Variability in International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-Scientific and Standardization Committee endorsed Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH-BAT) score with normal aging in healthy females: contributory factors and clinical significance

Standardization of definition and management for bleeding disorder of unknown cause: communication from the SSC of the ISTH

In many patients referred with significant bleeding phenotype, laboratory testing fails to define any hemostatic abnormalities. Clinical practice with respect to diagnosis and management of this patient cohort poses significant clinical challenges. We recommend that bleeding history in these patients should be objectively assessed using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) bleeding assessment tool. Patients with increased bleeding assessment tool scores should progress to hemostasis laboratory testing. To diagnose bleeding disorder of unknown cause (BDUC), normal complete blood count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, von Willebrand factor antigen, von Willebrand factor function, coagulation factors VIII, IX, and XI, and platelet light transmission aggregometry should be the minimum laboratory assessment. In some laboratories, additional specialized hemostasis testing may be performed to identify other rare causes of bleeding. We recommend that patients with a significant bleeding phenotype but normal laboratory investigations should be registered with a diagnosis of BDUC in preference to other terminology. Global hemostatic tests and markers of fibrinolysis demonstrate variable abnormalities, and their clinical significance remains uncertain. Targeted genomic sequencing examining candidate hemostatic genes has a low diagnostic yield. Underlying BDUC should be considered in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding since delays in diagnosis often extend to many years and negatively impact quality of life. Treatment options for BDUC patients include tranexamic acid, desmopressin, and platelet transfusions.

Limited value of testing for factor XIII and α2-antiplasmin deficiency in patients with a bleeding disorder of unknown cause

INTRODUCTION

In patients with an increased bleeding tendency, extensive diagnostic blood testing is often performed. When results of tier 1 assays of primary haemostasis are normal, protocols recommend additional testing to rule out rare disorders including coagulation factor XIII (FXIII) and α2-antiplasmin (α2AP) deficiency.

AIM

To evaluate the added diagnostic value of FXIII and α2AP levels in patients with a bleeding disorder of unknown cause (BDUC).

METHODS

A retrospective monocentre cohort study between August 2011 and August 2023 was conducted. In all patients with bleeding tendencies and normal diagnostic tests for von Willebrand disease and platelet function, FXIII and α2AP were measured.

RESULTS

We included 158 consecutive patients; mean ISTH-BAT scores were 8.2 (SD ± 3.7) in children, 6.2 (SD ± 2.1) in men and 10.6 (SD ± 3.3) in women. Median age was 37 (range 5-79) years, 88.6% of patients were female. Patients displayed median FXIII activity of 111% (IQR = 97-131) and median α2AP activity of 112% (IQR = 103-119). Three (1.9%) patients had FXIII levels < 50%, respectively 43%, 45% and 46%. Corresponding ISTH-BAT scores were 7, 12 and 14. No α2AP levels < 60% was observed. No significant association was found between FXIII levels and ISTH-BAT scores.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort of BDUC patients, no clinical relevant FXIII deficiencies were detected; absolute values were well above the 30% cutoff considered adequate for normal haemostasis. No α2AP deficiencies were detected. These data suggest that in BDUC patients, measuring FXIII or AP activity is of limited value.

How to investigate mild to moderate bleeding disorders and bleeding disorder of unknown cause

A bleeding tendency is one of the most common complaints observed by hematologists. It is challenging to differentiate a clinically insignificant bleeding from a bleeding phenotype that requires hemostatic evaluation and medical intervention. A thorough review of personal and familial history, objective assessment of bleeding severity using a bleeding assessment tool, and a focused physical examination are critical to correctly identifying suspected patients with mild to moderate bleeding disorders (MBDs). A basic laboratory work-up should be performed in all patients referred for a bleeding tendency. If a hemostatic abnormality is found such as evidence of von Willebrand disease, a platelet function disorder, or a coagulation factor deficiency, more extensive testing should be performed to further characterize the bleeding disorder. Conversely, if all results are normal the patient is considered to have bleeding disorder of unknown cause (BDUC). For patients with BDUC, further evaluation may include non-routine testing to look for rare bleeding disorders not detected by routine hemostasis tests, such as thrombomodulin-associated coagulopathy, tissue factor pathway inhibitor-related bleeding disorder, hyperfibrinolytic-bleeding disorders or impaired tissue factor production. In this review, we summarize the stepwise diagnostic procedure in MBDs and provide some insights into the biological features of BDUC.

The necessity of repeat testing for von Willebrand disease in adult patients with mild to moderate bleeding disorders

BACKGROUND

In patients with mild-to-moderate bleeding disorders (MBD), von Willebrand disease (VWD) is diagnosed at von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels ≤50 IU/dL. Although VWF levels are unstable, repeated testing for VWD diagnosis is not necessarily advised in recent guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the relevance of repeated VWF testing to diagnose VWD in patients with MBD.

METHODS

Data of 277 patients with MBD from the Vienna Bleeding Biobank with at least 2 separate assessments of VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and activity (VWF:Act) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In repeated VWF measurements, 36 patients (13.0%) had "changing" VWF levels (≤/>50 IU/dL), 27 (9.7%) had persistent levels ≤50 IU/dL ("pathologic"), and 214 (77.3%) had levels >50 IU/dL ("normal"). Of the 36 changing patients, 22 (61%) were diagnosed with VWD at baseline, whereas the others only met VWD diagnostic criteria at repeated measurements. Using logistic regression, we estimated a probability of change of 26.4% (95% CI, 12.5-47.4) at baseline VWF levels of 30 IU/dL, 50.8% (95% CI, 35.6-65.8) at 50 IU/dL, 18.8% (95% CI, 12.3-27.6) at 60 IU/dL, and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.3-4.9) at 80 IU/dL. Baseline VWF was a strong predictor for changing status (Χ2 = 49.9; P < .001), while age, sex, Vicenza score, and blood type O had limited added value (Χ2 = 5.1; P = .278). Baseline VWF:Ag or VWF:Act cutoffs of 80 IU/dL had negative predictive values of 98.1% and 99.1% for changing status, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data emphasize an overlap between patients with VWD and MBD with bleeding disorder of unknown cause and underline the need for repeated VWF testing, especially in patients with VWF levels <80 IU/dL.

Factor activity levels and bleeding scores in pediatric hemophilia carriers enrolled in the ATHNdataset

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have now shown that a significant proportion of hemophilia carriers meet the criteria for having hemophilia and/or report abnormal bleeding. However, to date, investigations of hemophilia carriers have almost exclusively involved women over 18 years of age. Little is known about factor activity levels and bleeding scores in carriers during childhood. We queried a large deidentified database of subjects with bleeding disorders residing in the United States to determine factor activity levels and bleeding scores.

PROCEDURES

The ATHNdataset was queried for hemophilia carriers under 18 years of age. Collected information included demographics, factor activity levels, and bleeding scores.

RESULTS

Over 700 carriers in the pediatric age group were identified, of which 626 submitted factor activity levels. Nearly half had factor activity levels less than 40 IU/dL, thereby meeting criteria for having hemophilia. Of those reporting bleeding scores, only 13.5% reported an abnormal bleeding score for age. The proportion reporting abnormal bleeding scores was higher in those with factor levels less than 40 IU/dL (23%) than those greater than 40 IU/dL (9.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of pediatric carriers with hemophilia was double of that previously reported for adults. Of those with hemophilia reporting a bleeding score, the majority (77%) did not report an abnormal bleeding score for age. However, nearly 10% of pediatric carriers not meeting criteria for having hemophilia reported abnormal bleeding scores for age. Similar results are reported in adults suggesting that factor activity levels may not be predictive of bleeding symptoms in carriers.

The ISTH-BAT score and outcomes after endometrial ablation in women with heavy menstrual bleeding

BACKGROUND

The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding assessment tool (ISTH-BAT), is used during the diagnostic workup of bleeding disorders. Data on ISTH-BAT scores in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) undergoing endometrial ablation (EA) could be essential in optimizing HMB counselling.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the postsurgical incidence of amenorrhea, dysmenorrhea, quality of life, re-intervention after EA, and ISTH-BAT score.

METHODS

This study included women who have undergone EA because of HMB. During a follow-up of 2 to 5 years, ISTH-BAT, pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC), and Short Form-36 survey (SF-36) were administered. At 10 years of follow-up surgical re-interventions were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-one women were included of whom 77% (n = 55) had an ISTH-BAT score < 6, versus 23% (n = 16) ISTH-BAT score ≥6 (mean age 46.3 versus 42.3, p = 0.004). In the ISTH-BAT ≥6 group versus < 6 group, amenorrhea occurred in 63% (10/16) versus 82% (45/55) (p = 0.111), dysmenorrhea in 38% (6/16) versus 18% (10/55) (p = 0.111), and surgical re-intervention in 19% (3/16) versus 25% (14/55) (p = 0.582). SF-36 item (Bodily) pain was lower in the ISTH-BAT ≥6 group versus < 6 (median score 58.7 vs. 80.0, p = 0.104).

CONCLUSIONS

An ISTH-BAT score ≥6 may be related to a lower amenorrhea incidence and higher dysmenorrhea rate after EA.

Novel therapeutics and emerging technology in haemostasis and thrombosis: highlights from the British society for haemostasis and thrombosis annual meeting

The 2023 annual meeting of the British Society for Haemostasis and Thrombosis (BSHT) was held in Birmingham, United Kingdom. The theme of this year's meeting was novel therapeutics and emerging technology. Here, the exciting research presented at the meeting is discussed.