Extent of surgical resection for radiologically subsolid T1N0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma: When is a wedge resection acceptable?

The evolution of the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: A shift in surgical paradigm to a more individualized approach

Surgical treatment is an integral part of the comprehensive therapeutic methods for lung cancer, especially for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With a deeper understanding of the disease, we found that lung cancer is more commonly detected in young females. For regions of Asia, more lung cancer has been detected in early-stage GGO-dominant non-smokers. Therefore, surgical strategies have also been reformed commensurate with the shift of the disease spectrum. However, the pursuit of lung-sparing individualized approaches has raised worldwide attention. Suitable surgical treatment within the curative time window is recommended to maximize the long-term benefit. This article summarizes the shift in surgical treatment for small NSCLCs and hopes to enlighten further innovations to fill in the gaps between the unmet needs and a more individualized approach.

Segmentectomy for ground glass-dominant invasive lung cancer with tumour diameter of 2-3 cm: protocol for a single-arm, multicentre, phase III trial (ECTOP1012)

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies demonstrated that wedge resection is sufficient for ground glass-dominant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with tumour diameter ≤2 cm, however, the optimal surgical type for ground glass-dominant LUAD with tumour diameter of 2-3 cm remains unclear. The purpose of this trial is to investigate the safety and efficacy of segmentectomy for ground glass-dominant invasive LUAD with tumour size of 2-3 cm.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We initiated a phase III trial to investigate whether segmentectomy is suitable for ground glass-dominant invasive LUAD with tumour size of 2-3 cm. This trial plans to enrol 307 patients from multiple institutions including four general hospitals and two specialty cancer hospitals over a period of 5 years. The primary endpoint is 5 year disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints are lung function, 5 year overall survival, the site of tumour recurrence and metastasis, segmentectomy completion rate, radical segmentectomy (R0 resection) completion rate and surgery-related complications.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre (reference 2212267-18) and by the institutional review boards of each participating centre. Written informed consent is required from all participants. The study results will be published in a peer-reviewed international journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05717803.

Intentional wedge resection versus segmentectomy for ≤2 cm ground-glass-opacity-dominant non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world study using inverse probability of treatment weighting

BACKGROUND

Whether wedge resection is oncological suitable for ground glass opacity (GGO)-dominant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤2 cm is still debatable. The aim of this study is to investigate the short-term and long-term outcomes of intentional wedge resection and segmentectomy for those patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a real-world study from one of the largest thoracic surgery centers in West China. Patients who underwent intentional wedge resection or segmentectomy for ≤2 cm CTR (consolidation-to-tumor) ≤0.5 NSCLC were consecutively included between December 2009 and December 2018. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Long-term outcomes, including overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), were analyzed using Cox proportional model.

RESULTS

A total of 1209 patients were included (497 in the wedge resection group, 712 in the segmentectomy group). Compared to segmentectomy, wedge resection had a significantly lower rate of complications (3.8 vs. 7.7%, P =0.008), a shorter operating time (65 min vs. 114 min, P <0.001), and a shorter postoperative stay (3 days vs. 4 days, P <0.001). The median follow-up was 70.1 months. The multivariate Cox model indicated that wedge resection had survival outcomes that were similar to segmentectomy in terms of 5-year OS (98.8 vs. 99.6%, HR=1.98, 95% CI: 0.59-6.68, P =0.270), 5-year RFS (98.8 vs. 99.5%, HR=1.88, 95% CI: 0.56-6.31, P =0.307) and 5-year LCSS (99.9 vs. 99.6%, HR=1.76, 95% CI: 0.24-13.15, P =0.581).

CONCLUSION

Intentional wedge resection is an appropriate choice for ≤2 cm GGO-dominant NSCLC.

Thoracoscopic segmentectomy for trans-fissure ground-glass opacity

OBJECTIVES

The trans-fissure ground-glass opacity (GGO) is a special category of lesions, with a diameter always exceeding 2 cm. It is located on a fused fissure, 'seizing' 2 neighbouring lobes simultaneously. The segmentectomy for the trans-fissure GGO is never reported.

METHODS

Between August 2016 and December 2022, patients operated with a trans-fissure GGO were included. The patients' backgrounds and surgical data were summarized. All procedures were performed with the help of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were included. The selection criteria included a consolidation tumour ratio <50% and a lesion size >2 and ≤3 cm. Thirty-six patients were operated with lobectomy + wedge (the traditional method group) and 48 patients were operated with anatomical segmentectomy + function-preserving sublobectomy (the new method group). The median operative time was 87 min in the traditional group and 98 min in the new method group, and the median blood loss was 60 ml in the traditional group and 70 ml in the new method group. The median duration of hospital stays was 4 days in the traditional group and 2 days in the new method group. In the traditional method group, there was 1 case of postoperative air leakage and 5 cases of haemoptysis. In the new method group, 2 cases of postoperative air leakage were identified. The median size of the tumour in the resected segment was 2.6 cm in the traditional group and 2.5 cm in the new method group. The median margin was 2.5 cm in the traditional group and 3.3 cm in the new method group.

CONCLUSIONS

The trans-fissure GGO could be safely resected en bloc by segmentectomy with a well-designed surgical procedure and appropriate preoperative planning.

Comparison of early patient-reported outcomes between uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy and wedge resection for peripheral small-sized non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) offers valuable insights into distinguishing the effects of closely related medical procedures from the patient's perspective. In this study we compared symptom burden in patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy and wedge resection for peripheral small-sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This study included patients with peripheral NSCLC from an ongoing longitudinal prospective cohort study (CN-PRO-Lung 3) who underwent segmentectomy or wedge resection with tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm and consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) ≤ 0.5. PROs data were collected using the Perioperative Symptom Assessment for Lung Surgery questionnaire pre-operatively, daily post-surgery up to the fourth hospitalization day, and weekly post-discharge up to the fourth week. Propensity score matching and a generalized estimation equation model were employed to compare symptom severity. In addition, short-term clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

In total, data of 286 patients (82.4%) undergoing segmentectomy and 61 patients (17.6%) undergoing wedge resection were extracted from the cohort. No statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of moderate-to-severe symptoms and mean scores for pain, cough, shortness of breath, disturbed sleep, fatigue, drowsiness, and distress during the 4-day postoperative hospitalization or the 4-week post-discharge period before or after matching (all p > 0.05). Compared with segmentectomy, wedge resection showed better short-term clinical outcomes, including shorter operative time (p = 0.001), less intraoperative bleeding (p = 0.046), and lower total hospital costs (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings indicate that uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy and wedge resection exert similar early postoperative symptom burden in patients with peripheral NSCLC (tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm and CTR ≤ 0.5).

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Radiomics Model to Predict High-Risk Pathologic Pulmonary Nodules Using Preoperative Computed Tomography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To accurately identify the high-risk pathological factors of pulmonary nodules, our study constructed a model combined with clinical features, radiomics features, and deep transfer learning features to predict high-risk pathological pulmonary nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 469 cases of lung adenocarcinoma patients, divided into a training cohort (n = 400) and an external validation cohort (n = 69). We obtained computed tomography (CT) semantic features and clinical characteristics, as well as extracted radiomics and deep transfer learning (DTL) features from the CT images. Selected features were used for constructing prediction models using the logistic regression (LR) algorithm. The performance of the models was evaluated through metrics including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

The clinical model achieved an AUC of 0.774 (95% CI: 0.728-0.821) in the training cohort and 0.762 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.650-0.873) in the external validation cohort. The radiomics model demonstrated an AUC of 0.847 (95% CI: 0.810-0.884) in the training cohort and 0.800 (95% CI: 0.693-0.907) in the external validation cohort. The radiomics-DTL (Rad-DTL) model showed an AUC of 0.871 (95% CI: 0.838-0.905) in the training cohort and 0.806 (95% CI: 0.698-0.914) in the external validation cohort. The proposed combined model yielded AUC values of 0.872 and 0.814 in the training and external validation cohorts, respectively. The combined model demonstrated superiority over both the clinical model and the Rad-DTL model. There were no statistically significant differences observed in the comparison between the combined model incorporating clinical features and the Rad-DTL model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that the models provided a net benefit in predicting high-risk pathologic pulmonary nodules.

CONCLUSION

Rad-DTL signature is a potential biomarker for predicting high-risk pathologic pulmonary nodules using preoperative CT, determining the appropriate surgical strategy, and guiding the extent of resection.