Nontechnical skills training in cardiothoracic surgery: A pilot study

Improving Pediatric Trauma Education by Teaching Non-technical Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Pediatric trauma is a significant cause of child mortality, and the absence of non-technical skills (NTS) among health providers is linked with errors in patients' care. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of a structured debriefing protocol in enhancing NTS during pediatric trauma simulation.

METHODS

A total of 45 medical students were successfully recruited from two medical schools, one in Brazil and one in Canada. Medical students were assigned to a control (N = 20) or intervention group (N = 25) in a randomized control trial. Following simulated scenarios, participants in the intervention group underwent NTS debriefing, while the control received standard debriefing based on the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocol. Students' confidence, NTS level, and performance were measured through self-assessment surveys, the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) score, and adherence to the trauma protocol, respectively. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared using t-tests, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon signed-rank Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA, and a repeated-measures ANCOVA. A significance level was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The workshop increased students' confidence in leading trauma resuscitation regardless of their assignment to condition. While controlling for covariates, students in the intervention group significantly improved their overall NOTSS compared to those in the control and in all categories: situational awareness, decision-making, communication and teamwork, and leadership. The intervention teams also demonstrated a significant increase in completing trauma protocol steps.

CONCLUSION

Implementing structured debriefing focusing on NTS enhanced these skills and improved adherence to protocol among medical students managing pediatric trauma-simulated scenarios. These findings support integrating NTS training in pediatric trauma education.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Crisis Scenarios for Simulation-Based Nontechnical Skills Training for Cardiac Surgery Teams: A National Survey Among Cardiac Anesthesiologists, Cardiac Surgeons, Clinical Perfusionists, and Cardiac Operating Room Nurses

BACKGROUND

Nontechnical skills in cardiac surgery are vital in ensuring patient safety in the operating room (OR). To train these skills in a simulation-based scenario, a collection of commonly accepted crisis scenarios is needed to serve as a framework for a simulation-based training program.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify and reach consensus on a collection of relevant crisis scenarios in cardiac surgery suitable for simulation-based team training focusing on nontechnical skills.

METHODS

Using the Delphi method, a national assessment was performed among cardiac surgeons, cardiac anesthesiologists, clinical perfusionists, and cardiac OR nurses in the Netherlands. In the first Delphi round, potential crisis scenarios for simulation-based team training in cardiac surgery were identified. In the second round, the identified scenarios were rated using a 5-point Likert scale. Finally, based on consensus (two-thirds majority), scenarios were prioritized and explored for feasibility.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen experts participated in the study (26 cardiac anesthesiologists, 24 cardiac surgeons, 25 clinical perfusionists, and 39 OR nurses), representing all 16 cardiac surgical centers in the Netherlands. In the first round, 237 scenarios were identified. After eliminating duplicates and grouping similar scenarios, 44 scenarios were scored in round 2, which finally resulted in 13 relevant crisis scenarios with an expert consensus higher than 67%.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirteen crisis scenarios relevant to simulation-based team training were identified by an expert panel consisting of all members of the cardiac surgical team. Further research is needed to evaluate the educational value of the respective scenarios.

Leadership skills curriculum development for residents and fellows: A needs-assessment

BACKGROUND

Non-technical skills (NTS) curricula have demonstrated success in surgical residencies. The purpose of this study is to examine the need for a structured leadership curriculum at our institution.

METHODS

A needs-assessment survey analyzing the importance of leadership domains, previously validated by Kazley et al. was delivered to 240 general surgery staff. Respondent groups were broken down into: Attendings, Residents, and Multi-Disciplinary. Statistical analyses were conducted using Cronbach's Alpha (α = 0.9259) and Fisher's exact test (pre-set p-value = 0.05). The importance of each competency was compared among groups and importance was defined as >75% important and very important responses.

RESULTS

Nineteen of 33 competencies were important for all groups, including 3 with 100% importance: interpersonal communication, team-work, and problem-solving. Several competencies showed statistically significant differences among groups.

CONCLUSION

A diverse range of surgery staff agreed that 19 leadership domains are important to teach residents, with some variance among respondent groups.