Long-term outcomes of atrioventricular septal defect and single ventricle: A multicenter study

Atrioventricular septal defect in Fontan circulation: Right ventricular dominance, not valve surgery, adversely affects survival

OBJECTIVE

The effect of ventricular dominance and previous atrioventricular valve (AVV) surgery on patient outcomes after Fontan operation remains unclear. We sought to determine the effect of ventricular dominance and previous AVV surgery on transplantation-free survival and long-term AVV competency in patients with atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) and Fontan circulation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 1703 patients in the Australia and New Zealand Fontan Registry, who survived Fontan operation between 1987 and 2021.

RESULTS

Of 174 patients with AVSD, 60% (105/174) had right ventricular (RV) dominance and 40% (69/174) had left ventricular (LV) dominance. The cumulative incidence of moderate or greater AVV regurgitation at 25 years after Fontan operation in patients with LV dominance was 56% (95% CI, 35%-72%), compared with 54% (95% CI, 40%-67%) in patients with RV dominance (P = .6). Nonetheless, transplantation-free survival at 25 years in patients with LV dominance was 94% (95% CI, 86%-100%), compared with 67% (95% CI, 52%-87%) in patients with RV dominance (hazard ratio, 5.9; 95% CI, 1.4-25.4; P < .01). Of note, transplantation-free survival was not different in patients who underwent AVV surgery before or at Fontan completion compared with those who did not (15 years: 81% [95% CI, 62%-100%] vs 88% [95% CI, 81%-95%]; P = .3).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AVSD and Fontan circulation the rate of moderate or greater common AVV regurgitation is similar in those with LV and RV dominance. RV dominance, rather than previous AVV surgery, is a risk factor for death or transplantation.

National outcomes of the Fontan operation with endocardial cushion defect

BACKGROUND

The traditional outcomes of the Fontan operation (FO) in endocardial cushion defect (ECD) patients have been suboptimal. Previous studies have been limited by the smaller number of ECD patients, longer study period with an era effect, and do not directly compare short-term outcomes of FO in ECD patients with non-ECD patients. Our study aims to address these shortcomings.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the Kids Inpatient Database (2009, 2012, and 2016) for the FO was done. The groups were divided into those who underwent FO with ECD as compared to non-ECD diagnosis. The data were abstracted for demographics, clinical characteristics, and operative outcomes. Standard statistical tests were used.

RESULTS

Three thousand three hundred eighty patients underwent the FO of which 360 patients (11%) were FO-ECD. ECD patients were more likely to have Down syndrome, Heterotaxy syndrome, transposition/DORV, and TAPVR as compared to non-ECD patients. FO-ECD had a higher discharge-mortality (2.84% vs. 0.45%, p = .04). The length of stay (16 vs. 13 days, p = .05) and total charges incurred ($283, 280 vs. $234, 106, p = .03) for the admission were higher in the FO-ECD as compared to non-ECD patients. In multivariable analysis, ECD diagnosis, cardiac arrest, acute kidney injury, and postoperative hemorrhage were predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Contemporary outcomes for FO are excellent with very low overall operative mortality. However, the outcomes in ECD patients are inferior with higher operative mortality than in non-ECD patients. The occurrence of postoperation complications and a diagnosis of ECD were predictive of a negative outcome.