Consensus report on flow cytometry for platelet function testing in thrombocytopenic patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH

Platelet function testing: Update on determinant variables and permissive windows using a platelet-count-based device

While there are various aspects of platelet biology that can be studied in the lab (i.e. adhesion, degranulation, integrin activation), the master test for platelet function is that which gives a measure of the platelet aggregation capacity upon stimulation with an agonist. Platelet function testing is necessary for the diagnosis of platelet disorders and the monitoring of patients receiving anti-platelet treatments. Furthermore, it becomes relevant in the quality control of platelet concentrates for transfusion purposes, especially considering the global concern about long term storage, other forms of storage (i.e. cryopreservation, lyophilization), and the impact of Pathogen Reduction Treatments (PRTs) on platelet performance upon transfusion. However, it has been acknowledged as technically difficult and demanding, since a fine platelet function test must be carried out under specific conditions. Still, there might be occasions that preclude the platelet function testing abiding to the gold standard requirements, thus, leaving us with the necessity to redefine which variables may condition or limit the analysis of platelet function testing. In the present manuscript, we test different variables (such as the anticoagulant used or the time elapsed since extraction) and the possibility to reconstitute blood prior to platelet function analysis. This study aims to provide windows of action at the diagnostics lab, especially when not all of the recommended procedures and conditions can be followed: for example, when a sample is sent from a long distance, when there is a limitation on blood extraction volume or when certain parameters (platelet count) preclude reliable test results.

Evaluation of a diagnostic platelet aggregation test strategy for platelet rich plasma samples with low platelet counts

INTRODUCTION

Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is important for diagnosing platelet function disorders (PFD) and von Willebrand disease (VWD) affecting ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA). Nonetheless, data is lacking on the utility of LTA for investigating thrombocytopenic patients and platelet rich plasma samples with low platelet counts (L-PRP). Previously, we developed a strategy for diagnostic LTA assessment of L-PRP that included: (1) acceptance of referrals/samples, regardless of thrombocytopenia severity, (2) tailored agonist selection, based on which are informative for L-PRP with mildly or severely low platelet counts, and (3) interpretation of maximal aggregation (MA) using regression-derived 95% confidence intervals, determined for diluted control L-PRP (C-L-PRP).

METHODS

To further evaluate the L-PRP LTA strategy, we evaluated findings for a subsequent patient cohort.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2021, the L-PRP strategy was applied to 211 samples (11.7% of all LTA samples) from 192 unique patients, whose platelet counts (median [range] × 109 /L) for blood and L-PRP were: 105 [13-282; 89% with thrombocytopenia] and 164 [17-249], respectively. Patient-L-PRP had more abnormal MA findings than simultaneously tested C-L-PRP (p-values <0.001). Among patients with accessible electronic medical records (n = 181), L-PRP LTA uncovered significant aggregation abnormalities in 45 (24.9%), including 18/30 (60%) with <80 × 109  platelets/L L-PRP, and ruled out PFD, and VWD affecting RIPA, in others. The L-PRP LTA strategy helped diagnose VWD affecting RIPA, Bernard Soulier syndrome, familial platelet disorder with myeloid malignancy, suspected ITGA2B/ITGB3-related thrombocytopenia, and acquired PFD.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic LTA with L-PRP, using a strategy that considers thrombocytopenia severity, is feasible and informative.