whether early postoperative ticagrelor reduces SVG occlusion compared to conventional aspirin therapy.

METHODS

In this multi-center double-blind randomized trial, 250 patients who had CABG with SVG were randomized to receive either aspirin 81 mg twice daily or ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily. The primary outcome was SVG occlusion at 1 year.

RESULTS

Altogether, 123 patients were randomized to aspirin and 127 received ticagrelor. One-year graft assessment was performed in 202 patients (80.8%), examining 588 grafts, yielding an overall graft occlusion rate of 10.9%. The primary outcome, SVG occlusion at 1 year, did not significantly differ between the two groups (17.4% vs. 13.2%, aspirin vs. ticagrelor, p = .30). The incidence of vein grafts with any disease (stenosis or occlusion) did not significantly differ between the groups (21.5% vs. 22.3%, aspirin vs. ticagrelor, p = .90), and the number of patients with vein graft disease did not significantly differ between the groups (29.4% vs. 28.0%, aspirin vs. ticagrelor, p = .88). Freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year was similar between the groups (p = .60).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional aspirin therapy, ticagrelor did not significantly reduce vein graft occlusion 1 year after CABG. Further study will assess the impact of ticagrelor on 2-year graft patency for this cohort.